Bioinspired robotic structures comprising soft actuation units have attracted increasing research interest. Taking advantage of its inherent compliance, soft robots can assure safe interaction with external environments, provided that precise and effective manipulation could be achieved. Endoscopy is a typical application. However, previous model-based control approaches often require simplified geometric assumptions on the soft manipulator, but which could be very inaccurate in the presence of unmodeled external interaction forces. In this study, we propose a generic control framework based on nonparametric and online, as well as local, training to learn the inverse model directly, without prior knowledge of the robot's structural parameters. Detailed experimental evaluation was conducted on a soft robot prototype with control redundancy, performing trajectory tracking in dynamically constrained environments. Advanced element formulation of finite element analysis is employed to initialize the control policy, hence eliminating the need for random exploration in the robot's workspace. The proposed control framework enabled a soft fluid-driven continuum robot to follow a 3D trajectory precisely, even under dynamic external disturbance. Such enhanced control accuracy and adaptability would facilitate effective endoscopic navigation in complex and changing environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TrivediD, et al.Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Appl Bionics Biomech, 2008; 5:99–117.
2.
MaoS, et al.Gait study and pattern generation of a starfish-like soft robot with flexible rays actuated by SMAs. J Bionic Eng, 2014; 11:400–411.
3.
SarehS, et al.Bio-inspired tactile sensor sleeve for surgical soft manipulators. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Hong Kong, China, May 31–June 7, 2014.
4.
SuzumoriK, IikuraS, TanakaH. Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotic mechanisms. In: The 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Sacramento, CA, April 9–11, 1991.
McMahanW, et al.Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Orlando, FL, May 15–19, 2006.
7.
RungeG, et al.SpineMan: Design of a soft robotic spine-like manipulator for safe human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Hamburg, Germany, September 28–Oct 2, 2015.
8.
MaghooaF, et al.Tendon and pressure actuation for a bio-inspired manipulator based on an antagonistic principle. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Seattle, WA, May 26–30, 2015.
9.
CianchettiM, et al.Soft robotics technologies to address shortcomings in today's minimally invasive surgery: The STIFF-FLOP approach. Soft Robotics, 2014; 1:122–131.
10.
LohsiriwatV. Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol, 2010; 16:425.
11.
TuminoE, et al.Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol, 2010; 16:5452–5456.
12.
CosentinoF, et al.Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial. Int J Art Organs, 2009; 32:517–527.
13.
PfefferJ, et al.The Aer-O-Scope: Proof of the concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope in a pig model. Endoscopy, 2006; 38:144–148.
14.
FrasJ, et al.New STIFF-FLOP module construction idea for improved actuation and sensing. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Seattle, WA, May 26–30, 2015.
15.
CamarilloDB, et al.Mechanics modeling of tendon-driven continuum manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot, 2008; 24:1262–1273.
16.
JonesB, WalkerID. Kinematics for multisection continuum robots. IEEE Trans Robot, 2006; 22:43–55.
17.
MahvashM, DupontPE. Stiffness control of surgical continuum manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot, 2011; 27:334–345.
18.
Webster RJIII, JonesBA. Design and kinematic modeling of constant curvature continuum robots: A review. Int J Robot Res, 2010; 29:1661–1683.
19.
GanjiY, Janabi-SharifiF. Catheter kinematics for intracardiac navigation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2009; 56:621–632.
20.
JonesBA, WalkerID. A New Approach to Jacobian Formulation for a Class of Multi-Section Continuum Robots. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Barcelona, Spain, April 18–22, 2005.
21.
WebsterRJIII, et al.Closed-form differential kinematics for concentric-tube continuum robots with application to visual servoing. In: Experimental Robotics: The Eleventh International Symposium. Athens: Greece, July 13–16, 2008, pp. 485–494.
22.
NeppalliS, et al.Closed-form inverse kinematics for continuum manipulators. Adv Robot, 2009; 23:2077–2091.
23.
MarcheseAD, et al.Design and control of a soft and continuously deformable 2d robotic manipulation system. In: The IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Hong Kong: China, May 31–June 7, 2014, pp. 2189–2196.
24.
MarcheseAD, TedrakeR, RusD. Dynamics and trajectory optimization for a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator. Int J Robot Res, 2016; 35:1000–1019.
25.
