Despite many attempts, true bovine embryonic stem cells (bESC) still remain elusive. The WNT pathway has been associated with stem cell control in vertebrates and its role in pluripotency maintenance has been proven for several mammalian species, including rodents and primates. Thus, we have aimed to investigate the effect of WNT activation on pluripotency marker gene expression in the inner cell mass (ICM) and the trophectoderm (TE) and to study the derivation potential of primary bESC lines from blastocysts obtained in the presence of the glycogen synthase kinase 3 inhibitor (GSK3i). WNT activity clearly exerted a positive effect on pluripotency gene expression in developing bovine embryos, manifested by upregulation of OCT4, NANOG, REX1, SOX2, c-MYC, and KLF4 in the ICM and downregulation of CDX2 in the TE. However, the prolonged exposition of preimplantation embryos to the GSK3i resulted in reduced potential to form primary ESC-like colonies. The results of bESC derivation experiments allowed us to speculate that the derived cell lines may share features of both naïve and primed ESCs. Similar to mouse epiblast stem cells and human ESCs, the derived lines grew as flat monolayer colonies intolerant to passaging as single cells. JAK/STAT signaling was indispensable for proper colony formation and proliferation, yet LIF alone was inefficient to support self-renewal. Concomitant with the naïve state of mouse ESCs, WNT activity supported by LIF had beneficial effects on cell culture propagation, survival after passage, morphology, and pluripotency-related marker gene expression. Moreover, colonies derived in the presence of LIF and GSK3i maintained KLF4 transcription over several passages, whereas EpiSCs virtually do not express KLF4.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SticeSL, StrelchenkoNS, KefferCL and MatthewsL. (1996). Pluripotent bovine embryonic cell lines direct embryonic development following nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod, 54:100–110.
2.
NgHH and SuraniMA. (2011). The transcriptional and signalling networks of pluripotency. Nat Cell Biol, 13:490–496.
3.
LannerF and RossantJ. (2010). The role of FGF/Erk signaling in pluripotent cells. Development, 137:3351–3360.
4.
LuCW, YabuuchiA, ChenL, ViswanathanS, KimK and DaleyGQ. (2008). Ras-MAPK signaling promotes trophectoderm formation from embryonic stem cells and mouse embryos. Nat Genet, 40:921–926.
5.
ArmanE, Krausz-HaffnerR, ChenY, HeathJK and LonaiP. (1998). Targeted disruption of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 suggests a role for FGF signaling in pregastrulation mammalian development. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 95:5082–5087.
6.
TanakaS, KunathT, hadjantonakisA-K, NagyA and RossantJ. (1998). Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferartion by FGF-4. Science, 282:2072–2075.
7.
BuehrM. (2002). Rapid loss of Oct-4 and pluripotency in cultured rodent blastocysts and derivative cell lines. Biol Reprod, 68:222–229.
8.
YingQL, WrayJ, NicholsJ, Batlle-MoreraL, DobleB, WoodgettJ, CohenP and SmithA. (2008). The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature, 453:519–523.
9.
SatoN, MeijerL, SkaltsounisL, GreengardP and BrivanlouAH. (2004). Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med, 10:55–63.
10.
BuehrM, MeekS, BlairK, YangJ, UreJ, SilvaJ, McLayR, HallJ, YingQL and SmithA. (2008). Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts. Cell, 135:1287–1298.
11.
LoganCY and NusseR. (2004). The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 20:781–810.
12.
GavertN and Ben-Ze'evA. (2007). Beta-catenin signaling in biological control and cancer. J Cell Biochem, 102:820–828.
13.
HeubergerJ and BirchmeierW. (2010). Interplay of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and canonical Wnt signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2:a002915.
14.
JamoraC, Das GuptaR, KocieniewskiP and FuchsE. (2003). Links between signal transduction, transcription and adhesion in epithelial bud development. Nature, 422:317–322.
15.
RiethmacherD, BrinkmannV and BirchmeierC. (1995). A targeted mutation in mouse E-cadherin gene results in defective preimplantation development. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 92:855–859.
16.
NiwaH. (2007). Open conformation chromatin and pluripotency. Genes Dev, 21:2671–2676.
17.
TesarPJ, ChenowethJG, BrookFA, DaviesTJ, EvansEP, MackDL, GardnerRL and McKayRD. (2007). New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature, 448:196–199.
