Tensegrity robots comprising solid rods connected by tensile cables are of interest due to their flexible and robust nature, which potentially makes them suitable for uneven and unpredictable environments where traditional robots often struggle. Much progress has been made toward attaining locomotion with tensegrity robots. However, measuring the shape of a dynamic tensegrity without the use of external hardware remains a challenge. Here we show how robotic skins may be attached around the exterior of a tensegrity structure, to both control and measure its shape from its surface. The robotic skins are planar, skin-like membranes with integrated actuators and sensors, which we use to transform a passive tensegrity structure into an active tensegrity robot that performs tasks such as locomotion. In addition, sensors placed on the ends of the tensegrity rods are used to directly measure orientation relative to the ground. The hardware and algorithms presented herein thus provide a platform for surface-driven actuation and intrinsic state estimation of tensegrity structures, which we hope will enable future tensegrity robots to execute precise closed-loop motions in real-world environments.
SkeltonRE, AdhikariR, PinaudJ-P, et al. An introduction to the mechanics of tensegrity structures. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No. 01CH37228), Orlando, FL, USA, December 4–7, 2001. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2001, pp. 4254–4259.
5.
WangN, ButlerJ, IngberD. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science, 1993; 260:1124–1127.
6.
IngberDE. The architecture of life. Sci Am, 1998; 278:48–57.
7.
PaulC, Valero-CuevasFJ, LipsonH. Design and control of tensegrity robots for locomotion. IEEE Trans Robot, 2006; 22:944–957.
8.
RieffelJ, Valero-CuevasF, LipsonH. Automated discovery and optimization of large irregular tensegrity structures. Comput Struct, 2009; 87:368–379.
9.
RieffelJ, LipsonH, Valero-CuevasFJ. Growing form-filling tensegrity structures using map L-systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO '07), London, England, July 2007. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. p.1063.
10.
KoizumiY, ShibataM, HiraiS. Rolling tensegrity driven by pneumatic soft actuators. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA, May 14–18, 2012. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2012, pp. 1988–1993.
11.
CaluwaertsK, DesprazJ, IşçenA, et al.Design and control of compliant tensegrity robots through simulation and hardware validation. J Roy Soc Interface, 2014; 11.
12.
KimK, AgoginoAK, MoonD, et al. Rapid prototyping design and control of tensegrity soft robot for locomotion. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2014), Bali, Indonesia, Dec. 5–10, 2014. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2014, pp. 7–14.
13.
SabelhausAP, BruceJ, CaluwaertsK, et al. System design and locomotion of SUPERball, an untethered tensegrity robot. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, USA, May 26–30, 2015. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2015, pp. 2867–2873.
14.
KimK, AgoginoAK, ToghyanA. Robust learning of tensegrity robot control for locomotion through form-finding. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 Sept.–2 Oct. 2015. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2015, pp. 5824–5831.
15.
ChenL-H, KimK, TangE, et al.Soft spherical tensegrity robot design using rod-centered actuation and control. J Mech Robot, 2017; 9:025001–025009.
16.
BöhmV, JentzschA, KaufholdT, et al. An approach to compliant locomotion systems based on tensegrity structures. In: 56th International Scientific Colloquium Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany, September 12–16, 2011, Session 2.1. Ilmenau, Germany: ilmedia - TU Ilmenau, 2011, pp. 1–6.
17.
SchorrP, BohmV, ZimmermannK, et al. An Approach to the Estimation of the Actuation Parameters for Mobile Tensegrity Robots with Tilting Movement Sequences. In: 2018 International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots (ReMAR), Delft, Netherlands, June 20–22, 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–8.
18.
MirletzBT, BhandalP, AdamsRD, et al. Goal-directed CPG-based control for tensegrity spines with many degrees of freedom traversing irregular terrain. Soft Robot 2015;2;165–176.
19.
SabelhausAP, JiH, HyltonP, et al. Mechanism design and simulation of the ULTRA spine: A tensegrity robot. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5A: 39th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 2–5, 2015. New York, NY: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V05AT08A059.
20.
FriesenJM, GlickP, FantonM, et al. The second generation prototype of a Duct Climbing Tensegrity robot, DuCTTv2. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, May 16–21, 2016. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2016, pp. 2123–2128.
21.
RieffelJ, StukR, Valero-CuevasFJ, et al. Locomotion of a tensegrity robot via dynamically coupled modules. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Morphological Computation. March. 2007.
22.
BöhmV, KaufholdT, ZeidisI, et al.Dynamic analysis of a spherical mobile robot based on a tensegrity structure with two curved compressed members. Arch Appl Mech, 2017; 87:853–864.
23.
MintchevS, ZappettiD, WilleminJ, et al. A Soft Robot for Random Exploration of Terrestrial Environment. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, May 21–25, 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018, pp. 7492–7497.
24.
VespignaniM, ErcolaniC, FriesenJM, et al. Steerable locomotion controller for six-strut icosahedral tensegrity robots. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain, 1–5 October, 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018, pp. 2886–2892.
