Deubiquitinating enzymes may play a major regulatory role in pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), but few studies have investigated this topic. Within this family of enzymes, we found that the ubiquitin-specific peptidase USP44, is highly expressed in embryonic stem cells, induced PSCs (iPSCs), and testes as compared with differentiated progenies and somatic organs. Analysis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and 5′ RACE showed that alternate promoters are responsible for expression in PSCs and organs. We noticed seven regions of transcription initiation, some of them with cell- or tissue-specific activity. Close analysis showed that one of the promoters involved in stem cell- and testis-specific activity is differentially regulated in those tissues. At the epigenetic level, USP44 transcription was correlated with DNA methylation of a CpG island close to the main promoter region. These data imply a complex picture where regulating factors such as OCT4 may interact with other epigenetic mechanisms to regulate USP44 expression in PSCs and testes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MasuiS, NakatakeY, ToyookaY, ShimosatoD, YagiR, TakahashiK, OkochiH, OkudaA, MatobaR, et al. (2007). Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol, 9:625–635.
2.
MitsuiK, TokuzawaY, ItohH, SegawaK, MurakamiM, TakahashiK, MaruyamaM, MaedaM and YamanakaS. (2003). The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell, 113:631–642.
3.
ChambersI, ColbyD, RobertsonM, NicholsJ, LeeS, TweedieS and SmithA. (2003). Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 113:643–655.
4.
NicholsJ, ZevnikB, AnastassiadisK, NiwaH, Klewe-NebeniusD, ChambersI, ScholerH and SmithA. (1998). Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell, 95:379–391.
5.
FongH, HohensteinKA and DonovanPJ. (2008). Regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency by Sox2 in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 26:1931–1938.
6.
YoungRA. (2011). Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell, 144:940–954.
7.
ChambersI and TomlinsonSR. (2009). The transcriptional foundation of pluripotency. Development, 136:2311–2322.
8.
TakahashiK, TanabeK, OhnukiM, NaritaM, IchisakaT, TomodaK and YamanakaS. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131:861–872.
9.
TakahashiK and YamanakaS. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126:663–676.
10.
BoyerLA, LeeTI, ColeMF, JohnstoneSE, LevineSS, ZuckerJP, GuentherMG, KumarRM, MurrayHL, et al. (2005). Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell, 122:947–956.
11.
BabaieY, HerwigR, GreberB, BrinkTC, WruckW, GrothD, LehrachH, BurdonT and AdjayeJ. (2007). Analysis of Oct4-dependent transcriptional networks regulating self-renewal and pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 25:500–510.
12.
ChavezL, BaisAS, VingronM, LehrachH, AdjayeJ and HerwigR. (2009). In silico identification of a core regulatory network of OCT4 in human embryonic stem cells using an integrated approach. BMC Genomics, 10:314.
13.
HershkoA and CiechanoverA. (1998). The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem, 67:425–479.
14.
KomanderD and RapeM. (2012). The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem, 81:203–229.
15.
NijmanSM, Luna-VargasMP, VeldsA, BrummelkampTR, DiracAM, SixmaTK and BernardsR. (2005). A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell, 123:773–786.
16.
RitortoMS, EwanR, Perez-OlivaAB, KnebelA, BuhrlageSJ, WightmanM, KellySM, WoodNT, VirdeeS, et al. (2014). Screening of DUB activity and specificity by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Nat Commun, 5:4763.
17.
JungL, TropelP, MoalY, TeletinM, JeandidierE, GayonR, HimmelspachC, BelloF, AndreC, et al. (2014). ONSL and OSKM cocktails act synergistically in reprogramming human somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol Hum Reprod, 20:538–549.
18.
LiL-C and DahiyaR. (2002). MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics, 18:1427–1431.
Le CarrourT, AssouS, TondeurS, LhermitteL, LambN, RemeT, PantescoV, HamamahS, KleinB and De VosJ. (2010). Amazonia!: An online resource to Google and visualize public human whole genome expression data. Open Bioinforma J. 4.
LiuY, ShinS, ZengX, ZhanM, GonzalezR, MuellerF-J, SchwartzCM, XueH, LiH, et al. (2006). Genome wide profiling of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), their derivatives and embryonal carcinoma cells to develop base profiles of U.S. Federal government approved hESC lines. BMC Dev Biol, 6:20.
27.
JungM, PetersonH, ChavezL, KahlemP, LehrachH, ViloJ and AdjayeJ (2010). A data integration approach to mapping OCT4 gene regulatory networks operative in embryonic stem cells and embryonal carcinoma cells. PLoS One, 5:e10709.
28.
KunarsoG, ChiaNY, JeyakaniJ, HwangC, LuX, ChanYS, NgHH and BourqueG. (2010). Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet, 42:631–634.
