Soft robots aim to revolutionize how robotic systems interact with the environment thanks to their inherent compliance. Some of these systems are even able to modulate their physical softness. However, simply equipping a robot with softness will not generate intelligent behaviors. Indeed, most interaction tasks require careful specification of the compliance at the interaction point; some directions must be soft and others firm (e.g., while drawing, entering a hole, tracing a surface, assembling components). On the contrary, without careful planning, the preferential directions of deformation of a soft robot are not aligned with the task. With this work, we propose a strategy to prescribe variations of the physical stiffness and the robot's posture so to implement a desired Cartesian stiffness and location of the contact point. We validate the algorithm in simulation and with experiments. To perform the latter, we also present a new tendon-driven soft manipulator, equipped with variable-stiffness segments and proprioceptive sensing and capable to move in three dimensional. We show that, combining the intelligent hardware with the proposed algorithm, we can obtain the desired stiffness at the end-effector over the workspace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Della SantinaC, CatalanoMG, BicchiA, et al.Soft robots. In: Encyclopedia of Robotics, Volume 489. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg;. 2020.
2.
KimS, LaschiC, TrimmerB. Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends Biotechnol, 2013; 31(5):287–294.
3.
HoganN.Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part II—Implementation. J Dyn Sys Meas Control, 1985; 107(1):8–16.
4.
WolfS, GrioliG, EibergerO, et al.Variable stiffness actuators: Review on design and components. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatr, 2015; 21(5):2418–2430.
5.
RanzaniT, GerboniG, CianchettiM, MenciassiA. A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. Bioinspir Biomim, 2015; 10(3):035008.
6.
BabuSM, SadeghiA, MondiniA, MazzolaiB. Antagonistic pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness for soft robotic applications. In: International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE; 2019; pp. 283–288.
7.
KimYK, ChengS, KimS, IagnemmaK. A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans Robot, 2013; 29(4):1031–1042.
8.
Della SantinaC, DuriezC, RusD. Model based control of soft robots: A survey of the state of the art and open challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01358; 2021.
9.
BernJM, RusD. Soft IK with stiffness control. In: 4th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE; 2021; pp. 465–471.
10.
SuT, NiuL, HeG, et al.Coordinated variable impedance control for multi-segment cable-driven continuum manipulators. Mech Mach Theory,, 2020; 153:103969.
11.
MaghooaF, StilliA, NohY, et al. Tendon and pressure actuation for a bio-inspired manipulator based on an antagonistic principle. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2015; pp. 2556–2561.
12.
ShivaA, StilliA, NohY, et al.Tendon-based stiffening for a pneumatically actuated soft manipulator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2016; 1(2):632–637.
ChengNG, GopinathA, WangL, et al Thermally tunable, self-healing composites for soft robotic applications. Macromol Mater Eng 2014;299(11):1279–1284.
15.
ShanW, LuT, MajidiC. Soft-matter composites with electrically tunable elastic rigidity. Smart Mater Struct, 2013; 22(8):085005.
16.
ChoiJ, LeeDY, EoJH, et al.Tendon-driven jamming mechanism for configurable variable stiffness. Soft Robot, 2021; 8(1):109–118.
17.
GillespieMT, BestCM, KillpackMD. Simultaneous position and stiffness control for an inflatable soft robot. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2016; pp. 1095–1101.
18.
StölzleM, Della SantinaC. Piston-driven pneumatically-actuated soft robots: Modeling and backstepping control. IEEE Control Syst Lett, 2021; 6:1837–1842.
19.
AnsariY, MantiM, FaloticoE, et al.Multiobjective optimization for stiffness and position control in a soft robot arm module. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2017; 3(1):108–115.
20.
BestCM, RupertL, KillpackMD. Comparing model-based control methods for simultaneous stiffness and position control of inflatable soft robots. Int J Robot Res, 2021; 40(1):470–493.
21.
SalisburyJK. Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates. In: 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes. IEEE; 1980; pp. 95–100.
22.
AjoudaniA.Exploring the roles of common mode stiffness (CMS) and configuration dependent stiffness (CDS) control. In: Transferring Human Impedance Regulation Skills to Robots. Springer: Cham, Switzerland; 2016; pp. 47–58.
23.
PeternelL, BeckersN, AbbinkDA. Independently commanding size, shape and orientation of robot endpoint stiffness in tele-impedance by virtual ellipsoid interface. In: 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). IEEE; 2021; pp. 99–106.
24.
PittEB, SimaanN, BarthEJ. An investigation of stiffness modulation limits in a pneumatically actuated parallel robot with actuation redundancy. In: Fluid Power Systems Technology, Volume 57236. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2015; p. V001T01A063.
