The clinical role of hyperoxia for preventing surgical site infection (SSI) remains uncertain because randomized controlled trials on this topic have reported disparate results. One of the principal reasons for this outcome may be that prior trials have entered heterogeneous populations of patients and a variety of procedures. The aim of our study was to assess the influence of hyperoxygenation on SSI using a homogeneous study population.
Methods:
From January 2004 to April 2013, we studied, in a randomized trial, 239 patients, who underwent open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). The surgical procedure was performed through an upper abdominal midline incision, and closure of PPU was achieved by suture alone or in combination with an omental patch. Patients were assigned randomly to an oxygen/air mixture with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 30% (n = 120) or 80% (n = 119). Administration was commenced after induction of anesthesia and maintained for 6 hours after surgery.
Results:
The overall incision infection rate was 38.4% (92 of 239): 61 patients (50.8%) had an infection in the 30% FiO2 group and 31 (26%) in the 80% FiO2 group (p < 0.05). The risk of SSI was 48% lower in the 80% FiO2 group (relative risk 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–1.08) vs 30% FiO2.
Conclusions:
Supplemental 80% FiO2 during and for 6 h after open surgery for PPU, which reduces post-operative SSI, should be considered part of ongoing quality improvement activities related to surgical care, with few risks to the patient and little associated cost.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KirklandKB, BriggsJP, TrivetteSL, et al.The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: Attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1999; 20:725–730.
2.
MangramAJ, HoranTC, PearsonML, et al.Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1999; 20:250–278.
3.
KurzA, SesslerDI, LenhardtR. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med, 1996; 334:1209–1215.
4.
LathamR, LancasterAD, CovingtonJF, et al.The association of diabetes and glucose control with surgical-site infections among cardiothoracic surgery patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2001:607–612.
5.
GreyNJ, PerdrizetGA. Reduction of nosocomial infections in the surgical intensive-care unit by strict glycemic control. Endocr Pract, 2004; 10(Suppl 2):46–52.
6.
HopfHW, HuntTK, WestJM, et al.Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients. Arch Surg, 1997; 132:997–1004.
7.
AroH, EerolaE, AhoAJ, NiinikoskiJ.Tissue oxygen tension in externally stabilized tibial fractures in rabbits during normal healing and infection. J Surg Res, 1984; 37:202–207.
8.
SaidHK, HijjawiJ, RoyN, et al.Transdermal sustained-delivery oxygen improves epithelial healing in a rabbit ear wound model. Arch Surg, 2005; 140:998–1004.
9.
GreifR, AkcaO, HornEP, et al.Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. Outcomes Research Group. N Engl J Med, 2000; 342:161–167.
10.
MayzlerO, WekslerN, DomchikS, et al.Does supplemental perioperative oxygen administration reduce the incidence of wound infection in elective colorectal surgery?. Minerva Anestesiol, 2005; 71:21–25.
11.
BeldaFJ, AguileraL, García de la AsunciónJ, et al.Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2005; 294:2035–2042.
12.
WhitneyJD, HeinerS, MygrantBI, WoodC.Tissue and wound healing effects of short duration postoperative oxygen therapy. Biol Res Nurs, 2001 Jan;2:206–215.
13.
PryorKO, Fahey TJIII, LienCA, GoldsteinPA. Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2004; 291:79–87.
14.
American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physiology status. Anesthesiologist, 1963; 24:111.
15.
KnausWA, DraperEA, WagnerDP, et al.APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 1985; 13:818–829.
16.
BillingA, FrohlichD, SchildbergFW, et al.Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim Peritonitis Index in 2003 patients. Br J Surg, 1994; 81:209–213.
17.
CulverDH, HoranTC, GaynesRP, et al.Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med, 1991; 91:152S–157S.
18.
HaleyRW, CulverDH, MorganWM, et al.Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection: A simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol, 1985; 121:206–215.
19.
FranchiM, GhezziF, ZanaboniF, et al.Nonclosure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol, 1997; 90:622.
20.
HoranTC, GaynesRP, MartoneWJ, et al.CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: A modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control. 1992; 20:271–4.
