Fluidic soft robots have the advantages of inherent compliance and adaptability, but they are significantly restricted by complex control systems and bulky power devices, including fluidic valves, fluidic pumps, electrical motors, as well as batteries, which make it challenging to operate in narrow space, energy shortage, or electromagnetic sensitive situations. To overcome the shortcomings, we develop portable human-powered master controllers to provide an alternative solution for the master-slave control of the fluidic soft robots. Each controller can supply multiple fluidic pressures to the multiple chambers of the soft robots simultaneously. We use modular fluidic soft actuators to reconfigure soft robots with various functions as control objects. Experimental results show that flexible manipulation and bionic locomotion can be simply realized using the human-powered master controllers. The developed controllers which eliminate energy storage and electronic components can provide a promising candidate of soft robot control in surgical, industrial, and entertainment applications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JoyeeEB, SzmelterA, EddingtonD, et al.3D printed biomimetic soft robot with multimodal locomotion and multifunctionality. Soft Robot, 2022; 9(1):1–13; doi: 10.1089/soro.2020.0004
2.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015; 521(7553):467–475; doi: 10.1038/nature14543
3.
FengH, SunY, ToddPA, et al.Body wave generation for anguilliform locomotion using a fiber-reinforced soft fluidic elastomer actuator array toward the development of the eel-inspired underwater soft robot. Soft Robot, 2020; 7(2):233–250; doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0054
4.
KatzschmannRK, DelPretoJ, MacCurdyR, et al.Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(16):eaar3449; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar3449
5.
GodabaH, LiJ, WangY, et al.A soft jellyfish robot driven by a dielectric elastomer actuator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2016; 1(2):624–631; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2016.2522498
RoderickWRT, CutkoskyMR, LentinkD. Bird-inspired dynamic grasping and perching in arboreal environments. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(61):eabj7562; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abj7562
8.
AbondanceS, TeepleCB, WoodRJ. A dexterous soft robotic hand for delicate in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020; 5(4):5502–5509; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3007411
9.
CianchettiM, RanzaniT, GerboniG, et al.Soft robotics technologies to address shortcomings in today's minimally invasive surgery: The STIFF-FLOP approach. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(2):122–131; doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0001
10.
AbidiH, GerboniG, BrancadoroM, et al.Highly dexterous 2-module soft robot for intra-organ navigation in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg, 2018; 14(1):e1875; doi: 10.1002/rcs.1875
11.
ChuC-Y, PattersonRM. Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: A narrative review. J Neuro Eng Rehabil, 2018; 15(1):9; doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0350-6
12.
RosaliaL, AngBW, YeowRC. Geometry-based customization of bending modalities for 3D-printed soft pneumatic actuators. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018; 3(4):3489–3496; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2018.2853640
13.
ZhangY, YangD, YanP, et al.Inchworm inspired multimodal soft robots with crawling, climbing, and transitioning locomotion. IEEE Trans Robot, 2021; 38(3):1–14; doi: 10.1109/TRO.2021.3115257
14.
LuoM, AgheliM, OnalCD. Theoretical modeling and experimental analysis of a pressure-operated soft robotic snake. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(2):136–146; doi: 10.1089/soro.2013.0011
15.
MarcheseAD, OnalCD, RusD. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot, 2014; 1(1):75–87; doi: 10.1089/soro.2013.0009
16.
ShepherdRF, IlievskiF, ChoiW, et al.Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011; 108(51):20400–20403; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116564108
MiriyevA, StackK, LipsonH. Soft material for soft actuators. Nat Commun, 2017; 8(1):596; doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00685-3
19.
LaschiC, CianchettiM, MazzolaiB, et al.Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Adv Robot, 2012; 26(7):709–727; doi: 10.1163/156855312X626343
20.
O'HalloranA, O'MalleyF, McHughP. A review on dielectric elastomer actuators, technology, applications, and challenges. J Appl Phys, 2008; 104(7):071101; doi: 10.1063/1.2981642
21.
ZhangY, WangZ, YangY, et al.Seamless multimaterial 3D liquid-crystalline elastomer actuators for next-generation entirely soft robots. Sci Adv, 2020; 6(9):eaay8606; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay8606
22.
