Homologous recombination (HR) maintains genomic integrity against DNA replication stress and deleterious lesions, such as double-strand breaks (DSBs). Rad51 recombinase is critical for HR events that mediate the exchange of genetic information between parental chromosomes in eukaryotes. Additionally, Rad51 and HR accessory factors may facilitate replication fork progression by preventing replication fork collapse and repair DSBs that spontaneously arise during the normal cell cycle. In this study, we demonstrated a novel role for Rad51 during the cell cycle in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). In mESCs, Rad51 was constitutively expressed throughout the cell cycle, and the formation of Rad51 foci increased as the cells entered S phase. Suppression of Rad51 expression caused cells to accumulate at G2/M phase and activated the DNA damage checkpoint, but it did not affect the self-renewal or differentiation capacity of mESCs. Even though Rad51 suppression significantly inhibited the proliferation rate of mESCs, Rad51 suppression did not affect the replication fork progression and speed, indicating that Rad51 repaired DNA damage and promoted DNA replication in S phase through an independent mechanism. In conclusion, Rad51 may contribute to G2/M transition in mESCs, while preserving genomic integrity in global organization of DNA replication fork.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RossantJ. (2001). Stem cells from the Mammalian blastocyst. Stem Cells, 19:477–482.
2.
AndrewsPW. (2002). From teratocarcinomas to embryonic stem cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 357:405–417.
3.
BakerDE, HarrisonNJ, MaltbyE, SmithK, MooreHD, ShawPJ, HeathPR, HoldenH and AndrewsPW. (2007). Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo. Nat Biotechnol, 25:207–215.
4.
MaitraA, ArkingDE, ShivapurkarN, IkedaM, StastnyV, KassaueiK, SuiG, CutlerDJ, LiuY, et al. (2005). Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet, 37:1099–1103.
5.
SavatierP, LapillonneH, JirmanovaL, VitelliL and SamarutJ. (2002). Analysis of the cell cycle in mouse embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol, 185:27–33.
6.
SerranoL, LiangL, ChangY, DengL, MaulionC, NguyenS and TischfieldJA. (2011). Homologous recombination conserves DNA sequence integrity throughout the cell cycle in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev, 20:363–374.
7.
TichyED. (2011). Mechanisms maintaining genomic integrity in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 236:987–996.
8.
TichyED, PillaiR, DengL, TischfieldJA, HexleyP, BabcockGF and StambrookPJ. (2012). The abundance of Rad51 protein in mouse embryonic stem cells is regulated at multiple levels. Stem Cell Res, 9:124–134.
9.
BranzeiD and FoianiM. (2010). Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 11:208–219.
10.
BurhansWC and WeinbergerM. (2007). DNA replication stress, genome instability and aging. Nucleic Acids Res, 35:7545–7556.
11.
PaquesF and HaberJE. (1999). Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 63:349–404.
12.
San FilippoJ, SungP and KleinH. (2008). Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem, 77:229–257.
13.
BlowJJ and GillespiePJ. (2008). Replication licensing and cancer—a fatal entanglement?. Nat Rev Cancer, 8:799–806.
14.
SieberOM, HeinimannK and TomlinsonIP. (2003). Genomic instability—the engine of tumorigenesis?. Nat Rev Cancer, 3:701–708.
15.
AdamsBR, GoldingSE, RaoRR and ValerieK. (2010). Dynamic dependence on ATR and ATM for double-strand break repair in human embryonic stem cells and neural descendants. PLoS One, 5:e10001.
16.
TichyED, PillaiR, DengL, LiangL, TischfieldJ, SchwembergerSJ, BabcockGF and StambrookPJ. (2010). Mouse embryonic stem cells, but not somatic cells, predominantly use homologous recombination to repair double-strand DNA breaks. Stem Cells Dev, 19:1699–1711.
17.
LimDS and HastyP. (1996). A mutation in mouse rad51 results in an early embryonic lethal that is suppressed by a mutation in p53. Mol Cell Biol, 16:7133–7143.
18.
TsuzukiT, FujiiY, SakumiK, TominagaY, NakaoK, SekiguchiM, MatsushiroA, YoshimuraY and MoritaT. (1996). Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 93:6236–6240.
19.
WestSC. (2003). Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 4:435–445.
20.
KrejciL, AltmannovaV, SpirekM and ZhaoX. (2012). Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic Acids Res, 40:5795–5818.
21.
HollomanWK. (2011). Unraveling the mechanism of BRCA2 in homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 18:748–754.
22.
LiuJ, DotyT, GibsonB and HeyerWD. (2010). Human BRCA2 protein promotes RAD51 filament formation on RPA-covered single-stranded DNA. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17:1260–1262.
23.
CarrAM, PaekAL and WeinertT. (2011). DNA replication: failures and inverted fusions. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 22:866–874.
PetermannE, OrtaML, IssaevaN, SchultzN and HelledayT. (2010). Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell, 37:492–502.
26.
