We present a compression sensor based on a strain-sensitive carbon black–silicone composite cast on top of a printed circuit board with interdigitated electrodes. This results in a very sensitive and soft capacitive compression sensor not requiring a structured dielectric or compliant electrodes. We show how the optimal loading of carbon black to maximize the sensitivity depends on the type of carbon black and the stiffness of the silicone matrix. The optimal quantity of carbon black leads to a high sensitivity of 252% for an input force of 10 N (this corresponds to an input pressure of 17 kPa), without stiffening the silicone matrix or increasing the viscoelastic losses noticeably. The fabrication process of the sensors is much simpler than that of other soft capacitive sensors, and unlike carbon black–silicone resistive sensors, these capacitive sensors do not exhibit time-dependent impedance creep. They can be made thick without affecting their base capacitance or sensitivity, leading to compliant and conformable sensing interfaces suitable for a variety of applications, such as robotic tactile sensors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ParkS, KimH, VosgueritchianM, et al.Stretchable energy-harvesting tactile electronic skin capable of differentiating multiple mechanical stimuli modes. Adv Mater, 2014; 26(43):7324–7332.
2.
AtalayO, AtalayA, GaffordJ, et al.A highly sensitive capacitive-based soft pressure sensor based on a conductive fabric and a microporous dielectric layer. Adv Mater Technol, 2018; 3(1):1–8.
3.
LiuJ, YangY, PengJ, et al.Fully soft pressure sensor based on bionic spine–pillar structure for robotics motion monitoring. Soft Robot, 2022; 9(3):1–13.
4.
TeginJ, WikanderJ. Tactile sensing in intelligent robotic manipulation—A review. Ind Robot, 2005; 32(1):64–70.
5.
KimS, KimC, ParkJH. Human-like arm motion generation for humanoid robots using motion capture database. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: Beijing, China; 2006; pp. 3486–3491.
6.
SakagamiY, WatanabeR, AoyamaC, et al.The intelligent ASIMO: System overview and integration. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: Lausanne, Switzerland; vol. 3; 2002; pp. 2478–2483.
7.
HesseS, SchmidtH, WernerC, et al.Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol, 2003; 16(6):705–710.
8.
SimorovA, Stephen OtteR, KopietzCM, et al.Review of surgical robotics user interface: What is the best way to control robotic surgery?. Surg Endosc, 2012; 26(8):2117–2125.
9.
YaoH, SunT, ChiamJS, et al.Augmented reality interfaces using virtual customization of microstructured electronic skin sensor sensitivity performances. Adv Funct Mater, 2021; 2008650:1–10.
10.
HudsonJ, OrviskaM, HunadyJ. People's attitudes to robots in caring for the elderly. Int J Soc Robot, 2017; 9(2):199–210.
11.
HayashiS, ShigematsuK, YamamotoS, et al.Evaluation of a strawberry-harvesting robot in a field test. Biosyst Eng, 2010; 105(2):160–171.
PersanoL, DagdevirenC, SuY, et al.High performance piezoelectric devices based on aligned arrays of nanofibers of poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene). Nat Commun, 2013; 4:1610–1633.
14.
LeeKY, YoonHJ, JiangT, et al.Fully packaged self-powered triboelectric pressure sensor using hemispheres-array. Adv Energy Mater, 2016; 6(11):1–5.
15.
TangY, LiuH, PanJ, et al.Optical micro/nanofiber-enabled compact tactile sensor for hardness discrimination. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021; 13(3):4560–4566.
16.
WangS, SunZ, ZhaoY, et al.A highly stretchable hydrogel sensor for soft robot multi-modal perception. Sens Actuat A Phys, 2021; 331:113006.
17.
MajidiC.Soft robotics: A perspective—Current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot, 2014;(1):5–11.
18.
O'BrienB, GisbyT, AndersonIA. Stretch sensors for human body motion. In: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD). SPIE—International Society for Optics and Photonics: San Diego, California; vol. 9056; 2014; p. 905618.