WilsonAP, TreasureT, SturridgeMF, GrünebergRN. A scoring method (ASEPSIS) for postoperative wound infections for use in clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Lancet, 1986; 1:311–313.
23.
MoherD, SchulzKF, AltmanD. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA, 2001; 285:1987–1991.
24.
KondrupJ, RasmussenHH, HambergO, StangaZ. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): A new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr, 2003; 22:321–336.
25.
RoosD, van BruggenR, MeischlC. Oxidative killing of microbes by neutrophils. Microbes Infect, 2003; 5:1307–1315.
26.
GardellaC, GoltraLB, LaschanskyE, et al.High concentration supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of post cesarean surgical site infection: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2008; 112:545–552.
27.
MeyhoffCS, WetterslevJ, JorgensenLN, et al; PROXITrial. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. JAMA, 2009; 302:1543–1550.
28.
ChuraJC, BoydA, ArgentaPA. Surgical site infections and supplemental perioperative oxygen in colorectal surgery patients: A systematic review. Surg Infect, 2007; 8:455–461.
29.
BrarMS, BrarSS, DixonE. Perioperative supplemental oxygen in colorectal patients: A meta-analysis. J Surg Res, 2011; 166:227–235.
30.
Al-NiaimiA, SafdarN. Supplemental perioperative oxygen for reducing surgical site infection: A meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract, 2009; 15:360–365.
31.
TogiokaB, GalvagnoS, SumidaS, et al.The role of perioperative high inspired oxygen therapy in reducing surgical site infection: A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg, 2012; 114:334–342.
32.
QadanM, AkçaO, MahidSS, et al.Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy and surgical site infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg, 2009; 144:359–366.
33.
WilsonAP, GibbonsC, ReevesBC, et al.Surgical wound infection as a performance indicator: Agreement of common definitions of wound infection in 4773 patients. BMJ, 2004; 329:720–724.
34.
HuntTK, HopfHW. High inspired oxygen fraction and surgical site infection. JAMA, 2009; 302:1588–1589.
35.
BickelA, GurevitsM, VamosR, et al.Perioperative hyperoxygenation and wound site infection following surgery for acute appendicitis: A randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Arch Surg, 2011; 146:464–470.
36.
BurkeJF.The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery, 1961; 50:161–168.
37.
SalaC, García-GraneroE, MartíR. Anastomotic pHi monitoring after colorectal surgery: Design and preliminary results. Br J Surg, 1994; 81:35.
38.
García-GraneroE, GarcíaJ, SalaC. Is intramucosal pH associated with wound anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery?. [abstract] Dis Colon Rectum, 1998; 41:A56.
39.
SchietromaM, CarleiF, CeciliaEM, et al.Colorectal infraperitoneal anastomosis: The effects of perioperative supplemental oxygen administration on the anastomotic dehiscence. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012; 16:427–434.
40.
SchietromaM, CeciliaEM, CarleiF, et al.Prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with perioperative supplemental oxygen administration: A prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013; 20:1584–1590.
41.
García-BotelloSA, García-GraneroE, LilloR, et al.Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of perioperative supplemental oxygen administration on the colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg, 2006; 93:698–706.
42.
CaldwellPRB, Lee WlJr, SchildkrautHS, ArchibaldER. Changes in lung volume, diffusing capacity, and blood gases in men breathing oxygen. J Appl Physiol, 1966; 21:1477–1483.
43.
ComroeJHJr, DrippsRD, DumkePR. Oxygen toxicity: The effect of inhalation of high concentrations of oxygen for twenty-four hours on normal men at sea level and at simulated altitude of 18000 feet. JAMA, 1945; 128:710–717.
44.
DuboisAB, TuraidsT, MammenRE, NobregaFT. Pulmonary atelectasis in subjects breathing oxygen at sea level or at simulated altitude. J Appl Physiol, 1966; 21:828–836.
45.
MontgomeryAB, LuceJM, MurrayJF. Retrosternal pain is an early indicator of oxygen toxicity. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1989; 139:1548–1550.
