Cultured mouse spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), also known as germline stem cells (GSCs), revert back to pluripotent state either spontaneously or upon being modified genetically. However, the reprogramming efficiencies are low, and the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. In the present study, we conducted transcriptomic analysis and found that many transcription factors and epigenetic modifiers were differentially expressed between GSCs and embryonic stem cells. We failed in reprogramming GSCs to pluripotent state using the Yamanaka 4 Factors, but succeeded when Nanog and Tet1 were included. More importantly, reprogramming was also achieved with Nanog alone in a p53-deficient GSC line with an efficiency of 0.02‰. These GSC-derived-induced pluripotent stem cells possessed in vitro and in vivo differentiation abilities despite the low rate of chimera formation, which might be caused by abnormal methylation in certain paternally imprinted genes. Together, these results show that GSCs can be reprogrammed to pluripotent state via multiple avenues and contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of GSC reprogramming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ResnickJL, BixlerLS, ChengL and DonovanPJ. (1992). Long-term proliferation of mouse primordial germ cells in culture. Nature, 359:550–551.
2.
MatsuiY, ZseboK and HoganBL. (1992). Derivation of pluripotential embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture. Cell, 70:841–847.
3.
LaboskyPA, BarlowDP and HoganBL. (1994). Mouse embryonic germ (EG) cell lines: transmission through the germline and differences in the methylation imprint of insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r) gene compared with embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Development, 120:3197–3204.
4.
Kanatsu-ShinoharaM, OgonukiN, IwanoT, LeeJ, KazukiY, InoueK, MikiH, TakehashiM, ToyokuniS, et al. (2005). Genetic and epigenetic properties of mouse male germline stem cells during long-term culture. Development, 132:4155–4163.
5.
Kanatsu-ShinoharaM, InoueK, LeeJ, YoshimotoM, OgonukiN, MikiH, BabaS, KatoT, KazukiY, et al. (2004). Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell, 119:1001–1012.
6.
GuanK, NayerniaK, MaierLS, WagnerS, DresselR, LeeJH, NolteJ, WolfF, LiM, EngelW and HasenfussG. (2006). Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis. Nature, 440:1199–1203.
7.
NayerniaK, LiM, JaroszynskiL, KhusainovR, WulfG, SchwandtI, KorabiowskaM, MichelmannHW, MeinhardtA and EngelW. (2004). Stem cell based therapeutical approach of male infertility by teratocarcinoma derived germ cells. Hum Mol Genet, 13:1451–1460.
8.
GeijsenN and HochedlingerK. (2009). gPS navigates germ cells to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell, 5:3–4.
9.
SeandelM, JamesD, ShmelkovSV, FalciatoriI, KimJ, ChavalaS, ScherrDS, ZhangF, TorresR, et al. (2007). Generation of functional multipotent adult stem cells from GPR125+ germline progenitors. Nature, 449:346–350.
10.
IzadyarF, PauF, MarhJ, SlepkoN, WangT, GonzalezR, RamosT, HowertonK, SayreC and SilvaF. (2008). Generation of multipotent cell lines from a distinct population of male germ line stem cells. Reproduction, 135:771–784.
11.
ConradS, RenningerM, HennenlotterJ, WiesnerT, JustL, BoninM, AicherW, BuhringHJ, MattheusU, et al. (2008). Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult human testis. Nature, 456:344–349.
12.
KossackN, MenesesJ, ShefiS, NguyenHN, ChavezS, NicholasC, GromollJ, TurekPJ and Reijo-PeraRA. (2009). Isolation and characterization of pluripotent human spermatogonial stem cell-derived cells. Stem Cells, 27:138–149.
13.
TapiaN, Arauzo-BravoMJ, KoK and ScholerHR. (2011). Concise review: challenging the pluripotency of human testis-derived ESC-like cells. Stem Cells, 29:1165–1169.
14.
KoK, TapiaN, WuG, KimJB, BravoMJ, SasseP, GlaserT, RuauD, HanDW, et al. (2009). Induction of pluripotency in adult unipotent germline stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 5:87–96.
15.
TakashimaS, HiroseM, OgonukiN, EbisuyaM, InoueK, Kanatsu-ShinoharaM, TanakaT, NishidaE, OguraA and ShinoharaT. (2013). Regulation of pluripotency in male germline stem cells by Dmrt1. Genes Dev, 27:1949–1958.
16.
MorimotoH, LeeJ, TanakaT, IshiiK, ToyokuniS, Kanatsu-ShinoharaM and ShinoharaT. (2012). In vitro transformation of mouse testis cells by oncogene transfection. Biol Reprod, 86:148, 1–11.
17.