XuF, WangH, AuKWS, et al.Underwater dynamic modeling for a cable-driven soft robot arm. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2018; 23(6):2726–2738; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2018.2872972
23.
UmedachiT, VikasV, TrimmerBA. Softworms: The design and control of non-pneumatic, 3D-printed, deformable robots. Bioinspir Biomim, 2016; 11(2):025001; doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/11/2/025001
24.
RendaF, GiorelliM, CalistiM, et al.Dynamic model of a multibending soft robot arm driven by cables. IEEE Trans Robot, 2014; 30(5):1109–1122; doi: 10.1109/TRO.2014.2325992
25.
PolygerinosP, CorrellN, MorinSA, et al.Soft robotics: Review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; Manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human-robot interaction: Review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft robots. Adv Eng Mater, 2017; 19(12):1700016; doi: 10.1002/adem.201700016
26.
WangT, ZhangY, ChenZ, et al.Parameter identification and model-based nonlinear robust control of fluidic soft bending actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2019; 24(3):1346–1355; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2909099
27.
MarcheseAD, KatzschmannRK, RusD. A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots. Soft Robot, 2015; 2(1):7–25; doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0022
28.
PhillipsBT, BeckerKP, KurumayaS, et al.A dexterous, glove-based teleoperable low-power soft robotic arm for delicate deep-sea biological exploration. Sci Rep, 2018; 8(1):14779; doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33138-y
29.
LowJH, LeeWW, KhinPM, et al.Hybrid tele-manipulation system using a sensorized 3-D-printed soft robotic gripper and a soft fabric-based haptic glove. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2017; 2(2):880–887; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2017.2655559
30.
FrazelleCG, KapadiaAD, FryKE, et al.Teleoperation mappings from rigid link robots to their extensible continuum counterparts. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE: Stockholm, Sweden; 2016; pp. 4093–4100; doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487600
31.
CampisanoF, RemirezAA, LandeweeCA, et al.Teleoperation and contact detection of a waterjet-actuated soft continuum manipulator for low-cost gastroscopy. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020; 5(4):6427–6434; doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.3013900
32.
WeerakoonL, ChopraN. Bilateral teleoperation of soft robots under piecewise constant curvature hypothesis: An experimental investigation. In: 2020 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE: Denver, CO, USA; 2020; pp. 2124–2129; doi: 10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147323
33.
GarbinN, WangL, ChandlerJH, et al.Dual-continuum design approach for intuitive and low-cost upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2019; 66(7):1963–1974; doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2881717
34.
HubbardJD, AcevedoR, EdwardsKM, et al.Fully 3D-printed soft robots with integrated fluidic circuitry. Sci Adv, 2021; 7(29):eabe5257; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5257
35.
JiaoZ, ZhangC, WangW, et al.Advanced artificial muscle for flexible material-based reconfigurable soft robots. Adv Sci, 2019; 6(21):1901371; doi: 10.1002/advs.201901371
36.
TeepleCB, KoutrosTN, GrauleMA, et al.Multi-segment soft robotic fingers enable robust precision grasping. Int J Robot Res, 2020; 39(14):1647–1667; doi: 10.1177/0278364920910465
37.
BartlettNW, TolleyMT, OverveldeJTB, et al.A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science, 2015; 349(6244):161–165; doi: 10.1126/science.aab0129
38.
ShepherdRF, StokesAA, FreakeJ, et al.Using explosions to power a soft robot. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013; 52(10):2892–2896; doi: 10.1002/anie.201209540
39.
LoepfeM, SchumacherCM, LustenbergerUB, et al.An untethered, jumping roly-poly soft robot driven by combustion. Soft Robot, 2015; 2(1):33–41; doi: 10.1089/soro.2014.0021
40.
DrotmanD, JadhavS, SharpD, et al.Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling soft-legged robots. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(51):eaay2627; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aay2627
WangT, ZhangY, ZhuZ, et al.An electrohydraulic control device with decoupling effect for three-chamber soft actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2022; 27(3):1683–1691; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3087196
43.
KwokSW, MorinSA, MosadeghB, et al.Magnetic assembly of soft robots with hard components. Adv Funct Mater, 2014; 24(15):2180–2187; doi: 10.1002/adfm.201303047
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
