LanzafameR.J.2010. Remarkable evolution and progress. Photomed. Laser Surg., 28:289–290.
2.
CalcagnoV., DemoinetE., GollnerK., GuidiL., RuthsD., de MazancourtC. 2012. Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science10.1126/science.1227833.
3.
KimS. H., VincentL.C., GoncaloJ.A.2012. Outside advantage: can social rejection fuel creative thought. J. Exper. Soc. Psychol(in press)digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1622. 121015.
4.
FischmanJ.2012. Fake peer reviews, the latest form of scientific fraud, fool journals. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Fake-Peer-Reviews-the-Latest/134784/?key=TGkmJgY9MyBKN3xqZDxFMz5TOHQ. 2012 October 2.
5.
FangF.C., SteenR. G., CasadevallA.2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109:17,028–17,033.