We described a tensegrity robotic fish and detailed its overall structure, stiffness, and mechatronics. The main flexible structure of the robotic fish body was composed with a series of rigid segments linked with tensegrity joints by means of tension elements. Each rigid segment can rotate around tensegrity-compliant joint and have no direct contact with each other. The dominant vibrational mode of the tensegrity robotic fish can be excited by a single harmonic input to mimic the desired kinematics of locomotion. For our tensegrity robotic fish, the experimental results showed that its maximum stride length was about 0.5 body length per cycle; its Strouhal number was roughly between 0.45 and 0.55 near the biological data of carangiform swimmers. Two different vibrational modes that can be achieved would be demonstrated by the harmonic analysis technique. The results indicated that the swimming performance can be improved by using tensegrity joints.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeilichKL, LauderGV. Passive mechanical models of fish caudal fins: effects of shape and stiffness on self-propulsion. Bioinspir Biomim, 2015; 10:036002.
2.
LauderGV. Fish locomotion: recent advances and new directions. Annu Rev Mar Sci, 2015; 7:521–545.
3.
BaleR, HaoM, BhallaAPS, et al.Gray's paradox: a fluid mechanical perspective. Sci Rep, 2014; 4:5904.
4.
AkanyetiO, ThornycroftPJM, LauderGV, et al.Fish optimize sensing and respiration during undulatory swimming. Nat Commun, 2016; 7:11044.
5.
SfakiotakisM, LaneDM, DaviesJBC. Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 1999; 24:237–252.
6.
StefaniniC, OrofinoS, ManfrediL, et al.A novel autonomous, bioinspired swimming robot developed by neuroscientists and bioengineers. Bioinspir Biomim, 2012; 7:025001.
7.
ParkYJ, HuhTM, ParkD, et al.Design of a variable-stiffness flapping mechanism for maximizing the thrust of a bio-inspired underwater robot. Bioinspir Biomim, 2014; 9:036002.
8.
TriantafyllouMS, TriantafyllouGS. An efficient swimming machine. Sci Am, 1995; 272:64–70.
9.
BarrettDS, TriantafyllouMS, YueDKP, et al.Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion. J Fluid Mech, 1999; 392:183–212.
10.
RoperDT, SharmaS, SuttonR, et al.A review of developments towards biologically inspired propulsion systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. Proc IME M J Eng Marit Environ, 2011; 225:77–96.
11.
RajA, ThakurA. Fish-inspired robots: design, sensing, actuation, and autonomy—a review of research. Bioinspir Biomim, 2016; 11:031001.
12.
Daou HEl, SalumäeT, ChambersLD, et al.Modelling of a biologically inspired robotic fish driven by compliant parts. Bioinspir Biomim, 2014; 9:016010.
13.
MarcheseAD, OnalCD, RusD. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:75–87.
14.
Valdiviay, AlvaradoP, Youcef-ToumiK. Design of machines with compliant bodies for biomimetic locomotion in liquid environments. J Dyn Syst Meas Control, 2006; 128.1:3–13.
15.
EppsBP, Valdivia Y AlvaradoP, et al.Swimming performance of a biomimetic compliant fish-like robot. Exp Fluids, 2009; 47:927–939.
16.
KatzschmannRK, DelPretoJ, MacCurdyR, et al.Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot, 2018; 3:eaar3449.
17.
TytellED, HsuC-Y, WilliamsTL, et al.Interactions between internal forces, body stiffness, and fluid environment in a neuromechanical model of lamprey swimming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010; 107:19832–19837.
18.
McMillenT, HolmesP. An elastic rod model for anguilliform swimming. J Math Biol, 2006; 53:843–886.
19.
WestneatMW, HoeseW, PellCA, et al.The horizontal septum: mechanisms of force transfer in locomotion of scombrid fishes (Scombridae, Perciformes). J Morphol, 1993; 217:183–204.
20.
QuennouelleC, GosselinCM. Stiffness matrix of compliant parallel mechanisms. In: LenarčičJ and WengerP (eds). Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Design. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. pp. 331–341.
21.
ChakarovD. Study of the antagonistic stiffness of parallel manipulators with actuation redundancy. Mech Mach Theory, 2004; 39:583–601.
BehzadipourS, KhajepourA. Stiffness of cable-based parallel manipulators with application to stability analysis. J Mech Design, 2006; 128:303–310.
24.
HenryMJMC, PellCA, LongJHJr., et al. Mechanical control of swimming speed: stiffness and axial wave form in undulating fish models. J Exp Biol, 1995; 2305:2293–2305.
25.
LongJHJr., NipperKS. The importance of body stiffness in undulatory propulsion. Am Zool, 1996; 36:678–694.
26.
LongJH. Muscles, elastic energy, and the dynamics of body stiffness in swimming eels. Am Zool, 1998; 38:771–792.
