Designing soft robots poses considerable challenges; automated design approaches may be particularly appealing in this field, as they promise to optimize complex multimaterial machines with very little or no human intervention. Evolutionary soft robotics is concerned with the application of optimization algorithms inspired by natural evolution to let soft robots (both their morphologies and controllers) spontaneously evolve within physically realistic simulated environments, figuring out how to satisfy a set of objectives defined by human designers. In this article, a powerful evolutionary system is put in place to perform a broad investigation on the free-form evolution of simulated walking and swimming soft robots in different environments. Three sets of experiments are reported, tackling different aspects of the evolution of soft locomotion. The first two explore the effects of different material properties on the evolution of terrestrial and aquatic soft locomotion: particularly, we show how different materials lead to the evolution of different morphologies, behaviors, and energy-performance trade-offs. It is found that within our simplified physics world, stiffer robots evolve more sophisticated and effective gaits and morphologies on land, while softer ones tend to perform better in water. The third set of experiments starts investigating the effect and potential benefits of major environmental transitions (land↔water) during evolution. Results provide interesting morphological exaptation phenomena and point out a potential asymmetry between land→water and water→land transitions: while the first type of transition appears to be detrimental, the second one seems to have some beneficial effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015; 521:467–475.
2.
LaschiC, MazzolaiB, CianchettiM. Soft robotics: technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci Robot, 2016; 1:eaah3690.
3.
LipsonH. Challenges and opportunities for design, simulation, and fabrication of soft robots. Soft Robot, 2014; 1:21–27.
FaureF, DuriezC, DelingetteH. SOFA: a multi-model framework for interactive physical simulation. In: PayanY (Ed.). Soft Tissue Biomechanical Modeling for Computer Assisted Surgery. Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials, vol. 11. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp. 283–321.
7.
JakobiN. Evolutionary robotics and the radical envelope-of-noise hypothesis. Adapt Behav, 1997; 6:325–368.
8.
CorucciF, CalistiM, HauserH, LaschiC. Novelty-based evolutionary design of morphing underwater robots. In Proceedings of the 2015 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO2015), Madrid, Spain, 2015.
9.
CorucciF, CalistiM, HauserH, LaschiC. Evolutionary discovery of self-stabilized dynamic gaits for a soft underwater legged robot. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR2015), Istanbul, Turkey, 2015.
10.
CalistiM, CorucciF, ArientiA, LaschiC. Dynamics of underwater legged locomotion: modeling and experiments on an octopus-inspired robot. Bioinspir Biomim, 2015; 10:046012.
11.
CullyA, CluneJ, TaraporeD, MouretJ-B. Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature, 2015; 521:503–507.
CorucciF, CheneyN, KriegmanS, BongardJ, LaschiC. Evolutionary developmental soft robotics as a framework to study intelligence and adaptive behavior in animals and plants. Front Robot AI, 2017; 4:34.
18.
CorucciF. Evolutionary developmental soft robotics: towards adaptive and intelligent soft machines following nature's approach to design. In: LaschiC, RossiterJ, IidaF, CianchettiM, MargheriL (Eds.). Soft Robotics: Trends, Applications and Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 111–116.
CorucciF, CheneyN, LipsonH, LaschiC, BongardJ. Material properties affect evolution's ability to exploit morphological computation in growing soft-bodied creatures. In ALIFE XV, The Fifteenth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Cancun, Mexico, 2016.
21.
Giorgio-SerchiF, ArientiA, CorucciF, GiorelliM, LaschiC. Hybrid parameter identification of a multi-modal underwater soft robot. Bioinspir Biomim, 2017; 12:025007.
22.
LangtonCG. Artificial Life: An Overview. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
23.
CorucciF, CheneyN, LipsonH, LaschiC, BongardJ. Evolving swimming soft-bodied creatures. In ALIFE XV, The Fifteenth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Late Breaking Proceedings, Cancun, Mexico, 2016.
24.
IjspeertAJ. Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: a review. Neural Netw, 2008; 21:642–653.
25.
IjspeertAJ, KodjabachianJ. Evolution and development of a central pattern generator for the swimming of a lamprey. Artif Life, 1999; 5:247–269.
26.
IjspeertAJ, HallamJ, WillshawD. From lampreys to salamanders: evolving neural controllers for swimming and walking. In From Animals to Animats, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Society for Adaptive Behavior (SAB98), Zurich, Switzerland, 1998.
27.
IjspeertJ, CrespiA, RyczkoD, CabelguenJ-M. From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model. Science, 2007; 315:1416–1420.
28.
MeyerJ-A, DoncieuxS, FilliatD, GuillotA. Evolutionary approaches to neural control of rolling, walking, swimming and flying animats or robots. In: DuroRJ, SantosJ, GranaM (Eds.). Biologically Inspired Robot Behavior Engineering. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2003, pp. 1–43.
