In this study, we describe the most ultralightweight living legged robot to date that makes it a strong candidate for a search and rescue mission. The robot is a living beetle with a wireless electronic backpack stimulator mounted on its thorax. Inheriting from the living insect, the robot employs a compliant body made of soft actuators, rigid exoskeletons, and flexure hinges. Such structure would allow the robot to easily adapt to any complex terrain due to the benefit of soft interface, self-balance, and self-adaptation of the insect without any complex controller. The antenna stimulation enables the robot to perform not only left/right turning but also backward walking and even cessation of walking. We were also able to grade the turning and backward walking speeds by changing the stimulation frequency. The power required to drive the robot is low as the power consumption of the antenna stimulation is in the order of hundreds of microwatts. In contrast to the traditional legged robots, this robot is of low cost, easy to construct, simple to control, and has ultralow power consumption.
LongJH, et al.How does soft robotics drive research in animal locomotion?. Soft Robotics, 2014; 1:161–168.
3.
RusD, TolleyMT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 2015; 521:467–475.
4.
TrimmerB. Soft robots and size. Soft Robotics, 2015; 2:49–50.
5.
TrimmerMB, et al.At the crossroads: interdisciplinary paths to soft robots. Soft Robotics, 2013; 1:63–69.
6.
HorchlerAD, et al.Peristaltic locomotion of a modular mesh-based worm robot: precision, compliance, and friction. Soft Robotics, 2015; 2:135–145.
7.
MarcheseAD, OnalCD, RusD. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robotics, 2014; 1:75–87.
8.
MingL, et al.Slithering towards autonomy: a self-contained soft robotic snake platform with integrated curvature sensing. Bioinspir Biomim, 2015; 10:055001.
9.
SantiagoJLC, GodageIS, GonthinaP, WalkerID. Soft robots and kangaroo tails: modulating compliance in continuum structures through mechanical layer jamming. Soft Robotics, 2016; 3:54–63.
10.
UmedachiT, VikasV, TrimmerBA. Softworms: the design and control of non-pneumatic, 3D-printed, deformable robots. Bioinspir Biomim, 2016; 11:025001.
11.
AkiyamaY, IwabuchiK, FurukawaY, MorishimaK. Culture of insect cells contracting spontaneously; research moving toward an environmentally robust hybrid robotic system. J Biotechnol, 2008; 133:261–266.
12.
AkiyamaY, IwabuchiK, FurukawaY, MorishimaK. Electrical stimulation of cultured lepidopteran dorsal vessel tissue: an experiment for development of bioactuators. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim, 2010; 46:411–415.
13.
AkiyamaY, et al.Rapidly-moving insect muscle-powered microrobot and its chemical acceleration. Biomed Microdevices, 2012; 14:979–986.
14.
AkiyamaY, et al.Atmospheric-operable bioactuator powered by insect muscle packaged with medium. Lab Chip, 2013; 13:4870–4880.
15.
MorishimaK, et al.Demonstration of a bio-microactuator powered by cultured cardiomyocytes coupled to hydrogel micropillars. Sensor Actuat B Chem, 2006; 119:345–350.
16.
BlaesingB, CruseH. Stick insect locomotion in a complex environment: climbing over large gaps. J Exp Biol, 2004; 207:1273–1286.
17.
DelcomynF. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Squire LR (Ed). Oxford: Academic Press, 2009, pp. 479–484.
18.
DickinsonMH, et al.How animals move: an integrative view. Science, 2000; 288:100–106.
19.
LippA, WolfH, LehmannF-O. Walking on inclines: energetics of locomotion in the ant Camponotus. J Exp Biol, 2005; 208:707–719.
20.
SponbergS, SpenceAJ, MullensCH, FullRJ. A single muscle's multifunctional control potential of body dynamics for postural control and running. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 2011; 366:1592–1605.
21.
TrimmerB, IssbernerJ. Kinematics of soft-bodied, legged locomotion in Manduca sexta Larvae. Biol Bull, 2007; 212:130–142.
22.
