Soft pneumatic actuators (SPAs) are widely studied and applied in the field of soft robotics. To expand their applications, the SPAs should be purpose-built to generate application-specific complex motions with multiple degrees of freedom. This article describes a new SPA consisting of a series of internal chambers with the same helix angle arranged in a row, which could generate bending and twisting motions simultaneously. The trajectory of the helical actuator was analyzed through the finite element method (FEM) by changing the angle of the chambers and the actuator length. We employed a three-dimensional printing method to directly fabricate the thin-walled and airtight helical actuators without applying any postfabrication process. The recorded trajectory of the actuator and the measured blocking force on the tipping point were compared with the corresponding simulation results from the FEM. The actuation behavior of the helical actuator has been compared with that of the actuator with zero chamber angle, but with the same size (i.e., a normal bending actuator generating a two-dimensional trajectory). It is found that the proposed helical actuator (with a maximum 2.10 N blocking force) had a higher mechanical output (or efficiency) than the normal bending actuator (with a maximum 1.19 N blocking force) under the same pressure input. We fabricated a soft helical actuator as the fingers of a four-finger gripper to grasp complex-shaped items. Furthermore, another four-finger gripper made of a hybrid actuator consisting of a half of the angled chambers and a half of the nonangled chambers was constructed to demonstrate that the proposed design and fabrication technique could be employed to establish application- and function-specific soft robotic systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MoserHE, DervanPB. Sequence-specific cleavage of double helical DNA by triple helix formation. Science, 1987; 238:645–650.
2.
KramerRZ, BellaJ, MayvilleP, et al.Sequence dependent conformational variations of collagen triple-helical structure. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 1999; 6:454–457.
3.
VidoniR, MimmoT, PandolfiC. Tendril-based climbing plants to model, simulate and create bio-inspired robotic systems. J Bionic Eng, 2015; 12:250–262.
4.
WalkerID. Biologically inspired vine-like and tendril-like robots. In: 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI), London: IEEE, 2015, pp. 714–720.
5.
LiuJ, HuangJ, SuT, et al.Structural transition from helices to hemihelices. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e93183.
6.
LaschiC, CianchettiM, MazzolaiB, et al.Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Adv Robot, 2012; 26:709–727.
7.
LinY, PisanoAP. The differential geometry of the general helix as applied to mechanical springs. J Appl Mech, 1988; 55:831–836.
8.
JeongKU, JangJH, KimDY, et al.Three-dimensional actuators transformed from the programmed two-dimensional structures via bending, twisting and folding mechanisms. J Mater Chem, 2011; 21:6824–6830.
9.
RodrigueH, WangW, BhandariB, et al.Cross-shaped twisting structure using SMA-based smart soft composite. Int J Pr Eng Man-Gt, 2014; 1:153–156.
10.
GorissenB, ChishiroT, ShimomuraS, et al.Flexible pneumatic twisting actuators and their application to tilting micromirrors. Sensor Actuat A Phys, 2014; 216:426–431.
11.
ShimJE, QuanYJ, WangW, et al.A smart soft actuator using a single shape memory alloy for twisting actuation. Smart Mater Struct, 2015; 24:125033.
12.
AliciG. Softer is harder: What differentiates soft robotics from hard robotics?. MRS Adv, 2018; 3:1557–1568.
13.
GreningerAB, MooradianVG. Strain transformation in metastable beta copper-zinc and beta copper-Ti alloys. Aime Trans, 1938; 128:337–369.
14.
SatoA, ChishimaE, YamajiY, et al.Orientation and composition dependencies of shape memory effect in Fe-Mn-Si alloys. Acta Metall Mater, 1984; 32:539–547.
15.
MavroidisC. Development of advanced actuators using shape memory alloys and electrorheological fluids. Res Nondestruct Eval, 2002; 14:1–32.
16.
SheY, LiC, ClearyJ, et al.Design and fabrication of a soft robotic hand with embedded actuators and sensors. J Mech Robot, 2015; 7:021007.
17.
VillanuevaA, SmithC, PriyaS. A biomimetic robotic jellyfish (Robojelly) actuated by shape memory alloy composite actuators. Bioinspir Biomim, 2011; 6:036004.
18.
