Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-01
Reproductive Physiology and Ovarian Folliculogenesis Examined via 1 H-NMR Metabolomics Signatures: A Comparative Study of Large and Small Follicles in Three Mammalian Species ( Bos taurus,Sus scrofa domesticus and Equus ferus caballus )
The aim of this study was to characterize the composition of follicular fluid (FF) collected from the small and large follicles of three mammalian species, Bos taurus, Sus scrofa domesticus, and Equus ferus caballus, that display distinct ovulatory properties. For each species, five large FF samples and five small FF samples were analyzed using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The FF metabolic profiles of the three species were very distinct. In cows and mares, the metabolic profiles of large FF and small FF were also very distinct. The concentrations of seventeen identified metabolites differed significantly between the sample groups. In mares, fourteen metabolites were found at much greater concentrations in large FF than in small FF (p<0.05). In cows, four metabolites differed in concentration between the large FF and small FF samples (p<0.05). A common feature of the monovulatory species was that the concentrations of α- and β-glucose were much greater in large FF compared with small FF (p<0.05). Sow FF was characterized by the apparent absence of citrate (detected in cow and mare FF), and the presence of succinate (not detected in cow and mare FF). Another obvious difference between species was the concentration of lactate, which was minimal in mare FF compared with cow and sow FF (p<0.05). The findings provide valuable insights into reproductive physiology broadly, and indicate that the activities of central metabolic enzymes differ enormously between these species. Future investigations into species-specific differences in follicle metabolism would increase our understanding of the processes critical to folliculogenesis and the acquisition of oocyte developmental competence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkokaS, BarantinL, and TrierweilerM. (1999). Concentration measurement by proton NMR using the ERETIC method. Anal Chem, 71, 2554–2557.
2.
AliS, AhmadN, AkhtarN, Zia urR, and NoakesDE. (2008). Metabolite contents of blood serum and fluid from small and large sized follicles in dromedary camels during the peak and the low breeding seasons. Anim Reprod Sci, 108, 446–456.
3.
AtiomoW, and DaykinCA. (2012). Metabolomic biomarkers in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A pilot study. Mol Hum Reprod, 18, 546–553.
BaggMA, NottleMB, ArmstrongDT, and GrupenCG. (2007). Relationship between follicle size and oocyte developmental competence in prepubertal and adult pigs. Reprod Fertil Dev, 19, 797–803.
6.
BarantinL, Le PapeA, and AkokaS. (1997). A new method for absolute quantitation of MRS metabolites. Magn Reson Med, 38, 179–182.
7.
BartonRH, NicholsonJK, ElliottP, and HolmesE. (2008). High-throughput 1H NMR-based metabolic analysis of human serum and urine for large-scale epidemiological studies: Validation study. Int J Epidemiol, 37, 31–40.
8.
BertoldoMJ, Nadal-DesbaratsL, GerardN, et al. (2013). Differences in the metabolomic signatures of porcine follicular fluid collected from environments associated with good and poor oocyte quality. Reproduction, 146, 221–231.
9.
BouatraS, AziatF, MandalR, et al. (2013). The human urine metabolome. PLosOne, 4, 8.
10.
CoenM, HolmesE, LindonJC, and NicholsonJK. (2008). NMR-based metabolic profiling and metabonomic approaches to problems in molecular toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol, 21, 9–27.
11.
CrozetN, Ahmed-AliM, and DubosMP. (1995). Developmental competence of goat oocytes from follicles of different size categories following maturation, fertilization and culture in vitro. J Reprod Fertil, 103, 293–298.
12.
DuchampG, BourB, CombarnousY, and PalmerE. (1987). Alternative solutions to hCG induction of ovulation in the mare. J Reprod Fertil Suppl, 35, 221–228.
13.
FortuneJE, RiveraGM, and YangMY. (2004). Follicular development: The role of the follicular microenvironment in selection of the dominant follicle. Anim Reprod Sci, 82–83, 109–126.
14.
GavaghanCL, NicholsonJK, ConnorSC, et al. (2001). Directly coupled high-performance liquid chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic with chemometric studies on metabolic variation in Sprague–Dawley rats. Anal Biochem, 291, 245–252.
15.
GerardN, LoiseauS, DuchampG, and SeguinF. (2002). Analysis of the variations of follicular fluid composition during follicular growth and maturation in the mare using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR). Reproduction, 124, 241–248.
16.
GosdenRG, HunterRH, TelferE, TorranceC, and BrownN. (1988). Physiological factors underlying the formation of ovarian follicular fluid. J Reprod Fertil, 82, 813–825.
17.
GosdenRG, SadlerIH, ReedD, and HunterRHF. (1990). Characterization of ovarian follicular fluids of sheep, pigs and cows using proton nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy. Experientia, 46, 1012–1015.
18.
GracaG, DuarteIF, GodfellowBJ, et al. (2008). Metabolite profiling of human amniotic fluid by hyphenated nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Anal Chem, 80, 6085–6092.
19.
GracaG, DuarteIF, BarrosAS, et al. (2009). (1)H NMR based metabonomics of human amniotic fluid for the metabolic characterization of fetus malformations. J Proteome Res, 8, 4144–4150.