29.
PatelLN, MurrayA, HallamJ. Super-lampreys and wave energy: optimised control of artificially-evolved, simulated swimming lamprey. Neurocomputing, 2007; 70:1139–1154.
SaundersF, GoldenE, WhiteRD, RifeJ. Experimental verification of soft-robot gaits evolved using a lumped dynamic model. Robotica, 2011; 29:823–830.
32.
ClarkAJ, MooreJM, WangJ, TanX, McKinleyPK. Evolutionary design and experimental validation of a flexible caudal fin for robotic fish. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, East Lansing, MI, 2012.
33.
MooreJM, McKinleyPK. Evolving flexible joint morphologies. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
34.
CacuccioloV, CorucciF, CianchettiM, LaschiC. Evolving optimal swimming in different fluids: a study inspired by batoid fishes. In: DuffA, LeporaNF, MuraA, PrescottTJ, VerschurePFMJ (Eds.). Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014, pp. 23–34.
35.
VujovicV, RosendoA, BrodbeckL, IidaF. Evolutionary developmental robotics: improving morphology and control of physical robots. Artif Life, 2017; 23:169–185.
36.
SimsK. Evolving virtual creatures. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Orlando, FL, 1994.
37.
LessinD, RisiS. Soft-body muscles for evolved virtual creatures: the next step on a bio-mimetic path to meaningful morphological complexity. In European Conference on Artificial Life, York, UK, 2015.
38.
LessinD, FussellD, MiikkulainenR. Trading control intelligence for physical intelligence: Muscle drives in evolved virtual creatures. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, BC, 2014.
39.
GeijtenbeekT, van de PanneM, van der StappenAF. Flexible muscle-based locomotion for bipedal creatures. ACM Trans Graphics, 2013; 32:6.
40.
RieffelJ, SaundersF, NadimpalliS, ZhouH, HassounS, RifeJ. Evolving soft robotic locomotion in PhysX. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers, Montreal, Canada, 2009.
41.
RieffelJ, TrimmerB. Body/brain co-evolution in soft robots. In ALIFE, Odense, Denmark, 2010.
42.
RieffelJ, SmithS. A Face-encoding grammar for the generation of tetrahedral-mesh soft bodies. In ALIFE, Odense, Denmark, 2010.
43.
KnoxD, RieffelJ. Scalable co-evolution of soft robot properties and gaits. In ECAL, Paris, France, 2011.
44.
BergerB, AndinoA, DaniseA, RieffelJ. Growing and evolving vibrationally actuated soft robots. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Madrid, Spain, 2015.
45.
HillerJD, LipsonH. Evolving amorphous robots. In ALIFE, Odense, Denmark, 2010.
46.
HillerJ, LipsonH. Automatic design and manufacture of soft robots. IEEE Trans Robot, 2012; 28:457–466.
47.
CheneyN, MacCurdyR, CluneJ, LipsonH. Unshackling evolution: evolving soft robots with multiple materials and a powerful generative encoding. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.
48.
CheneyN, BongardJ, LipsonH. Evolving soft robots in tight spaces. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Madrid, Spain, 2015.
49.
MethenitisG, HennesD, IzzoD, VisserA. Novelty search for soft robotic space exploration. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Madrid, Spain, 2015.
50.
JoachimczakM, SuzukiR, AritaT. Fine grained artificial development for body-controller coevolution of soft-bodied animats. Artif Life, 2014; 14:239–246.
51.
JoachimczakM, KowaliwT, DoursatR, WróbelB. Evolutionary design of soft-bodied animats with decentralized control. Artif Life Robot, 2013; 18:152–160.
52.
JoachimczakM, WròbelB. Co-evolution of morphology and control of soft-bodied multicellular animats. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.
AhlbergPE, JohansonZ. Osteolepiforms and the ancestry of tetrapods. Nature, 1998; 395:792–794.
55.
ClackJA. Gaining Ground: The Origin and Evolution of Tetrapods. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2012.
56.
CoatesMI, JefferyJE, RutaM. Fins to limbs: what the fossils say. Evol Dev, 2002; 4:390–401.
57.
JanvierP. Early Vertebrates. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.
58.
ShubinNH, DaeschlerEB, JenkinsFA. The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature, 2006; 440:764–771.
59.
DaeschlerEB, ShubinNH, JenkinsFA. A devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature, 2006; 440:757–763.
60.
BoisvertCA. The pelvic fin and girdle of Panderichthys and the origin of tetrapod locomotion. Nature, 2005; 438:1145–1147.
61.
BoisvertCA, Mark-KurikE, AhlbergPE. The pectoral fin of Panderichthys and the origin of digits. Nature, 2008; 456:636–638.
62.
CoatesM. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod interrelationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Trans R Soc Edinburgh: Earth Sci, 1996; 87:363–421.
63.
