DNA methylation constitutes a major obstacle in the reprogramming of cells to pluripotency. Although little is known regarding the molecular mechanisms of DNA demethylation, activation-induced deaminase (AID), which is known to function in antibody diversification, has been implicated in DNA demethylation through a base excision repair (BER)-mediated pathway. Here we comprehensively examine the plausibility of coupled AID-BER demethylation in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and show that AID is dispensable for reprogramming cells into iPSCs. Additionally, the overexpression of AID and other factors involved in AID-coupled DNA demethylation does not increase the efficiency of reprogramming. Moreover, BER is not likely to play a role in this process. Our results indicate that the reactivation of key genes governing the pluripotency circuitry occurs through a mechanism that is independent of deamination-coupled demethylation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HannaJH, SahaK and JaenischR. (2010). Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell, 143:508–525.
2.
TakahashiK and YamanakaS. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126:663–676.
3.
OkitaK, IchisakaT and YamanakaS. (2007). Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 448:313–317.
4.
WernigM, MeissnerA, ForemanR, BrambrinkT, KuM, HochedlingerK, BernsteinBE and JaenischR. (2007). In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature, 448:318–324.
5.
MaheraliN, et al. (2007). Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell, 1:55–70.
6.
MikkelsenTS, et al. (2008). Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature, 454:49–55.
7.
GaoY, et al. (2013). Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell, 12:453–469.
8.
HochedlingerK and PlathK. (2009). Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development, 136:509–523.
9.
BhutaniN, BradyJJ, DamianM, SaccoA, CorbelSY and BlauHM. (2010). Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature, 463:1042–1047.
10.
WuSC and ZhangY. (2010). Active DNA demethylation: many roads lead to Rome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 11:607–620.
11.
PoppC, DeanW, FengS, CokusSJ, AndrewsS, PellegriniM, JacobsenSE and ReikW. (2010). Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature, 463:1101–1105.
12.
NabelCS, JiaH, YeY, ShenL, GoldschmidtHL, StiversJT, ZhangY and KohliRM. (2012). AID/APOBEC deaminases disfavor modified cytosines implicated in DNA demethylation. Nat Chem Biol, 8:751–758.
13.
FritzEL, RosenbergBR, LayK, MihailovicA, TuschlT and PapavasiliouFN. (2013). A comprehensive analysis of the effects of the deaminase AID on the transcriptome and methylome of activated B cells. Nat Immunol, 14:749–755.
14.
RaiK, HugginsIJ, JamesSR, KarpfAR, JonesDA and CairnsBR. (2008). DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell, 135:1201–1212.
15.
GuoJU, SuY, ZhongC, MingGL and SongH. (2011). Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell, 145:423–434.
16.
RobbianiDF, et al. (2008). AID is required for the chromosomal breaks in c-myc that lead to c-myc/IgH translocations. Cell, 135:1028–1038.
17.
YingQL, WrayJ, NicholsJ, Batlle-MoreraL, DobleB, WoodgettJ, CohenP and SmithA. (2008). The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature, 453:519–523.
18.
ChenJ, et al. (2010). Towards an optimized culture medium for the generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. J Biol Chem, 285:31066–31072.
19.
BhutaniN, DeckerMN, BradyJJ, BussatRT, BurnsDM, CorbelSY and BlauHM. (2013). A critical role for AID in the initiation of reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells. FASEB J, 27:1107–1113.
20.
ChenJ, et al. (2013). H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. Nat Genet, 45:34–42.
21.
ChiouSH, et al. (2013). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 regulates nuclear reprogramming and promotes iPSC generation without c-Myc. J Exp Med, 210:85–98.
22.
HajkovaP, JeffriesSJ, LeeC, MillerN, JacksonSP and SuraniMA. (2010). Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science, 329:78–82.
KrausWL. (2008). Transcriptional control by PARP-1: chromatin modulation, enhancer-binding, coregulation, and insulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 20:294–302.
25.
SimonssonS and GurdonJ. (2004). DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nat Cell Biol, 6:984–990.
26.
FoshayKM, et al. (2012). Embryonic stem cells induce pluripotency in somatic cell fusion through biphasic reprogramming. Mol Cell, 46:159–170.
27.
MuramatsuM, KinoshitaK, FagarasanS, YamadaS, ShinkaiY and HonjoT. (2000). Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell, 102:553–563.
28.
PoloJM, et al. (2012). A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell, 151:1617–1632.
29.
CantoneI and FisherAG. (2013). Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 20:282–289.
30.
DoegeCA, et al. (2012). Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2. Nature, 488:652–655.
31.
CortellinoS, et al. (2011). Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell, 146:67–79.
32.
HeYF, et al. (2011). Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science, 333:1303–1307.
33.
DeplusR, et al. (2013). TET2 and TET3 regulate GlcNAcylation and H3K4 methylation through OGT and SET1/COMPASS. EMBO J, 32:645–655.
34.
VellaP, et al. (2013). Tet proteins connect the O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase Ogt to chromatin in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell, 49:645–656.
SzulwachKE, et al. (2011). 5-hmC-mediated epigenetic dynamics during postnatal neurodevelopment and aging. Nat Neurosci, 14:1607–1616.
37.
WilliamsK, ChristensenJ, PedersenMT, JohansenJV, CloosPA, RappsilberJ and HelinK. (2011). TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature, 473:343–348.
38.
McBrideKM, GazumyanA, WooEM, SchwickertTA, ChaitBT and NussenzweigMC. (2008). Regulation of class switch recombination and somatic mutation by AID phosphorylation. J Exp Med, 205:2585–2594.
39.
AriokaY, WatanabeA, SaitoK and YamadaY. (2012). Activation-induced cytidine deaminase alters the subcellular localization of Tet family proteins. PLoS One, 7, e45031.
40.
PatenaudeAM and Di NoiaJM. (2010). The mechanisms regulating the subcellular localization of AID. Nucleus, 1:325–331.
41.
LiYQ, ZhouPZ, ZhengXD, WalshCP and XuGL. (2007). Association of Dnmt3a and thymine DNA glycosylase links DNA methylation with base-excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res, 35:390–400.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