19.
WangP, LiG, LiuJ, et al.Tailorable capacitive tactile sensor based on stretchable and dissolvable porous silver nanowire/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposite hydrogel for wearable human motion detection. Adv Mater Interfaces, 2021; 2100998:1–12.
BöseH, FußE, LuxP. Influence of design and material properties on the performance of dielectric elastomer compression sensors. In: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD). SPIE—International Society for Optics and Photonics: San Diego, California; vol. 9430; 2015; p. 943029.
22.
BöseH, FußE. Novel dielectric elastomer sensors for compression load detection. In: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD). SPIE—International Society for Optics and Photonics: San Diego, California; vol. 9056; 2014; p. 905614.
23.
De Saint-AubinCA, RossetS, SchlatterS, et al.High-cycle electromechanical aging of dielectric elastomer actuators with carbon-based electrodes. Smart Mater Struct, 2018; 27(7).
24.
SunH, KuchenbeckerKJ, MartiusG. A soft thumb-sized vision-based sensor with accurate all-round force perception. Nat Mach Intell, 2022; 4(2):135–145.
SchlatterS, GrassoG, RossetS, et al.Inkjet printing of complex soft machines with densely integrated electrostatic actuators. Adv Intell Syst, 2020; 2(11):2000136.
27.
Hesam MahmoudinezhadM, AndersonI, RossetS. Interdigitated sensor based on a silicone foam for subtle robotic manipulation. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2020; 2000560:1–11.
28.
ShenZ, ZhuX, MajidiC, et al.Cutaneous ionogel mechanoreceptors for soft machines, physiological sensing, and amputee prostheses. Adv Mater, 2021; 2102069:1–12.
29.
NiN, ZhangL.Dielectric elastomer sensors. In Elastomers. IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia; 2017.
30.
CaiC, ChenT, ChenX, et al.Enhanced electromechanical properties of three-phased polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposites via surface encapsulation of barium titanate and multiwalled carbon nanotube with polydopamine. Macromol Mater Eng, 2021; 306(6):1–11.
31.
ZhaoH, XiaYJ, DangZM, et al.Composition dependence of dielectric properties, elastic modulus, and electroactivity in (carbon black-BaTiO3)/silicone rubber nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci, 2013; 127(6):4440–4445.
32.
SametM, KallelA, SergheiA. Polymer bilayers with enhanced dielectric permittivity and low dielectric losses by Maxwell–Wagner–Sillars interfacial polarization: Characteristic frequencies and scaling laws. J Appl Polym Sci, 2019; 136(22):38–40.
33.
ZhangQM, LiH, PohM, et al.An all-organic composite actuator material with a high dielectric constant. Nature, 2002; 419(6904):284–287.
34.
ChowTS.The effect of particle shape on the mechanical properties of filled polymers. J Mater Sci, 1980; 15(8):1873–1888.
35.
KuhringS, UhlenbuschD, HoffstadtT, et al.Finite element analysis of multilayer DEAP stack-actuators. In: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD). SPIE—International Society for Optics and Photonics: San Diego, California; vol. 9430; 2015; p. 94301L.
36.
LunkenheimerP, BobnarV, BobnarV, et al.Origin of apparent colossal dielectric constants. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys, 2002; 66(5):521051–521054.
37.
HuangM, TunnicliffeLB, ZhuangJ, et al.Strain-dependent dielectric behavior of carbon black reinforced natural rubber. Macromolecules, 2016; 49(6):2339–2347.
38.
SowM, WidenorR, KumarA, et al.Strain-induced reversal of charge transfer in contact electrification. Angew Chem, 2012; 124(11):2749–2751.
39.
BalasooriyaW, SchrittesserB, PinterG, et al.The effect of the surface area of carbon black grades on HNBR in harsh environments. Polymers, 2019; 11(1):61.
40.
WangL, MaF, ShiQ, et al.Study on compressive resistance creep and recovery of flexible pressure sensitive material based on carbon black filled silicone rubber composite. Sens Actuat A Phys, 2011; 165(2):207–215.
