Within the field of robotics, stiffness tuning technologies have potential for a variety of applications—perhaps most notably for robotic grasping. Many stiffness tuning grippers have been developed that can grasp fragile or irregularly shaped objects without causing damage and while still accommodating large loads. In addition to limiting gripper deformation when lifting an object, increasing gripper stiffness after contact formation improves load sharing at the interface and enhances adhesion. In this study, we present a novel stiffness and adhesion tuning gripper, enabled by the thermally induced phase change of a thermoplastic composite material embedded within a silicone contact pad. The gripper operates by bringing the pad into contact with an object while in its heated, soft state, and then allowing the pad to cool and stiffen to form a strong adhesive bond before lifting the object. Pull-off tests conducted using the gripper show that transitioning from a soft to stiff state during grasping enables up to 6 × increase in adhesion strength. Additionally, a finite element model is developed to simulate the behavior of the gripper. Finally, pick-and-place demonstrations are performed, which highlight the gripper's ability to delicately grasp objects of various shapes, sizes, and weights.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MantiM, CacuccioloV, CianchettiM. Stiffening in soft robotics: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Rob Autom Mag, 2016; 23:93–106.
2.
WangL, YangY, ChenY, et al.Controllable and reversible tuning of material rigidity for robot applications. Mater Today, 2018; 21:563–576.
BrownE, RodenbergN, AmendJ, et al.Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010; 107:18809–18814.
5.
AmendJR, BrownE, RodenbergN, et al.A positive pressure universal gripper based on the jamming of granular material. IEEE Trans Robot, 2012; 28:341–350.
6.
CianchettiM, RanzaniT, GerboniG, et al.Stiff-flop surgical manipulator: mechanical design and experimental characterization of the single module. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, 2013, pp. 3576–3581.
7.
WeiY, ChenY, RenT, et al.A novel, variable stiffness robotic gripper based on integrated soft actuating and particle jamming. Soft Robot, 2016; 3:134–143.
8.
MizushimaK, OkuT, SuzukiY, et al.Multifingered robotic hand based on hybrid mechanism of tendon-driven and jamming transition. In: IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE, 2018, pp. 376–381.
9.
CaoC, ZhaoX. Tunable stiffness of electrorheological elastomers by designing mesostructures. Appl Phys Lett, 2013; 103:041901.
10.
PetterssonA, DavisS, GrayJO, et al.Design of a magnetorheological robot gripper for handling of delicate food products with varying shapes. J Food Eng, 2010; 98:332–338.
11.
EisenhaureJD, XieT, VargheseS, et al.Microstructured shape memory polymer surfaces with reversible dry adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013; 5:7714–7717.
12.
McCoulD, RossetS, BesseN, et al.Multifunctional shape memory electrodes for dielectric elastomer actuators enabling high holding force and low-voltage multisegment addressing. Smart Mater Struct, 2016; 26:025015.
13.
WangW, AhnS-H. Shape memory alloy-based soft gripper with variable stiffness for compliant and effective grasping. Soft Robot, 2017; 4:379–389.
14.
BucknerTL, WhiteEL, YuenMC, et al.A move-and-hold pneumatic actuator enabled by self-softening variable stiffness materials. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 3728–3733.
15.
YangY, ChenY, LiY, et al.Novel variablestiffness robotic fingers with built-in position feedback. Soft Robot, 2017; 4:338–352.
16.
FirouzehA, SalernoM, PaikJ. Stiffness control with shape memory polymer in underactuated robotic origamis. IEEE Trans Robot, 2017; 33:765–777.
17.
HaoY, LiuZ, LiuJ, et al.A soft gripper with programmable effective length, tactile and curvature sensory feedback. Smart Mater Struct, 2020; 29:035006.
18.
KrahnJ, SameotoD, MenonC. Controllable biomimetic adhesion using embedded phase change material. Smart Mater Struct, 2010; 20:015014.
19.
ChengNG, GopinathA, WangL, et al.Thermally tunable, self-healing composites for soft robotic applications. Macromol Mater Eng, 2014; 299:1279–1284.
20.
BalasubramanianA, StandishM, BettingerCJ. Microfluidic thermally activated materials for rapid control of macroscopic compliance. Adv Funct Mater, 2014; 24:4860–4866.
21.
WangL, CulhaU, IidaF. A dragline-forming mobile robot inspired by spiders. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2014; 9:016006.
22.
Andy McEvoyM, CorrellN. Thermoplastic variable stiffness composites with embedded, networked sensing, actuation, and control. J Compos Mater, 2015; 49:1799–1808.