KingHM, ShubinNH, CoatesMI, HaleME. Behavioral evidence for the evolution of walking and bounding before terrestriality in sarcopterygian fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2011; 108:21146–21151.
64.
MacesicLJ, KajiuraSM. Comparative punting kinematics and pelvic fin musculature of benthic batoids. J Morphol, 2010; 271:1219–1228.
65.
PridmoreP. Submerged walking in the epaulette shark hemiscyllium-ocellatum (hemiscyllidae) and its implications for locomotion in rhipidistian fishes and early tetrapods. Zool Anal Complex Syst, 1994; 98:278–297.
66.
OrdTJ, SummersTC, NobleMM, FultonCJ. Ecological release from aquatic predation is associated with the emergence of marine blenny fishes onto land. Am Nat, 2017; 189:570–579.
67.
KriegmanS, CappelleC, CorucciF, BernatskiyA, CheneyN, BongardJ. Simulating the evolution of soft and rigid-body robots. In Workshop on Simulation in Evolutionary Robotics, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), Berlin, Germany, 2017.
68.
VogelS. Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.
69.
StanleyKO. Compositional pattern producing networks: a novel abstraction of development. Genet Programming Evolvable Machines, 2007; 8:131–162.
70.
StanleyKO. Exploiting regularity without development. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Developmental Systems, Arlington, VA, 2006.
71.
CheneyN, BongardJ, SunSpiralV, LipsonH. On the Difficulty of Co-Optimizing Morphology and Control in Evolved Virtual Creatures. In Proceedings of the Artificial Life Conference, Cancun, Mexico, 2016.
72.
Coello CoelloC, LamontGB, Van VeldhuizenDA. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems, vol. 5. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.
73.
ZhangC, ChenT. Efficient feature extraction for 2D/3D objects in mesh representation. In 2001 International Conference on Image Processing, Thessaloniki, Greece.
74.
BarberCB, DobkinDP, HuhdanpaaH. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans Math Software, 1996; 22:469–483.
75.
AuerbachJE, BongardJC. Environmental influence on the evolution of morphological complexity in machines. PLoS Comput Biol, 2014; 10:e1003399.
76.
ShannonC. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical J, 27:379–423, 623–656. Math Rev (MathSciNet) 1948;MR10:133e.
77.
SukumarSR, PageDL, KoschanAF, AbidiMA. Towards understanding what makes 3D objects appear simple or complex. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2008. CVPRW’08. IEEE Computer Society Conference on, Anchorage, AK, 2008.
78.
PageDL, KoschanAF, SukumarSR, Roui-AbidiB, AbidiMA. Shape analysis algorithm based on information theory. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing 2003 (ICIP 2003), Barcelona, Spain, 2003.
79.
CastroRFA, GuillamotL, CrosA, EloyC. Non-linear effects on the resonant frequencies of a cantilevered plate. J Fluids Struct, 2014; 46:165–173.
80.
ParazF, EloyC, SchouveilerL. Experimental study of the response of a flexible plate to a harmonic forcing in a flow. C R Méc, 2014; 342:532–538.
81.
MichelinS, SmithSGL. Resonance and propulsion performance of a heaving flexible wing. Phys Fluids, 2009; 21:071902.
82.
DeweyPA, BoschitschBM, MooredKW, StoneHA, SmitsAJ. Scaling laws for the thrust production of flexible pitching panels. J Fluid Mech, 2013; 732:29–46.
83.
TriantafyllouM, TriantafyllouG, YueDKP. Hydrodynamics of fishlike swimming. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2000; 32:33–53.
84.
MooreMNJ. Analytical results on the role of flexibility in flapping propulsion. J Fluid Mech, 2014; 757:599–612.
85.
AlbenS, ShelleyM, ZhangJ. Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature, 2002; 420:479–481.
86.
KatzJ, WeihsD. Hydrodynamic propulsion by large amplitude oscillation of an airfoil with chordwise flexibility. J Fluid Mech, 1978; 88:485–497.
87.
AlbenS, WittC, Vernon BakerT, AndersonE, LauderG. Dynamics of freely swimming flexible foils. Phys Fluids, 2012; 24:051901.
88.
HauserH, FüchslinRM, PfeiferR (Eds). Opinions and Outlooks on Morphological Computation. Zürich, 2014, p. 244. Available at: www.morphologicalcomputation.org/e-book/ (accessed June26, 2018).
89.
HauserH, IjspeertAJ, FüchslinRM, PfeiferR, MaassW. Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biol Cybern, 2011; 105:355–370.
90.
PaulC. Morphological computation: a basis for the analysis of morphology and control requirements. Rob Auton Syst, 2006; 54:619–630.
PfeiferR, BongardJ. How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
93.
SchmidtM, LipsonH. Age-fitness pareto optimization. (Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VIII). Springer, 2011, pp. 129–146.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