41.
BarkoulaNM, AlcockB, CabreraNO, et al.Flame-retardancy properties of intumescent ammonium poly(phosphate) and mineral filler magnesium hydroxide in combination with graphene. Polym Polym Compos, 2008; 16(2):101–113.
GerezL, GaoG, LiarokapisM. Laminar jamming flexure joints for the development of variable stiffness robot grippers and hands. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: Las Vegas, NV; 2020; pp. 8709–8715.
44.
GuoY, GuoZ, ZhongM, et al.A flexible wearable pressure sensor with bioinspired microcrack and interlocking for full-range human–machine interfacing. Small, 2018; 14:44.
45.
WangT, ZhangY, LiuQ, et al.A self-healable, highly stretchable, and solution processable conductive polymer composite for ultrasensitive strain and pressure sensing. Adv Funct Mater, 2018; 28(7):1–12.
46.
ZhanZ, LinR, TranVT, et al.Paper/carbon nanotube-based wearable pressure sensor for physiological signal acquisition and soft robotic skin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017; 9(43):37921–37928.
47.
OziokoO, KaripothP, EscobedoP, et al.SensAct: The soft and squishy tactile sensor with integrated flexible actuator. Adv Intell Syst, 2021; 3(3):1900145.
48.
KumaresanY, OziokoO, DahiyaR. Effect of dielectric and stiffness of soft material between the electrodes of a capacitive pressure sensor on its performance. In: FLEPS 2020—IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems. 2020; p. 2020–2023.
49.
ChhetryA, KimJ, YoonH, et al.Ultrasensitive interfacial capacitive pressure sensor based on a randomly distributed microstructured iontronic film for wearable applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019; 11(3):3438–3449.
50.
ViryL, LeviA, TotaroM, et al.Flexible three-axial force sensor for soft and highly sensitive artificial touch. Adv Mater, 2014; 26(17):2659–2664.
51.
LiT, LuoH, QinL, et al.Flexible capacitive tactile sensor based on micropatterned dielectric layer. Small, 2016; 12(36):5042–5048.
52.
HuaQ, SunJ, LiuH, et al.Skin-inspired highly stretchable and conformable matrix networks for multifunctional sensing. Nat Commun, 2018; 9(1):1–11.
53.
ToC, HellebrekersTL, ParkYL. Highly stretchable optical sensors for pressure, strain, and curvature measurement. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: Hamburg, Germany; vol. 2015, 2015; pp. 5898–5903.
54.
RamuzM, TeeBCK, TokJBH, et al.Transparent, optical, pressure-sensitive artificial skin for large-area stretchable electronics. Adv Mater, 2012; 24(24):3223–3227.
55.
LiT, ZouJ, XingF, et al.From dual-mode triboelectric nanogenerator to smart tactile sensor: A multiplexing design. ACS Nano, 2017; 11(4):3950–3956.
56.
YangY, ZhangH, LinZH, et al.Human skin based triboelectric nanogenerators for harvesting biomechanical energy and as self-powered active tactile sensor system. ACS Nano, 2013; 7(10):9213–9222.
57.
YuanZ, ZhouT, YinY, et al.Transparent and flexible triboelectric sensing array for touch security applications. ACS Nano, 2017; 11(8):8364–8369.
58.
McGannCM, LeeYJ, KimSU, et al.Reverse-engineered highly conformable, leak and pressure reducing cushion for neonatal resuscitation mask. Adv Mater Technol, 2021; 2101364:1–8.
59.
MaW, LiB, JiangL, et al.A bioinspired, electroactive colorable and additive manufactured photonic artificial muscle. Soft Matter, 2022; 18(8):1617–1627.
60.
AtiehA.Design, modeling, fabrication and testing of a piezoresistive-based tactile sensor for minimally invasive surgery applications, page 87. Master thesis, Concordia University. February, 2012. Available from: https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/973889/ [Last accessed: February14, 2023].
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
