Abstract
Background:
The Flow Index was recently developed as a bedside method based on flow waveforms to assess patient inspiratory effort during invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to externally validate the Flow Index by assessing its ability to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths.
Methods:
Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. The association between Flow Index and patient inspiratory effort (pressure generated by the respiratory muscles [ΔPmus] and pressure-time product from the start of inspiratory flow [PTPinsp]) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models. The discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) of the Flow Index to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths was analyzed.
Results:
A total of 1,095 breaths from 38 subjects were included in the analysis. Flow Index had moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths (AUC of 0.73 and 0.77 for low inspiratory effort defined with ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low (AUC of 0.68 and 0.65 for ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively).
Conclusions:
Flow Index demonstrated moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths, whereas discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
