This article proposes a piezoelectric-driven insect-scale soft robot with ring-like curved legs, enabling it to traverse complex three-dimensional (3D) terrain only by body-terrain mechanical action. Relying on the repeated deformation of the main body's n and u shapes, the robot's leg-ground mechanical action produces an “elastic gait” to move. Regarding the detailed design, first, a theoretical curve of the front leg with a fixed angle of attack of 75° is designed by finite element simulation and comparative experiments. It ensures no increase in drag and no decrease in the lift when climbing steps. Second, a ring-like leg structure with 100% closed degree is proposed to ensure a smooth pass through small-sized uneven terrain without getting stuck. Then, the design of the overall asymmetrical structure of the robot can improve the conversion ratio of vibration to forward force. The shape of curved legs is controlled by pulling the flexible leg structure with two metal wires working as spokes. The semirigid leg structure made of fully flexible materials has shape stability and structural robustness. Compared with the plane-legged robot, the curved-legged robot can smoothly traverse different rugged 3D terrains and cross the terrain covering obstacles 0.36 times body height (BH) at a speed of >4 body lengths per second. Moreover, the curved-legged robot shows 100% and 64% chances of climbing steps with 1.2- and 1.9-times BH, respectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GrimaldiD, EngelM. Evolution of the Insects. J Insect Conserv, 2007; 11:211–212; doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9003-3
2.
BruzzoneL, QuagliaG. Review article: Locomotion systems for ground mobile robots in unstructured environments. Mechanical Sciences, 2012; 3(2):49–62; doi: 10.5194/ms-3-49-2012
3.
CullyA, CluneJ, TaraporeD, et al.Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature, 2015; 521(7553):503–507; doi: 10.1038/nature14422
4.
WallinTJ, PikulJ, ShepherdRF. 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat Rev Mater, 2018; 3(6):84–100; doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0002-2
5.
YangGZ, BellinghamJ, DupontPE, et al.The grand challenges of Science Robotics. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(14):14; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650
6.
AguilarJ, ZhangTN, QianFF, et al.A review on locomotion robophysics: The study of movement at the intersection of robotics, soft matter and dynamical systems. Rep Prog Phys, 2016; 79(11); doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/110001
7.
St. Pierre R, Bergbreiter S. Toward autonomy in sub-gram terrestrial robots. Ann Rev Control Robot Auton Syst, 2019; 2(1):231–252; doi: 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023814
8.
HuW, LumGZ, MastrangeliM, et al.Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature, 2018; 554(7690):81–85; doi: 10.1038/nature25443
9.
BartlettNW, TolleyMT, OverveldeJTB, et al.A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science, 2015; 349(6244):161–165; doi: 10.1126/science.aab0129
10.
ChenH, LiangJ, MiaoZ, et al.Elevation control of a soft jumping robot. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021; 11843–11849; doi: 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561676
11.
ZhakypovZ, MoriK, HosodaK, et al.Designing minimal and scalable insect-inspired multi-locomotion millirobots. Nature, 2019; 571(7765):381–386; doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1388-8
12.
ZhaoJ, ZhangJ, McCOulD, et al. Soft and fast hopping–running robot with speed of six times its body length per second. 2019;6(6):713–721. doi: 10.1089/soro.2018.0098.
13.
ShepherdRF, IlievskiF, ChoiW, et al.Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011; 108(51):20400–20403; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116564108
14.
de RivazSD, GoldbergB, DoshiN, et al.Inverted and vertical climbing of a quadrupedal microrobot using electroadhesion. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(25); doi: ARTN eaau3038 10.1126/scirobotics.aau3038
15.
BlaesingB, CruseH. Stick insect locomotion in a complex environment: Climbing over large gaps. J Exp Biol, 2004; 207(8):1273–1286; doi: 10.1242/jeb.00888
16.
ChangMH, ChaeSH, YooHJ, et al.Loco-sheet: Morphing Inchworm Robot Across Rough-terrain. 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), 2019; 808–813; doi: 10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722724
17.
WangX, YangBS, TanD, et al.Bioinspired footed soft robot with unidirectional all-terrain mobility. Mater Today, 2020; 35:42–49; doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.12.028
18.
RogozM, ZengH, XuanC, et al.Light-driven soft robot mimics caterpillar locomotion in natural scale. Adv Optical Mater, 2016; 4(11):1689–1694; doi: 10.1002/adom.201600503
19.
AhnC, LiangX, CaiS. Bioinspired design of light-powered crawling, squeezing, and jumping untethered soft robot. Adv Mater Technol, 2019; 4(7):1900185; doi: 10.1002/admt.201900185
20.
SeokS, OnalCD, ChoKJ, et al.Meshworm: A peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2013; 18(5):1485–1497; doi: 10.1109/tmech.2012.2204070
21.
