PooleMS, Van de VenAH. Toward a general theory of innovation processes. In: Van de VenAH, AngleHL, PooleMS. (eds.). Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000:pp. 637–662.
3.
VennessonP.Case studies and process tracing: Theories and practices. In: Della PortaD, KeatingM. (eds.). Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008:pp. 223–239.
4.
GeelsFW.Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 2002; 31(8–9):1257–1274.
5.
GeelsFW.Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Pol. 2010; 39(4):495–510.
6.
Van de VenAH, PolleyDE, GarudR, VenkataramanS.The Innovation Journey, 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.
7.
GarudRB, Van de VenAH. Technological innovation and industry emergence: The case of cochlear implants. In: Van de VenAH, AngleHL, PooleMS. (eds.). Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press on Demand, 2000:pp. 489–532.
8.
FligsteinN.The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
9.
MenschG.Stalemate in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression. New York, NY: Ballinger, 1979.
