Traditional robots derive their capabilities of movement through rigid structural “links” and discrete actuated “joints.” Alternatively, soft robots are composed of flexible materials that permit movement across a continuous range of their body and appendages and thus are not restricted in where they can bend. While trade-offs between material choices may restrain robot functionalities within a narrow spectrum, we argue that bridging the functional gaps between soft and hard robots can be achieved from a hybrid design approach that utilizes both the reconfigurability and the controllability of traditional soft and hard robot paradigms. In this study, we present a hybrid robot with soft inflated “linkages,” and rigid internal joints that can be spatially reconfigured. Our method is based on the geometric pinching of an inflatable beam to form mechanical pinch-joints connecting the inflated robot linkages. Such joints are activated and controlled via internal motorized modules that can be relocated for on-demand joint–linkage configurations. We demonstrate two applications that utilize joint reconfigurations: a deployable robot manipulator and a terrestrial crawling robot with tunable gaits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmuribHAF, Al-QrimliHF, KumarN. A review of application industrial robotic design. In: 2011 Ninth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand; 2012; pp. 105–112; doi: 10.1109/ICTKE.2012.6152387
2.
PervozvanskiAA, FreidovichLB. Robust stabilization of robotic manipulators by PID controllers. Dyn Control, 1999; 9(3):203–222.
3.
GrecoC, KotakP, PagnottaL, et al.The evolution of mechanical actuation: From conventional actuators to artificial muscles. Int Mater Rev, 2022; 67(6):575–619.
4.
GuoW, LiR, CaoC, et al.Kinematics, dynamics, and control system of a new 5-degree-of-freedom hybrid robot manipulator. Adv Mech Eng, 2016; 8(11):1687814016680309.
5.
VukobratovicM, TuneskiA. Adaptive control of single rigid robotic manipulators interacting with dynamic environment—An overview. J Intell Rob Syst, 1996; 17(1):1–30.
6.
MurtazaMA, AguileraS, WaqasM, et al.Safety compliant control for robotic manipulator with task and input constraints. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2022; 7(4):10659–10664.
7.
WhitesidesGM.Soft robotics. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2018; 57(16):4258–4273.
8.
SchmittF, PiccinO, Barbé L, et al. Soft robots manufacturing: A review. Front Robot AI, 2018; 5:84.
9.
XavierMS, TawkCD, ZolfagharianA, et al.Soft pneumatic actuators: A review of design, fabrication, modeling, sensing, control and applications. IEEE Access, 2022; 10:59442–59485.
10.
BoothJW, Cyr-ChoinièreO, CaseJC, et al.Surface actuation and sensing of a tensegrity structure using robotic skins. Soft Robot, 2021; 8(5):531–541.
11.
KarD, GeorgeB, SridharanK.A review on flexible sensors for soft robotics. In: Systems for Printed Flexible Sensors: Design and Implementation. (Islam T, Mukhopadhyay S, George B. eds.). IOP Publishing: Bristol; 2022.
12.
ThuruthelTG, ShihB, LaschiC, et al.Soft robot perception using embedded soft sensors and recurrent neural networks. Sci Robot, 2019; 4(26):eaav1488; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aav1488
13.
El-AtabN, MishraRB, Al-ModafF, et al.Soft actuators for soft robotic applications: A review. Adv Intell Syst, 2020; 2(10):2000128.
14.
LiM, PalA, AghakhaniA, et al.Soft actuators for real-world applications. Nat Rev Mater, 2022; 7:235–249.
15.
ShepherdRF, IlievskiF, ChoiW, et al.Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011; 108(51):20400–20403.
16.
PolygerinosP, WangZ, OverveldeJTB, et al.Modeling of soft fiber-reinforced bending actuators. IEEE Trans Rob, 2015; 31(3):778–789.
17.
HwangD, Barron EJ 3rd, HaqueABMT, et al.Shape morphing mechanical metamaterials through reversible plasticity. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(63):eabg2171.
18.
