Pneumatic actuators are widely studied in soft robotics as they are facile, low cost, scalable, and robust and exhibit compliance similar to many systems found in nature. The challenge is to harness high energy density chemical and biochemical reactions that can generate sufficient pneumatic pressure to actuate soft systems in a controlled and ecologically compatible manner. This investigation evaluates the potential of chemical reactions as both positive and negative pressure sources for use in soft robotic pneumatic actuators. Considering the pneumatic actuation demands, the chemical mechanisms of the pressure sources, and the safety of the system, several gas evolution/consumption reactions are evaluated and compared. Furthermore, the novel coupling of both gas evolution and gas consumption reactions is discussed and evaluated for the design of oscillating systems, driven by the complementary evolution and consumption of carbon dioxide. Control over the speed of gas generation and consumption is achieved by adjusting the initial ratios of feed materials. Coupling the appropriate reactions with pneumatic soft-matter actuators has delivered autonomous cyclic actuation. The reversibility of these systems is demonstrated in a range of displacement experiments, and practical application is shown through a soft gripper that can move, pick up, and let go of objects. Our approach presents a significant step toward more autonomous, versatile soft robots driven by chemo-pneumatic actuators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GruberDF, WoodRJ. Advances and future outlooks in soft robotics for minimally invasive marine biology. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(66):6807; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abm6807
2.
KimJ, KimJW, KimHC, et al.Review of soft actuator materials. Int J Precis Eng Manuf, 2019; 20(12):2221–2241; doi: 10.1007/s12541-019-00255-1
3.
DickerMPM, BakerAB, IredaleRJ, et al.Light-triggered soft artificial muscles: Molecular-level amplification of actuation control signals. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):9197; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08777-2
4.
DickerMPM, RossiterJM, BondIP, et al.Biomimetic photo-actuation: Sensing, control and actuation in sun-tracking plants. Bioinspir Biomim, 2014; 9(3):036015; doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/036015
5.
LiuZ, LuZ, KarydisK. SoRX: A soft pneumatic hexapedal robot to traverse rough, steep, and unstable terrain. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 2020; 2020:420–426; doi: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196731
6.
LaschiC, MazzolaiB, CianchettiM. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci Robot, 2016; 1(1):eaah3690.
7.
GallowayKC, BeckerKP, PhillipsB, et al.Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Sof Robot, 2016; 3(1):23–33; doi: 10.1089/soro.2015.0019
8.
MajidiC. Soft robotics: A perspective—Current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot, 2013; 1(1):5–11; doi: 10.1089/soro.2013.0001
9.
CaoC, GaoX, ConnAT, et al.A magnetically coupled dielectric elastomer pump for soft robotics. Adv Mater Technol, 2019; 4(8):1900128; doi: 10.1002/admt.201900128
10.
ZhuM, DoTN, HawkesE, et al.Fluidic fabric muscle sheets for wearable and soft robotics. Soft Robot, 2020; 7(2):179–197; doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0033
11.
ShenZ, ZhongH, XuE, et al.An underwater robotic manipulator with soft bladders and compact depth-independent actuation. Soft Robot, 2020; 7(5):535–549; doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0087
12.
TianY, LiYT, TianH, et al.Recent progress of soft electrothermal actuators. Soft Robot, 2021; 8(3):241–250; doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0164
13.
KhalilM, MagdanzV, MisraS, et al.Magnetic actuation methods in bio/soft robotics. Adv Funct Mater, 2021; 31(11):2005137; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202005137
14.
BakerAB, BatesSRG, Llewellyn-JonesTM, et al.4D Printing with robust thermoplastic polyurethane hydrogel-elastomer trilayers. Mater Des, 2019; 163:107544; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107544
15.
MulakkalMC, TraskRS, TingVP, et al.Responsive cellulose-hydrogel composite ink for 4D printing. Mater Des, 2018; 160:108–118; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.009
16.
