Bacillus subtilis is a Gram-positive bacterium commonly found in soil. Phages infecting B. subtilis have diverse genomes and may be used in therapeutics against pathogenic Bacillus species.
Materials and Methods:
Phages were isolated and purified on B. subtilis. Comparative genomics was performed to determine taxonomy, a liquid-culture lysis assay was used to determine host range, and virion structure was observed for a representative phage by transmission electron microscopy.
Results:
Five phages were found to have high sequence similarity to each other and known phages, including phiNIT1. Annotation shows a conserved genome structure and protein families unique to this group. Repeated sequences are concentrated in intergenic regions at the ends of the genomes. Capsid structure and tail length suggest these phages are myoviruses.
Conclusions:
The phages described here share sequence similarity and genomic structure with known Bacillus phages. This study expands our understanding of the genetic diversity of Bacillus phages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshelfordKE, DayMJ, FryJC. Elevated abundance of bacteriophage infecting bacteria in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003; 69(1):285–289; doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.285-289.2003
2.
SuttleCA. Viruses in the sea. Nature, 2005; 437(7057):356–361; doi: 10.1038/nature04160
3.
ComeauAM, HatfullGF, KrischHM, et al.Exploring the prokaryotic virosphere. Res Microbiol, 2008; 159(5):306–313; doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.05.001
4.
KoskellaB, BrockhurstMA. Bacteria–phage coevolution as a driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2014; 38(5):916–931; doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12072
5.
ScanlanPD. Bacteria–bacteriophage coevolution in the human gut: Implications for microbial diversity and functionality. Trends Microbiol, 2017; 25(8):614–623; doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.02.012
6.
BibbyK. Improved bacteriophage genome data is necessary for integrating viral and bacterial ecology. Microb Ecol, 2014; 67(2):242–244; doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0325-x
7.
PopeWH, BowmanCA, RussellDA, et al.Whole genome comparison of a large collection of mycobacteriophages reveals a continuum of phage genetic diversity. eLife, 2015; 4:e06416; doi: 10.7554/eLife.06416
8.
BorodovichT, ShkoporovAN, RossRP, et al.Phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer and its implications for the human gut microbiome. Gastroenterol Rep, 2022; 10:goac012; doi: 10.1093/gastro/goac012
9.
KortrightKE, ChanBK, KoffJL, et al.Phage therapy: A renewed approach to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Cell Host Microbe, 2019; 25(2):219–232; doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.014
10.
HatfullGF, DedrickRM, SchooleyRT. Phage therapy for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Annu Rev Med, 2022; 73(1):197–211; doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-080219-122208
11.
BeauregardPB, ChaiY, VlamakisH, et al.Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2013; 110(17):E1621–E1630; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218984110
12.
Allard-MassicotteR, TessierL, LécuyerF, et al.Bacillus subtilis early colonization of arabidopsis thaliana roots involves multiple chemotaxis receptors. Straight PD, Ruby EG. eds. mBio, 2016; 7(6):e01664-16; doi: 10.1128/mBio.01664-16
13.
RadhakrishnanR, HashemA, Abd_AllahEF. Bacillus: A biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front Physiol, 2017; 8:667; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00667
14.
VijuN, PunithaSMJ, SatheeshS. Antibiofilm activity of symbiotic Bacillus species associated with marine gastropods. Ann Microbiol, 2020; 70(1):11; doi: 10.1186/s13213-020-01554-z
15.
LiG, ZhengX, ZhuY, et al.Bacillus symbiont drives alterations in intestinal microbiota and circulating metabolites of lepidopteran host. Environ Microbiol, 2022; 24(9):4049–4064; doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15934
16.
BaranovaMN, KudzhaevAM, MokrushinaYA, et al.Deep functional profiling of wild animal microbiomes reveals probiotic Bacillus pumilus strains with a common biosynthetic fingerprint. IJMS, 2022; 23(3):1168; doi: 10.3390/ijms23031168
17.
DoseK, Bieger-DoseA, ErnstB, et al.Survival of microorganisms under the extreme conditions of the Atacama desert. Orig Life Evol Biosph, 2001; 31:287–303; doi: 10.1023/A:1010788829265
18.
PrestelE, SalamitouS, DuBowMS. An examination of the bacteriophages and bacteria of the Namib desert. J Microbiol, 2008; 46(4):364–372; doi: 10.1007/s12275-008-0007-4
19.
PrestelE, RegeardC, SalamitouS, et al.The bacteria and bacteriophages from a Mesquite Flats site of the Death Valley desert. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2013; 103(6):1329–1341; doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9914-4
YoungFE. Requirement of glucosylated teichoic acid for adsorption of phage in Bacillus subtilis 168. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1967; 58(6):2377–2384; doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.6.2377
22.
TzipilevichE, HabushaM, Ben-YehudaS. Acquisition of phage sensitivity by bacteria through exchange of phage receptors. Cell, 2017; 168(1–2):186.e12–199.e12; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.003
23.
BlancoL, SalasM. Characterization and purification of a phage Φ29-encoded DNA polymerase required for the initiation of replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1984; 81:5325–5329.
24.