BucknerTL, BilodeauRA, KimSY, et al.Roboticizing fabric by integrating functional fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2020; 117(41):25360–25369.
19.
MantiM, CacuccioloV, CianchettiM. Stiffening in soft robotics: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 2016; 23(3):93–106.
20.
BainesR, PatiballaSK, BoothJ, et al.Multi-environment robotic transitions through adaptive morphogenesis. Nature, 2022; 610(7931):283–289.
21.
JuY, HuR, XieY, et al.Reconfigurable magnetic soft robots with multimodal locomotion. Nano Energy, 2021; 87:106169.
22.
KatzschmannRK, DelPretoJ, MacCurdyR, et al.Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(16):aar3449; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar3449
23.
HegdeC, SuJ, TanJMR, et al.Sensing in soft robotics. ACS Nano, 2023; 17(16):15277–15307; doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c04089
24.
AraromiOA, GrauleMA, DorseyKL, et al.Ultra-sensitive and resilient compliant strain gauges for soft machines. Nature, 2020; 587(7833):219–224.
25.
MustI, SinibaldiE, MazzolaiB. A variable-stiffness tendril-like soft robot based on reversible osmotic actuation. Nat Commun, 2019; 10(1):1–8.
26.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of origami robots. Nat Rev Mater, 2018; 3(6):101–112.
27.
EbrahimiN, BiC, CappelleriDJ, et al.Magnetic actuation methods in bio/soft robotics. Adv Funct Mater, 2021; 31(11):2005137.
SananS, MoidelJB, AtkesonCG. Robots with Inflatable Links. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2009; pp. 4331–4336.
30.
XiongJ, ChenJ, LeePS. Functional fibers and fabrics for soft robotics, wearables, and human-robot interface. Adv Mater, 2021; 33(19):e2002640.
31.
WangW, KimN-G, RodrigueH, et al.Modular assembly of soft deployable structures and robots. Mater Horiz, 2017; 4(3):367–376.
32.
PalmieriP, MelchiorreM, MauroS. Design of a lightweight and deployable soft robotic arm. Robotics, 2022; 11(5):88.
33.
ShahDS, PowersJP, TiltonLG, et al.A soft robot that adapts to environments through shape change. Nat Mach Intell, 2020; 3(1):51–59.
34.
HawkesEW, BlumenscheinLH, GreerJD, et al.A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci Robot, 2017; 2(8):aan3028; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan3028
35.
da VeigaT, ChandlerJH, LloydP, et al.Challenges of continuum robots in clinical context: a review. Prog Biomed Eng, 2020; 2(3):032003.
36.
ParkM, JeongB, ParkY-L. Hybrid system analysis and control of a soft robotic gripper with embedded proprioceptive sensing for enhanced gripping performance. Adv Intell Syst, 2021; 3(3):2000061.
DrotmanD, JadhavS, SharpD, et al.Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling soft-legged robots. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(51):eaay2627; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aay2627
39.
HartmannF, BaumgartnerM, KaltenbrunnerM. Becoming sustainable, the new frontier in soft robotics. Adv Mater, 2021; 33(19):e2004413.
40.
LipsonH.Challenges and opportunities for design, simulation, and fabrication of soft robots. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(1):21–27.
41.
ZhangY, LiP, QuanJ, et al.Progress, challenges, and prospects of soft robotics for space applications. Adv Intell Syst, 2023; 5(3):2200071; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202200071
42.
GallowayKC, PolygerinosP, WalshCJ, et al.Mechanically programmable bend radius for fiber-reinforced soft actuators. In: 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). 2013; pp. 1–6.
43.
PagoliA, ChapelleF, Corrales-RamonJ-A, et al.Review of soft fluidic actuators: Classification and materials modeling analysis. Smart Mater Struct, 2021; 31(1):013001.
44.
KokubuS, WangY, Tortós VinocourPE, et al.Evaluation of fiber-reinforced modular soft actuators for individualized soft rehabilitation gloves. Actuators, 2022; 11(3):84.
