Current aerial robots demonstrate limited interaction capabilities in unstructured environments when compared with their biological counterparts. Some examples include their inability to tolerate collisions and to successfully land or perch on objects of unknown shapes, sizes, and texture. Efforts to include compliance have introduced designs that incorporate external mechanical impact protection at the cost of reduced agility and flight time due to the added weight. In this work, we propose and develop a lightweight, inflatable, soft-bodied aerial robot (SoBAR) that can pneumatically vary its body stiffness to achieve intrinsic collision resilience. Unlike the conventional rigid aerial robots, SoBAR successfully demonstrates its ability to repeatedly endure and recover from collisions in various directions, not only limited to in-plane ones. Furthermore, we exploit its capabilities to demonstrate perching where the three-dimensional collision resilience helps in improving the perching success rates. We also augment SoBAR with a novel hybrid fabric-based bistable (HFB) grasper that can utilize impact energies to perform contact-reactive grasping through rapid shape conforming abilities. We exhaustively study and offer insights into the collision resilience, impact absorption, and manipulation capabilities of SoBAR with the HFB grasper. Finally, we compare the performance of conventional aerial robots with the SoBAR through collision characterizations, grasping identifications, and experimental validations of collision resilience and perching in various scenarios and on differently shaped objects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DankoTW, KellasA, OhPY. Robotic rotorcraft and perch-and-stare: Sensing landing zones and handling obscurants. IEEE Int Conf Adv Robot, 2005; 296–302:2005.
2.
MengJ, BuzzattoJ, LiuY, et al.On aerial robots with grasping and perching capabilities: A comprehensive review. Front Robot AI, 2022; 8:739173.
3.
RuggieroF, LippielloV. Aerial manipulation: A literature review. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018; 3(3):1957–1964.
4.
KovačM, GermannJ, HürzelerC, et al.A perching mechanism for micro aerial vehicles. J Micro-Nano Mechatron, 2009; 5(3):77–91.
5.
SittiM. Physical intelligence as a new paradigm. Extreme Mech Lett, 2021; 46:101340.
6.
HangK, LyuX, SongH, et al.Perching and resting—A paradigm for UAV maneuvering with modularized landing gears. Sci Robot, 2019; 6637:1–11.
7.
NguyenPH, Kovač M. Adopting physical artificial intelligence in soft aerial robots. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2022; 1261:012006.
8.
CoryR, TedrakeR. Experiments in fixed-wing UAV perching. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Honolulu, Hawaii; 2008; pp. 1–12.
9.
MooreJ, TedrakeR. Control synthesis and verification for a perching uav using lqr-trees. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Grand Wailea. Maui, HI; 2012; pp. 3707–3714.
10.
ThomasJ, LoiannoG, PopeM, et al.Planning and control of aggressive maneuvers for perching on inclined and vertical surfaces. Int Des Eng Tech Conf Comput Inf Eng Conf. 2015; 57144:V05CT08A012.
11.
DoyleCE, BirdJJ, IsomTA, et al.An avian-inspired passive mechanism for quadrotor perching. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2013; 18(2):506–517.
12.
WatsonM. The mechanism of perching in birds. J Anat Physiol, 1869; 3(Pt 2):379.
13.
ChiW, LowKH, HoonKH, et al.An optimized perching mechanism for autonomous perching with a quadrotor. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Hong Kong, China; 2014; pp. 3109–3115.
14.
QuinnTH, BaumelJJ. The digital tendon locking mechanism of the avian foot (aves). Zoomorphology, 1990; 109:281–293.
15.
HyzerWG. Flight behavior of a fly alighting on a ceiling. Science, 1962; 137(3530):609–610.
16.
ErbilMA, PriorSD, KeaneAJ. Design optimisation of a reconfigurable perching element for vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicles. Int J Micro Air Veh, 2013; 5(3):207–228.
17.