WangX, MaoG, GeJ, et al.Untethered and ultrafast soft-bodied robots. Commun Mater, 2020; 1(1):67; doi: 10.1038/s43246-020-00067-1
22.
LuH, ZhangM, YangY, et al.A bioinspired multilegged soft millirobot that functions in both dry and wet conditions. Nat Commun, 2018; 9:3944; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06491-9
23.
ShahDS, PowersJP, TiltonLG, et al.A soft robot that adapts to environments through shape change. Nat Mach Intell, 2020; doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00263-1
24.
ZhangS, KeX, JiangQ, et al.Programmable and reprocessable multifunctional elastomeric sheets for soft origami robots. Sci Robot, 2021; 6:eabd6107; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abd6107
25.
JayaramK, MongeauJM, MohapatraA, et al.Transition by head-on collision: Mechanically mediated manoeuvres in cockroaches and small robots. J R Soc Interface, 2018; 15(139); doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0664
26.
ScarfoglieroU, StefaniniC, DarioP, et al. Bioinspired jumping robot with elastic actuators and passive forelegs. In: 2006 1st Ieee Ras-Embs International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Vol. 1–3. 2006; pp. 343–+.
27.
SchiebelPE, RieserJM, HubbardAM, et al.Mechanical diffraction reveals the role of passive dynamics in a slithering snake. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019; 116(11):4798–4803; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808675116
28.
BirkmeyerP, PetersonK, FearingRS. DASH: A dynamic 16g hexapedal robot. 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2009; 2683–2689; doi: 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354561
29.
GartSW, LiC. Body-terrain interaction affects large bump traversal of insects and legged robots. Bioinspir Biomim, 2018; 13(2):026005; doi: ARTN 026005 10.1088/1748-3190/aaa2d0
30.
GartSW, YanCX, OthayothR, et al.Dynamic traversal of large gaps by insects and legged robots reveals a template. Bioinspir Biomim, 2018; 13(2):026006; doi: ARTN 026006 10.1088/1748-3190/aaa2cd
31.
LiC, ZhangTN, GoldmanDI. A terradynamics of legged locomotion on granular media. Science, 2013; 339(6126):1408–1412; doi: 10.1126/science.1229163
32.
ZhangTN, QianFF, LiC, et al.Ground fluidization promotes rapid running of a lightweight robot. Int J Robot Res, 2013; 32(7):859–869; doi: 10.1177/0278364913481690
33.
LiC, PullinAO, HaldaneDW, et al.Terradynamically streamlined shapes in animals and robots enhance traversability through densely cluttered terrain. Bioinspir Biomim, 2015; 10(4):046003; doi: 10.1088/1748–3190/10/4/046003
34.
MiJ, WangY, LiC. Omni-Roach: A legged robot capable of traversing multiple types of large obstacles and self-righting. 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2022; 235–242; doi: 10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811372
35.
WuY, HoKY, KariyaK, et al.Pre-curved PVDF/PI unimorph structures for biomimic soft crawling actuators. In: 2018 IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Belfast, Northern Ireland, 2018; pp. 581–584; doi: 10.1109/MEMSYS.2018.8346620
36.
WuYC, YimJK, LiangJM, et al.Insect-scale fast moving and ultrarobust soft robot. Sci Robot, 2019; 4(32):9; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aax1594
37.
LiangJM, WuYCA, YimJK, et al.Electrostatic footpads enable agile insect-scale soft robots with trajectory control. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(55):11; doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abe7906
38.
LiangJ, WuY, ShaoZ, et al.Manipulating the moving trajectory of insect-scale piezoelectric soft robots by frequency. In: 2019 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Seoul, South Korea, 2019; pp. 1041–1044; doi: 10.1109/MEMSYS.2019.8870751
39.
ByrnesG, JayneBC. The effects of three-dimensional gap orientation on bridging performance and behavior of brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis). J Exp Biol, 2012; 215(15):2611–2620; doi: 10.1242/jeb.064576
40.
LiljebäckP, PettersenKY,Stavdahl Ø, et al. Snake robot locomotion in environments with obstacles. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech, 2012; 17:1158–1169; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2011.2159863
41.
FuQY, LiC. Robotic modelling of snake traversing large, smooth obstacles reveals stability benefits of body compliance. R Soc Open Sci, 2020; 7(2):14; doi: 10.1098/rsos.191192
42.
RameshD, FuQ, LiCJA. SenSnake: A snake robot with contact force sensing for studying locomotion in complex 3-D terrain. 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2022; 2068–2075; doi: 10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812159
43.
FuQ, LiC. Snake robot traversing large obstacles using vertical bending with force feedback. ArXiv abs/2112.07815 2021.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
