Variable stiffness actuation has applications in a wide range of fields, including wearable haptics, soft robots, and minimally invasive surgical devices. There have been numerous design approaches to control and tune stiffness and rigidity; however, most have relatively low specific load-carrying capacities (especially for flexural loads) in the most rigid state that restricts their use in small or slender devices. In this article, we present an approach to the design of slender, high flexural stiffness modules based on the principle of fiber jamming. The proposed fiber jamming modules (FJMs) consist of axially packed fibers in an airtight envelope that transition from a flexible to a rigid beam when a vacuum is created inside the envelope. This FJM can provide the flexural stiffness of up to eight times that of a particle jamming module in the rigid state. Unlike layer jamming modules, the design of FJMs further allows them to control stiffness while bending in space. We present an analytical model to guide the parameter choices for the design of fiber jamming devices. Finally, we demonstrate applications of FJMs, including as a versatile tool, as part of a kinesthetic force feedback haptic glove and as a programmable structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MajidiC.Soft robotics: a perspective current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:5–11.
2.
MantiM, CacuccioloV, CianchettiM. Stiffening in soft robotics: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 2016; 23:93–106.
3.
WangL, YangY, ChenY, et al.Controllable and reversible tuning of material rigidity for robot applications. Mat Tod, 2018; 21:563–576.
4.
BlancL, DelchambreA, LambertP. Flexible medical devices: review of controllable stiffness solutions. In Actuators, Volume 6. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel, Switzerland, 2017, p. 23.
5.
YangY, LiY, ChenY. Principles and methods for stiffness modulation in soft robot design and development. Biodesign Manufac, 2018; 1:14–25.
GuX, ZhangY, SunW, et al.Dexmo: an inexpensive and lightweight mechanical exoskeleton for motion capture and force feedback in VR. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’16, ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 1991–1995.
8.
StrasnickE, HolzC, OfekE, et al. Haptic links: bimanual haptics for virtual reality using variable stiffness actuation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM, 2018, p. 644.
9.
SenatoreG, WangQ, BierH, et al.The use of variable stiffness joints in adaptive structures. In Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, volume 2017. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS), 2017, pp. 1–10.
10.
ZhaiZ, WangY, JiangH. Origami-inspired, on-demand deployable and collapsible mechanical metamaterials with tunable stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2018; 115:2032–2037.
11.
KimJ, LeeD-Y, KimS-R, et al.A self-deployable origami structure with locking mechanism induced by buckling effect. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Seattle, WA: IEEE, 2015, pp. 3166–3171.
BlakeJ, GurocakHB. Haptic glove with MR brakes for virtual reality. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics, 2009; 14:606–615.
14.
PetterssonA, DavisS, GrayJO, et al.Design of a magnetorheological robot gripper for handling of delicate food products with varying shapes. J Food Eng, 2010; 98:332–338.
15.
ChenJZ, LiaoWH. Design, testing and control of a magne-torheological actuator for assistive knee braces. Smart Mater Struct, 2010; 19:035029.
16.
OhJ-S, HanY-M, LeeS-R, et al.A 4-dof haptic master using er fluid for minimally invasive surgery system application. Smart Mater Struct, 2013; 22:045004.
17.
SadeghiA, BeccaiL, MazzolaiB. Innovative soft robots based on electro-rheological fluids. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Vilamoura, Portugal: IEEE, 2012, pp. 4237–4242.
18.
ShintakeJ, SchubertB, RossetS, et al.Variable stiffness actuator for soft robotics using dielectric elastomer and low-melting-point alloy. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Hamburg, Germany: IEEE, 2015, pp. 1097–1102.
19.
NasabAM, SabzehzarA, TatariM, et al.A soft gripper with rigidity tunable elastomer strips as ligaments. Soft Robot, 2017; 4:411–420.
20.
YangB, LinQ. A latchable microvalve using phase change of paraffin wax. Sens Actuat A Phys, 2007; 134:194–200.
21.
SteltzE, MozeikaA, RodenbergN, et al.Jsel: jamming skin enabled locomotion. In 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). St. Louis, MO, USA: IEEE, 2009, pp. 5672–5677.
22.
SteltzE, MozeikaA, RembiszJ, et al.Jamming as an enabling technology for soft robotics. In Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2010 (Vol. 7642, p. 764225). SPIE, 2010; 7642:63, Bellingham, WA, USA.
