Amid growing environmental concerns, this study explores the psychological underpinnings of individuals’ self-assessment of their general environmental behavior. By analyzing data from the 2023 Spanish General Social Survey, made available by the Centre for Sociological Research, we find that individuals’ positive self-assessment of their environmental conduct is weakly correlated with specific pro-environmental actions, particularly those involving high costs. Conversely, specific behaviors that incur low costs are the most significant determinants of individuals’ positive self-assessment of their overall environmental behavior. These results support the hypothesis that individuals engage in tokenistic behaviors as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance and maintaining a positive self-image as environmentally responsible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsvatourianV., CraigT., HorganG. W., KyleJ., & MacdiarmidJ. I. (2018). Relationships between pro-environmental attitudes and dietary intake patterns. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 216–226; 10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.009
2.
BarrS., & GilgA. W. (2007). A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour. Geografiska Annaler, 89(4), 361–379; 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00266.x
3.
BentlerD., KadiG., & MaierG. (2023). Increasing pro-environmental behaviour in the home and work contexts through cognitive dissonance and autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1199363; 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199363
4.
BestH. (2009). Organic farming as a rational choice: Empirical investigations in environmental decision making. Rationality and Society, 21(2), 197–224; 10.1177/1043463109103899
5.
BosoneL., ChevrierM., & ZenasniF. (2022). Consistent or inconsistent? The effects of inducing cognitive dissonance Vs cognitive consonance on the intention to engage in pro-environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 902703; 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902703
6.
BronfmanN. C., CisternasP. C., López-VázquezP., de la MazaC., & OyanedelJ. C. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean Community. Sustainability, 7(10), 14133–14152; 10.3390/su71014133
7.
BroomC. (2017). Exploring the relations between childhood experiences in nature and young adults’ environmental attitudes and behaviours. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(1), 34–47; 10.1017/aee.2017.1
8.
BurgerA. M., SchulerJ., & EberlingE. (2022). Guilty pleasures: Moral licensing in climate-related behavior. Global Environmental Change, 72, 102415; 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102415
9.
BuscheV., & SargissonR. (2020). The long and the short of it: Do psychological variables predict intentions to reduce the impact of air travel? Sustainability, 13(2), 68–73; 10.1089/sus.2019.0052
10.
CampbellB. (2022). Climate Change impacts and adaptation in the agrifood system. A summary of the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sixth Assessment Report. Rome, FAO.
11.
CheungL. T. O., MaA. T. H., LeeK. M. Y., LeeJ. C. K., & LoY. L. (2019). How does political orientation influence one’s environmental attitude and behaviour? Debate over country park conservation in Hong Kong. Environmental Science & Policy, 99, 115–122; 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.026
12.
CooperJ., & FazioR. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229–266. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60121-5
13.
De VosJ., & SingletonP. A. (2020). Travel and cognitive dissonance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 138, 525–536; 10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.014
14.
DhirA., SadiqM., TalwarS., SakashitaM., & KaurP. (2021). Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102398; 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102398
15.
Di SantoN., LopolitoA., & SistoR. (2023). Tokenism in territorial development: Enabling factors and mitigation measures. European Countryside, 15(3), 346–365; 10.2478/euco-2023-0019
16.
DiekmannA., & PreisendörferP. (1998). Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspiration and reality. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 79–102; 10.1177/104346398010001004
17.
DiekmannA., & PreisendörferP. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15(4), 441–472; 10.1177/1043463103154002
18.
ErtzM., KarakasF., & SarigölluE. (2016). Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3971–3980; 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.010
19.
FestingerL. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Standford,. Standford University Press.
20.
FranzenA., & VoglD. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1001–1008; 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
21.
FuchsD., & LorekS. (2010). Sustainability in electric production and consumption systems-A consumers’ perspective. In LebelL, LorekS. & DanielR. (Eds.) Sustainable Production Consumption Systems: Knowledge, Engagement, Practice. London, Springer. pp. 79–96.
22.
Gaziulusoyİ., & Erdoğan ÖztekinE. (2019). Design for sustainability transitions: Origins, attitudes, and future directions. Sustainability, 11(13), 3601; 10.3390/su11133601
23.
GengL., ChengX., TangZ., ZhouK., & YeL. (2016). Can previous pro-environmental behaviours influence subsequent environmental behaviours? The licensing effect of pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology Article, 10(e9); 10.1017/prp.2016.6
24.
GiffordR. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation. The American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302; 10.1037/a0023566
25.
GiffordR. D., & ChenA. K. S. (2017). Why aren’t we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change, 140(2), 165–178; 10.1007/s10584-016-1830-y
26.
GreenwaldA. G., & RonisD. L. (1978). Twenty years of cognitive dissonance: Case study of the evolution of the theory. Psychological Review, 85(1), 53–57; 10.1037/0033-295x.85.1.53
27.
GuptaA., AroraN., SharmaR., & MishraA. (2022). Determinants of tourists’ site-specific environmentally responsible behavior: An eco-sensitive zone perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 61(6), 1267–1286; 10.1177/00472875211030328
28.
HarrellA. (2021). How can I help you? Multiple resource availability promotes generosity with low value (but not high value) resources. Rationality and Society, 33(3), 341–362; 10.1177/1043463121999658
29.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate Change 2023. Geneva, World Meteorological Organization.
30.