McGovernS, AliciG, TruongVT, et al.Finding NEMO (novel electromaterial muscle oscillator): a polypyrrole powered robotic fish with real-time wireless speed and directional control. Smart Mater Struct, 2009; 18:095009.
19.
AliciG, SpinksG, HuynhNN, et al.Establishment of a biomimetic device based on tri-layer polymer actuators—propulsion fins. Bioinspir Biomim, 2007; 2:S18–S30.
20.
NguyenCH, AliciG, MutluR. A compliant translational mechanism based on dielectric elastomer actuators. J Mech Des, 2014; 136:061009-9.
21.
KimJW, YoshidaK, KoudaK, et al.A flexible electro-rheological microvalve (FERV) based on SU-8 cantilever structures and its application to microactuators. Sensor Actuat A Phys, 2009; 156:366–372.
22.
KashimaS, MiyasakaF, HirataK. Novel soft actuator using magnetorheological elastomer. IEEE Trans Magn, 2012; 48:1649–1652.
23.
MitsumataT, SakaiK, TakimotoJI. Giant reduction in dynamic modulus of κ-carrageenan magnetic gels. J Phys Chem B, 2006; 110:20217–20223.
24.
TawkC, in het PanhuisM, SpinksGM, et al.Bioinspired 3D printable soft vacuum actuators for locomotion robots, grippers and artificial muscles. Soft Robot, 2018; 5:685–694.
25.
TawkC, SpinksG, in het PanhuisM, et al. 3D Printable Linear Soft Vacuum Actuators (LSOVA): their modeling, performance quantification and application in soft robotic systems. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2933027
26.
IkutaK, IchikawaH, SuzukiK. Safety-active catheter with multiple-segments driven by micro-hydraulic actuators. In: 2002 International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Berlin: Springer, 2002, pp. 182–191.
27.
KatzschmannRK, MarcheseAD, RusD. Hydraulic autonomous soft robotic fish for 3D swimming. In: The 14th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Marrakesh: Springer, 2016, pp. 405–420.
AndrikopoulosG, NikolakopoulosG, ManesisS. Pneumatic artificial muscles: a switching model predictive control approach. Control Eng Pract, 2013; 21:1653–1664.
30.
DaerdenF, LefeberD. The concept and design of pleated pneumatic artificial muscles. Int J Fluid Power, 2001; 2:41–50.
31.
TonduB, BoitierV, LopezP. Naturally compliant robot-arms actuated by McKibben artificial muscles. In: 1994 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Antonio: IEEE, 1994, pp. 2635–2640.
32.
TonduB, IppolitoS, GuiochetJ, et al.A seven-degrees-of-freedom robot-arm driven by pneumatic artificial muscles for humanoid robots. Int J Robot Res, 2005; 24:257–274.
33.
CaldwellDG, TsagarakisN, BadihiD, et al.Pneumatic muscle actuator technology: a light weight power system for a humanoid robot. In: 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven: IEEE, 1998, pp. 3053–3058.
34.
DaerdenF, LefeberD. Pneumatic artificial muscles: actuators for robotics and automation. Eur J Mech Environ Eng, 2002; 47:11–21.
35.
ParkYL, SantosJ, GallowayKG, et al.A soft wearable robotic device for active knee motions using flat pneumatic artificial muscles. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hongkong: IEEE, 2014, pp. 4805–4810.
36.
FolgheraiterM, GiniG. Blackfingers an artificial hand that copies human hand in structure, size, and function. In: 2000 International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Cambridge: IEEE, 2000, p. 4.
37.
NoritsuguT, TakaiwaM, SasakiD. Development of power assist wear using pneumatic rubber artificial muscles. J Robot Mechatron, 2009; 21:607.
38.
CaldwellDG, Medrano-CerdaGA, GoodwinMJ. Braided pneumatic actuator control of a multi-jointed manipulator. In: 1993 International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Le Touquet: IEEE, 1993, pp. 423–428.
39.
ShepherdRF, IlievskiF, ChoiW, et al.Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011; 108:20400–20403.
40.
IlievskiF, MazzeoAD, ShepherdRF, et al.Soft robotics for chemists. Angew Chem, 2011; 123:1930–1935.
41.
MorinSA, ShepherdRF, KwokSW, et al.Camouflage and display for soft machines. Science, 2012; 337:828–832.
42.