BravoA, SalasM. Initiation of bacteriophage Φ29 DNA replication in Vivo: Assembly of a membrane-associated multiprotein complex. J Mol Biol, 1997; 269(1):102–112; doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1032
25.
GroseJH, JensenGL, BurnettSH, et al.Correction: Genomic comparison of 93 Bacillus phages reveals 12 clusters, 14 singletons and remarkable diversity. BMC Genomics, 2014; 15(1):1184; doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1184
26.
KohmK, FloccariVA, LutzVT, et al.The Bacillus phage SPβ and its relatives: A temperate phage model system reveals new strains, species, prophage integration loci, conserved proteins and lysogeny management components. Environ Microbiol, 2022; 24(4):2098–2118; doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15964
27.
BatinovicS, StantonCR, RiceDTF, et al.Tyroviruses are a new group of temperate phages that infect Bacillus species in soil environments worldwide. BMC Genomics, 2022; 23(1):777; doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-09023-4
28.
DuncanKE, FergusonN, KimuraK, et al.Fine-scale genetic and phenotypic structure in natural populations of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis: Implications for bacterial evolution and speciation. Evolution, 1994; 48(6):2002–2025; doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02229.x
29.
IstockCA, FergusonN, IstockNL, et al.Geographical diversity of genomic lineages in Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn sensu lato. Org Divers Evol, 2001; 1:179–191.
30.
DelesalleVA, TomkoBE, VillAC, et al.Forty years without family: Three novel bacteriophages with high similarity to SPP1 reveal decades of evolutionary stasis since the isolation of their famous relative. Viruses, 2022; 14(10):2106; doi: 10.3390/v14102106
31.
RussellDA.Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. In: Bacteriophages. Methods in Molecular Biology. (ClokieMRJ, KropinskiAM, LavigneR. eds.) Humana Press: New York, NY, USA; 2018.
32.
GordonD, GreenP. Consed: A graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics, 2013; 29(22):2936–2937; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515
33.
GarneauJR, DepardieuF, FortierL-C, et al.PhageTerm: A tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1):8292; doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5
34.
DelcherAL, BratkeKA, PowersEC, et al.Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics, 2007; 23(6):673–679; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009
35.
BesemerJ, BorodovskyM. GeneMark: Web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res, 2005; 33(Web Server):W451–W454; doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487
36.
SödingJ, BiegertA, LupasAN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucl Acids Res, 2005; 33(Suppl. 2):W244–W248; doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408
37.
BoratynGM, SchäfferAA, AgarwalaR, et al.Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biol Direct, 2012; 7:12; doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-12
38.
LaslettD, CanbackB. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004; 32(1):11–16; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152
39.
LoweTM, ChanPP. tRNAscan-SE On-line: Integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016; 44(W1):W54–W57; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413
XieY, WahabL, GillJ. Development and validation of a microtiter plate-based assay for determination of bacteriophage host range and virulence. Viruses, 2018; 10(4):189; doi: 10.3390/v10040189
42.
CresawnSG, BogelM, DayN, et al.Phamerator: A bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinform, 2011; 12:395; doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395
43.
MavrichTN, GauthierC, AbadL, et al.pdm_utils: A SEA-PHAGES MySQL phage database management toolkit. Luigi Martelli P. ed. Bioinformatics, 2021; 37(16):2464–2466; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa983
44.
GauthierCH, CresawnSG, HatfullGF. PhaMMseqs: A new pipeline for constructing phage gene phamilies using MMseqs2. Andrews B. ed. G3 Genes Genomes Genet, 2022; 12(11):jkac233; doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac233
45.
Rodriguez-RLM, KonstantinidisKT. The enveomics collection: A toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. Preprint. PeerJ Preprints, 2016; doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1
46.
KrumsiekJ, ArnoldR, RatteiT. Gepard: A rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics, 2007; 23(8):1026–1028; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm039
47.
BaileyTL. STREME: Accurate and versatile sequence motif discovery. Birol I. ed. Bioinformatics, 2021; 37(18):2834–2840; doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab203
48.
WassermanWW, SandelinA. Applied bioinformatics for the identification of regulatory elements. Nat Rev Genet, 2004; 5(4):276–287; doi: 10.1038/nrg1315
49.
PagèsH, AboyounP, GentlemanR, et al.Biostrings: Efficient manipulation of biological strings. Available from: https://bioconductor.org/packages/Biostrings [Last accessed: August1, 2023].
50.
GuptaS, StamatoyannopoulosJA, BaileyTL, et al.Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol, 2007; 8(2):R24; doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24
51.
KılıçS, WhiteER, SagitovaDM, et al.CollecTF: A database of experimentally validated transcription factor-binding sites in Bacteria. Nucl Acids Res, 2014; 42(D1):D156–D160; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1123
CiprianoMJ, NovichkovPN, KazakovAE, et al.RegTransBase—A database of regulatory sequences and interactions based on literature: A resource for investigating transcriptional regulation in prokaryotes. BMC Genomics, 2013; 14(1):213; doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-213
54.
PiligrimovaEG, KazantsevaOA, KazantsevAN, et al.Putative plasmid prophages of Bacillus cereus sensu lato may hold the key to undiscovered phage diversity. Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1):7611; doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87111-3
55.
