Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2023-08
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy for Treating Peri-Implant Mucositis Among Cigarette Smokers and Diabetics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This systematic review aimed to assess the influence of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to mechanical debridement (MD) on peri-implant clinical and radiographic outcomes among cigarette smokers and diabetics with peri-implant mucositis (piM).
Methods:
Randomized controlled trials, assessing the clinical and radiographic parameters of aPDT versus MD alone among smokers and diabetics with piM, were included in the study. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate the standard mean difference with a 95% confidence interval. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed utilizing the modified Jadad quality scale.
Results:
The meta-analyses found statistically significant differences between the impact of adjunct aPDT and MD alone on the peri-implant plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing among smokers and diabetics with piM at the final follow-up visit. However, no significant differences were found between the impact of adjunct aPDT and MD alone on the peri-implant crestal bone loss among smokers and diabetics with piM at the final follow-up.
Conclusions:
The application of aPDT as an adjunctive to MD demonstrated improved scores of the peri-implant clinical parameters among smokers and diabetics with piM in comparison with MD alone.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RenvertS, PolyzoisI. Risk indicators for peri-implant mucositis: A systematic literature review. J Clin Periodontol, 2015; 42:S172–S186.
2.
ZhouN, HuangH, LiuH, et al.Microbiota analysis of peri-implant mucositis in patients with periodontitis history. Clin Oral Inves, 2022; 26(10):6223–6233.
LeeC-T, HuangY-W, ZhuL, et al.Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent, 2017; 62:1–12.
5.
GrischkeJ, KarchA, WenzlaffA, et al.Keratinized mucosa width is associated with severity of peri-implant mucositis. A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Imp Res, 2019; 30(5):457–465.
6.
BerglundhT, JepsenS, StadlingerB, et al.Peri-implantitis and its prevention. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2019; 30(2):150–155.
7.
AlshahraniA, Al DeebM, AlresayesS, et al.Comparison of peri-implant soft tissue and crestal bone status of dental implants placed in prediabetic, type 2 diabetic, and non-diabetic individuals: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Imp Dent, 2020; 6:1–8.
8.
AndradeCAS, PazJLC, de MeloGS, et al.Survival rate and peri-implant evaluation of immediately loaded dental implants in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Inves, 2022; 26(2):1797–1810.
9.
TsigaridaA, DabdoubS, NagarajaHN, et al.The influence of smoking on the peri-implant microbiome. J Dent Res, 2015; 94(9):1202–1217.
10.
BastosM, TucciM, De SiqueiraA, et al.Diabetes may affect the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors more than smoking in chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol Res, 2017; 52(2):292–299.
11.
SemlaliA, WitoledC, AlanaziM, et al.Whole cigarette smoke increased the expression of TLRs, HBDs, and proinflammory cytokines by human gingival epithelial cells through different signaling pathways. PLoS One, 2012; 7(12):e52614.
12.
KatzJ, BhattacharyyaI, Farkhondeh-KishF, et al.Expression of the receptor of advanced glycation end products in gingival tissues of type 2 diabetes patients with chronic periodontal disease: A study utilizing immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. J Clin Periodontol, 2005; 32(1):40–44.
13.
KenneyE, KraalJ, SaxeS, et al.The effect of cigarette smoke on human oral polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Periodontol Res, 1977; 12(4):227–234.
14.
GiucaMR, PasiniM, TeccoS, et al.Levels of salivary immunoglobulins and periodontal evaluation in smoking patients. BMC Immunol, 2014; 15:1–5.
15.
TymkiwKD, ThunellDH, JohnsonGK, et al.Influence of smoking on gingival crevicular fluid cytokines in severe chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol, 2011; 38(3):219–228.
16.
DietrichT, BernimoulinJP, GlynnRJ. The effect of cigareté smoking on gingival bleeding. J Periodontol, 2004; 75(1):16–22.
17.
KotsakisGA, JavedF, HinrichsJE, et al.Impact of cigarette smoking on clinical outcomes of periodontal flap surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol, 2015; 86(2):254–263.
18.
JavedF, Al-RasheedA, Al-HezaimiK, et al.Effect of cigarette smoking on the clinical outcomes of periodontal surgical procedures. Am J Med Sci, 2012; 343(1):78–84.
19.
FroumSJ, DagbaAS, ShiY, et al.Successful surgical protocols in the treatment of peri-implantitis: A narrative review of the literature. Impl Dent, 2016; 25(3):416–426.
20.
MalgikarS, ReddySH, SagarSV, et al.Clinical effects of photodynamic and low-level laser therapies as an adjunct to scaling and root planing of chronic periodontitis: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. In J Dent Res, 2016; 27(2):121.
21.
SculeanA, AokiA, RomanosG, et al.Is photodynamic therapy an effective treatment for periodontal and peri-implant infections?. Dental Clin, 2015; 59(4):831–858.
22.
ShahmohammadiR, YounespourS, PaknejadM, et al.Efficacy of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to mechanical debridement in the treatment of peri-implantitis or peri-implant mucositis in smokers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photochem Photob, 2022; 98(1):232–241.