XuX, HaoX, HuJ, et al.Recyclable silicone elastic light-triggered actuator with a reconfigurable janus structure and self-healable performance. Polym Chem, 2022; 13(6):829–837; doi: 10.1039/d1py01632f
17.
GaoYY, HanB, ZhaoWY, et al.Light-responsive actuators based on graphene. Front Chem, 2019; 7:506; doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00506
18.
LiangJ, XuY, HuangY, et al.Infrared-triggered actuators from graphene-based nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C, 2009; 113(22):9921–9927; doi: 10.1021/jp901284d
19.
TolleyMT, ShepherdRF, KarpelsonM, et al.An Untethered Jumping Soft Robot. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: Chicago, IL; 2014; pp. 561–566.
YangD, VermaMS, LossnerE, et al.Negative-pressure soft linear actuator with a mechanical advantage. Adv Mater Technol, 2017; 2(1):1600164; doi: 10.1002/admt.201600164
22.
WehnerM, TrubyRL, FitzgeraldDJ, et al.An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature, 2016; 536(7617):451–455; doi: 10.1038/nature19100
23.
ZhangL, HappeT, MelisA. Biochemical and morphological characterization of sulfur-deprived and H2-producing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Green alga). Planta, 2002; 214(4):552–561; doi: 10.1007/s004250100660
24.
JonesDP, EklöwL, ThorH, et al.Metabolism of hydrogen peroxide in isolated hepatocytes: Relative contributions of catalase and glutathione peroxidase in decomposition of endogenously generated H2O2. Arch Biochem Biophys, 1981; 210(2):505–516; doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(81)90215-0
25.
MaehlyAC, ChanceB. The assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Biochem Anal, 1954; 1:357–424; doi: 10.1002/9780470110171.ch14
26.
NickersonJF, KrausFW, PerryWI. Peroxidase and catalase in saliva. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 1957; 95(2):405–408; doi: 10.3181/00379727-95-23236
27.
OkuiM, NaguraY, IikawaS, et al.A Pneumatic Power Source Using a Sodium Bicarbonate and Citric Acid Reaction with Pressure Booster for Use in Mobile Devices. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE: Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2017; pp. 1040–1045.
28.
PetrułevskiVM, TaseskaM, MonkovićM. Reaction of copper with fuming nitric acid: A novel lecture experiment in passivation. Chem Educator, 2005; 10:208–210.
29.
PatelS, MiaoJH, YetiskulE, et al.Physiology, Carbon Dioxide Retention. StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, Florida; 2022.
30.
GrunhutI. Water and electrolyte balance. Nurs Times, 2020; 58:651–663; doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815499-1.00037-5
31.
OttawayMR, CoatesCF, HainesPJ, et al.The use of thermal methods in assessing the hazards and safety of chemical reactions. Anal Proc, 1986; 23(4):116–122; doi: 10.1039/ap9862300116
32.
BerdouziF, VillemurC, Olivier-MagetN, et al.Dynamic simulation for risk analysis: Application to an exothermic reaction. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2018; 113:149–163; doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.019
33.
WehnerM, TolleyMT, MengüçY, et al.Pneumatic energy sources for autonomous and wearable soft robotics. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(4):263–274; doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0018
34.
LoepfeM, SchumacherCM, LustenbergerUB, et al.An untethered, jumping roly-poly soft robot driven by combustion. Soft Robot, 2015; 2(1):33–41; doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0021
35.
ZhangJ, ShengJ, O'NeillCT, et al.Robotic artificial muscles: Current progress and future perspectives. IEEE Trans Robot, 2019; 35(3):761–781; doi: 10.1109/tro.2019.2894371
36.
FatahillahM, OhN, RodrigueH. A novel soft bending actuator using combined positive and negative pressures. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020; 8:472; doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00472
37.
