AmdurD., RabeB. G., & BorickC. P. (2014). Public views on a carbon tax depend on the proposed use of revenue. Issues in Energy and Environmental Policy, 13.
BaranziniA., GoldembergJ., & SpeckS. (2000). A future for carbon taxes. Ecological economics, 32(3), 395-412.
4.
BristowA. L., WardmanM., ZanniA. M., & ChintakayalaP. K. (2010). Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1824-1837.
5.
BirolF., & KepplerJ. H. (2000). Prices, technology development and the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6-7), 457-469.
6.
ChangB., KangS. J., & JungT. Y. (2019). Price and output elasticities of energy demand for industrial sectors in OECD countries. Sustainability, 11(6), 1786.
7.
FarberD. A. (2012). Pollution markets and social equity: Analyzing the fairness of cap and trade. Ecology Law Quarterly, 39(1), 1–56.
8.
FischerC., & FoxA. K. (2012). Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(2), 199-216.
9.
GevrekZ. E., & UyduranogluA. (2015). Public preferences for carbon tax attributes. Ecological Economics, 118, 186-197.
10.
GillinghamK., KotchenM. J., RapsonD. S., & WagnerG. (2013). The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature, 493(7433), 475-476.
11.
GillinghamK., RapsonD., & WagnerG. (2020). The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,10(1), 68-88.
12.
HaasR., & BiermayrP. (2000). The rebound effect for space heating—Empirical evidence from Austria. Energy Policy, 28(6-7), 403-410.
13.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022, April 4). Sixth Assessment Report. AR6 Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/
14.
MehlingM. A., MetcalfG. E., & StavinsR. N. (2018). Linking climate policies to advance global mitigation. Science, 359(6379), 997-998.
15.
MetcalfG. E., & WeisbachD. (2009). The design of a carbon tax. Harvard Environmental Literature Review, 33, 499.
16.
MizobuchiK. (2008). An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2486-2516.
17.
NordhausW. D. (2017). Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7), 1518-1523.
18.
PearceD. (2003). The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3), 362-384.
19.
RajabiM. M., & MousaviM. (2019). Estimating industrial natural gas demand elasticities in selected OECD countries. Energy Economics Letters, 6(1), 52-65.
20.
RajabiM. M. (2022). Dilemmas of energy efficiency: A systematic review of the rebound effect and attempts to curb energy consumption. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102661.
21.
RoyJ. (2000). The rebound effect: Some empirical evidence from India. Energy Policy, 28(6-7), 433-438.
22.
RuzzenentiF., & WagnerA. (2018). Efficiency and the rebound effect in the hegemonic discourse on energy. Nature and Culture, 13(3), 356–377. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26888036
23.
SaundersH. D. (1992). The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. The Energy Journal, 13(4).
24.
SmallK. A., & Van DenderK. (2007). Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: The declining rebound effect. The Energy Journal, 28(1).
25.
SorrellS., & DimitropoulosJ. (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 636-649.
26.
SorrellS., DimitropoulosJ., & SommervilleM. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy policy, 37(4), 1356-1371.
27.
ThomasB. A., & AzevedoI. L. (2013). Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for US households with input–output analysis. Part 2: Simulation. Ecological Economics, 86, 188-198.
28.
TolR. S. (2008). The social cost of carbon. In L. Bernard & W. Semmler (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of the Macroeconomics of Global Warming. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
29.
United Nations Climate Change Conference UK. (2021). Delivering the Glasgow Climate Pact. (COP26). https://ukcop26.org/