CorbineauS, LassalleB, GiveletM, Souissi-SarahouiI, FirlejV, RomeoPH, AllemandI, RiouL and FouchetP. (2017). Spermatogonial stem cells and progenitors are refractory to reprogramming to pluripotency by the transcription factors Oct3/4, c-Myc, Sox2 and Klf4. Oncotarget, 8:10050–10063.
18.
WangS, WangX, WuY and HanC. (2015). IGF-1R signaling is essential for the proliferation of cultured mouse spermatogonial stem cells by promoting the G2/M progression of the cell cycle. Stem Cells Dev, 24:471–483.
19.
YangY, LiuB, XuJ, WangJ, WuJ, ShiC, XuY, DongJ, WangC, et al. (2017). Derivation of pluripotent stem cells with in vivo embryonic and extraembryonic potency. Cell, 169:243.e25–257.e25.
20.
WangX and YangP. (2008). In vitro differentiation of mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells using the hanging drop method. J Vis Exp. e825.
21.
LiY, WangX, FengX, LiaoS, ZhangD, CuiX, GaoF and HanC. (2014). Generation of male germ cells from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Stem Cell Res, 12:517–530.
22.
ChenX, GuQ, WangX, MaQ, TangH, YanX, GuoX, YanH, HaoJ and ZengF. (2013). Directed neuronal differentiation of mouse embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells and their gene expression profiles. Int J Mol Med, 32:25–34.
23.
de HoonMJ, ImotoS, NolanJ and MiyanoS. (2004). Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics, 20:1453–1454.
24.
SaldanhaAJ. (2004). Java TreeView–extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics, 20:3246–3248.
25.
WrightonKH. (2009). Suppression of indued pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway. Nature, 10:578–579.
26.
YiL, LuC, HuW, SunY and LevineAJ. (2012). Multiple roles of p53-related pathways in somatic cell reprogramming and stem cell differentiation. Cancer Res, 72:5635–5645.
27.
AnJ, ZhengY and DannCT. (2017). Mesenchymal to epithelial transition mediated by CDH1 promotes spontaneous reprogramming of male germline stem cells to pluripotency. Stem Cell Rep, 8:446–459.
28.
ZhaoY, YinX, QinH, ZhuF, LiuH, YangW, ZhangQ, XiangC, HouP, et al. (2008). Two supporting factors greatly improve the efficiency of human iPSC generation. Cell Stem Cell, 3:475–479.
29.
BuganimY, FaddahDA, ChengAW, ItskovichE, MarkoulakiS, GanzK, KlemmSL, van OudenaardenA and JaenischR. (2012). Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell, 150:1209–1222.
MitsuiK, TokuzawaY, ItohH, SegawaK, MurakamiM, TakahashiK, MaruyamaM, MaedaM and YamanakaS. (2003). The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell, 113:631–642.
32.
ChambersI, ColbyD, RobertsonM, NicholsJ, LeeS, TweedieS and SmithA. (2003). Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 113:643–655.
33.
YamaguchiS, KimuraH, TadaM, NakatsujiN and TadaT. (2005). Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development. Gene Expr Patterns, 5:639–646.
34.
MurakamiK, GunesdoganU, ZyliczJJ, TangWW, SenguptaR, KobayashiT, KimS, ButlerR, DietmannS and SuraniMA. (2016). NANOG alone induces germ cells in primed epiblast in vitro by activation of enhancers. Nature, 529:403–407.
35.
CarterAC, Davis-DusenberyBN, KoszkaK, IchidaJK and EgganK. (2014). Nanog-independent reprogramming to iPSCs with canonical factors. Stem Cell Rep, 2:119–126.
36.
SchwarzBA, Bar-NurO, SilvaJC and HochedlingerK. (2014). Nanog is dispensable for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr Biol, 24:347–350.
37.
StadtfeldM, MaheraliN, BreaultDT and HochedlingerK. (2008). Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell, 2:230–240.
38.
FiczG, HoreTA, SantosF, LeeHJ, DeanW, ArandJ, KruegerF, OxleyD, PaulYL, et al. (2013). FGF signaling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell, 13:351–359.
39.
GaoY, ChenJ, LiK, WuT, HuangB, LiuW, KouX, ZhangY, HuangH, et al. (2013). Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell, 12:453–469.
40.
StadtfeldM and HochedlingerK. (2010). Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications. Genes Dev, 24:2239–2263.
41.
LiuY, GiannopoulouEG, WenD, FalciatoriI, ElementoO, AllisCD, RafiiS and SeandelM. (2016). Epigenetic profiles signify cell fate plasticity in unipotent spermatogonial stem and progenitor cells. Nat Commun, 7:11275.
42.
HammoudSS, LowDH, YiC, CarrellDT, GuccioneE and CairnsBR. (2014). Chromatin and transcription transitions of Mammalian adult germline stem cells and spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell, 15:239–253.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