45.
WangX, MaoG, GeJ, et al.Untethered and ultrafast soft-bodied robots. Commun Mater, 2020; 1(1):1–10.
46.
GuG-Y, ZhuJ, ZhuL-M, et al.A survey on dielectric elastomer actuators for soft robots. Bioinspir Biomim, 2017; 12(1):011003.
StokesAA, ShepherdRF, MorinSA, et al.A hybrid combining hard and soft robots. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(1):70–74.
49.
HaggertyDA, NaclerioND, HawkesEW. Hybrid vine robot with internal steering-reeling mechanism enhances system-level capabilities. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021; 6(3):5437–5444.
50.
NuckolsRW, LeeS, SwaminathanK, et al.Individualization of exosuit assistance based on measured muscle dynamics during versatile walking. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(60):eabj1362.
51.
AsbeckAT, De RossiSMM, GalianaI, et al.Stronger, smarter, softer: Next-generation wearable robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 2014; 21(4):22–33.
52.
SharifzadehM, JiangY, AukesDM. Reconfigurable curved beams for selectable swimming gaits in an underwater robot. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021; 6(2):3437–3444.
53.
JiangM, YuQ, GravishN. Vacuum induced tube pinching enables reconfigurable flexure joints with controllable bend axis and stiffness. In: 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). 2021; pp. 315–320.
54.
JiangY, SharifzadehM, AukesDM. Reconfigurable soft flexure hinges via pinched tubes. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2020; pp. 8843–8850.
55.
SparksC, JustusN, HattonR, et al.Amoeba-inspired swimming through isoperimetric modulation of body shape. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2022; pp. 2685–2692.
56.
VoisembertS, MechbalN, RiwanA, et al.Design of a novel long-range inflatable robotic arm: Manufacturing and numerical evaluation of the joints and actuation. J Mech Robot, 2013; 5(4):045001.
57.
VoisembertS, RiwanA, MechbalN, et al.A novel inflatable robot with constant and continuous volume. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2011; pp. 5843–5848.
58.
SatakeY, IshiiH. Pitch-up motion mechanism with heat welding by soft inflatable growing robot. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2022; 7(2):5071–5078.
59.
ThomasJ-C, WielgoszC, Le VanA. Mechanics of inflatable fabric beams. In: 4th International Conference on Thin Walled Structures (ICTWS’04), Loughborough, United Kingdom; June 2004; p. hal-01008403.
60.
ThomasJ-C, BlochA. Non linear behaviour of an inflatable beam and limit states. Procedia Eng, 2016; 155:398–406.
61.
KaramGN, GibsonLJ. Elastic buckling of cylindrical shells with elastic cores—I. Analysis. Int J Solids Struct, 1995; 32(8):1259–1283.
SeoJ, PaikJ, YimM. Modular reconfigurable robotics. Annu Rev Control Robot Auton Syst, 2019; 2(1):63–88.
64.
ChennareddySSR, AgrawalA, KaruppiahA. Modular self-reconfigurable robotic systems: A survey on hardware architectures. J Robot, 2017; 2017; doi: 10.1155/2017/5013532>
65.
HarnettCK.Soft Optics with Mechanically Tunable Refractive Index. US Patent; 2021.
66.
BupeP, JacksonDJ, HarnettCK. Electronically reconfigurable virtual joints by shape memory alloy-induced buckling of curved sheets. In: SoutheastCon 2022. 2022; pp. 598–604.
67.
HattonRL, ChosetH. Geometric swimming at low and high reynolds numbers. IEEE Trans Rob, 2013; 29(3):615–624.
68.
WangY, NittaT, HiratsukaY, et al.In situ integrated microrobots driven by artificial muscles built from biomolecular motors. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(69):eaba8212.
69.
SuH, HouX, ZhangX, et al.Pneumatic soft robots: Challenges and benefits. Actuators, 2022; 11(3):92.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