23.
HauserS, EckertP, TuleuA, et al.Friction and damping of a compliant foot based on granular jamming for legged robots. In 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob). Singapore, Singapore: IEEE, 2016, pp. 1160–1165.
24.
LathropE, AdibnazariI, GravishN, et al.Shear strengthened granular jamming feet for improved performance over Natural Terrain. In 2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). New Haven, CT, USA: IEEE, 2020, pp. 388–393.
25.
BrownE, RodenbergN, AmendJ, et al.Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2010; 107:18809–18814.
26.
StanleyAA, GwilliamJC, OkamuraAM. Haptic jamming: a deformable geometry, variable stiffness tactile display using pneumatics and particle jamming. In World Haptics Conference (WHC). Daejeon, South Korea: IEEE, 2013, pp. 25–30.
27.
FollmerS, LeithingerD, OlwalA, et al.Jamming user interfaces: programmable particle stiffness and sensing for malleable and shape-changing devices. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2012, pp. 519–528.
28.
Simon. TM, Smith RT, Thomas BH. Wearable jamming mitten for virtual environment haptics. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ISWC'14, ACM. New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp. 67–70.
29.
AmendJR, LipsonH. Shape-shifting materials for pro-grammable structures. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing: Workshop on Architectural Robotics, Citeseer. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009.
30.
KellerS, JaegerHM. Aleatory architectures. Gran Matter, 2016; 18:29.
31.
CianchettiM, RanzaniT, GerboniG, et al.Soft robotics technologies to address shortcomings in today's minimally invasive surgery: the stiff-flop approach. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:122–131.
32.
AllenJ, XynogalasG, DasguptaP, et al.Design of a variable stiffness flex-ible manipulator with composite granular jamming and membrane coupling. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Vilamoura, Portugal: IEEE, 2012, pp. 2922–2927.
33.
JiangA, RanzaniT, GerboniG, et al.Robotic granular jamming: does the membrane matter?. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:192–201.
34.
NarangYS, DegirmenciA, VlassakJJ, et al.Transforming the dynamic response of robotic structures and systems through laminar jamming. IEEE Robot Autom Lett, 2017; 3:688–695.
ZubryckiI, GranosikG. Novel haptic device using jamming principle for providing kinaesthetic feedback in glove-based control interface. J Intell Robot Syst, 2017; 85:413–429.
37.
KimY, ChengS, KimS, et al.A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans on Robotics, 2013; 29:1031–1042.
38.
YuZ, WangD, WangZ, et al.Passive force-feedback gloves with joint-based variable impedance using layer jamming. IEEE Trans Haptics, 2019; 12:269–280.
39.
BrancadoroM, MantiM, TognarelliS, et al.Preliminary experimental study on variable stiff-ness structures based on fiber jamming for soft robots. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). Livorno, Italy: IEEE, 2018, pp. 258–263.
40.
BrancadoroM, MantiM, GraniF, et al.Towards a vari-able stiffness surgical manipulator based on fiber jamming transition. Front Robot AI, 2019; 6:12.
41.
BrancadoroM, MantiM, TognarelliS, et al.Fiber jamming transition as a stiffening mechanism for soft robotics. Soft Robot, 2020; 7:663–674.
42.
VasiosN, NarangY, AktaşB, et al.Numerical analysis of periodic laminar and fibrous media undergoing a jamming transition. Eur J Mech A Solids, 2019; 75:322–329.
GarrettJW.The adult human hand: some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Hum Factors, 1971; 13:117–131.
45.
ZhengY, WangD, WangZ, et al.Design of a lightweight force-feedback glove with a large workspace. Engineering, 2018; 4:869–880.
46.
ShimizuS, InoS, SatoM, et al.A basic study of a force display using a metal hydride actuator. In Proceedings of 1993 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. Tokyo, Japan: IEEE, 1993, pp. 211–215.
47.
ZhouS-L, MatsumotoS, TianH-D, et al.pH-responsive shrinkage/swelling of a supramolecular hydrogel composed of two small amphiphilic molecules. Chemistry, 2005; 11:1130–1136.
48.
LangRL.Ultrasonic atomization of liquids. J Acoust Soc Am, 1962; 34:6–8.
49.
Moses. MS, Kutzer MDM, Ma H, et al. A continuum manipulator made of interlocking fibers. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, 2013, pp. 4008–4015.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
