Humidification of inspired gases is critical for maintaining airway integrity in mechanically ventilated patients. However, airway instrumentation and the use of cold, dry medical gases can disrupt this process, necessitating external humidification systems. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices regarding humidification systems in mechanical ventilation among health care professionals in Latin American ICUs.
Methods:
A cross-sectional, digital survey was conducted from April to August 2024, targeting ICU professionals across Latin America. The questionnaire assessed operational and clinical knowledge of heat-and-moisture exchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers, as well as their use in mechanical ventilation. Participants were recruited through professional societies and personal networks. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with significance set at P < .05.
Results:
A total of 510 valid responses were analyzed, representing 20 countries. Most respondents were respiratory therapists (73%) with over 5 years of ICU experience (43%). HMEs were the first-line option for mechanical ventilation in 68% of cases, whereas 69% used humidification systems in noninvasive ventilation, favoring heated humidifiers. The median correct response rate showed significant differences by profession (P < .001) and education level (P < .001). Only 31% of respondents correctly identified the recommended minimum absolute humidity, and only 5.3% reported routine maintenance of heated systems.
Conclusions:
This study highlights critical gaps in knowledge and practices related to humidification systems in ICUs. The observed differences in performance based on profession and level of training suggest that continuing education and specialization are essential to optimize clinical practice.
KeckT, LeiackerR, RiechelmannH, et al.Temperature profile in the nasal cavity. Laryngoscope, 2000; 110(4):651–654; doi: 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00021
2.
LindemannJ, LeiackerR, RettingerG, et al.Nasal mucosal temperature during respiration. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 2002; 27(3):135–139; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00544.x
3.
MerckeU. The influence of temperature on mucociliary activity. Temperature range 40 degrees C to 50 degrees C. Acta Otolaryngol, 1974; 78(3–4):253–258; doi: 10.3109/00016487409126352
4.
WalkerAK, BethuneDW. A comparative study of condenser humidifiers. Anaesthesia, 1976; 31(8):1086–1093; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11950.x
5.
RathgeberJ, KazmaierS, PenackO, et al.Evaluation of heated humidifiers for use on intubated patients: a comparative study of humidifying efficiency, flow resistance, and alarm functions using a lung model. Intensive Care Med, 2002; 28(6):731–739; doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1275-9
6.
BurtonJD. Effects of dry anaesthetic gases on the respiratory mucous membrane. Lancet, 1962; 1(7223):235–238; doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(62)91187-x
7.
DéryR. The evolution of heat and moisture in the respiratory tract during anaesthesia with a non-rebreathing system. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1973; 20(3):296–309; doi: 10.1007/BF03027168
8.
PlotnikowGA, AccoceM, NavarroE, et al.Humidification and heating of inhaled gas in patients with artificial airway. A narrative review. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2018; 30(1):86–97; doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20180015
9.
EckerbomB, LindholmCE. Performance evaluation of six heat and moisture exchangers according to the Draft International Standard (ISO/DIS 9360). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1990; 34(5):404–409; doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03112.x
10.
CohenIL, WeinbergPF, FeinIA, et al.Endotracheal tube occlusion associated with the use of heat and moisture exchangers in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 1988; 16(3):277–279; doi: 10.1097/00003246-198803000-00013
11.
BransonR, DavisK.Jr. Evaluation of 21 passive humidifiers according to the ISO 9360 standard: moisture output, dead space, and flow resistance. Respir Care, 1996; 41:736–743.
12.
UnalN, KanhaiJK, BuijkSL, et al.A novel method of evaluation of three heat-moisture exchangers in six different ventilator settings. Intensive Care Med, 1998; 24(2):138–146; doi: 10.1007/s001340050535
13.
WilkesAR. Heat and moisture exchangers. Structure and function. Respir Care Clin N Am, 1998; 4(2):261–279; doi: 9648186
14.
MartinC, PapazianL, PerrinG, et al.Preservation of humidity and heat of respiratory gases in patients with a minute ventilation greater than 10 L/min. Crit Care Med, 1994; 22(11):1871–1876; doi: 10.1097/00003246-199411000-00025
15.
MartinC, ThomachotL, QuinioB, et al.Comparing two heat and moisture exchangers with one vaporizing humidifier in patients with minute ventilation greater than 10 L/min. Chest, 1995; 107(5):1411–1415; doi: 10.1378/chest.107.5.1411
16.
LelloucheF, SimardS, BouchardPA. Monitoring of heated wire humidifier hygrometric performances with heater plate temperature. Respir Care, 2022; 67(9):1147–1153; doi: 10.4187/respcare.10014
17.
BransonRD. Humidification for patients with artificial airways. Respir Care, 1999; 44(6):630–641.
18.
OhTE, LinES, BhattS. Resistance of humidifiers, and inspiratory work imposed by a ventilator-humidifier circuit. Br J Anaesth, 1991; 66(2):258–263; doi: 10.1093/bja/66.2.258
19.
RouxNG, PlotnikowGA, VillalbaDS, et al.Evaluation of an active humidification system for inspired gas. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2015; 8(1):69–75; doi: 10.3342/ceo.2015.8.1.69
20.
AriA, AlwadeaiKS, FinkJB. Effects of heat and moisture exchangers and exhaled humidity on aerosol deposition in a simulated ventilator-dependent adult lung model. Respir Care, 2017; 62(5):538–543; doi: 10.4187/respcare.05015
21.