23.
RichS, JangS-H, ParkY-L, et al.Liquid metal-conductive thermoplastic elastomer integration for low-voltage stiffness tuning. Adv Mater Technol, 2017; 2:1700179.
24.
ShanW, DillerS, TutcuogluA, et al.Rigidity-tuning conductive elastomer. Smart Mater Struct, 2015; 24:065001.
25.
Mohammadi NasabA, SabzehzarA, TatariM, et al.A soft gripper with rigidity tunable elastomer strips as ligaments. Soft Robot, 2017; 4:411–420.
26.
TatariM, Mohammadi NasabA, TurnerKT, et al.Dynamically tunable dry adhesion via subsurface stiffness modulation. Adv Mater Interfaces, 2018; 5:1800321.
27.
RichSI, NambeesanV, KhanR, et al.Tuning the composition of conductive thermoplastics for stiffness switching and electrically activated healing. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, 2019; 30:2908–2918.
28.
ShanW, LuT, MajidiC. Soft-matter composites with electrically tunable elastic rigidity. Smart Mater Struct, 2013; 22:085005.
29.
SchubertBE, FloreanoD. Variable stiffness material based on rigid low-meltingpoint-alloy microstructures embedded in soft poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). RSC Adv, 2013; 3:24671–24679.
30.
ShintakeJ, SchubertB, RossetS, et al.Variable stiffness actuator for soft robotics using dielectric elastomer and low-melting-point alloy. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2015, pp. 1097–1102.
31.
Van MeerbeekIM, Mac MurrayBC, KimJW, et al.Morphing metal and elastomer bicontinuous foams for reversible stiffness, shape memory, and self-healing soft machines. Adv Mater, 2016; 28:2801–2806.
SongS, MajidiC, SittiM. Geckogripper: a soft, inflatable robotic gripper using gecko-inspired elastomer micro-fiber adhesives. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2014, pp. 4624–4629.
34.
SongS, DrotlefD-M, MajidiC, et al.Controllable load sharing for soft adhesive interfaces on three-dimensional surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017; 114:E4344–E4353.
35.
GlickP, SureshSA, RuffattoD, et al.A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2018; 3:903–910.
36.
ShintakeJ, RossetS, SchubertB, et al.Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. Adv Mater, 2016; 28:231–238.
37.
HughesJ, IidaF. Tack and deformation based sensorised gripping using conductive hot melt adhesive. In: IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). IEEE, 2018, pp. 553–558.
38.
TestaP, ChappuisB, KistlerS, et al.Switchable adhesion of soft composites induced by a magnetic field. Soft Matter, 2020; 16:5806–5811.
39.
CrollAB, HosseiniN, BartlettMD. Switchable adhesives for multifunctional interfaces. Adv Mater Technol, 2019; 4:1900193.
40.
YeZ, LumGZ, SongS, et al.Phase change of gallium enables highly reversible and switchable adhesion. Adv Mater, 2016; 28:5088–5092.
41.
SongS, DrotlefD-M, PaikJ, et al.Mechanics of a pressure-controlled adhesive membrane for soft robotic gripping on curved surfaces. Extreme Mech Lett, 2019; 30:100485.
42.
BartlettMD, MarkvickaEJ, MajidiC. Rapid fabrication of soft, multilayered electronics for wearable biomonitoring. Adv Funct Mater, 2016; 26:8496–8504.
43.
MarkvickaE, WangG, LeeY-C, et al.Electrodermis: fully untethered, stretchable, and highly-customizable electronic bandages. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2019:1–10.
44.
Mengü ç Y, Röhrig M, Abusomwan U, et al. Staying sticky: contact self-cleaning of gecko-inspired adhesives. J R Soc Interface, 2014; 11:20131205.
45.
BartlettMD, CrosbyAJ. Scaling normal adhesion force capacity with a generalized parameter. Langmuir, 2013; 29:11022–11027.
46.
KendallK. The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids. J Phys D Appl Phys, 1971; 4:1186.
47.
BartlettMD, KazemN, Powell-PalmMJ, et al.High thermal conductivity in soft elastomers with elongated liquid metal inclusions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017; 114:2143–2148.
48.
HeQ, WangZ, SongZ, et al.Bioinspired design of vascular artificial muscle. Adv Mater Technol, 2019; 4:1800244.
49.
HwangD-G, TrentK, BartlettMD. Kirigami-inspired structures for smart adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018; 10:6747–6754.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
