Abstract
Twenty years have passed since Kadenbach and Müller-Höcker first proposed that the age-related accumulation of mutant mitochondrial DNA is caused by its clonal expansion, rather than by a “vicious cycle” of de novo mutational events caused by the disruptive metabolic impact of prior ones. Proof that they were correct emerged rapidly (though recognition of this was much slower); however, the mechanism underlying this selective advantage remained obscure. Numerous hypotheses were advanced during the 1990s, but proved hard to test. A wealth of data has been published very recently that bears on this question. While these reports surely bring us closer to an understanding of this phenomenon, and thus probably to a better understanding of how it might be combated or even reversed, they currently raise more questions than they answer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.