Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

“-Omics” systems sciences are at the epicenter of personalized medicine and public health, and drivers of knowledge-based biotechnology innovation. Bioinformatics, a core component of omics research, is one of the disciplines that first employed Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS), and thus provided a fertile ground for its further development. Understanding the use and characteristics of FLOSS deployed in the omics field is valuable for future innovation strategies, policy and funding priorities. We conducted a bibliometric, longitudinal study of the use of FLOSS in sepsis omics research from 2011 to 2015 in the United States, EU-28 and China. Because sepsis is an interdisciplinary field at the intersection of multiple omics technologies and medical specialties, it was chosen as a model innovation ecosystem for this empirical analysis, which used publicly available data. Despite development of and competition from proprietary commercial software, scholars in omics continue to employ FLOSS routinely, and independent of the type of omics technology they work with. The number of articles using FLOSS increased significantly over time in the EU-28, as opposed to the United States and China (R = 0.96, p = 0.004). Furthermore, in an era where sharing of knowledge is being strongly advocated and promoted by public agencies and social institutions, we discuss possible correlations between the use of FLOSS and various funding sources in omics research. These observations and analyses provide new insights into the use of FLOSS in sepsis omics research across three (supra)national regions. Further benchmarking studies are warranted for FLOSS trends in other omics fields and geographical settings. These could, in time, lead to the development of new composite innovation and technology use metrics in omics systems sciences and bioinformatics communities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alkhatib

, Mohab

, and Noori

. (2008). Open source: The next big thing in technology transfer to developing nations. IAMOT 2008: International Association for Management of Technology Proceedings.

Altelaar

, Munoz

, and Heck

. (2013). Next-generation proteomics: Towards an integrative view of proteome dy- namics. Nat Rev Genet, 14, 35–48.

Archibugi

, and Filippetti

. (2015). Knowledge as global public good. In: Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation. Archibugi

, Filippetti

, eds. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 483–597.

Azoulay

, Graff-Zivin

, Li

, and Sampat

. (2015). Public R&D investments and private sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. NBER working paper no. 20883. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

BOSC. (2018). www.open-bio.org/wiki/BOSC, Accessed February 18, 2018.

Brand

, Evangelatos

, and Satyamoorthy

. (2016). Public health genomics: The essential part for good governance in public health. Int J Public Health, 61, 401–403.

Comino

, and Manenti

. (2005). Government policies supporting open source software for the mass market. Rev Ind Organ, 26, 217–240.

Crowston

, Wei

, Howsion

, and Wiggins

. (2012). Free/libre open source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Comput Surv, 44, Article 7.

Earl

. (2012). Open source software for mass spectrometry and metabolomics. In: Open Source Software in Life Science Research. Practical Solutions to Common Challenges in the Pharmaceutical Industry and Beyond. Harland

, Forster

, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

10.

Evangelatos

, Reumann

, Lehrach

, and Brand

. (2016). Clinical trial data as public goods: Fair trade and the virtual knowledge bank as a solution to the free rider problem—A framework for the promotion of innovation by facilitation of clinical trial data sharing among biopharmaceutical companies in the era of omics and big data. Public Health Genomics, 19, 211–219.

11.

Hafen

, Kossmann

, and Brand

. (2014). Health data cooperatives—Citizen empowerment. Methods Inf Med, 53, 82–86.

12.

Hardin

. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

13.

Heather

, and Chain

. (2016). The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA. Genomics, 107, 1–8.

14.

Higgins

, and Sharp

. (1988). CLUSTAL: A package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene, 73, 237–244.

15.

Holmes

, Wilson

, and Nicholson

. (2008). Metabolic phenotyping in health and disease. Cell, 134, 714–717.

16.

International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409, 860–921.

17.

Jimenez-Sanchez

, and Philp

. (2015). Omics and the bioeconomy: Applications of genomics hold great potential for a future bio-based economy and sustainable development. EMBO Rep, 16, 17–20.

18.

Karopka

, Schmuhl

, and Demski

. (2014). Free/Libre open source software in health care: A review. Healthc Inform Res, 20, 11–22.

19.

Lander

. (2011). Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature, 470, 187–197.

20.

Laurent AMSt. (2014). Understanding Open Source and Free Software Licensing. 1st ed. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 1–224.

21.

Lemley

, and Shafir

. (2011). Who chooses open-source software?. Univ Chicago Law Rev, 78, 139–164.

22.

Lerner

, and Tirole

. (2005). The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J Econ Perspect, 19, 99–120.

23.

Levine

, and Prietula

. (2014). Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance. Organ Sci, 25, 1414–1433.

24.

Needleman

, and Wunsch

. (1970). A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol, 48, 443–453.

25.

Obermeyer

, and Emanuel

. (2016). Predicting the future—Big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med, 375, 1216–1219.

26.

OBF (Open Bioinformatics Foundation). (2018). www.open-bio.org/wiki/Main_Page, Accessed February 18, 2018.

27.

Ostrom

. (2010). The institutional analysis and development framework and the commons. Cornell L Rev, 95, 807–816.

28.

özdemir

, and Hekim

. (2016). Innovation management? Orienting sepsis R&D and technology transfer towards stratified medicine. EBioMedicine, 6, 8–9.

29.

Paton

, and Karopka

. (2017). The role of free/libre and open source software in learning health systems. Yearb Med Inform, 8, 26.

30.

Ployhart

, and Vandenberg

. (2010). Longitudinal re- search: The theory, design, and analysis of change. J Manag, 36, 94–120.

31.

Portin

. (2002). Historical development of the concept of the gene. J Med Philos, 27, 257–286.

32.

Searls

. (2010). The roots of bioinformatics. PLoS Comput Biol, 6, e1000809.

33.

Skibsted

, Bhasin

, Aird

, and Shapiro

. (2013). Bench-to bedside review: Future novel diagnostics for sepsis—A systems biology approach. Crit Care, 17, 231.

34.

Smith

. (2015). Buying in to bioinformatics: An introduction to commercial sequence analysis software. Brief Bioinform, 16, 700–709.

35.

Sourceforge. (2018). https://sourceforge.net/about, Accessed February 18, 2018.

36.

Taichman

, Sahni

, Pinborg

, et al. (2017). Data sharing statements for clinical trials: A requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA, 317, 2491–2492.

37.

UMIC. (2006). http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20170901141650/http://www.english.umic.pt/images/stories/2006-11-20-flossimpact.pdf, Accessed February 18, 2018.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Use of Free/Libre Open Source Software in Sepsis “-Omics” Research: A Bibliometric,Comparative Analysis Among the United States,EU-28 Member States,and China

Abstract

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material