This article extends the rigorous, interdisciplinary investigation of social-ecological systems (SESs) to an emerging resource system, the Moon. The Lunar Resources Database (LRD) project showcases the diversity and complexity of lunar SESs in support of ongoing global lunar governance and policy discussions. We find that many characteristics that lead to successful self-governance and collective action in terrestrial resource systems are present in the lunar context. An initial analysis of 5 likely lunar resource systems highlights their differences and foreshadows the need for diverse management regimes and modes of governance. We propose that the ongoing analysis of complex social-ecological lunar systems through the LRD is a valuable contribution to lunar governance and policy development. Finally, we outline an institutional analysis framework of conventional and new modes of governance within the context of the Moon as future work is required to progress evidence-based research to inform coherent, timely, sustainable, and equitable lunar governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Treaty on principles governing the activities of States in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, New York, 19 Dec 1966, United Nations Treaty Series, 610: 8843, p. 205, Available at https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280128cbd&clang=_en (Last accessed on 27 April, 2022).
2.
HardinG.The tragedy of the commons. J Nat Resour Policy Res. 2009; 1(3):243–253.
3.
OstromE. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
4.
OstromE, JanssenMA, AnderiesJM. Going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(39):15176–15178.
5.
TepperE.Structuring the discourse on the exploitation of space resources: Between economic and legal commons. Space Policy. 2019; 49(101290):1–11.
6.
WeedenBC, ChowT. Taking a common-pool resources approach to space sustainability: A framework and potential policies. Space Policy. 2012; 28(3):166–172.
7.
JakhuRS, PeltonJN. Space mining and use of space natural resources. In: Jakhu R, Pelton J (eds), Global Space Governance: An International Study. Cham: Springer, 2017; pp. 379–413.
8.
JohnsonD.Limits on the giant leap for mankind: Legal ambiguities of extraterrestrial resource extraction. Am Univ Int Law Rev. 2011; 26(5):1477–1517.
9.
WrenchJG.Non-appropriation, no problem: The outer space treaty is ready for asteroid mining, case W. Res J IntL L. 2019; 51(1):437–462.
10.
OstromE.A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 2009; 325(5939):419–422.
11.
OstromE, HessC. Private and common property rights. In: Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Gerrit De Geest, ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing, UK; 2010 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806510.00008.
12.
CoxM.Understanding large social-ecological systems: Introducing the SESMAD project. Int J Commons. 2014; 8(2):265–276.
13.
SESMAD. Social-ecological systems meta-analysis database: background and research methods. 2014. Available at: http://sesmad.dartmouth.edu/ (Last accessed on April15, 2021).
14.
MorinJF, RichardB. Astro-environmentalism: Towards a polycentric governance of space debris. Global Policy. 2021; 12(4):568–573.
15.
Colin-CastilloS, WoodwardR. Measuring the potential for self-governance: An approach for the management of the common-pool resources. Int J Commons. 2015; 9(1):281–305.
16.
AgrawalA.Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev. 2001; 29(10):1649–1672.
17.
BassettN, RapettiD, BurnsJ, et al. Characterizing the radio quiet region behind the lunar farside for low radio frequency experiments. Adv Space Res 2020:1–14. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03468.pdf
18.
MimounD, WieczorekMA, AlkalaiL, et al.Farside explorer: Unique science from a mission to the farside of the moon. Exp Astron. 2012; 33(2):529–585.
19.
WoltMK, AminaeiA, ZarkaP, SchraderJR, BoonstraAJ, FalckeH. Radio astronomy with the European Lunar Lander: Opening up the last unexplored frequency regime. Planet Space Sci. 2012; 74(1):167–178.
20.
JesterS, FalckeH. Science with a lunar low-frequency array: From the dark ages of the Universe to nearby exoplanets. New Astron Rev. 2009; 53(1–2):1–26.
21.
LiC, ZuoW, WenW, et al.Overview of the Chang'e-4 mission: Opening the frontier of scientific exploration of the lunar far side. Space Sci Rev. 2021; 217(2):1–32.
ColapreteA, SchultzP, HeldmannJ, et al.Detection of water in the LCROSS ejecta plume. Science. 2010; 330(6003):463–468.
24.
ElvisM, KrolikowskiA, MilliganT. Concentrated lunar resources: Imminent implications for governance and justice. Philos Trans R Soc A, 2021; 379(20190563):1–24.
25.
HaynePO, AharonsonO, SchörghoferN. Micro cold traps on the Moon. Nature Astron. 2021; 5(2):169–175.
26.
RobinsonMS, et al. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Instrument Overview, Space Science Reviews. 2010; 150:81–124.
27.
GladstoneGR, RetherfordKD, EganAF, et al.Far-ultraviolet reflectance properties of the moon's permanently shadowed regions. JGR Planets. 2012; 117(E12):1–13.
28.
HongIS, YiY, KimE. Lunar pit craters presumed to be the entrances of lava caves by analogy to the earth lava tube pits. J Astron Space Sci. 2014; 31(2):131–140.
29.
