Sub-millimeter untethered locomoting robots hold promise to radically change multiple areas of human activity such as microfabrication/assembly or health care. To overcome the associated hurdles of such a degree of robot miniaturization, radically new approaches are being adopted, often relying on soft actuating polymeric materials. Here, we present light-driven, crawling microrobots that locomote by a single degree of freedom actuation of their light-responsive tail section. The direction of locomotion is dictated by the robot body design and independent of the spatial modulation of the light stimuli, allowing simultaneous multidirectional motion of multiple robots. Moreover, we present a method for steering such robots by reversibly deforming their front section, using ultraviolet (UV) light as a trigger. The deformation dictates the robot locomotion, performing right- or left-hand turning when the UV is turned on or off respectively. The robots' motion and navigation are not coupled to the position of the light sources, which enables simultaneous locomotion of multiple robots, steering of robots and brings about flexibility with the methods to deliver the light to the place of robot operation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SittiM, CeylanH, HuW, et al.Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc IEEE, 2015; 103(2):205–224; doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2385105.
2.
CeylanH, GiltinanJ, KozielskiK, et al.Mobile microrobots for bioengineering applications. Lab Chip, 2017; 17(10):1705–1724; doi: 10.1039/C7LC00064B.
ZhangH, HutmacherDW, CholletF, et al.Microrobotics and MEMS-based fabrication techniques for scaffold-based tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci, 2005; 5(6):477–489; doi: 10.1002/mabi.200400202.
5.
JangD, JeongJ, SongH, et al.Targeted drug delivery technology using untethered microrobots: A review. J Micromech Microeng, 2019; 29(5):053002; doi: 10.1088/1361-6439/ab087d.
6.
NauberR, GouduSR, GoeckenjanM, et al.Medical microrobots in reproductive medicine from the bench to the clinic. Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1):728; doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36215-7.
7.
WangQ, ZhangL. External power-driven microrobotic swarm: From fundamental understanding to imaging-guided delivery. ACS Nano, 2021; 15(1):149–174; doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07753.
8.
WuR, ZhuY, CaiX, et al.Recent process in microrobots: From propulsion to swarming for biomedical applications. Micromachines, 2022; 13(9):1473; doi: 10.3390/mi13091473.
9.
MastrangeliM.Enabling Capillary Self-Assembly for Microsystem Integration. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering (MTM); Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2010.
10.
KropacekJ, MaslenC, van DijkB, et al.Hydrogel microrobots self-assembled into ordered structures with programmable actuation. Adv Intell Syst, 2023; 9(5):2300096; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202300096.
11.
FloydS, DillerE, PawasheC, et al.Control methodologies for a heterogeneous group of untethered magnetic micro-robots. Int J Robot Res, 2011; 30(13):1553–1565; doi: 10.1177/0278364911399525.
12.
TungHW, MaffioliM, FrutigerDR, et al.Polymer-based wireless resonant magnetic microrobots. IEEE Trans Robot, 2014; 30(1):26–32; doi: 10.1109/TRO.2013.2288514.
13.
AghakhaniA, YasaO, WredeP, et al.Acoustically powered surface-slipping mobile microrobots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020; 117(7):3469–3477; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920099117.
14.
CalistiM, PicardiG, LaschiC. Fundamentals of soft robot locomotion. J R Soc Interf, 2017; 14(130):20170101; doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0101.
15.
JiaoD, ZhuQL, LiCY, et al.Programmable morphing hydrogels for soft actuators and robots: From structure designs to active functions. Acc Chem Res, 2022; 55(11):1533–1545; doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00046.
ZhuQL, DuC, DaiY, et al.Light-steered locomotion of muscle-like hydrogel by self-coordinated shape change and friction modulation. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):5166; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18801-1.
20.
ReynoldsMF, CorteseAJ, LiuQ, et al.Microscopic robots with onboard digital control. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(70):eabq2296; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abq2296.
21.
SunX-C, XiaH, XuX-L, et al.Ingenious humidity-powered micro-worm with asymmetric biped from single hydrogel. Sens Actuat B Chem, 2020; 322:128620; doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128620.
22.
MourranA, ZhangH, VinokurR, et al.Soft microrobots employing nonequilibrium actuation via plasmonic heating. Adv Mater, 2017; 29(2):1604825; doi: 10.1002/adma.201604825.
23.
PalagiS, MarkAG, ReighSY, et al.Structured light enables biomimetic swimming and versatile locomotion of photoresponsive soft microrobots. Nat Mater, 2016; 15(6):647–653; doi: 10.1038/nmat4569.
24.
AydinO, ZhangX, NuethongS, et al.Neuromuscular actuation of biohybrid motile bots. PNAS, 2019; 116(40):19841–19847; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907051116.
