Bacteriology of Acute Appendicitis and Its Implication for the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics

Abstract

Background:

To prevent surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy, antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended for all patients, but this approach is based largely on bacteriologic findings that are decades old. The objective of this study was to reevaluate the bacteriology of acute appendicitis in order to assess the usefulness of current antibiotic prophylaxis.

Methods:

Between January 1 and December 31, 2010, 117 patients with pathology-proved acute appendicitis were recruited. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given according to national guidelines. Immediately after operation, the luminal contents of the appendices were swabbed for bacterial culture. The charts of the patients were surveyed retrospectively for postoperative complications until June 30, 2011.

Results:

Bacteria were isolated from 115 of 117 specimens sent for culture (98%). Of the 115 samples that yielded bacteria, all gave rise to aerobic isolates and five yielded mixed aerobic and anaerobic isolates. The most common aerobic organism was Escherichia coli, which was present in 100 of 117 patients who had pathology-proved acute appendicitis (85%). Less frequent organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (30 cases; 26%), Streptococcus spp. (29 cases; 25%), Enterococcus spp. (21 cases; 18%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18 cases; 15%). All P. aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to amikacin, ceftazidime, and cefepime; but seven of the eight were resistant to cefuroxime. Eight patients were identified as having had a postoperative SSI, and P. aeruginosa was isolated from five of these cases. The isolation of P. aeruginosa correlated significantly with SSI (p=0.002).

Conclusions:

The most commonly identified aerobic bacteria associated with acute appendicitis were E. coli, followed by K. pneumoniae, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and P. aeruginosa. Pseudomonas aeruginosa frequently was not covered by the prophylactic antibiotics chosen and might be associated with SSI.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ilves

, Paajanen

, Herzig

et al. Changing incidence of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain between 1987 and 2007 in Finland. World J Surg, 2011; 35:731–738.

Williams

, Jackson

, Everson

, Johnstone

. Is the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1998; 80:122–124.

Korner

, Sondenaa

, Soreide

et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: Age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg, 1997; 21:313–317.

Ming

, Yan

, Tat

. Risk factors of postoperative infections in adults with complicated appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009; 19:244–248.

Rucinski

, Fabian

, Panagopoulos

et al. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis: A meta-analytic study of 2532 patients indicates that the incision should be closed primarily. Surgery, 2000; 127:136–141.

Davies

, Dasbach

, Teutsch

. The burden of appendicitis-related hospitalizations in the United States in 1997. Surg Infect, 2004; 5:160–165.

Bauer

, Vennits

, Holm

et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute nonperforated appendicitis. The Danish Multicenter Study Group III. Ann Surg, 1989; 209:307–311.

Andersen

, Kallehave

, Andersen

. Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005; CD001439.

Nichols

. Preventing surgical site infections: A surgeon's perspective. Emerg Infect Dis, 2001; 7:220–224.

10.

Browder

, Smith

, Vivoda

, Nichols

. Nonperforative appendicitis: A continuing surgical dilemma. J Infect Dis, 1989; 159:1088–1094.

11.

Nadler

, Gaines

. The Surgical Infection Society Guidelines on antimicrobial therapy for children with appendicitis. Surg Infect, 2008; 9:75–83.

12.

Bennion

, Baron

, Thompson

et al. The bacteriology of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis—Revisited. Ann Surg, 1990; 211:165–171.

13.

Lau

, Teoh-Chan

, Fan

et al. The bacteriology and septic complication of patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg, 1984; 200:576–581.

14.

Lang

, Morris

, Charlesworth

. Prophylaxis in appendicectomy with cefoxitin or ceftriaxone. N Z Med J, 1988; 101:781–783.

15.

Bennion

, Thompson

, Baron

, Finegold

. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis with peritonitis: Treatment and bacteriology. Clin Ther, 1990; 12,Suppl C:31–44.

16.

Nadler

, Reblock

, Ford

, Gaines

. Monotherapy versus multi-drug therapy for the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. Surg Infect, 2003; 4:327–333.

17.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery. Treat Guidelines Med Lett, 2009; 7:47–52.

18.

Altemeier

. The bacterial flora of acute perforated appendicitis with peritonitis: A bacteriologic study based upon one hundred cases. Ann Surg, 1938; 107:517–528.

19.

Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group. Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Eur J Surg, 1994; Suppl:61–66.

20.

Anonymous. Guidelines for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2004; 37:71–74.

21.

DeArmond

, Dent

, Myers

et al. Appendicitis: Selective use of abdominal CT reduces negative appendectomy rate. Surg Infect, 2003; 4:213–218.

22.

Weyant

, Eachempati

, Maluccio

et al. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation. Surg Infect, 2001; 2:19–23.

23.

Aanning

. Negative appendectomy and perforation rates in the SCOAP trial. Ann Surg, 2009; 249:699–700.

24.

Wagner

, Eachempati

, Soe

et al.

Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: For whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact?

Surgery, 2008; 144:276–282.

25.

Gladman

, Knowles

, Gladman

, Payne

. Intra-operative culture in appendicitis: Traditional practice challenged. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2004; 86:196–201.

26.

Rasnake

, Dooley

. Culture-negative surgical site infections. Surg Infect, 2006; 7:555–565.

27.

Rautio

, Saxen

, Siitonen

et al. Bacteriology of histopathologically defined appendicitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2000; 19:1078–1083.

28.

Lai

, Wang

, Chu

et al. Correlation between antibiotic consumption and resistance of gram-negative bacteria causing healthcare-associated infections at a university hospital in Taiwan from 2000 to 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2011; 66:1374–1382.

29.

Donovan

, Ellis

, Gatehouse

et al. One-dose antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy: A randomized trial of clindamycin, cefazolin sodium and a placebo. Br J Surg, 1979; 66:193–196.

30.

Montravers

, Lepape

, Dubreuil

et al. Clinical and microbiological profiles of community-acquired and nosocomial intra-abdominal infections: Results of the French prospective, observational EBIIA study. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2009; 63:785–794.

31.

Paraskaki

, Lebessi

, Legakis

. Epidemiology of community-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 1996; 15:782–786.

32.

Yellin

, Heseltine

, Berne

et al. The role of Pseudomonas species in patients treated with ampicillin and sulbactam for gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1985; 161:303–307.

33.

Master

, Clark

, Karlowsky

et al. Analysis of resistance, cross-resistance and antimicrobial combinations for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 1997 to 2009. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2011; 38:291–295.

34.

Blondeau

, Yaschuk

. Canadian Multicenter Susceptibility Study, with a focus on cephalosporins, from 15 Canadian medical centers. The Canadian Multicenter Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1997; 41:2773–2775.

35.

Poole

. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005; 49:479–487.

36.

, Rusin

, Hill

, Langell

. Post-operative antibiotic use in nonperforated appendicitis. Am J Surg, 2009; 198:748–752.

37.

Taylor

, Berjis

, Bosch

et al. The efficacy of postoperative oral antibiotics in appendicitis: A randomized prospective double-blinded study. Am Surg, 2004; 70:858–862.

38.

Boni

, Benevento

, Rovera

et al. Infective complications in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Infect, 2006; 7,Suppl 2:S109–S111.

39.

Yau

, Siu

, Tang

et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg, 2007; 205:60–65.

40.

Khan

, Fayyad

, Cecil

, Moran

. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: The risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS, 2007; 11:363–367.