WangH, et al.Visual servo control of cable-driven soft robotic manipulator. In: The 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Tokyo: Japan, November 3–7, 2013, pp. 57–62.
KangR, et al.Design, modeling and control of a pneumatically actuated manipulator inspired by biological continuum structures. Bioinspir Biomim, 2013; 8:036008.
28.
YekutieliY, et al.Dynamic model of the octopus arm. I. biomechanics of the octopus reaching movement. J Neurophysiol, 2005; 94:1443–1458.
29.
GiorelliM, et al.A two dimensional inverse kinetics model of a cable driven manipulator inspired by the octopus arm. In: The 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Autonomous Systems. Saint Paul: MN, May 14–18, 2012, pp. 3819–3824.
30.
RendaF, et al.Dynamic model of a multibending soft robot arm driven by cables. IEEE Trans Robot, 2014; 30:1109–1122.
31.
Nguyen-TuongD, PetersJ. Model learning for robot control: A survey. Cogn Process, 2011; 12:319–340.
32.
BraganzaD, et al.A neural network controller for continuum robots. IEEE Trans Robot, 2007; 23:1270–1277.
33.
GiorelliM, et al.Neural network and Jacobian method for solving the inverse statics of a cable-driven soft arm with nonconstant curvature. IEEE Trans Robot, 2015; 31:823–834.
34.
YipMC, CamarilloDB. Model-less feedback control of continuum manipulators in unknown environments. IEEE Trans Robot, 2014; 30:880–889.
35.
Nguyen-TuongD, SeegerM, PetersJ. Model learning with local gaussian process regression. Adv Robot, 2009; 23:2015–2034.
36.
PetersJ, SchaalS. Learning to control in operational space. Int J Robot Res, 2008; 27:197–212.
37.
VijayakumarS, D'SouzaA, SchaalS. Incremental online learning in high dimensions. Neural Comput, 2005; 17:2602–2634.
38.
LargilliereF, et al.Real-time control of soft-robots using asynchronous finite element modeling. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, May 26–30, 2015.
39.
DuriezC. Control of elastic soft robots based on real-time finite element method. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Karlsruhe, Germany, May 6–10, 2013.
40.
FaudziAAM, et al.Development of bending soft actuator with different braided angles. In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Kachsiung, Taiwan, July 11–14, 2012.
41.
GreigarnT, CavusogluMC. Task-space motion planning of MRI-actuated catheters for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014). Chicago, IL, September 14–18, 2014.
42.
KoSY, FrassonL, BaenaFRY. Closed-loop planar motion control of a steerable probe with a “programmable bevel” inspired by nature. IEEE Trans Robot, 2011; 27:970–983.
43.
XuR, et al.Position control of concentric-tube continuum robots using a modified Jacobian-based approach. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, Germany, May 6–10, 2013.
44.
HartmannC, et al.Real-time inverse dynamics learning for musculoskeletal robots based on echo state Gaussian process regression. In: Robotics: Science and Systems. Sydney, NSW, Australia, July9–13, 2012.
45.
SigaudO, SalaünC, PadoisV. On-line regression algorithms for learning mechanical models of robots: A survey. Robot Autonom Syst, 2011; 59:1115–1129.
46.
SchaalS, AtkesonCG, VijayakumarS. Scalable techniques from nonparametric statistics for real time robot learning. Appl Intellig, 2002; 17:49–60.
BaşarY, ItskovM. Finite element formulation of the Ogden material model with application to rubber‐like shells. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 1998; 42:1279–1305.
49.
HughesTJ. The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. New York: Dover Publications, 2012.
50.
KlankeS, VijayakumarS, SchaalS. A library for locally weighted projection regression. J Machine Learn Res, 2008; 9:623–626.
51.
WhitneyDE. Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses. IEEE Trans Man-Machine Syst, 1969; 10:47–53.
ChenY, et al.Design and fabrication of MR-tracked metallic stylet for gynecologic brachytherapy. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2015; 21:956–962.
54.
SadatiSH, et al.Stiffness control of soft robotic manipulator for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) using scale jamming. In: Intelligent Robotics and Applications. Portsmouth, UK; Springer, August24–27, 2015, pp. 141–151.
55.
KwokKW, et al.Dimensionality reduction in controlling articulated snake robot for endoscopy under dynamic active constraints. IEEE Trans Robot, 2013; 29:15–31.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