25.
KhalilISM, TabakAF, SeifMA, et al.Controllable switching between planar and helical flagellar swimming of a soft robotic sperm. PLoS One, 2018; 13(11):e0206456; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206456.
26.
MagdanzV, SanchezS, SchmidtOG. Development of a Sperm-Flagella driven micro-bio-robot. Adv Mater, 2013; 25(45):6581–6588; doi: 10.1002/adma.201302544.
27.
LiM, WangX, DongB, et al.In-air fast response and high speed jumping and rolling of a light-driven hydrogel actuator. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):3988; doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17775-4.
28.
HuW, IshiiKS, FanQ, et al.Hydrogel microrobots actuated by optically generated vapour bubbles. Lab Chip, 2012; 12(19):3821–3826; doi: 10.1039/c2lc40483d.
29.
SharanP, MaslenC, AltunkeyikB, et al.Fundamental modes of swimming correspond to fundamental modes of shape: Engineering I-, U-, and S-Shaped Swimmers. Adv Intell Syst, 2021; 3(11):2100068; doi: 10.1002/aisy.202100068.
30.
ZhuS, ZhengW, WangJ, et al.Interactive and synergistic behaviours of multiple heterogeneous microrobots. Lab Chip, 2022; 22(18):3412–3423; doi: 10.1039/D2LC00265E.
PawasheC, FloydS, SittiM. Multiple magnetic microrobot control using electrostatic anchoring. Appl Phys Lett, 2009; 94(16):164108; doi: 10.1063/1.3123231.
33.
SittiM, WiersmaDS. Pros and Cons: Magnetic versus Optical Microrobots. Adv Mater, 2020; 32(20):1906766; doi: 10.1002/adma.201906766.
34.
AlapanY, YasaO, YigitB, et al.Microrobotics and microorganisms: Biohybrid autonomous cellular robots. Annu Rev Control Robot Auton Syst, 2019; 2(1):205–230; doi: 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023803.
35.
Bastos-ArrietaJ, Revilla-GuarinosA, UspalWE, et al.Bacterial biohybrid microswimmers. Front Robot AI, 2018; 5; doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00097.
FrancisW, DunneA, DelaneyC, et al.Spiropyran based hydrogels actuators—Walking in the light. Sens Actuat B Chem, 2017; 250:608–616; doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.005.
38.
RogóżM, ZengH, XuanC, et al.Light-driven soft robot mimics caterpillar locomotion in natural scale. Adv Opt Mater, 2016; 4(11):1689–1694; doi: 10.1002/adom.201600503.
39.
GelebartAH, Jan MulderD, VargaM, et al.Making waves in a photoactive polymer film. Nature, 2017; 546(7660):632–636; doi: 10.1038/nature22987.
40.
AhnC, LiK, CaiS. Light or thermally powered autonomous rolling of an Elastomer Rod. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10(30):25689–25696; doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b07563.
41.
YangL, ChangL, HuY, et al.An autonomous soft actuator with light-driven self-sustained wavelike oscillation for phototactic self-locomotion and power generation. Adv Funct Mater, 2020; 30(15):1908842; doi: 10.1002/adfm.201908842.
42.
WhiteTJ, TabiryanNV, SerakSV, et al.A high frequency photodriven polymer oscillator. Soft Matter, 2008; 4(9):1796–1798; doi: 10.1039/B805434G.
43.
PurcellEM. Life at low Reynolds number. Am J Phys, 1977; 45(1):3–11; doi: 10.1119/1.10903.
44.
FrensG. Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in Monodisperse Gold Suspensions. Nat Phys Sci, 1973; 241(105):20–22; doi: 10.1038/physci241020a0.
45.
VrbaJ, MaslenC, MaxovaJ, et al.An automated platform for assembling light-powered hydrogel microrobots and their subsequent chemical binding. J Comput Sci, 2021; 55:101446; doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101446.
46.
NikoobakhtB, El-SayedMA. Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem Mater, 2003; 15(10):1957–1962; doi: 10.1021/cm020732l.
47.
AppleyardDC, ChapinSC, SrinivasRL, et al.Bar-coded hydrogel microparticles for protein detection: Synthesis, assay and scanning. Nat Protoc, 2011; 6(11):1761–1774; doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.400.
48.
Vakkipurath KodakkadanYN, MaslenC, CiglerP, et al.Friction-directed self-assembly of Janus lithographic microgels into anisotropic 2D structures. J Mater Chem B, 2021; 9(23):4718–4725; doi: 10.1039/D1TB00572C.
49.
SandovalC, OrtegaA, SanchezS, et al.Structuration in the interface of direct and reversed micelles of sucrose esters, studied by fluorescent techniques. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0123669; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123669.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