25.
KimK, AgoginoAK, AgoginoAM. Rolling locomotion of cable-driven soft spherical tensegrity robots. Soft Robot, 2020; 7:346–361.
26.
HiraiS, KoizumiY, ShibataM, et al. Active shaping of a tensegrity robot via pre-pressure. In: 2013 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, July 9–12, 2013. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2013, pp. 19–25.
27.
BoothJW, ShahD, CaseJC, et al.OmniSkins: Robotic skins that turn inanimate objects into multifunctional robots. Science Robotics 19 Sep, 2018; 3:eaat1853.
28.
SchorrP, BöhmV, ZentnerL, et al.Motion characteristics of a vibration driven mobile tensegrity structure with multiple stable equilibrium states. J Sound Vib, 2018; 437:198–208.
29.
SchorrP, BöhmV, ZentnerL, et al.Dynamical investigation of crawling motion system based on a multistable tensegrity structure. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO, Porto, Portugal, July 29–31, 2018. Setúbal, Portugal: SCITEPRESS Digital Library, 2018, pp. 122–130.
30.
KhazanovM, HumphreysB, KeatWD, et al. Exploiting dynamical complexity in a physical tensegrity robot to achieve locomotion. In: Artificial Life Conference Proceedings 2013, East Lansing, MI, USA, July 19–22, 2013. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 965–972.
31.
BöhmV, ZimmermannK. Vibration-driven mobile robots based on single actuated tensegrity structures. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2013:5475–5480.
32.
ZappettiD, MintchevS, ShintakeJ, et al. Bio-inspired Tensegrity Soft Modular Robots. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Living Machines 2017: Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems, Stanford, CA, USA, July 26–28, 2017. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2017, pp. 497–508.
33.
KhazanovM, JocqueJ, RieffelJ. Evolution of locomotion on a physical tensegrity robot. In Artificial Life Conference Proceedings 2014, Manhattan, New York, USA, July 30–August 2, 2014. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 232–238.
34.
KhazanovM, JocqueJ, RieffelJ. Developing morphological computation in tensegrity robots for controllable actuation. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO Comp '14), Vancouver, BC Canada, July, 2014. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2014, pp. 1049–1052.
35.
RieffelJ, TrimmerB, LipsonH. Mechanism as mind-what tensegrities and caterpillars can teach us about soft robotics. In: Artificial Life XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, Winchester, United Kingdom, August 5–8, 2008. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 506–512.
36.
RieffelJA, Valero-CuevasFJ, LipsonH, Morphological communication: exploiting coupled dynamics in a complex mechanical structure to achieve locomotion. J Roy Soc Interface, 2010; 7:613–621.
37.
BruceJ, CaluwaertsK, IscenA, et al. Design and evolution of a modular tensegrity robot platform. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China, 31 May–7 June, 2014. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2014, pp. 3483–3489.
38.
CaluwaertsK, BruceJ, FriesenJM, et al.State estimation for tensegrity robots. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2016:1860–1865.
39.
CampanaroL. Sensor integration and controller design for a tensegrity-modular robot. Master's thesis, Politecnico di Torino, 2018; 4.
40.
TonduB. Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: A review. J Intel Mater Syst Struct, 2012; 23:225–253.
41.
BoothJW, CaseJC, WhiteEL, et al. An addressable pneumatic regulator for distributed control of soft robots. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), Livorno, Italy, 24–28 April, 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2018, pp. 25–30.
42.
WhiteEL, YuenMC, CaseJC, et al.Low-cost, facile, and scalable manufacturing of capacitive sensors for soft systems. Adv Mater Technol, 2017; 2:1700072.
MouretJ-B, DoncieuxS. Encouraging behavioral diversity in evolutionary robotics: An empirical study. Evol Comput, 2012; 20:91–133.
46.
ChatzilygeroudisK, RamaR, KaushikR, et al. Black-box data-efficient policy search for robotics. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, September 24–28, 2017. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2017, pp. 51–58.
47.
CullyA, CluneJ, TaraporeD, et al.Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature, 2015; 521:503–507.
48.
ArunKS, HuangTS, BlosteinSD. Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intel, 1987; 5:698–700.
49.
George ThuruthelT, AnsariY, FaloticoE, et al.Control strategies for soft robotic manipulators: A survey. Soft Robot, 2018; 5:149–163.
50.
KimD, KwonJ, HanS, et al.Deep full-body motion network for a soft wearable motion sensing suit. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech, 2018; 24:56–66.
51.
ThuruthelTG, ShihB, LaschiC, et al.Soft robot perception using embedded soft sensors and recurrent neural networks. Sci Robot, 2019; 4:eaav1488.
52.
SoterG, ConnA, HauserH, et al. Bodily aware soft robots: integration of proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensors. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 21–25 May, IEEE, 2018, pp. 2448–2453.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