23.
SoukosNS, WilsonM, BurnsT, et al.Photodynamic effects of toluidine blue on human oral keratinocytes and fibroblasts and Streptococcus sanguis evaluated in vitro. Laser Surg Med, 1996; 18(3):253–259.
24.
LinGH, Suárez López del AmoF, WangHL. Laser therapy for treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol, 2018; 89(7):766–782.
25.
AlbakerAM, ArRejaieAS, AlrabiahM, et al.Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2018; 21:147–152.
26.
Faggion JrCM. Laser therapy as an adjunct treatment for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis provides no extra benefit for most clinical outcomes. J Evi Based Dent Prac, 2019; 19(2):203–206.
27.
GhanemA, PasumarthyS, RannaV, et al.Is mechanical curettage with adjunct photodynamic therapy more effective in the treatment of peri-implantitis than mechanical curettage alone?. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2016; 15:191–196.
28.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J, 2021; 372:n71.
29.
StoneP. Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Nurs Res, 2002; 15(3):197–198.
30.
HirookaH, RenvertS. Diagnosis of periimplant disease. Implant Dent, 2019; 28(2):144–149.
31.
OremusM, WolfsonC, PerraultA, et al.Interrater reliability of the modified Jadad quality scale for systematic reviews of Alzheimer's disease drug trials. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2001; 12(3):232–236.
32.
HigginsJP, ThompsonSG, DeeksJJ, et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J, 2003; 327(7414):557–560.
33.
EspositoM, GrusovinMG, MaghairehH, et al.Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; 2013(3):CD003878.
34.
LabbanN, AlfouzanAF, Al TaweelSM, et al.Role of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in reducing whole salivary oral yeasts colonization in type-2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients with and without dental implants. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2021; 33:102183.
35.
Al AmriMD, KellesarianSV, AhmedA, et al.Efficacy of periimplant mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2016; 14:166–169.
36.
AlsayedH, BukhariIA, AlsaifR, et al.Efficacy of indocyanine green and methylene blue mediated-photodynamic therapy on peri-implant outcomes among diabetics with peri-implant mucositis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2023; 42:103344.
37.
Al DeebM, AlresayesS, MokeemSA, et al.Clinical and immunological peri-implant parameters among cigarette and electronic smoking patients treated with photochemotherapy: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020; 31:101800.
38.
JavedF, AbduljabbarT, CarranzaG, et al.Efficacy of periimplant mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of periimplant diseases among cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Photodiagnosis Photodynamic Ther, 2016; 16:85–89.
39.
JavedF, BinShabaibMS, AlharthiSS, et al.Role of mechanical curettage with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis in cigarette smokers: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2017; 18:331–334.
40.
Al DeebM, AlsahhafA, AlhamoudiN, et al.Clinical and microbiological outcomes of photodynamic and systemic antimicrobial therapy in smokers with peri-implant inflammation. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020; 29:101587.
41.
AbduljabbarT. Effect of mechanical debridement with adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of peri-implant diseases in type-2 diabetic smokers and non-smokers. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2017; 17:111–114.
42.
Al HafezASS, IngleN, TasheryHM, et al.Effectiveness of mechanical debridement with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic for treating peri-implant mucositis among prediabetic cigarette-smokers and non-smokers. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020; 31:101912.
43.
MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Inter Med, 2009; 151(4):264–269.
44.
AokiA, MizutaniK, SchwarzF, et al.Periodontal and peri-implant wound healing following laser therapy. Periodontology 2000, 2015; 68(1):217–269.
45.
BerglundhT, ArmitageG, AraujoMG, et al.Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol, 2018; 89:S313–S318.
46.
LangN, WetzelA, StichH, et al.Histologic probe penetration in healthy and inflamed peri-implant tissues. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1994; 5(4):191–201.
47.
Sánchez-MartosR, SammanA, Bouazza-JuanesK, et al.Clinical effect of diode laser on peri-implant tissues during non-surgical peri-implant mucositis therapy: Randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Exp Dentistry, 2020; 12(1):e13.
48.
RenvertS, QuirynenM. Risk indicators for peri-implantitis. A narrative review. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2015; 26:15–44.
49.
SchwarzF, SchmuckerA, BeckerJ. Efficacy of alternative or adjunctive measures to conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Imp Dent, 2015; 1:1–34.
RadvarM, MacFarlaneT, MacKenzieD, et al.An evaluation of the Nd: YAG laser in periodontal pocket therapy. Br Dent J, 1996; 180(2):57–62.
52.
MonzaviA, ChinipardazZ, MousaviM, et al.Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using diode laser activated indocyanine green as an adjunct in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2016; 14:93–97.
53.
CadoreUB, ReisMB, MartinsSH, et al.Multiple sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy associated with surgical periodontal treatment in patients with chronic periodontitis. J Periodontol, 2019; 90(4):339–349.
54.
MeiselP, KocherT. Photodynamic therapy for periodontal diseases: State of the art. J Photochem Photobio B, 2005; 79(2):159–170.
