Abstract
Abstract
Microbial communities residing in the nose play important roles in human health and disease. We report marked differences in nasal microbiota between a rural community and an industrial setting located near a major urban city. Nasal samples were collected from 19 healthy male subjects: 9 samples from persons living in a rural village, and 10 samples from ceramic factory workers in a major industrial Egyptian city. The nasal microbiota in the rural sample had higher and distinct diversity compared with industrial samples from workers exposed to pollution daily. Taxonomic analysis of the sequences revealed five major phyla; among these phyla were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria, revealing significant abundance variation by geographical location. For example, the rural group had a significant increase in representation of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes (p = 0.004, p = 0.01, respectively) compared with the industrial group. However, the industrial group showed a significant increase in relative abundance of phylum Proteobacteria (p = 0.02). The most predominant genera for the rural group were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Alloiococcus, and Peptoniphilus. By contrast, the industrial group was dominated by Staphylococcus, Sphingomonas, and Moraxella. Environmental pollution might alter the nasal microbiome leading to an attendant disturbance in the microbiome community structure. The clinical and public health implications of these nasal microbiome variations by rural and industrialized geography warrant further research. This study contributes to our knowledge of the bacterial composition of nasal microbiome in rural and industrialized geographies, and informs public health, respiratory medicine, and occupational health scholarship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