27.
LongJH. Stiffness and damping forces in the intervertebral joints of Blue Marlin (Makaira Nigricans). J Exp Biol, 1992; 155:131–155.
28.
TytellED, LeftwichMC, HsuC-Y, et al.The role of body stiffness in undulatory swimming: insights from robotic and computational models. Phys Rev Fluids, 2016; 073202:1–17.
29.
JonesSF. The physiology of the joints. Physiotherapy, 1990; DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9406(10)62475-3.
30.
SkeltonRE, HeltonWW, ChanW, et al. An introduction to the mechanics of tensegrity structures. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL. 2001; 5:4254–4259.
LevinSM. Putting the shoulder to the wheel: a new biomechanical model for the shoulder girdle. Biomed Sci Instrum, 1997; 3:412–417.
34.
PardehshenasH, MaroufiN, SanjariMA, et al.Lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns in three stances under graded loading conditions: proposing a tensegrity model for load transfer through the sacroiliac joints. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2014; 18:633–642.
35.
LessardS, CastroD, AsperW, et al. A bio-inspired tensegrity manipulator with multi-DOF, structurally compliant joints. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, South Korea, 2016. pp. 5515–5520.
36.
Baltaxe-AdmonyL, RobbinsAS, JungEA, et al. Simulating the human shoulder through active tensegrity structures. ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 6: 12th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, Charlotte, NC, 2016. DOI:10.1115/DETC2016-60157.
37.
LessardS, BruceJ, JungE, et al. A lightweight, multi-axis compliant tensegrity joint. In: Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Stockholm, Sweden, 2016. pp. 630–635.
38.
MirletzBT, ParkI-W, FlemonsTE, et al.Design and control of modular spine-like tensegrity structures. In: The Proceedings of the 6th World Conference of the International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.
39.
LevinSM. The tensegrity-truss as a model for spine mechanics: biotensegrity. J Mech Med Biol, 2002; 2:375–388.
40.
OrkiO, AyaliA, ShaiO, et al.Modeling of caterpillar crawl using novel tensegrity structures. Bioinspir Biomim, 2012; 7:046006.
41.
BlissT, IwasakiT, Bart-SmithH. Central pattern generator control of a tensegrity swimmer. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech, 2013; 18:586–597.
42.
AhlbornBK. Zoological physics: Quantitative models of body design, actions, and physical limitations of animals. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
43.
BöhmV, ZimmermannK. Vibration-driven mobile robots based on single actuated tensegrity structures. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2013. pp. 5475–5480.
44.
BlakeRW. Fish functional design and swimming performance. J Fish Biol, 2004; 65:1193–1222.
45.
EloyC. On the best design for undulatory swimming. J Fluid Mech, 2013; 717:48–89.
46.
LighthillMJ. Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotion. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 1971; 179:125–138.
47.
CulhaU, HughesJ, RosendoA, et al.Design principles for soft-rigid hybrid manipulators. Biosyst Biorobot, 2017:87–94.
48.
JiangH, HeJ, TongZ. Characteristics analysis of joint space inverse mass matrix for the optimal design of a 6-DOF parallel manipulator. Mech Mach Theory, 2010; 45:722–739.
49.
VidelerJJ, WardleCS. Fish swimming stride by stride: speed limits and endurance. Rev Fish Biol Fish, 1991; 1:23–40.
50.
EloyC. Optimal Strouhal number for swimming animals. J Fluids Struct, 2012; 30:205–218.
51.
VidelerJJ. Fish swimming. Springer Science and Business Media. 1993; 10:1–254.
52.
TriantafyllouMS, TriantafyllouGS, GopalkrishnanR. Wake mechanics for thrust generation in oscillating foils. Phys Fluids A, 1991; 3:2835–2837.
53.
WebbP, KosteckiP, StevensE. The effect of size and swimming speed on locomotor kinematics of rainbow trout. J Exp Biol, 1984; 109:77–95.
54.
WebbBYPW. “Steady” swimming kinematics of Tiger musky, an esociform accelerator, and rainbow trout, a generalist cruiser. J Exp Biol, 1988; 138:51–69.
55.
WebbPW. Kinematics of lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, at cruising speeds. Can J Zool, 1986; 64:2137–2141.
56.
HornerAM, JayneBC. The effects of viscosity on the axial motor pattern and kinematics of the African lungfish (Protopterus annectens) during lateral undulatory swimming. J Exp Biol, 2008; 211:1612–1622.
57.
BlakeRW, LiJ, ChanKHS. Swimming in four goldfish Carassius auratus morphotypes: understanding functional design and performance employing artificially selected forms. J Fish Biol, 2009; 75:591–617.
LongJH, PorterME, RootRG, et al.Go reconfigure: how fish change shape as they swim and evolve. Integr Comp Biol, 2010; 50:1120–1139.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
