The increasing demand for inspection, upkeep, and repair of pipeline and tunnel infrastructures has catalyzed research into the creation of robots with superior flexibility, adaptability, and load-bearing capacities. This study introduces an autonomous soft robot designed for navigating both straight and curved pipelines of 90 mm diameter. The soft robot is enabled by an elongation pneumatic actuator (EPA) as its body and multiple radial expansion pneumatic actuators (REPAs) as its feet to provide adhesion and support on the pipe walls. It achieves a horizontal movement speed of 1.27 mm/s and ascends vertically at 0.39 mm/s. An integrated control mechanism, merging both pneumatic and electrical systems is employed to facilitate unrestrained movement. A novel control tactic has been formulated to ensure synchronized coordination between the robot’s body deformation and leg anchoring, ensuring stable movement. This soft robot demonstrates remarkable mobility metrics, boasting an anchoring strength of over 100 N, a propelling force of 43.8 N when moving vertically, and a pulling strength of 31.4 N during navigation in curved pipelines. It can carry a camera to capture the internal view of the pipe and remove obstacles autonomously. The unconstrained and autonomous movement of the untethered soft robot presents new opportunities for various applications at different scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015; 521(7553):467–475; doi: 10.1038/nature14543
2.
NansaiS, MohanR. A survey of wall climbing robots: Recent advances and challenges. Robotics, 2016; 5(3):14; doi: 10.3390/robotics5030014
3.
DrotmanD, JadhavS, KarimiM, et al. editors. 3D printed soft actuators for a legged robot capable of navigating unstructured terrain. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation; 2017.
4.
RohSG, ChoiHR. Differential-drive in-pipe robot for moving inside urban gas pipelines. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2005; 21(1):1–17.
5.
RohS-G, KimDW, LeeJ-S, et al.In-pipe robot based on selective drive mechanism. Int J Control Autom Syst, 2009; 7(1):105–112; doi: 10.1007/s12555-009-0113-z
6.
KwonYS, LeeB, WhangIC, et al. editors. A flat pipeline inspection robot with two wheel chains. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation; 2011.
7.
KakogawaA, MaS, editors. Design of a multilink-articulated wheeled inspection robot for winding pipelines: AIRo-II. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2016.
8.
KimJH, SharmaG, IyengarSS, editors. FAMPER: A fully autonomous mobile robot for pipeline exploration. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology; 2010.
9.
KwonY-S, YiB-J. Design and motion planning of a two-module collaborative indoor pipeline inspection robot. IEEE Trans Robot, 2012; 28(3):681–696; doi: 10.1109/tro.2012.2183049
10.
KakogawaA, MaS. Effect of underactuated parallelogram shape-shifting for environmental adaptation movement of a three modular in-pipe robot. Front Robot AI, 2023; 10:1234835; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1234835
11.
LuYi, YuJingjing, SuiChunping, et al. editors. Design of in-pipe 3SPR/3RPS parallel manipulator and its kinestatics analysis. 2015 IEEE International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER); 2015.
12.
SavinS, VorochaevaL, editors. Nested quadratic programming-based controller for in-pipe robots. Proceedings of International conference on industrial engineering 2017; 2017.
13.
FjerdingenSA, LiljebäckP, TransethAA, editors. A snake-like robot for internal inspection of complex pipe structures (PIKo). IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems; 2009.
14.
SchempfH, MutschlerE, GavaertA, et al.Visual and nondestructive evaluation inspection of live gas mains using the Explorer™ family of pipe robots. Journal of Field Robotics, 2010; 27(3):217–249; doi: 10.1002/rob.20330
15.
KimHM, ChoiYS, MunHM, et al. editors. Design of back-drivable joint mechanism for in-pipe robot. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015; 2015.
16.
ChattopadhyayP, GhoshalS, MajumderA, et al.Locomotion methods of pipe climbing robots: A review. JESTR, 2018; 11(4):154–165; doi: 10.25103/jestr.114.20
WaleedD, MustafaSH, MukhopadhyayS, et al.An in-pipe leak detection robot with a neural-network-based leak verification system. IEEE Sensors J, 2019; 19(3):1153–1165; doi: 10.1109/jsen.2018.2879248
19.
FangD, ShangJ, LuoZ, et al.Development of a novel self-locking mechanism for continuous propulsion inchworm in-pipe robot. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2018; 10(1):168781401774940.
20.
