Many current bird-inspired flapping-wing air vehicles (FWAVs) achieve their flight characteristics through deformations associated with compliant wings during the flapping cycle. Most FWAVs use a single actuator to flap both wings. This couples and synchronizes motions of the wings, which only provides variable rate flapping at constant amplitude to control wing deformations. Independent wing control has the potential to provide a greater flight envelope through the ability to program wing motions to achieve a desired wing shape and associated aerodynamic forces. This approach requires the use of at least two actuators with position and velocity control that can be programmed to drive the wings independently. Integration of two actuators in a flying platform significantly increases the weight and hence makes it challenging to achieve flight. Based on our previous designs with synchronized wing flapping, we developed a new FWAV platform using programmable digital servo motors and a compatible highly compliant wing design that enables shape control of the wings during the flapping cycle. The wings and flapping characteristics can generate the highest possible lift near the maximum power operating point for the servos. The servos were integrated into a wing drive subsystem consisting of 3D printed and laser-etched/cut structural components to reduce part count and weight. A servo-driven tail was also used to augment the steering control and lift of the FWAV. The platform reported in this article, known as Robo Raven, was the first demonstration of a bird-inspired platform doing outdoor aerobatics using independently actuated and controlled wings. This platform successfully performed dives, flips, and buttonhook turns, demonstrating the capability of bioinspired aerobatic maneuvers afforded by the new design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WarrickD, DialK, BiewenerA. Asymmetrical force production in the slow maneuvering flight of pigeons. Auk, 1998; 115:916–928.
2.
HeinrichB. Mind of the Raven: Investigations and Adventures with Wolf-Birds. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1999, pp. 280–294.
AzumaA. The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2006, pp. 77–154.
6.
NorbergU. Vertebrate Flight, Vol. 27. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 118–165.
7.
VidelerJ. Avian Flight. Oxford Ornithology Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 33.
8.
TobalskeB. Biomechanics of bird flight. J Exp Biol, 2007; 210:3135–3146.
9.
VidelerJ, GroenewegenA, GnoddeM, VossebeltG. Indoor flight experiments with trained kestrels II. The effect of added weight on flapping flight kinematics. J Exp Biol, 1988; 134:185–199.
10.
OlM, ParkerG, AbateG, EversJ. Flight controls and performance challenges for MAVs in complex environments. Presented at the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, HI, 2008.
TahaH, HajjM, NayfehA. Flight dynamics and control of flapping-wing MAVs: A review. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2012; 70:907–939.
13.
DomanD, OppenheimerM, SigthorssonD. Wingbeat shape modulation for flapping-wing micro-air-vehicle control during hover. J Guidance Control Dynamics, 2010; 33:724–739.
TeohZ, WoodR. A flapping-wing microbot with a differential angle-of-attack mechanism. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Karlsruhe, Germany, 2013.
16.
FinioB, WoodR. Open-loop roll, pitch and yaw torques for a robotic bee. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vilamoura, Algarve, 2012.
17.
ChirarattananonP, MaKY, WoodRJ. Adaptive control of a millimeter-scale flapping-wing robot. Bioinspiration Biomimetics, 2014; 9:025004.
18.
MaKY, ChirarattananonP, FullerSB, WoodRJ. Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science, 2013; 340:603–607.
19.
ChirarattananonP, MaK, WoodRJ. Single-loop control and trajectory following of a flapping-wing microrobot. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, CN, 2014.
20.
ChirarattananonP, MaKY, WoodRJ. Fly on the wall. IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2014.
21.
KarpelsonM, WhitneyJ, WeiG-Y, WoodR. Energetics of flapping-wing robotic insects: Towards autonomous hovering flight. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010, pp. 1630–1637.
22.
WhitneyJ, WoodR. Conceptual design of flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Bioinspiration Biomimicry, 2012; 7:036001.
23.
WoodR, SteltzE, FearingR. Optimal energy density piezoelectric bending actuators. Sensors Actuators A Phys, 2004; 119:476–488.
24.
KarpelsonM, WeiG-Y, WoodR. Milligram-scale high-voltage power electronics for piezoelectric microrobots. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2009, pp. 2217–2224.
25.
WoodR, NagpalR, WeiG-Y. Flight of the robobees. Sci Am, 2013; 308:60–65.
26.
Pornsin-SirirakT, TaiY, HoC, KeennonM. Microbat: A palm-sized electrically powered ornithopter. NASA/JPL Workshop on Biomorphic Robotics, Pasadena, CA, 2001.