ChiP, Van KomenS, SehornMG, SigurdssonS and SungP. (2006). Roles of ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis in human Rad51 recombinase function. DNA Repair (Amst), 5:381–391.
27.
KimTM, KoJH, HuL, KimSA, BishopAJ, VijgJ, MontagnaC and HastyP. (2012). RAD51 mutants cause replication defects and chromosomal instability. Mol Cell Biol, 32:3663–3680.
28.
HashimotoY, Ray ChaudhuriA, LopesM and CostanzoV. (2010). Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17:1305–1311.
29.
SchwabRAV and NiedzwiedzW. (2011). Visualization of DNA replication in the vertebrate model system DT40 using the DNA fiber technique. J Vis Exp, 56:e3255.
30.
BadieS, EscandellJM, BouwmanP, CarlosAR, ThanasoulaM, GallardoMM, SuramA, JacoI, BenitezJ, et al. (2010). BRCA2 acts as a RAD51 loader to facilitate telomere replication and capping. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17:1461–1469.
31.
YataK, LloydJ, MaslenS, BleuyardJY, SkehelM, SmerdonSJ and EsashiF. (2012). Plk1 and CK2 act in concert to regulate Rad51 during DNA double strand break repair. Mol Cell, 45:371–383.
32.
ScaifeRM. (2004). G2 cell cycle arrest, down-regulation of cyclin B, and induction of mitotic catastrophe by the flavoprotein inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium. Mol Cancer Ther, 3:1229–1237.
33.
WoldMS. (1997). Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu Rev Biochem, 66:61–92.
34.
BuissonR, Dion-CoteAM, CoulombeY, LaunayH, CaiH, StasiakAZ, StasiakA, XiaB and MassonJY. (2010). Cooperation of breast cancer proteins PALB2 and piccolo BRCA2 in stimulating homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 17:1247–1254.
35.
SioftanosG, IsmailA, FohseL, ShanleyS, WorkuM and ShortSC. (2010). BRCA1 and BRCA2 heterozygosity in embryonic stem cells reduces radiation-induced Rad51 focus formation but is not associated with radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol, 86:1095–1105.
36.
PaullTT, RogakouEP, YamazakiV, KirchgessnerCU, GellertM and BonnerWM. (2000). A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol, 10:886–895.
37.
BellSP and DuttaA. (2002). DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem, 71:333–374.
38.
LeonhardtH, PageAW, WeierHU and BestorTH. (1992). A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell, 71:865–873.
39.
MurtiKG, HeDC, BrinkleyBR, ScottR and LeeSH. (1996). Dynamics of human replication protein A subunit distribution and partitioning in the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res, 223:279–289.
40.
LeonhardtH, RahnHP, WeinzierlP, SporbertA, CremerT, ZinkD and CardosoMC. (2000). Dynamics of DNA replication factories in living cells. J Cell Biol, 149:271–280.
41.
ScholzenT and GerdesJ. (2000). The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol, 182:311–322.
42.
DupreA, Boyer-ChatenetL, SattlerRM, ModiAP, LeeJH, NicoletteML, KopelovichL, JasinM, BaerR, PaullTT and GautierJ. (2008). A forward chemical genetic screen reveals an inhibitor of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nat Chem Biol, 4:119–125.
43.
BuglerB, SchmittE, AressyB and DucommunB. (2010). Unscheduled expression of CDC25B in S-phase leads to replicative stress and DNA damage. Mol Cancer, 9:29.
44.
DaboussiF, CourbetS, BenhamouS, KannoucheP, ZdzienickaMZ, DebatisseM and LopezBS. (2008). A homologous recombination defect affects replication-fork progression in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci, 121:162–166.
45.
VannierJB, SandhuS, PetalcorinMI, WuX, NabiZ, DingH and BoultonSJ. (2013). RTEL1 is a replisome-associated helicase that promotes telomere and genome-wide replication. Science, 342:239–242.
46.
NagyA, GertsensteinM, VinterstenK and BehringerR. (2003). Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
47.
PauklinS, KristjuhanA, MaimetsT and JaksV. (2005). ARF and ATM/ATR cooperate in p53-mediated apoptosis upon oncogenic stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 334:386–394.
48.
SlupianekA, SchmutteC, TomblineG, Nieborowska-SkorskaM, HoserG, NowickiMO, PierceAJ, FishelR and SkorskiT. (2001). BCR/ABL regulates mammalian RecA homologs, resulting in drug resistance. Mol Cell, 8:795–806.
49.
CappelliE, TownsendS, GriffinC and ThackerJ. (2011). Homologous recombination proteins are associated with centrosomes and are required for mitotic stability. Exp Cell Res, 317:1203–1213.
50.
KobernaK, LigasovaA, MalinskyJ, PlissA, SiegelAJ, CvackovaZ, FidlerovaH, MasataM, FialovaM, RaskaI and BerezneyR. (2005). Electron microscopy of DNA replication in 3-D: evidence for similar-sized replication foci throughout S-phase. J Cell Biochem, 94:126–138.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