WagnerRV, RobinsonMS. Distribution, formation mechanisms, and significance of lunar pits. Icarus. 2014; 237:52–60.
30.
HaruyamaJ, HiokiK, ShiraoM, et al.Possible lunar lava tube skylight observed by SELENE cameras. Geophys Res Lett. 2009; 36(L21206):1–5.
31.
KakuT, HaruyamaJ, MiyakeW, et al.Detection of intact lava tubes at Marius Hills on the Moon by SELENE (Kaguya) lunar radar sounder. Geophys Res Letters. 2017; 44(10):10155–10161.
32.
WaldenBE, BillingsTL, YorkCL, et al. Utility of lava tubes on other worlds. In: Using In situ Resources for Construction of Planetary Outposts. LPI Technical Report 98-01.1998;16–17.
33.
CoombsCR, HawkeBR. A search for intact lava tubes on the Moon: Possible lunar base habitats. In: Mendell MM. (ed), 2nd Conference on Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century. Houston, Texas: NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 1992; 3166(1):219–229.
34.
HaruyamaJ, MorotaT, KobayashiS, et al. Lunar holes and lava tubes as resources for lunar science and exploration. In: Badesci V (ed). Moon. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp.139–164.
35.
RossA, RuppertS, GläserP, et al.Towers on the Peaks of Eternal Light: Quantifying the Available Solar Power. arXiv. 2021; 2102(11766):1–27.
36.
AnandM, CrawfordIA, Balat-PichelinM, et al.A brief review of chemical and mineralogical resources on the Moon and likely initial in situ resource utilization (ISRU) applications. Planet Space Sci. 2012; 74:42–48.
37.
HeikenGH, et al. (Eds). The Lunar Sourcebook: A User's Guide to the Moon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
38.
LomaxBA, ContiM, KhanN, et al.Proving the viability of an electrochemical process for the simultaneous extraction of oxygen and production of metal alloys from lunar regolith. Planet Space Sci. 2020; 180(104748):1–10.
39.
KinnersleyM, et al. ROXY: regolith to oxygen & metal conversion lunar demonstrator: proposed for payloads and research investigations on the surface of the moon (prism) project. In: Lunar Surface Innovation Consortium Fall Meeting, October 14–15, 2020.
40.
AllenCC, MorrisRV, McKayDS, et al.Oxygen extraction from lunar soils and pyroclastic glass. J Geophys Res Planets. 1996; 101(E11):26085–26095.
41.
ImhofB, UrbinaDA, WeissP, et al. Using solar sintering to build infrastructure on the moon. Latest advancements in the regolight project. In: 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Bremen, Germany, 1–5 October 2018. IAC-18.E5.1.x4, 7746.
42.
FarriesKW, VisintinP, SmithST, et al.Sintered or melted regolith for lunar construction: State-of-the-art review and future research questions. Constr Build Mater. 2021; 296(16):1–31.
43.
LandisG.Materials refining on the Moon. Acta Astronaut. 2007; 60:906–915.
44.
RayCS, ReisaST, SenS, et al.JSC-1A lunar soil simulant: Characterization, glass formation, and selected glass properties. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2010; 356:2369–2374.
45.
AllenCC, MorrisRV, McKayDS, et al.Experimental reduction of lunar mare soil and volcanic glass. J Geophys Res: Planets. 1994; 99(E11):23173–23185.
46.
SchwandtC, HamiltonJA, FrayDJ, et al.The production of oxygen and metal from lunar regolith. Planet Space Sci. 2012; 74(1):49–56.
47.
SandersGB, LarsonWE. Progress made in lunar in-situ resource utilization under NASA's exploration technology and development program. J Aerosp Eng. 2012; 26(1):5–17.
48.
SargeantHM, AbernethyF, WrightIP, et al. Hydrogen reduction of ilmenite as an ISRU demonstration for ProSPA. In: 2017 European Lunar Symposium (ELS). Munster, Germany: May 2–3, 2017.
49.
SargeantHM, AbernethyFAJ, AnandM, et al. Feasibility studies for hydrogen reduction of ilmenite in a static system for use as an ISRU demonstration on the lunar surface, Planet Space Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2019.104759.)
50.
SchwandtC, DoughtyGR, FrayDJ. The FFC-Cambridge process for titanium metal winning. Key Eng Mater. 2010; 436:13–25.
51.
McKayDS, et al. The lunar regolith. In: Heiken GH, Vaniman DT, French BM (eds), The Lunar Sourcebook. Houston, Texas: Cambridge University Press, 1991. pp. 285–356.
52.
CrawfordIA.Lunar resources: A review. Prog Phys Geogr. 2015; 39(2):137–167.
53.
MazaricoE, NeumannGA, SmithDE, Zuber MTM.H. Torrence MH. Illumination conditions of the lunar polar regions using LOLA topography. Icarus. 2011; 211(2):1066–1081.
54.
WilliamsJP, GreenhagenBT, PaigeDA, et al.Seasonal polar temperatures on the moon. JGR Planets, 2019; 124:2505–2521.