XieQ, LiuS, MaX. Design of a novel inchworm in-pipe robot based on cam-linkage mechanism. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2021; 13(9):168781402110451.
21.
LiM, WangG, WangJ, et al.Development of an inchworm-like soft pipe robot for detection. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2023; 253:108392; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108392
22.
IshikawaR, TomitaT, YamadaY, et al. editors. Development of a peristaltic crawling robot for long-distance complex line sewer pipe inspections. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM); 2016.
23.
ManoY, IshikawaR, YamadaY, et al. editors. Development of contraction force control system of peristaltic crawling robot for sewer pipe inspection. 2018 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM); 2018.
24.
ZhangB, FanY, YangP, et al.Worm-like soft robot for complicated tubular environments. Soft Robot, 2019; 6(3):399–413; doi: 10.1089/soro.2018.0088
LiuX, SongM, FangY, et al.Worm‐inspired soft robots enable adaptable pipeline and tunnel inspection. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2022; 4(1):2100128.
27.
TangC, DuB, JiangS, et al.A pipeline inspection robot for navigating tubular environments in the sub-centimeter scale. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(66):eabm8597.
28.
YamamotoT, SakamaS, KamimuraA. Pneumatic duplex-chambered inchworm mechanism for narrow pipes driven by only two air supply lines. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020; 5(4):5034–5042; doi: 10.1109/lra.2020.3003859
29.
XieD, LiuJ, KangR, et al.Fully 3d-printed modular pipe-climbing robot. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021; 6(2):462–469; doi: 10.1109/lra.2020.3047795
30.
WehnerM, TrubyRL, FitzgeraldDJ, et al.An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature, 2016; 536(7617):451–455; doi: 10.1038/nature19100
WallinTJ, PikulJ, ShepherdRF. 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat Rev Mater, 2018; 3(6):84–100; doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0002-2
33.
WalkerJ, ZidekT, HarbelC, et al.Soft robotics: A review of recent developments of pneumatic soft actuators. Actuators, 2020; 9(1):3; doi: 10.3390/act9010003
34.
GorissenB, ReynaertsD, KonishiS, et al.Elastic inflatable actuators for soft robotic applications. Adv Mater, 2017; 29(43); doi: 10.1002/adma.201604977
YuanP, KawanoG, TsukagoshiH, Design and modeling of soft pneumatic helical actuator with high contraction ratio. JRM, 2020; 32(5):1061–1070; doi: 10.20965/jrm.2020.p1061
37.
WonP, KimKK, KimH, et al.Transparent soft actuators/sensors and camouflage skins for imperceptible soft robotics. Adv Mater, 2021; 33(19):e2002397; doi: 10.1002/adma.202002397
38.
SeokS, OnalCD, ChoK-J, et al.Meshworm: A peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2013; 18(5):1485–1497; doi: 10.1109/tmech.2012.2204070
39.
MustI, KaasikF, PõldsaluI, et al.Ionic and capacitive artificial muscle for biomimetic soft robotics. Adv Eng Mater, 2015; 17(1):84–94; doi: 10.1002/adem.201400246
40.
CaoJ, QinL, LiuJ, et al.Untethered soft robot capable of stable locomotion using soft electrostatic actuators. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 2018; 21:9–16; doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2018.02.004
41.
PfeilS, HenkeM, KatzerK, et al.A worm-like biomimetic crawling robot based on cylindrical dielectric elastomer actuators. Front Robot AI, 2020; 7:9; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00009
42.
WangT, GeL, GuG. Programmable design of soft pneu-net actuators with oblique chambers can generate coupled bending and twisting motions. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2018; 271:131–138; doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.01.018
QinL, LiangX, HuangH, et al.A versatile soft crawling robot with rapid locomotion. Soft Robot, 2019; 6(4):455–467; doi: 10.1089/soro.2018.0124
45.
TawkC, SpinksGM, In Het PanhuisM, et al.3D printable linear soft vacuum actuators: Their modeling, performance quantification and application in soft robotic systems. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2019; 24(5):2118–2129; doi: 10.1109/tmech.2019.2933027
46.
LiuX, ZhaoY, GengD, et al.Soft humanoid hands with large grasping force enabled by flexible hybrid pneumatic actuators. Soft Robot, 2020; 8(2):175–185.
47.
MarcheseAD, KatzschmannRK, RusD. A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots. Soft Robot, 2015; 2(1):7–25; doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0022
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