ThomasJ, LoiannoG, PolinJ, et al.Toward autonomous avian-inspired grasping for micro aerial vehicles. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2014; 9(2):025010.
18.
StewartW, GuarinoL, PiskarevY, et al.Passive perching with energy storage for winged aerial robots. Adv Intell Syst, 2021; 2100150.
19.
RoderickW, CutkoskyM, LentinkD. Bird-inspired dynamic grasping and perching in arboreal environments. Sci Robot, 2021; 6(61):eabj7562.
20.
KirchgeorgS, MintchevS. Hedgehog: Drone perching on tree branches with high-friction origami spines. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2021; 7(1):602–609.
21.
Sedaghat-PishehH, RiveraAR, BiazS, et al.Collision avoidance algorithms for unmanned aerial vehicles using computer vision. J Comput Sci Coll, 2017; 33(2):191–197.
22.
SpasojevicI, MuraliV, KaramanS. Perception-aware time optimal path parameterization for quadrotors. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2020; pp. 3213–3219.
23.
PatnaikK, ZhangW. Towards reconfigurable and flexible multirotors. Int J Intell Robot Appl, 2021; 5(3):365–380.
24.
BuckiN, MuellerMW. Design and control of a passively morphing quadcopter. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal, Canada; 2019; pp. 9116–9122.
25.
MintchevS, de RivazS, FloreanoD. Insect-inspired mechanical resilience for multicopters. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2017; 2(3):1248–1255.
26.
DilaveroğluL, ÖzcanO. Minicore: A miniature, foldable, collision resilient quadcopter. In: IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics. 2020; pp. 176–181.
27.
PatnaikK, MishraS, ChaseZ, et al.Collision recovery control of a foldable quadrotor. In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Delft, Netherlands; 2021; pp. 418–423.
28.
PatnaikK, MishraS, SorkhabadiSMR, et al.Design and control of squeeze: A spring-augmented quadrotor for interactions with the environment to squeeze-and-fly. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Las Vegas, USA; 2020; pp. 1364–1370.
29.
LiuZ, KarydisK. Toward impact-resilient quadrotor design, collision characterization and recovery control to sustain flight after collisions. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE: Xi'an, China; 2021; pp. 183–189.
30.
SarehP, ChermprayongP, EmmanuelliM, et al.Rotorigami: A rotary origami protective system for robotic rotorcraft. Sci Robot, 2018; 5228(September):1–13.
31.
KlaptoczA, BriodA, DalerL, et al.Euler spring collision protection for flying robots. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IEEE: Tokyo, Japan; 2013; pp. 1886–1892.
32.
SavinS, Al BadrA, DevittD, et al.Mixed-integer-based path and morphing planning for a tensegrity drone. Appl Sci, 2022; 12(11):5588.
33.
MintchevS, ZappettiD, WilleminJ, et al.A soft robot for random exploration of terrestrial environments. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE: Brisbane, Australia; 2018; pp. 7492–7497.
34.
ZhaJ, WuX, KroegerJ, et al.A collision-resilient aerial vehicle with icosahedron tensegrity structure. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: Las Vegas, USA; 2020; pp. 1407–1412.
35.
BriodA, KornatowskiP, ZuffereyJ-C, et al.A collision-resilient flying robot. J Field Robot, 2014; 31(4):496–509.
36.
HedayatiH, SuzukiR, LeithingerD, et al.Pufferbot: Actuated expandable structures for aerial robots. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Las Vegas, USA; 2020; pp. 1338–1343.
37.
CoyleS, MajidiC, LeDucP, et al.Bio-inspired soft robotics: Material selection, actuation, and design. Extreme Mech Lett, 2018; 22:51–59.
38.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015; 521(7553):467–475.
39.
LaschiC, MazzolaiB, CianchettiM. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci Robot, 2016; 1(1):eaah3690.
40.
FloreanoD, WoodRJ. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature, 2015; 521(7553):460–466.
