Objective: Posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PCFD) is regarded as an effective treatment option for cervical radiculopathy. However, limited exposure of the disc space is one of its major disadvantages. To address this problem, we used a CO2 laser for sophisticated decompression. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of laser-assisted PCFD and to discuss the benefits of laser use. Methods: A total of 47 consecutive patients with cervical radiculopathy were treated with PCFD. Among them, 24 patients were treated with laser-assisted PCFD, and the remaining 23 patients were treated with conventional PCFD. After standard posterior cervical microscopic foraminotomy, a microscopic CO2 laser was used for selective discectomy in the laser PCFD group. Clinical data were compared with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and modified MacNab criteria. Results: The clinical outcomes of the two groups were similar. The mean VAS score for radicular arm pain improved from 7.42 to 1.83 in the laser PCFD group and from 8.30 to 1.65 in the conventional PCFD group. The mean NDI improved from 47.00% to 10.46% in the laser PCFD group and from 53.86% to 10.02% in the conventional PCFD group. The rate of excellent or good outcomes was 87.5% for the laser PCFD group and 86.9% for the conventional PCFD group. A significant difference between the groups was found for intraoperative bleeding. The laser PCFD group had significantly lower estimated blood loss values than did the conventional PCFD group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Laser-assisted PCFD is an efficacious surgical option for treating lateral cervical disc herniation. The pinpoint accuracy of the laser scalpel facilitates sophisticated decompression within a limited surgical field, and may reduce the risk of intraoperative bleeding and neural damage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichF.1990. Posterolateral microdisectomy for cervical monoradiculopathy caused by posterolateral soft cervical disc sequestration. J. Neurosurg., 72:370–377.
2.
DuckerT.B., ZeidmanS.M.1993. The posterior operative approach for cervical radiculopathy. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am., 4:61–74.
3.
HendersonC.M., HennessyR.G., ShueyH.M.Jr., ShackelfordE.G.1983. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery, 13:504–512.
4.
HiltonD.L.Jr. 2007. Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy with three-dimensional microscopic visualization and localization with anterior/posterior imaging. Spine J., 7:154–158.
5.
JeonS.H., LeeS.H., ChoiW.C.2007. Iliac artery perforation following lumbar discectomy with microsurgical carbon dioxide laser: a report of a rare case and discussion on the treatment. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976), 32:E124–E125.
VernonH., MiorS.1991. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther., 14:409–415.
10.
MacnabI.1971. Negative disc exploration: an analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in 68 patient. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 53:891–903.
11.
RussellS.M., BenjaminV.2004. Posterior surgical approach to the cervical neural foramen for intervertebral disc disease. Neurosurgery, 54:662–665.
12.
DavisR.A.1996. A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy. Surg. Neurol., 46:523–530.
13.
WilliamsR.W.1983. Microcervical foraminotomy. A surgical alternative for intractable radicular pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 8:708–716.
14.
WoertgenC., HolzschuhM., RothoerlR.D., HaeuslerE., BrawanskiA.1997. Prognostic factors of posterior cervical disc surgery: a prospective, consecutive study of 54 patients. Neurosurgery, 40:724–728.
15.
ZeidmanS.M., DuckerT.B.1993. Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for radiculopathy: review of 172 cases. Neurosurgery, 33:356–362.
16.
ChenB.H., NatarajanR.N., AnH.S., AnderssonG.B.2001. Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. J. Spinal Disord., 14:17–20.
17.
ZdeblickT.A., ZouD., WardenK.E., McCabeR., KunzD., VanderbyR.1992. Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 74:22–27.
18.
ColliasJ.C., RobertsM.P.2000. Posterior surgical approaches for cervical disk herniation and spondylotic myelopathy. Operative Neurosurgical Techniques: Indications, Methods, and Results. SchmidkH.H.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2016–2028.
19.
HallR.R., BeachA.D., BakerE., MorisonP.C.1971. Incision of tissue by carbon dioxide laser. Nature, 232:131–132.
20.
RyanR.W., SpetzlerR.F., PreulM.C.2009. Aura of technology and the cutting edge: a history of lasers in neurosurgery. Neurosurg. Focus, 27:E6.
21.
GropperG.R., RobertsonJ.H., McClellanG.1984. Comparative histological and radiographic effects of CO2 laser versus standard surgical anterior cervical discectomy in the dog. Neurosurgery, 14:42–47.
22.
SteinE., SedlacekT., FabianR.L., NishiokaN.S.1990. Acute and chronic effects of bone ablation with a pulsed holmium laser. Lasers Surg. Med., 10:384–388.
23.
LeeS.H., AhnY., LeeJ.H.2008. Laser-assisted anterior cervical corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for cervical myelopathic patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Photomed. Laser Surg., 26:119–127
DenaroV., DenaroL., Di MartinoA., LongoU.G., MaffulliN.2010. Degenerative disk disease. Pitfalls in Cervical Spine Surgery: Avoidance and Management of Complications. DenaroL., D'AvellaD., DenaroV.Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 121–164.
26.
JödickeA., DaentzerD., KästnerS., AsamotoS., BökerD.K.2003. Risk factors for outcome and complications of dorsal foraminotomy in cervical disc herniation. Surg. Neurol., 60:124–129.
27.
KimK.T., KimY.B.2009. Comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: results of a randomized controlled study. J. Korean Med. Sci., 24:649–653.