29.
GreberB, LehrachH and AdjayeJ. (2007). Silencing of core transcription factors in human EC cells highlights the importance of autocrine FGF signaling for self-renewal. BMC Dev Biol, 7:46.
30.
SloaneMA, WongJW, PereraD, NunezAC, PimandaJE, HawkinsNJ, SieberOM, BourkeMJ, HessonLB and WardRL. (2014). Epigenetic inactivation of the candidate tumor suppressor USP44 is a frequent and early event in colorectal neoplasia. Epigenetics, 9:1092–1100.
31.
ReddingtonJP, PenningsS and MeehanRR. (2013). Non-canonical functions of the DNA methylome in gene regulation. Biochem J, 451:13–23.
32.
MaunakeaAK, NagarajanRP, BilenkyM, BallingerTJ, D'SouzaC, FouseSD, JohnsonBE, HongC, NielsenC, et al. (2010). Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature, 466:253–257.
33.
FarthingCR, FiczG, NgRK, ChanC-F, AndrewsS, DeanW, HembergerM and ReikW. (2008). Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet, 4:e1000116.
34.
StraussmanR, NejmanD, RobertsD, SteinfeldI, BlumB, BenvenistyN, SimonI, YakhiniZ and CedarH. (2009). Developmental programming of CpG island methylation profiles in the human genome. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 16:564–571.
35.
IchiyanagiK. (2013). Epigenetic regulation of transcription and possible functions of mammalian short interspersed elements, SINEs. Genes Genet Syst, 88:19–29.
36.
KatoY, KanedaM, HataK, KumakiK, HisanoM, KoharaY, OkanoM, LiE, NozakiM and SasakiH. (2007). Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum Mol Genet, 16:2272–2280.
37.
ZhangX, NeganovaI, PrzyborskiS, YangC, CookeM, AtkinsonSP, AnyfantisG, FenykS, KeithWN, et al. (2009). A role for NANOG in G1 to S transition in human embryonic stem cells through direct binding of CDK6 and CDC25A. J Cell Biol, 184:67–82.
38.
StegmeierF, RapeM, DraviamVM, NalepaG, SowaME, AngXL, McDonaldER3rd, LiMZ, HannonGJ, et al. (2007). Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature, 446:876–881.
39.
SowaME, BennettEJ, GygiSP and HarperJW (2009). Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell, 138:389–403.
40.
ZhangY, ForemanO, WigleDA, KosariF, VasmatzisG, SalisburyJL, van DeursenJ and GalardyPJ (2012). USP44 regulates centrosome positioning to prevent aneuploidy and suppress tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest, 122:4362–4374.
41.
ZhangY, van DeursenJ and GalardyPJ (2011). Overexpression of ubiquitin specific protease 44 (USP44) induces chromosomal instability and is frequently observed in human T-cell leukemia. PLoS One, 6:e23389.
42.
LiuT, SunB, ZhaoX, LiY, ZhaoX, LiuY, YaoZ, GuQ, DongX, et al. (2015). USP44+ cancer stem cell subclones contribute to breast cancer aggressiveness by promoting vasculogenic mimicry. Mol Cancer Ther, 14:2121–2131.
43.
FuchsG, ShemaE, VestermanR, KotlerE, WolchinskyZ, WilderS, GolombL, PribludaA, ZhangF, et al. (2012). RNF20 and USP44 regulate stem cell differentiation by modulating H2B monoubiquitylation. Mol Cell, 46:662–673.
44.
LanX, AtanassovBS, LiW, ZhangY, FlorensL, MohanRD, GalardyPJ, WashburnMP, WorkmanJL, et al. (2016). USP44 is an integral component of N-CoR that contributes to gene repression by deubiquitinating histone H2B. Cell Rep, 17:2382–2393.
45.
MosbechA, LukasC, Bekker-JensenS and MailandN. (2013). The deubiquitylating enzyme USP44 counteracts the DNA double-strand break response mediated by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases. J Biol Chem, 288:16579–16587.
46.
EndohM, EndoTA, EndohT, IsonoK, SharifJ, OharaO, ToyodaT, ItoT, EskelandR, et al. (2012). Histone H2A mono-ubiquitination is a crucial step to mediate PRC1-dependent repression of developmental genes to maintain ES cell identity. PLoS Genet, 8:e1002774.
47.
MadanB, MadanV, WeberO, TropelP, BlumC, KiefferE, VivilleS and FehlingHJ. (2009). The pluripotency-associated gene Dppa4 is dispensable for embryonic stem cell identity and germ cell development but essential for embryogenesis. Mol Cell Biol, 29:3186–3203.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
