Implementation of Geriatric Recommendations by Doctors: A Comparison of Models of Geriatric Assessment for Mobile and Home-Ridden Patients

Abstract

In the present study we assessed the rate of implementation of recommendations given following geriatric assessment for home-ridden patients; a retrospective review of medical records to evaluate the implementation of geriatric recommendations given to patients in the Home Geriatric Service (HGS) between 2015 and 2016. The patients were categorized into two groups: the HGS-clinic (HGS-C) group, in which the primary care physician was responsible for implementation of the recommendations, and the HGS-home care (HGS-H) group, in which the responsibility for implementation of the recommendations was on the geriatrician. The results were compared with the implementation of recommendations in other ambulatory models for mobile patients—Clinic-Based Geriatric Assessment Services (CBGAS). The study included 865 patients. The highest rate of implementation was in the HGS-H group (85.7%), compared with 66.6% in the HGS-C group and 52.7% in the CBGAS group (p < 0.0001). In the logistic regression model for prediction of patients with implementation rates above 75%, the only variable that entered the prediction model was affiliation with the HGS-H group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3–9.6, p < 0.0001) or the HGS-C group (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–2.9, p = 0.046). The implementation rate for geriatric recommendations is higher for home-ridden patients compared with mobile patients, with the maximum recommendation rate in the subgroup, where geriatricians implemented the recommendations themselves. These findings raise the possibility that the most successful model, in terms of the implementation of recommendations, is the model in which implementation is carried out by the same staff that conducted the assessment.