AusselL, BarreF-X, AroyoM, et al.FtsK is a DNA motor protein that activates chromosome dimer resolution by switching the catalytic state of the XerC and XerD recombinases. Cell, 2002; 108(2):195–205; doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4
56.
YukgehnaishK, RajandasH, ParimannanS, et al.PhageLeads: Rapid assessment of phage therapeutic suitability using an ensemble machine learning approach. Viruses, 2022; 14(2):342; doi: 10.3390/v14020342
57.
HockenberryAJ, WilkeCO. BACPHLIP: Predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains. PeerJ, 2021; 9:e11396; doi: 10.7717/peerj.11396
ComeauAM, TremblayD, MoineauS, et al.Phage morphology recapitulates phylogeny: The comparative genomics of a new group of myoviruses. Parkinson J. ed. PLoS One, 2012; 7(7):e40102; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040102
60.
LefkowitzEJ, DempseyDM, HendricksonRC, et al.Virus taxonomy: The database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). Nucleic Acids Res, 2018; 46(D1):D708–D717; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx932
61.
HayashiK, KensukeT, KobayashiK, et al.Bacillus subtilis RghR (YvaN) represses rapG and rapH, which encode inhibitors of expression of the srfA operon. Mol Microbiol, 2006; 59(6):1714–1729; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05059.x
62.
OguraM, FujitaY. Bacillus subtilis rapD, a direct target of transcription repression by RghR, negatively regulates srfA expression. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2007; 268(1):73–80; doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00559.x
63.
Van SinderenD, VenemaG. comK acts as an autoregulatory control switch in the signal transduction route to competence in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol, 1994; 176(18):5762–5770; doi: 10.1128/jb.176.18.5762-5770.1994
64.
McDonnellGE, McConnellDJ. Overproduction, isolation, and DNA-binding characteristics of Xre, the repressor protein from the Bacillus subtilis defective prophage PBSX. J Bacteriol, 1994; 176(18):5831–5834; doi: 10.1128/jb.176.18.5831-5834.1994
65.
TétartF, RepoilaF, MonodC, et al.Bacteriophage T4 host range is expanded by duplications of a small domain of the tail fiber adhesin. J Mol Biol, 1996; 258(5):726–731; doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0281
66.
WangJ, HofnungM, CharbitA. The C-terminal portion of the tail fiber protein of bacteriophage lambda is responsible for binding to LamB, its receptor at the surface of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol, 2000; 182(2):508–512; doi: 10.1128/JB.182.2.508-512.2000
67.
NguyenHA, TomitaT, HirotaM, et al.DNA inversion in the tail fiber gene alters the host range specificity of carotovoricin Er, a phage-tail-like bacteriocin of phytopathogenic Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora Er. J Bacteriol, 2001; 183(21):6274–6281; doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6274-6281.2001
KristensenDM, CaiX, MushegianA. Evolutionarily conserved orthologous families in phages are relatively rare in their prokaryotic hosts. J Bacteriol, 2011; 193(8):1806–1814; doi: 10.1128/JB.01311-10
70.
EdgellDR, GibbEA, BelfortM. Mobile DNA elements in T4 and related phages. Virol J, 2010; 7(1):290; doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-290
71.
FriedrichNC, TorrentsE, GibbEA, et al.Insertion of a homing endonuclease creates a genes-in-pieces ribonucleotide reductase that retains function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007; 104(15):6176–6181; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609915104
72.
NovikovaO, JayachandranP, KelleyDS, et al.Intein clustering suggests functional importance in different domains of life. Mol Biol Evol, 2016; 33(3):783–799; doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv271
73.
ChoiY, AhnS, ParkM, et al.HGTree v2.0: A comprehensive database update for horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events detected by the tree-reconciliation method. Nucleic Acids Res, 2023; 51(D1):D1010–D1018; doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac929
74.
PopaO, LandanG, DaganT. Phylogenomic networks reveal limited phylogenetic range of lateral gene transfer by transduction. ISME J, 2017; 11(2):543–554; doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.116
75.
MagnessL, DelesalleVA, VillAC, et al.Bacillus subtilis phages related to SIOphi from desert soils of the Southwest United States. PHAGE, 2023; 4(4):165–172.
76.
Bailly-BechetM, VergassolaM, RochaE. Causes for the intriguing presence of tRNAs in phages. Genome Res, 2007; 17(10):1486–1495; doi: 10.1101/gr.6649807
77.
DelesalleVA, TankeNT, VillAC, et al.Testing hypotheses for the presence of tRNA genes in mycobacteriophage genomes. Bacteriophage, 2016; 6(3):e1219441; doi: 10.1080/21597081.2016.1219441
78.
VernyikV, KarcagiI, TímárE, et al.Exploring the fitness benefits of genome reduction in Escherichia coli by a selection-driven approach. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1):7345; doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64074-5
79.
KoskellaB. Bacteria-phage interactions across time and space: Merging local adaptation and time-shift experiments to understand phage evolution. Am Nat, 2014; 184(S1):S9–S21; doi: 10.1086/676888
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
