Here, we describe a focused microarray for screening rat embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and provide validation data that this array can distinguish undifferentiated rat ESCs from rat trophoblast stem (TS) cells, rat extraembryonic endoderm cells, mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells, and differentiated rat ESCs. Using this tool, genuine rat ESC lines, which have been expanded in a conventional rat ESC medium containing two inhibitors (2i), for example, glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors, and leukemia inhibitory factor, and genuine rat ESCs, which have been expanded in rat ESC medium containing four inhibitors (4i), for example, GSK3, MEK, Alk5, and Rho-associated kinase inhibitors were compared; as were genuine rat ESCs from 4 different strains of rats. Expression of Cdx2, a gene associated with trophoblast determination, was observed in genuine, undifferentiated rat ESCs from 4 strains and from both 2i and 4i ESC derivation medium. This finding is in contrast to undifferentiated mouse ESCs that do not express Cdx2. The rat ESC focused microarray described in this report has utility for rapid screening of rat ESCs. This tool will enable optimization of culture conditions in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HamraFK. 2010. Gene targeting: enter the rat. Nature, 467:161–163.
2.
IannacconePM, JacobHJ. 2009. Rats!Dis Model Mech, 2:206–210.
3.
BuehrM, MeekS, BlairK, YangJ, UreJ, SilvaJ, McLayR, HallJ, YingQL, SmithA. 2008. Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts. Cell, 135:1287–1298.
TongC, LiP, WuNL, YanY, YingQL. 2010. Production of p53 gene knockout rats by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature, 467:211–213.
6.
HongJ, HeH, WeissML. 2011. Derivation and characterization of embryonic stem cells lines derived from transgenic fischer 344 and dark agouti rats. Stem Cells Dev, 21:1571–1586.
7.
RalstonA, RossantJ. 2005. Genetic regulation of stem cell origins in the mouse embryo. Clin Genet, 68:106–112.
8.
SasakiH. 2010. Mechanisms of trophectoderm fate specification in preimplantation mouse development. Dev Growth Differ, 52:263–273.
9.
BuehrM, NicholsJ, StenhouseF, MountfordP, GreenhalghCJ, KantachuvesiriS, BrookerG, MullinsJ, SmithAG. 2003. Rapid loss of Oct-4 and pluripotency in cultured rodent blastocysts and derivative cell lines. Biol Reprod, 68:222–229.
10.
KawamataM, OchiyaT. 2010. Generation of genetically modified rats from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107:14223–14228.
11.
AibaK, NedorezovT, PiaoY, NishiyamaA, MatobaR, SharovaLV, SharovAA, YamanakaS, NiwaH, KoMS. 2009. Defining developmental potency and cell lineage trajectories by expression profiling of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA Res, 16:73–80.
12.
TanakaTS, KunathT, KimberWL, JaradatSA, StaggCA, UsudaM, YokotaT, NiwaH, RossantJ, KoMS. 2002. Gene expression profiling of embryo-derived stem cells reveals candidate genes associated with pluripotency and lineage specificity. Genome Res, 12:1921–1928.
13.
ChuykinI, LapidusI, PopovaE, VilianovichL, MosienkoV, AleninaN, BinasB, ChaiG, BaderM, KrivokharchenkoA. 2010. Characterization of trophoblast and extraembryonic endoderm cell lineages derived from rat preimplantation embryos. PLoS One, 5:e9794.
GalatV, BinasB, IannacconeS, PostovitLM, DebebBG, IannacconeP. 2009. Developmental potential of rat extraembryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev, 18:1309–1318.
16.
BronsIG, SmithersLE, TrotterMW, Rugg-GunnP, SunB, Chuva de Sousa LopesSM, HowlettSK, ClarksonA, Ahrlund-RichterL, PedersenRA, VallierL. 2007. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature, 448:191–195.
17.
HayashiK, LopesSM, TangF, SuraniMA. 2008. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell, 3:391–401.
18.
TesarPJ, ChenowethJG, BrookFA, DaviesTJ, EvansEP, MackDL, GardnerRL, McKayRD. 2007. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature, 448:196–199.
19.
AsanomaK, RumiMA, KentLN, ChakrabortyD, RenaudSJ, WakeN, LeeDS, KubotaK, SoaresMJ. 2011. FGF4-dependent stem cells derived from rat blastocysts differentiate along the trophoblast lineage. Dev Biol, 351:110–119.
20.
TanakaS, KunathT, HadjantonakisAK, NagyA, RossantJ. 1998. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science, 282:2072–2075.
21.
SoaresMJ, SchabergKD, PinalCS, DeSK, BhatiaP, AndrewsGK. 1987. Establishment of a rat placental cell line expressing characteristics of extraembryonic membranes. Dev Biol, 124:134–144.
22.
VandesompeleJ, DePK, PattynF, PoppeB, VanRN, DePA, SpelemanF. 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol, 3RESEARCH0034.
23.
AndersenCL, JensenJL, OrntoftTF. 2004. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res, 64:5245–5250.
24.
PfafflMW, TichopadA, PrgometC, NeuviansTP. 2004. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett, 26:509–515.
25.
SilverN, BestS, JiangJ, TheinSL. 2006. Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol, 7:33.
26.
LiC, YangY, GuJ, MaY, JinY. 2009. Derivation and transcriptional profiling analysis of pluripotent stem cell lines from rat blastocysts. Cell Res, 19:173–186.
TanakaTS, LopezDS, Lopez de SilanesI, SharovaLV, AkutsuH, YoshikawaT, AmanoH, YamanakaS, GorospeM, KoMS. 2006. Esg1, expressed exclusively in preimplantation embryos, germline, and embryonic stem cells, is a putative RNA-binding protein with broad RNA targets. Dev Growth Differ, 48:381–390.
29.
YeomYI, FuhrmannG, OvittCE, BrehmA, OhboK, GrossM, HubnerK, ScholerHR. 1996. Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Development, 122:881–894.
30.
ScholerHR, HatzopoulosAK, BallingR, SuzukiN, GrussP. 1989. A family of octamer-specific proteins present during mouse embryogenesis: evidence for germline-specific expression of an Oct factor. EMBO J, 8:2543–2550.
31.
BaoS, TangF, LiX, HayashiK, GillichA, LaoK, SuraniMA. 2009. Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Nature, 461:1292–1295.
32.
ImamuraM, MiuraK, IwabuchiK, IchisakaT, NakagawaM, LeeJ, Kanatsu-ShinoharaM, ShinoharaT, YamanakaS. 2006. Transcriptional repression and DNA hypermethylation of a small set of ES cell marker genes in male germline stem cells. BMC Dev Biol, 6:34.
33.
SuraniMA, Durcova-HillsG, HajkovaP, HayashiK, TeeWW. 2008. Germ line, stem cells, and epigenetic reprogramming. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 73:9–15.
34.
LiuL, LuoGZ, YangW, ZhaoX, ZhengQ, LvZ, LiW, WuHJ, WangL, WangXJ, ZhouQ. 2010. Activation of the imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 region correlates with pluripotency levels of mouse stem cells. J Biol Chem, 285:19483–19490.
PfaffN, MoritzT, ThumT, CantzT. 2012. miRNAs involved in the generation, maintenance, and differentiation of pluripotent cells. J Mol Med (Berlin), 90:747–752.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