18.
BronsIG, SmithersLE, TrotterMW, Rugg-GunnP, SunB, Chuva de Sousa LopesSM, HowlettSK, ClarksonA, Ahrlund-RichterL, PedersenRA and VallierL. (2007). Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature, 448:191–195.
19.
ten BergeD, KurekD, BlauwkampT, KooleW, MaasA, ErogluE, SiuRK and NusseR. (2011). Embryonic stem cells require Wnt proteins to prevent differentiation to epiblast stem cells. Nat Cell Biol, 13:1070–1075.
20.
XuRH, Sampsell-BarronTL, GuF, RootS, PeckRM, PanG, YuJ, Antosiewicz-BourgetJ, TianS, StewartR and ThomsonJA. (2008). NANOG is a direct target of TGFbeta/activin-mediated SMAD signaling in human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell, 3:196–206.
21.
SilvaSS, RowntreeRK, MekhoubadS and LeeJT. (2008). X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105:4820–4825.
22.
KeeK, AngelesVT, FloresM, NguyenHN and Reijo PeraRA. (2009). Human DAZL, DAZ and BOULE genes modulate primordial germ-cell and haploid gamete formation. Nature, 462:222–225.
23.
PantD and KeeferCL. (2009). Expression of pluripotency-related genes during bovine inner cell mass explant culture. Cloning Stem Cells, 11:355–365.
24.
HannaJH, ChengAW, SahaK, LengnerCJ, SoldnerF, CassadyJP, MuffatJ., CareyBW and JaenischR. (2010). Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 107:9222–9227.
25.
MadejaZE, SosnowskiJ, HryniewiczK, WarzychE, PawlakP, RozwadowskaN, PlusaB and LechniakD. (2013). Changes in sub-cellular localisation of trophoblast and inner cell mass specific transcription factors during bovine preimplantation development. BMC Dev Biol, 13:32.
26.
HolmP, BoothPJ, SchnidtMH, GreveT and CellesenH. (1999). High bovine blastocyst development in a static in vitro production system using SOFaa medium supplemented with sodium citrate and myo-inositol with or without serum-proteins. Theriogenology, 52:683–700.
27.
de LoosF, van VlietC, van MaurikP and KruipAM. (1989). Morphology of immature bovine oocytes. Gamete Res, 24:197–204.
28.
PeippoJ, MachatyZ and PeterA. (2011). Terminologies for the pre-attachment bovine embryo. Theriogenology, 76:1373–1379.
29.
ViebahnC. (1999). The anterior margin of the mammalian gastrula: comparative and phylogenetic aspects of its role in axis formation and head induction. Curr Top Dev Biol, 46:63–103.
30.
LivakKJ and SchmittgenTD. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods, 25:402–408.
31.
SchmittgenTD and LivakKJ. (2008). Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc, 3:1101–1108.
32.
RogersMB, HoslerBA and GudasLJ. (1991). Specific expression of a retinoic-acid regulated, zinc-finger gene, Rex-1, in preimplantation embryos, trophoblast and spermatocytes. Development, 113:815–824.
33.
DenicolAC, DobbsKB, McLeanKM, CarambulaSF, LoureiroB and HansenPJ. (2013). Canonical WNT signaling regulates development of bovine embryos to the blastocyst stage. Sci Rep, 3:1266.
34.
AdjayeJ, HerwigR, BrinkTC, HerrmannD, GreberB, SudheerS, GrothD, CarnwathJW, LehrachH and NiemannH. (2007). Conserved molecular portraits of bovine and human blastocysts as a consequence of the transition from maternal to embryonic control of gene expression. Physiol Genomics, 31:315–327.
35.
AparicioIM, Garcia-HerrerosM, FairT and LonerganP. (2010). Identification and regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 during bovine embryo development. Reproduction, 140:83–92.
36.
KramerT, SchmidtB and Lo MonteF. (2012). Small-molecule inhibitors of GSK-3: structural insights and their application to Alzheimer's disease models. Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2012:381029.
37.
KellyKF, NgDY, JayakumaranG, WoodGA, KoideH and DobleBW. (2011). beta-catenin enhances Oct-4 activity and reinforces pluripotency through a TCF-independent mechanism. Cell Stem Cell, 8:214–227.
38.