Brigido-GonzálezJD, BurrowSG, WoodsBK. Switchable stiffness morphing aerostructures based on granular jamming. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2019; 30(17):2581–2594; doi: 10.1177/1045389X19862372
ZhangB, ChenJ, MaX, et al.Pneumatic system capable of supplying programmable pressure states for soft robots. Soft Robot, 2022; 9(5):1001–1013; doi: 10.1089/soro.2021.0016
NishikawaY, MatsumotoM. A design of fully soft robot actuated by gas–liquid phase change. Adv Robot, 2019; 33(12):567–575; doi: 10.1080/01691864.2019.1626281
43.
GonlachanvitS, ColeskiR, OwyangC, et al.Nutrient modulation of intestinal gas dynamics in healthy humans: dependence on caloric content and meal consistency. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2006; 291(3):G389–G395; doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00526.2005
44.
PerezF, AccarinoA, AzpirozF, et al.Gas distribution within the human gut: Effect of meals. Am J Gastroenterol, 2007; 102(4):842–849; doi: 10.1111/J.1572-0241.2007.01071.X
45.
OuJZ, YaoCK, RotbartA, et al.Human intestinal gas measurement systems: In vitro fermentation and gas capsules. Trends Biotechnol, 2015; 33(4):208–213; doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.02.002
46.
BurnettGR, StephenAS, PizzeyRL, et al.In vitro effects of novel toothpaste actives on components of oral malodour. Int Dent J, 2011; 61(Suppl 3):67–73; doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2011.00052.x
47.
TittelJ, KamjunkeN. Metabolism of dissolved organic carbon by planktonic bacteria and mixotrophic algae in lake neutralisation experiments. Freshw Biol, 2004; 49(8):1062–1071; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01241.x
48.
ProkschE. pH in nature, humans and skin. J Dermatol, 2018; 45(9):1044–1052; doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14489
49.
ShiQ, LiuH, TangD, et al.Bioactuators based on stimulus-responsive hydrogels and their emerging biomedical applications. NPG Asia Mater, 2019; 11(1):1–21; doi: 10.1038/s41427-019-0165-3
50.
HanZ, WangP, MaoG, et al.Dual pH-responsive hydrogel actuator for lipophilic drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020; 12(10):12010–12017; doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b21713
51.
Lee HammL, NakhoulN, Hering-SmithKS. Acid-base homeostasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015; 10(12):2232–2242; doi: 10.2215/cjn.07400715
MosadeghB, PolygerinosP, KeplingerC, et al.Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv Funct Mater, 2014; 24(15):2163–2170; doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303288
54.
SuM, XieR, ZhangY, et al.Pneumatic soft actuator with anisotropic soft and rigid restraints for pure in-plane bending motion. Appl Sci, 2019; 9(15):2999; doi: 10.3390/app9152999
55.
DumoulinC, CacciariLP, Hay-SmithEJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018; 2018(10):CD005654; doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub4
56.
HelpsT, RomeroC, TaghaviM, et al.Liquid-amplified zipping actuators for micro-air vehicles with transmission-free flapping. Sci Robot, 2022; 7(63):eabi8189; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abi8189
57.
WuY, YimJK, LiangJ, et al.Insect-scale fast moving and ultrarobust soft robot. Sci Robot, 2019; 4(32):31; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aax1594
58.
MosadeghB, KuoCH, TungYC, et al.Integrated elastomeric components for autonomous regulation of sequential and oscillatory flow switching in microfluidic devices. Nat Phys, 2010; 6(6):433–437; doi: 10.1038/nphys1637
59.
RothemundP, AinlaA, BeldingL, et al.A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(16):eaar7986; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar7986
60.
NarzaryBB, BakerBC, YadavN, et al.Crosslinked porous polyimides: Structure, properties and applications. Polym Chem, 2021; 12(45):6494–6514; doi: 10.1039/d1py00997d
61.
WangH, ChengZ, LiaoY, et al.Conjugated microporous polycarbazole networks as precursors for nitrogen-enriched microporous carbons for CO2 storage and electrochemical capacitors. Chem Mater, 2017; 29(11):4885–4893; doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00857
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