Di LucaM, MintchevS, HeitzG, et al.Bioinspired morphing wings for extended flight envelope and roll control of small drones. Interface focus, 2017; 7(1):20160092.
43.
DalerL, MintchevS, StefaniniC, et al.A bioinspired multi-modal flying and walking robot. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2015; 10(1):016005.
44.
JafferisNT, HelblingEF, KarpelsonM, et al.Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle. Nature, 2019; 570(7762):491–495.
45.
NguyenDQ, LoiannoG, et al. Towards design of a deformable propeller for drone safety. In: IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics. 2020; pp. 464–469.
46.
ShintakeJ, RossetS, SchubertBE, et al.A foldable antagonistic actuator. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2015; 20(5):1997–2008.
47.
TonazziniA, MintchevS, SchubertB, et al.Variable stiffness fiber with self-healing capability. Adv Mater, 2016; 28(46):10142–10148.
48.
RamezaniA, ChungS-J, HutchinsonS. A biomimetic robotic platform to study flight specializations of bats. Sci Robot, 2017; 2(3):Art–No.
KimS-J, LeeD-Y, JungG-P, et al.An origami-inspired, self-locking robotic arm that can be folded flat. Sci Robot, 2018; 3(16):eaar2915.
51.
MironG, BédardB, PlanteJ-S. Sleeved bending actuators for soft grippers: A durable solution for high force-to-weight applications. Actuators, 2018; 7(3):40.
52.
LeeD-J, JungG-P. Snatcher: A highly mobile chameleon-inspired shooting and rapidly retracting manipulator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2020; 5(4):6097–6104.
53.
LiH, YaoJ, WeiC, et al.An untethered soft robotic gripper with high payload-to-weight ratio. Mech Mach Theory, 2021; 158:104226.
54.
KovacM. Learning from nature how to land aerial robots. Sci Robot, 2016; 352(6288):895–896.
55.
ZhangK, ZhuY, LouC, et al.A design and fabrication approach for pneumatic soft robotic arms using 3D printed origami skeletons. In: IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics. Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2019; pp. 821–827.
56.
NguyenH-N, SiddallR, StephensB, et al.A passively adaptive microspine grapple for robust, controllable perching. In: IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics. Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2019; pp. 80–87.
57.
RubialesFJG, SoriaPR, ArrueBC, et al.Soft-tentacle gripper for pipe crawling to inspect industrial facilities using UAVs. Sensors, 2021; 21:4142. June.
58.
FishmanJ, UbellackerS, HughesN, et al.Dynamic grasping with a “soft” drone: From theory to practice. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Prague, Czech Republic; 2021; pp. 4214–4221.
59.
SullivanTN, WangB, EspinosaHD, et al.Extreme lightweight structures: Avian feathers and bones. Mater Today, 2017; 20(7):377–391.
60.
NovitskayaE, RuestesCJ, PorterM, et al.Reinforcements in avian wing bones: Experiments, analysis, and modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017; 76:85–96.
61.
NguyenPH, ZhangW. Design and computational modeling of fabric soft pneumatic actuators for wearable assistive devices. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):1–13.
62.
SridarS, NguyenPH, ZhuM, et al.Development of a soft-inflatable exosuit for knee rehabilitation. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vancouver, Canada; 2017; pp. 3722–3727.
63.
SridarS, QiaoZ, MuthukrishnanN, et al.A soft-inflatable exosuit for knee rehabilitation: Assisting swing phase during walking. Front Robot AI, 2018; 5:44.
64.
SananS, MoidelJB, AtkesonCG. Robots with inflatable links. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE: St. Louis, MO, USA; 2009;pp. 4331–4336.
65.
HowellLL. Compliant mechanisms. In: 21st Century Kinematics. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; 2013; pp. 189–216.
66.
LeeT, LeokM, McClamrochNH. Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor uav on se (3). In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2010; pp. 5420–5425.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