27.
GerdesJ, GuptaSK, WilkersonS. A review of bird-inspired flapping wing miniature air vehicle designs. J Mech Robotics, 2012; 4:021003-1.
KeennonM, KlingebielK, WonH, AndriukovA. Development of the Nano Hummingbird: A tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 2012.
McDonaldM, AgrawalS. Design of a bio-inspired spherical four-bar mechanism for flapping-wing micro air-vehicle applications. J Mech Robotics, 2010; 2:021012.
33.
McIntoshS, AgrawalS, KhanZ. Design of a mechanism for biaxial rotation of a wing for a hovering vehicle. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics, 2013; 11:145–153.
34.
ParkJH, YangE, ZhangC, AgrawalS. Kinematic design of an asymmetric in-phase flapping mechanism for MAVs. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, 2012.
35.
ChoiJ-S, ZhaoL, ParkG-J, AgrawalS, KolonayR. Enhancement of a flapping wing using path and dynamic topology optimization. AIAA J, 2011; 49:2616–2626.
36.
MadangopalR, KhanZ, AgrawalS. Biologically inspired design of small flapping wing air vehicles using four-bar mechanisms and quasi-steady aerodynamics. J Mech Des, 2005; 127:809–817.
37.
MadangopalR, KhanZ, AgrawalS. Energetics based design of small flapping wing air vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004, pp. 2367–2372.
BejgerowskiW, AnanthanarayananA, MuellerD, GuptaSK. Integrated product and process design for a flapping wing drive mechanism. J Mech Des, 2009; 131:061006-1.
42.
MuellerD, BruckH, GuptaSK. Measurement of thrust and lift forces associated with drag of compliant flapping wing for micro air vehicles using a new test stand design. Exp Mech, 2009; 50:725–735.
43.
MuellerD, GerdesJ, GuptaSK. Incorporation of passive wing folding in flapping wing miniature air vehicles. Presented at the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, San Diego, CA, 2009.
44.
CellonK. Characterization of flexible flapping wings and the effects of solar cells for miniature air vehicles. MS thesis, Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 2010.
45.
GerdesJ. Design, analysis, and testing of a flapping-wing miniature air vehicle. MS thesis, Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 2010.
46.
VidelerJ. Avian Flight. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 182.
47.
BejgerowskiW, GerdesJ, GuptaSK, BruckH. Design and fabrication of miniature compliant hinges for multi-material compliant mechanisms. Int J Adv Manufac Technol, 2011; 57:437–452.
48.
GerdesJ, CellonK, BruckH, GuptaSK. Characterization of the mechanics of compliant wing designs for flapping-wing miniature air vehicles. Exp Mech, 2013; 53:1561–1571.
49.
GerdesJ, RobertsL, BarnettE, KempnyJ, Perez-RosadoA, BruckH, GuptaSK. Wing performance characterization for flapping wing air vehicles. IDETC 2013, Portland, Oregon, 2013:DETC2013-12479.
WarrickD, DialK. Kinematic, aerodynamic, and anatomical mechanisms in the slow, maneuvering flight of pigeons. J Exp Biol, 1998; 201:655–672.
52.
HummelD. Aerodynamic investigations on tail effects in birds. Z Flugwiss Weltraumforsch, 1992; 16:159–168.
53.
ThomasA. On the aerodynamics of birds' tails. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 1993; 340:361–380.
54.
MayburyWJ, RaynerJMV. The avian tail reduces body parasite drag by controlling flow separation and vortex shedding. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2001; 268:1405–1410.
55.
MayburyWJ, RaynerJMV, CouldrickLB. Lift generation by the avian tail. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2001; 268:1443–1448.
56.
TaylorG, NuddsR, ThomasA. Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency. Nature, 2003; 425:707–711.
57.
AndersonJ, StreitlienK, BarrettD, TriantafyllouM. Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency. J Fluid Mech, 1998; 360:41–72.
58.
LintonJ. The physics of flight: II. Flapping wings. Phys Educ, 2007; 42:358–364.
59.
RobertsL, BruckHA, GuptaSK. Autonomous loitering control for a flapping wing aerial vehicle with independent wing control. ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Buffalo, NY, 2014.
60.
Perez-RosadoA, GriesingerAGJ, BruckHA, GuptaSK. Performance characterization of multifunctional wings with integrated solar cells for miniature air vehicles. ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Buffalo, NY, 2014.