AliciG, CantyT, MutluR, et al.Modeling and experimental evaluation of bending behavior of soft pneumatic actuators made of discrete actuation chambers. Soft Robot, 2018; 5:24–35.
43.
KonishiS, KawaiF, CusinP. Thin flexible end-effector using pneumatic balloon actuator. Sensor Actuat A Phys, 2001; 89:28–35.
44.
MorimotoK, UtsumiA, KonishiS. A design of longitudinally-divided balloon structure in PDMS pneumatic balloon actuator based on FEM simulations. In: 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, Beijing: IEEE, 2011, pp. 2774–2777.
45.
MosadeghB, PolygerinosP, KeplingerC, et al.Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv Funct Mater, 2014; 24:2163–2170.
46.
ChangB, BerringJ, VenkataramM, MenonC, ParameswaranM. Bending fluidic actuator for smart structures. Smart Mater Struct, 2011; 20:035012.
47.
YapHK, GohJCH, YeowRCH. Design and characterization of soft actuator for hand rehabilitation application. In: 6th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, Dubrovnik: Springer, 2015, pp. 367–370.
48.
YapHK, LimJH, NasrallahF, et al. A soft exoskeleton for hand assistive and rehabilitation application using pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seattle: IEEE, 2015, pp. 4967–4972.
49.
PolygerinosP, LyneS, WangZ, et al. Toward a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo: IEEE, 2013, pp. 1512–1517.
50.
SasakiD, NoritsuguT, TakaiwaM. Development of active support splint driven by pneumatic soft actuator (ASSIST). In: 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona: IEEE, 2005, pp. 520–525.
51.
DeimelR, BrockO. A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe: IEEE, 2013, pp. 2047–2053.
52.
PolygerinosP, WangZ, GallowayKC, et al.Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robot Auton Syst, 2015; 73:135–143.
53.
SuzumoriK, EndoS, KandaT, et al. A bending pneumatic rubber actuator realizing soft-bodied manta swimming robot. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma: IEEE, 2007, pp. 4975–4980.
54.
Wakimoto. S, Ogura K, Suzumori K, et al. Miniature soft hand with curling rubber pneumatic actuators. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe: IEEE, 2009, pp. 556–561.
55.
PaekJ, ChoI, KimJ. Microrobotic tentacles with spiral bending capability based on shape-engineered elastomeric microtubes. Sci Rep, 2015; 5:10768.
56.
StokesAA, ShepherdRF, MorinSA, et al.A hybrid combining hard and soft robots. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:70–74.
57.
MarcheseAD, OnalCD, RusD. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:75–87.
58.
SunY, YapHK, LiangX, et al.Stiffness customization and patterning for property modulation of silicone-based soft pneumatic actuators. Soft Robot, 2017; 4:251–260.
59.
Bishop-MoserJ, KotaS. Toward snake-like soft robots: design of fluidic fiber-reinforced elastomeric helical manipulators. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo: IEEE, 2013, pp. 5021–5026.
60.
Bishop-Moser. J, Krishnan G, Kim C, et al. Design of soft robotic actuators using fluid-filled fiber-reinforced elastomeric enclosures in parallel combinations. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura: IEEE, 2012, pp. 4264–4269.
61.
WangD, LiL, SerjoueiA, et al.Controllable helical deformations on printed anisotropic composite soft actuators. Appl Phys Lett, 2018; 112:181905.
62.
WangW, LiC, ChoM, et al.Soft tendril-inspired grippers: Shape morphing of programmable polymer–paper bilayer composites. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2018; 10:10419–10427.
63.
GallowayKC, BeckerKP, PhillipsB, et al.Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robot, 2016; 3:23–33.
64.
IonovL. Hydrogel-based actuators: possibilities and limitations. Mater Today, 2014; 17:494–503.
65.
RodrigueH, BhandariB, HanMW, et al.A shape memory alloy-based soft morphing actuator capable of pure twisting motion. J Intel Mat Syst Str, 2015; 26:1071–1078.
66.
HuW, LiW, AliciG. 3D printed helical soft pneumatic actuators. In: 2018 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Auckland: IEEE, 2018, pp. 950–955.
67.
TawkC, GillettA, in het PanhuisM, et al.A 3D-printed omni-purpose soft gripper. IEEE Trans Robot. DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2019.2924386, 2019.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