KöhlerJ., GeelsF. W., KernF., MarkardJ., OnsongoE., et al. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32; 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
31.
KollmussA., & AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260; 10.1080/13504620220145401
32.
KriwyP., & MeckingR. A. (2012). Health and environmental consciousness, costs of behaviour and the purchase of organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(1), 30–37; 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01004.x
33.
LacroixK., GiffordR., & ChenA. (2019). Developing and validating the Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers (DIPS) scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 9–18; 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.001
34.
LaneB., & PotterS. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: Exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1085–1092; 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026
35.
LangsethT., & VyffA. (2021). Cultural dissonance: Surfers’ environmental attitudes and actions. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, 695048; 10.3389/fspor.2021.695048
36.
LatoucheS. (2009). Farewell to Growth. Cambridge, Polity Press.
37.
LavergneK. J., & PelletierL. G. (2015). Predicting individual differences in the choice of strategy to compensate for attitude-behaviour inconsistencies in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 135–148; 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.0010
38.
LeonidouL. D., LeonidouC. N., & KvasovaO. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13–14), 1319–1344; 10.1080/0267257X.2010.523710
39.
LiC., AgyeiwaahE., & ZhaoY. (2024). Understanding tourists’ eco-paralysis, environmental concern, and pro-environmental behavior: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(10), 2060–2079; 10.1080/09669582.2023.2266778
40.
LorenzoniI., Nicholson-ColeS., & WhitmarshL. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459; 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
41.
MenziesK., & SheeshkaJ. (2012). The process of exiting vegetarianism: An exploratory study. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research: A Publication of Dietitians of Canada = Revue Canadienne de la Pratique et de la Recherche En Dietetique: une Publication Des Dietetistes du Canada, 73(4), 163–168; 10.3148/73.4.2012.163
42.
MooreH. E., & BolderoJ. (2017). Designing interventions that lasts: A classification of environmental behaviors in relation to the activities, costs, and effort involved for adoption and maintenance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1874; 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01874
43.
MossK. R. (1979). Men and Women of the Corporation. London, Basic Books.
44.
OECD. (2022). Global Plastic Outlook: Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options. Paris, OECD Publishing.
45.
OzakiR. (2011). Adopting sustainable innovation: What makes consumers sign up to green electricity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 1–17; 10.1002/bse.650
46.
RompfS., KronebergC., & SchlösserT. (2017). Institutional trust and the provision of public goods: When do individual costs matter? The case of recycling. Rationality and Society, 29(2), 160–178; 10.1177/1043463117701124
47.
RosaH., DörreK., & LessenichS. (2017). Appropriation, activation and acceleration: The escalatory logics of capitalist modernity and the crisis of dynamic stabilization. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(1), 53–73; 10.1177/0263276416657600
48.
RothgerberH. (2020). Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146, 104511; 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511
49.
SamarasingheR. (2012). The influence of cultural values and environmental attitudes and green consumer behaviour. International Journal of Behavioural Science, 7(1), 83–98; 10.14456/ijbs.2012.6
50.
SchremsI., & UphamP. (2020). Cognitive dissonance and sustainability scientists regarding air travel for academic purposes: A qualitative study. Sustainability, 12(5), 1837; 10.3390/su12051837
SedovaI., SlovakL., & JezkovaI. (2016). Coping with unpleasant knowledge: Meat eating among students of environmental studies. Appetite, 107, 415–424; 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.102
53.
Shinan-AltmanS., & Hamama-RazY. (2023). The association between climate change exposure and climate change worry among Israeli adults: The interplay of risk appraisal, collective efficacy, age and gender. Sustainability, 15(18), 13689; 10.3390/su151813689
54.
Silva SouzaL. G., & O’DwyerE. (2022). Animal rights, environment, or health? Effects of argument type and dissonance on the attitudes towards the consumption of animals. Appetite, 176, 106129; 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106129
55.
SmithK. T., & BrowerT. R. (2012). Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that influence Millennials. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(6), 535–551; 10.1080/0965254X.2012.711345
56.
ThibodeauR., & AronsonE. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 591–602; 10.1177/0146167292185010
57.
ThogersenJ. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 93–103; 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2
58.
ToblerC., VisschersV. H. M., & SiegristM. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 197–207; 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001
59.
VenghausS., HenseleitM., & BelkaM. (2022). The impact of climate change awareness on behavioural changes in Germany: Changing minds or changing behaviour? Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12(1), 1–11; 10.1186/s13705-022-00334-8
60.
VieiraJ., CastroS. L., & SouzaA. S. (2023). Psychological barriers moderate the attitude-behavior gap for climate change. PloS One, 18(7), e0287404; 10.1371/journal.pone.0287404
61.
WhitmarshL., PlayerL., JiongcoA., JamesM., WilliamsM., et al. (2022). Climate anxiety: What predicts it and how is it related to climate action? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 83, 101866; 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101866
62.
World Wide Fund. (2024). 2024 Living Planet Report: A System in Peril. Gland, World Wide Fund.
63.
WrightM., & KlÿnB. (1998). Environmental attitude-behaviour correlations in 21 countries. Journal of Empirical Generalisation in Marketing Science, 3, 42–60.
64.
XiaT., ZhangY., Braunack-MayerA., & CrabbS. (2017). Public attitudes toward encouraging sustainable transportation: An Australian case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(8), 593–601; 10.1080/15568318.2017.1287316