PlusaB, PiliszekA, FrankenbergS, ArtusJ and HadjantonakisAK. (2008). Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development, 135:3081–3091.
39.
KangM, PiliszekA, ArtusJ and HadjantonakisAK. (2013). FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse. Development, 140:267–279.
40.
BergDK, SmithCS, PeartonDJ, WellsDN, BroadhurstR, DonnisonM and PfefferPL. (2011). Trophectoderm lineage determination in cattle. Dev Cell, 20:244–255.
41.
NishiokaN, InoueK, AdachiK, KiyonariH, OtaM, RalstonA, YabutaN, HiraharaS, StephensonRO, et al. (2009). The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev Cell, 16:398–410.
42.
GoossensK, Van SoomA, Van PouckeM, VandaeleL, VandesompeleJ, Van ZeverenA and PeelmanLJ. (2007). Identification and expression analysis of genes associated with bovine blastocyst formation. BMC Dev Biol, 7:64.
43.
HesseM, FranzT, TamaiY, M.M.T and MaginTM. (2000). Targeted deletion of keratins 18 and 19 leads to trophoblast fragility and early embryonic lethality. EMBO J, 19:5060–5070.
44.
NiwaH, ToyookaY, ShimosatoD, StrumpfD, TakahashiK, YagiR and RossantJ. (2005). Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell, 123:917–929.
45.
RoddaDJ, ChewJL, LimLH, LohYH, WangB, NgHH and RobsonP. (2005). Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. J Biol Chem, 280:24731–24737.
46.
MasuiS, NakatakeY, ToyookaY, ShimosatoD, YagiR, TakahashiK, OkochiH, OkudaA, MatobaR, et al. (2007). Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol, 9:625–635.
47.
TakaoY, YokotaT and KoideH. (2007). Beta-catenin up-regulates Nanog expression through interaction with Oct-3/4 in embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 353:699–705.
48.
MitsuiK, TokuzawaY, ItohH, SegawaK, MurakamiM, MaedaM and YamanakaS. (2003). The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell, 113:631–642.
49.
ChenL, YabuuchiA, EminliS, TakeuchiA, LuCW, HochedlingerK and DaleyGQ. (2009). Cross-regulation of the Nanog and Cdx2 promoters. Cell Res, 19:1052–1061.
50.
AntonR, KestlerHA and KuhlM. (2007). Beta-catenin signaling contributes to stemness and regulates early differentiation in murine embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett, 581:5247–5254.
51.
BrembeckFH, RosarioM and BirchmeierW. (2006). Balancing cell adhesion and Wnt signaling, the key role of beta-catenin. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 16:51–59.
52.
BoneHK, NelsonAS, GoldringCE, ToshD and WelhamMJ. (2011). A novel chemically directed route for the generation of definitive endoderm from human embryonic stem cells based on inhibition of GSK-3. J Cell Sci, 124:1992–2000.
53.
OzawaM, SakataniM, YaoJ, ShankerS, YuF, YamashidaR, WakabayashiS, NakaiK, SudanoMH, FarmerieWG and HansenPJ. (2012). Global gene expression of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the bovine blastocyst. BMC Dev Biol, 12:33.
54.
SinghAM, HamazakiT, HankowskiKE and TeradaN. (2007). A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells, 25:2534–2542.
55.
NgRK, DeanW, DawsonC, LuciferoD, MadejaZ, ReikW and HembergerM. (2008). Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat Cell Biol, 10:1280–1290.
56.
SpitsC, MateizelI, GeensM, MertzanidouA, StaessenC, VandeskeldeY, Van der ElstJ, LiebaersI and SermonK. (2008). Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol, 26:1361–1363.
57.
GaztelumendiN and NoguesC. (2014). Chromosome instability in mouse embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep, 4:5324.
58.
GuoG, YangJ, NicholsJ, HallJS, EyresI, MansfieldW and SmithA. (2009). Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development, 136:1063–1069.
59.
TakahashiK and YamanakaS. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126:663–676.
60.
ChenX, XuH, YuanP, FangF, HussM, VegaVB, WongE, OrlovYL, ZhangW, et al. (2008). Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 133:1106–1117.
61.
JiangJ, ChanY-S, LohY-H, CaiJ, TongG-Q, LimC-A, RobsonP, ZhongS and NgH-H. (2008). A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol, 10:353–360.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