ThomachotL, ViviandX, BoyadjievI, et al.The combination of a heat and moisture exchanger and a Booster: a clinical and bacteriological evaluation over 96 h. Intensive Care Med, 2002; 28(2):147–153; doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1193-2
22.
BransonRD, CampbellRS, JohannigmanJA, et al.Comparison of conventional heated humidification with a new active hygroscopic heat and moisture exchanger in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care, 1999; 44(8):912–917.
23.
SiemposII, VardakasKZ, KopteridesP, et al.Impact of passive humidification on clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med, 2007; 35(12):2843–2851; doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000295302.67973.9a
24.
KellyM, GilliesD, ToddDA, et al.Heated humidification versus heat and moisture exchangers for ventilated adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010(4):CD004711; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004711.pub2
25.
KlompasM, BransonR, CawcuttK, et al.Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2022; 43(6):687–713; doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.88
26.
PrinS, CherguiK, AugardeR, et al.Ability and safety of a heated humidifier to control hypercapnic acidosis in severe ARDS. Intensive Care Med, 2002; 28(12):1756–1760; doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1520-2
27.
RestrepoRD, WalshBK, American Association for Respiratory Care. Humidification during invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation: 2012. Respir Care, 2012; 57(5):782–788; doi: 10.4187/respcare.01766
28.
KacmarekRM, BarnesTA, DurbinCG.Jr. Survey of directors of respiratory therapy departments regarding the future education and credentialing of respiratory care students and staff. Respir Care, 2012; 57(5):710–720; doi: 10.4187/respcare.01360
29.
Salimi-BaniM, PandianV, Vahedian-AzimiA, et al.A respiratory critical care nurse training program for settings without a registered respiratory therapists: A protocol for a multimethod study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2024; 82:103662; doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103662
30.
KingHB, BattlesJ, AkerDP, et al.TeamSTEPPS™: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety. In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches Vol. 3: Performance and Tools. (HenriksenB, BattlesK, KeyesJB, GradyMA, eds.) Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.
31.
EddyK, JordanZ, StephensonM. Health professionals’ experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep, 2016; 14(4):96–137; doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843
32.
KacmarekRM. Mechanical ventilation competencies of the respiratory therapist in 2015 and Beyond. Respir Care, 2013; 58(6):1087–1096; doi: 10.4187/respcare.02546
33.
GoodfellowLT, MillerAG, VarekojisSM, et al.AARC clinical practice guideline: patient-ventilator assessment. Respir Care, 2024; 69(8):1042–1054; doi: 10.4187/respcare.12007
34.
LelloucheF, TailléS, LefrançoisF, et al.; Groupe de travail sur les Respirateurs de l’AP-HP. Humidification performance of 48 passive airway humidifiers: comparison with manufacturer data. Chest, 2009; 135(2):276–286; doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0679
35.
LelloucheF, RousseauE, BouchardPA. Evaluation of the humidification performances of new generation of heated wire humidifiers. Respir Care, 2024; 69(4):430–437; doi: 10.4187/respcare.11352
36.
VargasM, ChiumelloD, SutherasanY, et al.Heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers (HHs) in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care, 2017; 21(1):123; doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1710-5
37.
PicazoL, Gracia ArnillasMP, Muñoz-BermúdezR, et al.Active humidification in mechanical ventilation is not associated to an increase in respiratory infectious complications in a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed), 2021; 45(6):354–361; doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2019.11.008
38.
WilliamsRB, RankinN, SmithT, et al.Relationship between the humidity and temperature of inspired gas and the function of airway mucosa. Crit Care Med, 1996; 24(11):1920–1929; doi: 10.1097/00003246-199611000-00025
39.
GilliesD, ToddDA, FosterJP, et al.Heat and moisture exchangers versus heated humidifiers for mechanically ventilated adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017; 9(9):CD004711; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004711.pub3
40.
MattsonJR, GadaKD, JawaR, et al.Impact of humidification modality on incidence of endotracheal tube occlusion in COVID-19 patients. J Intensive Care Med, 2024; 39(10):965–973; doi: 10.1177/08850666241246969
41.
HernándezG, ParedesI, MoranF, et al.Effect of postextubation noninvasive ventilation with active humidification vs high-flow nasal cannula on reintubation in patients at very high risk for extubation failure: a randomized trial. Intensive Care Med, 2022; 48(12):1751–1759; doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06919-3
42.
EsquinasAM, BaHammamAS. Humidification during noninvasive ventilation in the critically ill. Respir Care, 2013; 58(3):e35–e36; doi: 10.4187/respcare.02285
43.
HollandAE, DenehyL, BuchanCA, et al.Efficacy of a heated passover humidifier during noninvasive ventilation: a bench study. Respir Care, 2007; 52(1):38–44.
44.
LelloucheF, MaggioreSM, DeyeN, et al.Effect of the humidification device on the work of breathing during noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 2002; 28(11):1582–1589; doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1518-9
45.
JaberS, ChanquesG, MateckiS, et al.Comparison of the effects of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers on ventilation and gas exchange during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 2002; 28(11):1590–1594; doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1441-0
46.
PloysongsangY, BransonR, RashkinMC, et al.Pressure flow characteristics of commonly used heat-moisture exchangers. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1988; 138(3):675–678; doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.675
47.
MebiusC. A comparative evaluation of disposable humidifiers. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1983; 27(5):403–409; doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1983.tb01977.x
48.
LelloucheF, MaggioreSM, LyazidiA, et al.Water content of delivered gases during non-invasive ventilation in healthy subjects. Intensive Care Med, 2009; 35(6):987–995; doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1455-y
