Abstract
Background:
CPAP therapy has been shown to effectively reduce the risk of obstructive apnea and oxygen desaturation in procedural sedation. An economical approach to administering CPAP is through a Venturi adapter, which amplifies oxygen flows to produce pressures suitable for CPAP. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of four Venturi adapters across clinically relevant metrics including pressure-generation efficiency, inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2 ), dilution of the end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2 ) sample for capnometry, and noise levels produced.
Methods:
A benchtop simulator was used to evaluate Venturi adapters. The simulator was composed of a test lung, corrugated tubing to simulate a trachea, a silicone-molded face, an air-cushioned mask strapped to the face, a high-pressure oxygen source, and several Venturi adapters. The oxygen flows required to produce specific airway pressures were measured to evaluate pressure-generation efficiency, and the noise levels produced by the Venturi adapters at these pressures were recorded. CO2 was infused into the test lung while the lung was ventilated, and the EtCO2 measured at the mask was compared with a reference measurement taken from the trachea. FIO2 was evaluated by ventilating the test lung and observing the steady-state oxygen concentration in the lung.
Results:
Each of the Venturi adapter designs provides their unique strengths and weaknesses. There appears to be a direct trade-off between high pressure-generation efficiency and high FIO2 . There also appears to be a direct trade-off between high FIO2 and the extent of dilution in the EtCO2 sample. Some Venturi adapters produce high noise levels, which might result in patient discomfort and clinician unwillingness to use.
Conclusion:
Variations in Venturi adapter designs create different clinical benefits. Clinicians should choose the Venturi adapter to best suit their present clinical needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