CaoF, ZhangC, ChooHY, SatoH. Insect-computer hybrid legged robot with user-adjustable speed, step length and walking gait. J R Soc Interface, 2016; 13:20160060.
23.
HolzerR, ShimoyamaI. Locomotion control of a bio-robotic system via electric stimulation. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1997. IROS '97., Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, Grenoble, France, vol. 1513, pp. 1514–1519.
24.
LatifT, BozkurtA. Line following terrestrial insect biobots. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2012; 2012:972–975.
25.
SanchezCJ, et al.Locomotion control of hybrid cockroach robots. J R Soc Interface, 2015; 12:20141363.
26.
SatoH, et al.Deciphering the role of a coleopteran steering muscle via free flight stimulation. Curr Biol, 2015; 25:798–803.
27.
WhitmireE, LatifT, BozkurtA. Kinect-based system for automated control of terrestrial insect biobots. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2013; 2013:1470–1473.
28.
CaoF, et al.A biological micro actuator: graded and closed-loop control of insect leg motion by electrical stimulation of muscles. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e105389.
29.
DirafzoonA, et al.Biobotic motion and behavior analysis in response to directional neurostimulation. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), New Orleans, LA.
30.
EricksonJC, HerreraM, BustamanteM, ShingiroA, BowenT. Effective stimulus parameters for directed locomotion in madagascar hissing cockroach biobot. PLoS One, 2015; 10:e0134348.
31.
MerrillDR, BiksonM, JefferysJGR. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. J Neurosci Methods, 2005; 141:171–198.
32.
PopovicD, GordonT, RafuseVF, ProchazkaA. Properties of implanted electrodes for functional electrical stimulation. Ann Biomed Eng, 1991; 19:303–316.
33.
BozkurtA, LobatonE, SichitiuM. A biobotic distributed sensor network for under-rubble search and rescue. Computer, 2016; 49:38–46.
34.
JayaramK, FullRJ. Cockroaches traverse crevices, crawl rapidly in confined spaces, and inspire a soft, legged robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2016; 113:E950–E957.
35.
MurphyRR, TadokoroS, KleinerA. Springer Handbook of Robotics. SicilianoB, KhatibO (Eds). Berlin Heidelberg; Springer International Publishing: 2016. pp. 1577–1604.
36.
TysonLH. Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim, 2008; 3:034001.
37.
RitzmannRE, PollackAJ. Response of thoracic interneurons to tactile stimulation in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J Neurobiol, 1994; 25:1113–1128.
38.
YeS, ComerCM. Correspondence of escape-turning behavior with activity of descending mechanosensory interneurons in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J Neurosci, 1996; 16:5844–5853.
39.
BabaY, TsukadaA, ComerCM. Collision avoidance by running insects: antennal guidance in cockroaches. J Exp Biol, 2010; 213:2294–2302.
40.
CamhiJM, JohnsonEN. High-frequency steering maneuvers mediated by tactile cues: antennal wall-following in the cockroach. J Exp Biol, 1999; 202:631–643.
41.
ComerCM, ParksL, HalvorsenMB, Breese-TertelingA. The antennal system and cockroach evasive behavior. II. Stimulus identification and localization are separable antennal functions. J Comp Physiol A, 2003; 189:97–103.
42.
DürrV, EbelingW. The behavioural transition from straight to curve walking: kinetics of leg movement parameters and the initiation of turning. J Exp Biol, 2005; 208:2237–2252.
43.
RitzmannRE, et al.Deciding which way to go: how do insects alter movements to negotiate barriers?. Front Neurosci, 2012; 6:97.
44.
ShojiK, et al.Insect biofuel cells using trehalose included in insect hemolymph leading to an insect-mountable biofuel cell. Biomed Microdevices, 2012; 14:1063–1068.
45.
ShojiK, et al.Insect biofuel cell using an electrode with gold nanoparticles deposited by sputtering. IET Micro Nano Lett, 2015; 10:674–677.
46.
ShojiK, et al.Biofuel cell backpacked insect and its application to wireless sensing. Biosens Bioelectron, 2016; 78:390–395.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