25.
OrekhovAL, SimaanN. Directional stiffness modulation of parallel robots with kinematic redundancy and variable stiffness joints. J Mech Robot, 2019; 11(5):051003.
26.
RiceJJ, SchimmelsJM. Passive compliance control of redundant serial manipulators. J Mech Robot, 2018; 10(4):044507.
27.
PashkevichA, KlimchikA, CaroS, ChablatD. Cartesian stiffness matrix of manipulators with passive joints: analytical approach. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE; 2011; pp. 4034–4041.
28.
MetzgerMF, Faruk SenanNA, O'ReillyOM. On cartesian stiffness matrices in rigid body dynamics: An energetic perspective. Multibody Syst Dyn, 2010; 24(4):441–472.
29.
OttC.Cartesian Impedance Control of Redundant and Flexible-Joint Robots. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg;. 2008.
30.
AjoudaniA, TsagarakisNG, BicchiA. On the role of robot configuration in cartesian stiffness control. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2015; pp. 1010–1016.
31.
CiblakN, LipkinH. Synthesis of cartesian stiffness for robotic application. In: Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 99CH36288C), Volume 3. IEEE: Detroit, MI, USA; 1999; pp. 2147–2152.
32.
PetitF, Albu-SchäfferA. Cartesian impedance control for a variable stiffness robot arm. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE; 2011; pp. 4180–4186.
33.
Albu-SchafferA, FischerM, SchreiberG, et al. Soft robotics: What cartesian stiffness can obtain with passively compliant, uncoupled joints? In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), Volume 4. IEEE; 2004; pp. 3295–3301.
34.
Della SantinaC, BicchiA, RusD, On an improved state parametrization for soft robots with piecewise constant curvature and its use in model based control. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2020;5(2):1001–1008.
35.
Albu-SchafferA, HirzingerG. Cartesian impedance control techniques for torque controlled light-weight robots. In: Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 02CH37292), Volume 1. IEEE; 2002; pp. 657–663.
36.
KingstonZ, MollM, KavrakiLE. Exploring implicit spaces for constrained sampling-based planning. Int J Robot Res, 2019; 38(10–11):1151–1178.
37.
RheinboldtWC.Manpak: A set of algorithms for computations on implicitly defined manifolds. Comput Math Appl, 1996; 32(12):15–28.
38.
PetitF. Analysis and control of variable stiffness robots. PhD Dissertation, ETH-Zürich, 2014.
39.
ZachariasF, BorstC, HirzingerG, Capturing robot workspace structure: Representing robot capabilities. In: 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE; 2007; pp. 3229–3236.
40.
MüllerI, StrehlowP. Rubber and Rubber Balloons: Paradigms of Thermodynamics, Volume 637. Springer. Science & Business Media: Berlin, Heidelberg;. 2004.
41.
Oliver-ButlerK, TillJ, RuckerC. Continuum robot stiffness under external loads and prescribed tendon displacements. IEEE Trans Robot, 2019; 35(2):403–419.
42.
HughesJ, StellaF, SantinaCD, RusD. Sensing soft robot shape using imus: An experimental investigation. In: Experimental Robotics. (Siciliano B, Laschi C, Khatib O. eds.) Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; 2021; pp. 543–552.
43.
HannanMW, WalkerID. Kinematics and the implementation of an elephant's trunk manipulator and other continuum style robots. J Robot Syst, 2003; 20(2):45–63.
44.
SimaanN, TaylorR, FlintP. A dexterous system for laryngeal surgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Volume 1. Proceedings ICRA’04. IEEE; 2004; pp. 351–357.
45.
GodageIS, BransonDT, GuglielminoE, et al. Shape function-based kinematics and dynamics for variable length continuum robotic arms. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE; 2011; pp. 452–457.
46.
MilanaE, StellaF, GorissenB, et al. Model-based control can improve the performance of artificial cilia. In: 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE; 2021; pp. 527–530.
47.
KatzschmannRK, Della SantinaC, ToshimitsuY, et al. Dynamic motion control of multi-segment soft robots using piecewise constant curvature matched with an augmented rigid body model. In: 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE; 2019; pp. 454–461.
48.
Della SantinaC, BicchiA, RusD. Dynamic control of soft robots with internal constraints in the presence of obstacles. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2019; pp. 6622–6629.
49.
Webster IIIRJ, JonesBA. Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: A review. Int J Robot Res, 2010; 29(13):1661–1683.
50.
JonesBA, WalkerID. Kinematics for multisection continuum robots. IEEE Trans Robot, 2006; 22(1):43–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
