A lightweight soft gripper for envelope grasping is proposed. The main component of the gripper is a spherical latex superelastic membrane whose material properties allow a grabbing function to be realized. The grasping process includes the expansion and tightening of the membrane, and it does not require a constant supply of energy. The geometric relationship between the actuator and the target object are analyzed, from which a gripping force model is deduced to estimate the grasping ability. A test-rig was designed to verify the gripping force model experimentally. The gripper can inherently realize shape adaptability and safety. It is easy to manipulate and control for beginners. Moreover, an actuator of only 50 g can grasp and lift various objects, including fragile and irregularly shaped items with a maximum mass >650 g.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CaseJC, WhiteEL, KramerRK. Soft material characterization for robotic applications. Soft Robot, 2015; 2:80–87.
2.
GardanJ.Smart materials in additive manufacturing: state of the art and trends. Virtual Phys Prototy, 2019; 14:1–18.
3.
WallinTJ, PikulJ, ShepherdRF. 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat Rev Mater, 2018; 3:84–100.
4.
KhareV, SonkariaS, LeeGY, et al.From 3D to 4D printing-design, material and fabrication for multi-functional multi-materials. Int J Pr Eng Man-GT, 2017; 4:291–299.
5.
Soreni-HarariM, St PierreR, McCueC, et al.Multimaterial 3D printing for microrobotic mechanisms. Soft Robot, 2020; 7:59–67.
6.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015; 521:467–475.
7.
LaschiC, MazzolaiB, CianchettiM. Soft robotics: technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci Robot, 2016; 1:eaah3690.
8.
WhitesidesGM.Soft robotics. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018; 57:4258–4273.
9.
TaiK, El-SayedAR, ShahriariM, et al.State of the art robotic grippers and applications. Robotics, 2016; 5:11.
10.
SongS, SittiM. Soft grippers using micro-fibrillar adhesives for transfer printing. Adv Mater, 2014; 26:4901–4906.
11.
SongS, DrotlefDM, PalkJ, et al.Mechanics of a pressure-controlled adhesive membrane for soft robotic gripping on curved surfaces. Extr Mech Lett, 2019; 30:100485.
12.
KrahnJM, FabbroF, MenonC. A soft-touch gripper for grasping delicate objects. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2017; 22:1276–1286.
13.
MosadeghB, PolygerinosP, KeplingerC, et al.Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv Funct Mater, 2014; 24:2163–2170.
14.
DeimelR, BrockO. A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping. Int J Robot Res, 2016; 35:161–185.
15.
GuptaA, EppnerC, LevineS, et al.Learning dexterous manipulation for a soft robotic hand from human demonstrations. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), October 9–14, 2016, Daejeon, South Korea. New York, NY: IEEE,, 2016:3786–3793.
16.
HuWP, AliciG. Bioinspired three-dimensional-printed helical soft pneumatic actuators and their characterization. Soft Robot, 2020; 7:267–282.
17.
AmaseH, NishiokaY, YasudaT. Mechanism and basic characteristics of a helical inflatable gripper. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Beijing, China, August 2–5, 2015, 2559–2564.
18.
UppalapatiNK, KrishnanG. Towards pneumatic spiral grippers: modeling and design considerations. Soft Robot, 2018; 5:695–709.
19.
ShepherdRF, StokesAA, NunesRMD, et al.Soft machines that are resistant to puncture and that self seal. Adv Mater, 2013; 25:6709–6713.
20.
ZhongGL, HouYD, DouWQ. A soft pneumatic dexterous gripper with convertible grasping modes. Int J Mech Sci, 2019; 153:445–456,
21.
BrownE, RodenbergN, AmendJ, et al.Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2010; 107:18809–18814.
22.
AmendJR, BrownE, RodenbergN, et al.A positive pressure universal gripper based on the jamming of granular material. IEEE Trans Robot, 2012; 28:341–350.
23.
MantiM, HassanT, PassettiG, et al.A bioinspired soft robotic gripper for adaptable and effective grasping. Soft Robot, 2015; 2:107–116.
24.
MutluR, AliciG, PanhuisMIH, et al.3D printed flexure hinges for soft monolithic prosthetic fingers. Soft Robot, 2016; 3:120–133.
25.
TanN, GuXY, RenHL. Design, characterization and applications of a novel soft actuator driven by flexible shafts. Mech Mach Theory, 2018; 122:197–218.
26.
KimHI, HanMW, SongSH, et al.Soft morphing hand driven by SMA tendon wire. Compost Part B-Eng, 2016; 105:138–148.
27.
WangW, AhnSH. Shape memory alloy-based soft gripper with variable stiffness for compliant and effective grasping. Soft Robot, 2017; 4:379–389.
28.
SheY, ChenJ, ShiHL, et al.Modeling and validation of a novel bending actuator for soft robotics applications. Soft Robot, 2016; 3:71–81.
29.
KofodG, WirgesW, PaajanenM, et al.Energy minimization for self-organized structure formation and actuation. Appl Phys Lett, 2007; 90:081916.
30.
Bar-CohenY, XueT, ShahinpoorM, et al.Flexible, low-mass robotic arm actuated by electroactive polymers and operated equivalently to human arm and hand. In: 3rd ASCE Speciality Conference on Robotics for Challenging Environments (Robotics 98), Albuquerque, NM, April 26–30, 1998, 15–21.
31.
SinatraNR, TeepleCB, VogtDM, et al.Ultragentle manipulation of delicate structures using a soft robotic gripper. Sci Robot, 2019; 4:eaax5425.
32.
WangYZ, GuptaU, ParulekarN, et al.A soft gripper of fast speed and low energy consumption. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019; 62:31–38.
33.
FuH, ZhangWZ. The development of a soft robot hand with pin-array structure. Appl Sci-Basel, 2019; 9:1011.
34.
AzmiNN, Ab PatarMNA, NoorSNAM, et al.Testing standards assessment for silicone rubber. 1st International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), Bandung, Indonesia, May 27–29, 2014, 332–336.
35.
OgdenRW.Large deformation isotropic elasticity—on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1972; 326:565–584.
36.
StuartH, WangS, KhatibO, et al.The ocean one hands: an adaptive design for robust marine manipulation. Int J Robot Res, 2017; 36:150–166.
37.
GallowayKC, BeckerKP, PhillipsB, et al.Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robot, 2016; 3:23–33.
38.
WeiY, ChenYH, RenT, et al.A novel, variable stiffness robotic gripper based on integrated soft actuating and particle jamming. Soft Robot, 2016; 3:134–143.
39.
ShintakeJ, RossetS, SchubertB, et al.Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. Adv Mater, 2016; 28:231–238.
40.
SheY, LiC, ClearyJ, et al.Design and fabrication of a soft robotic hand with embedded actuators and sensors. J Mech Robot, 2015; 7:021007.
41.
ChenR, SongRZ, ZhangZ, et al.Bio-inspired shape-adaptive soft robotic grippers augmented with electroadhesion functionality. Soft Robot, 2019; 6:701–712.
42.
LiHL, YaoJT, ZhouP, et al.High-load soft grippers based on bionic winding effect. Soft Robot, 2019; 6:276–288.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
