Why Are Some Omics Biotechnologies More Popular Than Others? The Sociomateriality of Glycans Offers New Clues

Barad K . (2011). Erasers and erasures: Pinch's unfortunate “uncertainty principle.”. Soc Stud Sci, 41, 443–454.

Diaz S , Settele J , Brondizio ES , et al. (2019). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES Secretariat.

Fisher E . (2019). Governing with ambivalence: The tentative origins of socio-technical integration. Res Policy, 48, 1138–1149.

Gabius HJ . (2018). The sugar code: Why glycans are so important. Biosystems, 164, 102–111.

Guston D . (2019). The Legacies of Apollo 11. OneZero, 17th July. https://onezero.medium.com/the-legacies-of-apollo-11-6c8df29fbb3a. Accessed December 30, 2019.

Holbrook JB . (2005). Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion. Technol Soc, 27, 437–451.

Klein N . (2019). On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal. Toronto, ON: Alfred A. Knopf.

Ma Q , Adua E , Boyce M , Li X , Ji G , and Wang W . (2018). IMass time: The future, in future! OMICS, 22, 679–695.

O'Doherty B . (1999). Inside the White Cube. The Ideology of the Gallery Space. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Orlikowski WJ . (2007). Socio-material practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ Stud, 28, 1435–1448.

Owen R . (2014). The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council's commitment to a framework for responsible innovation. J Responsible Innov, 1, 113–117.

Özdemir V . (2019a). Not all intelligence is artificial: Data science, automation, and AI meet HI. OMICS, 23, 67–69.

Özdemir V . (2019b). Innovating governance for planetary health with three critically informed frames. OMICS, 23, 623–630.

Özdemir V . (2020). Genomics, the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence and society. In: Applied Genomics and Public Health. Patrinos G , ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 275–284.

Özdemir V , Arga KY , Aziz RK , et al. (2020). Digging deeper into precision/personalized medicine: Cracking the sugar code, the third alphabet of life, and socio-materiality of the cell. OMICS, 24, 62–80.

Ravetz J . (2016). How should we treat science's growing pains? The Guardian, June 8. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/jun/08/how-should-we-treat-sciences-growing-pains Accessed December 30, 2019.

Sarewitz D . (2015). CRISPR: Science can't solve it. Nature, 522, 413–414.

Sarewitz D . (2016). Saving science. The New Atlantis 49, (Spring/Summer), 4–40.

Snow CP . (1993). The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stilgoe J , Lock SJ , and Wilsdon J . (2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science?. Public Underst Sci, 23, 4–15.

Von Schomberg R . (2019a). Why responsible innovation? https://app.box.com/s/h8gib5ga6wtcv81dste3kjlhyz1zpu91 Accessed December 25, 2019.

Von Schomberg R . (2019b). Why responsible innovation? In: International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. Von Schomberg R, and Hankins J, eds. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, Publishing, 12–34.

Whitmee S , Haines A , Beyrer C , et al. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet, 386, 1973–2028.