A healthy diet is an important protective factor to prevent cardiometabolic disease. Traditional face-to-face dietary interventions are often episodic, expensive, and may have limited effectiveness, particularly among older adults and people living in rural areas. Telehealth-delivered dietary interventions have proven to be a low-cost and effective alternative approach to improve dietary behaviors among adults with chronic health conditions. In this study, we developed a validated agent-based model of cardiometabolic health conditions to project the impact of expanding telehealth-delivered dietary interventions among older adults in the state of Georgia, a state with a large rural population. We projected the incidence of major cardiometabolic health conditions (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol) with the implementation of telehealth-delivered dietary interventions versus no intervention among all older adults and 3 subpopulations (older adults with diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol, separately). The results showed that expanding telehealth-delivered dietary interventions could avert 22,774 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22,091–23,457) cases of type 2 diabetes, 19,732 (19,145–20,329) cases of hypertension, and 18,219 (17,672–18,766) cases of high cholesterol for 5 years among older adults in Georgia. The intervention would have a similar effect in preventing cardiometabolic health conditions among the 3 selected subpopulations. Therefore, expanding telehealth-delivered dietary interventions could substantially reduce the burden of cardiometabolic health conditions in the long term among older adults and those with chronic health conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ViraniSS, AlonsoA, BenjaminEJ, et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2020; 141:e139–e596.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. Department of Health and Hum and Services, 2020:12–15.
3.
FlaggLA, AndersonRN. Unsuitable underlying causes of death for assessing the quality of cause-of-death reporting. National Vital Statistics Reports; Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2021; 69(14):1–25.
4.
RiddleMC, HermanWH. The cost of diabetes care—an elephant in the room. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41:929–932.
5.
DauchetL, AmouyelP, HercbergS, DallongevilleJ. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Nutr, 2006; 136:2588–2593.
6.
MontonenJ, KnektP, HärkänenT, et al.Dietary patterns and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Am J Epidemiol, 2005; 161:219–227.
7.
EpsteinLH, GordyCC, RaynorHA, BeddomeM, KilanowskiCK, PaluchR. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obes Res, 2001; 9:171–178.
8.
CookNR, ObarzanekE, CutlerJA, et al.Joint effects of sodium and potassium intake on subsequent cardiovascular disease: the Trials of Hypertension Prevention follow-up study. Arch Intern Med, 2009; 169:32–40.
9.
JayalathVH, de SouzaRJ, HaV, et al.Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr, 2015; 102:914–921.
10.
KellerA, HeitmannBL, OlsenN. Sugar-sweetened beverages, vascular risk factors and events: a systematic literature review. Public Health Nutr, 2015; 18:1145–1154.
11.
XiB, HuangY, ReillyKH, et al.Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of hypertension and CVD: a dose–response meta-analysis. Br J Nutr, 2015; 113:709–717.
12.
SacksFM, SvetkeyLP, VollmerWM, et al.Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med, 2001; 344:3–10.
13.
CoxsonPG, CookNR, JoffresM, et al.Mortality benefits from US population-wide reduction in sodium consumption projections from 3 modeling approaches. Hypertension, 2013; 61:564–570.
14.
PatersonBL, CharltonP, RichardS. Non-attendance in chronic disease clinics: a matter of non-compliance?. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn, 2010; 2:63–74.
15.
MarcinJP, ShaikhU, SteinhornRH. Addressing health disparities in rural communities using telehealth. Pediatr Res, 2016; 79:169–176.
16.
GoodeAD, ReevesMM, EakinEG. Telephone-delivered interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change: an updated systematic review. Am J Prev Med, 2012; 42:81–88.
17.
KellyJT, ReidlingerDP, HoffmannTC, CampbellKL. Telehealth methods to deliver dietary interventions in adults with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr, 2016; 104:1693–1702.
18.
World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States. Report on the Second Global Survey on EHealth. World Health Organization, 2010.
19.
CDC. Using Telehealth to Expand Access to Essential Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/telehealth.html Accessed January10, 2021.
20.
RollinsL, AkintobiTH, HermstadA, et al.Community-based approaches to reduce chronic disease disparities in Georgia. J Ga Public Health Assoc, 2017; 6(4):402–410.
21.
LiY, KongN, LawleyM, PagánJA. Assessing lifestyle interventions to improve cardiovascular health using an agent-based model. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press, New York, NY: USA, 2014:1221–1232.
22.
LiY, KongN, LawleyM, WeissL, PagánJA. Advancing the use of evidence-based decision-making in local health departments with systems science methodologies. Am J Public Health, 2015; 105(S2):S217–S222.
23.
BonabeauE. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2002; 99(suppl 3):7280–7287.
24.
LukeDA, StamatakisKA. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu Rev Public Health, 2012; 33:357–376.
25.
LiY, LawleyMA, SiscovickDS, ZhangD, PagánJA. Agent-based modeling of chronic diseases: a narrative review and future research directions. Prev Chronic Dis, 2016; 13:150561.
26.
LiY, BerensonJ, GutiérrezA, PagánJA. Leveraging the food environment in obesity prevention: the promise of systems science and agent-based modeling. Curr Nutr Rep, 2016; 5:245–254.
27.
NianogoRA, ArahOA. Agent-based modeling of noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review. Am J Public Health, 2015; 105:e20–e31.
28.
Lloyd-JonesDM, HongY, LabartheD, et al.Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation, 2010; 121:586–613.
29.
WilsonPW, CastelliWP, KannelWB. Coronary risk prediction in adults (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol, 1987; 59:G91–G94.
30.
D'Agostino Sr. RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation, 2008; 117:743–753.
31.
BorshchevA. The big book of simulation modeling: multimethod modeling with anylogic 6, AnyLogic, Oakbrook Terrace, IL: USA, 2013.
32.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Overview BRFSS 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2007.htm Accessed March7, 2014.
33.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Overview BRFSS 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2012/pdf/Overview_2012.pdf Accessed March7, 2014.
34.
JonesA, Hedges-ChouJ, BatesJ, LoyolaM, LearSA, Jarvis-SelingerS. Home telehealth for chronic disease management: selected findings of a narrative synthesis. Telemed E-Health, 2014; 20:346–380.
35.
KaufmanDR, PevznerJ, HillimanC, et al.Redesigning a telehealth diabetes management program for a digital divide seniors population. Home Health Care Manag Pract, 2006; 18:223–234.
36.
CicoliniG, SimonettiV, ComparciniD, et al.Efficacy of a nurse-led email reminder program for cardiovascular prevention risk reduction in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud, 2014; 51:833–843.
37.
ChowCK, RedfernJ, HillisGS, et al.Effect of lifestyle-focused text messaging on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015; 314:1255–1263.
38.
KooninLM, HootsB, TsangCA, et al.Trends in the use of telehealth during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, January–March 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2020; 69:1595.
39.
ThomasEE, HaydonHM, MehrotraA, et al.Building on the momentum: sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare, 2020 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20960638
40.
LamK, LuAD, ShiY, CovinskyKE. Assessing telemedicine unreadiness among older adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med, 2020; 180:1389–1391.
41.
JainV, Al RifaiM, LeeMT, et al.Racial and geographic disparities in internet use in the US among patients with hypertension or diabetes: implications for telehealth in the era of COVID-19. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44:e15–e17.