20.
GrupenCG, GilchristRB, NayuduPL, et al. (2007). Effects of ovarian stimulation, with and without human chorionic gonadotrophin, on oocyte meiotic and developmental competence in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Theriogenology, 68, 861–872.
21.
HeazellAE, BrownM, DunnWB, et al. (2008). Analysis of the metabolic footprint and tissue metabolome of placental villous explants cultured at different oxygen tensions reveals novel redox biomarkers. Placenta, 29, 691–698.
22.
HeazellAE, BrownM, WortonSA, and DunnWB. (2011). Review: The effects of oxygen on normal and pre-eclamptic placental tissue—Insights from metabolomics. Placenta, 32, S119–124.
23.
HolmesE, WilsonID, and NicholsonJK. (2008). Metabolic phenotyping in health and disease. Cell, 134, 714–717.
24.
IwataH, HashimotoS, OhotaM, et al. (2004) Effects of follicle size and electrolytes and glucose in maturation medium on nuclear maturation and developmental competence of bovine oocytes. Reproduction, 127, 159–164.
25.
JozwikM, JozwikM, TengC, and BattagliaFC. (2006). Amino acid, ammonia and urea concentrations in human pre-ovulatory ovarian follicular fluid. Human Reprod, 21, 2776–2782.
26.
KanitzW. (2003). Follicular dynamic and ovulation in cattle—A review. Arch Anim Breeding, 46, 187–198.
27.
KauffoldJ, AmerHAH, BergfeldU, WeberW, and SobirajA. (2005). The in vitro developmental competence of oocytes from juvenile calves is related to follicular diameter. J Reprod Develop, 51, 325–332.
28.
KennyLC, BroadhurstD, BrownM, et al. (2008). Detection and identification of novel metabolomic biomarkers in preeclampsia. Reprod Sci, 15, 591–597.
29.
KennyLC, BroadhurstDI, DunnW, et al. (2010). Robust early pregnancy prediction of later preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers. Hypertension, 56, 741–749.
30.
LandauS, Braw-TalR, KaimM, BorA, and BruckentalI. (2000). Preovulatory follicular status and diet affect the insulin and glucose content of follicles in high-yielding dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci, 64, 181–197.
31.
LequarreAS, VigneronC, RibaucourF, et al. (2005). Influence of antral follicle size on oocyte characteristics and embryo development in the bovine. Theriogenology, 63, 841–859.
32.
LeroyJL, VanholderT, DelangheJR, et al. (2004). Metabolite and ionic composition of follicular fluid from different-sized follicles and their relationship to serum concentrations in dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci, 80, 201–211.
33.
MailletS, Vion-DuryJ, Confort-GounyS, et al. (1998). Experimental protocol for clinical analysis of cerebrospinal fluid by high resolution proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Brain Res Protoc, 3, 123–134.
34.
MarchalR, VigneronC, PerreauC, Bali-PappA, and MermillodP. (2002). Effect of follicular size on meiotic and developmental competence of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology, 57, 1523–1532.
35.
MazerbourgS, OvergaardMT, OxvigC, et al. (2001). Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in ovine, bovine, porcine, and equine ovarian follicles: involvement in IGF binding protein-4 proteolytic degradation and mRNA expression during follicular development. Endocrinology, 142, 5243–5253.
36.
McRaeC, BaskindNE, OrsiNM, SharmaV, and FisherJ. (2012). Metabolic profiling of follicular fluid and plasma from natural cycle in vitro fertilization patients—A pilot study. Fertil Steril, 98, 1449–1457.
37.
Nadal-DesbaratsL, VeauS, BlascoH, et al. (2013). Is NMR metabolic profiling of spent embryo culture media useful to assist in vitro human embryo selection?. MAGMA, 26, 193–202.
38.
NandiS, Girish KumarV, ManjunathaBM, RameshHS, and GuptaPS. (2008). Follicular fluid concentrations of glucose, lactate and pyruvate in buffalo and sheep, and their effects on cultured oocytes, granulosa and cumulus cells. Theriogenology, 69, 186–196.
39.
NandiS, KumarVG, ManjunathaBM, and GuptaPS. (2007). Biochemical composition of ovine follicular fluid in relation to follicle size. Dev Growth Differ, 49, 61–66.
40.
NicholsonJK, FoxallPJ, SpraulM, FarrantRD, and LindonJC. (1995). 750 MHz 1H and 1H-13C NMR spectroscopy of human blood plasma. Anal Chem, 67, 793–811.
41.
OrsiNM, GopichandranN, LeeseHJ, PictonHM, and HarriSE. (2005). Fluctuations in bovine ovarian follicular fluid composition throughout the oestrous cycle. Reproduction, 129, 219–228.
42.
Pinero-SagredoE, NunesS, de Los SantosMJ, CeldaB, and EsteveV. (2010). NMR metabolic profile of human follicular fluid. NMR Biomed, 23, 485–495.
43.
RevelliA, Delle PianeL, CasanoS, et al. (2009). Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: From single biochemical markers to metabolomics. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 4, 7–40.
44.
RomeroR, Mazaki-ToviS, VaisbuchE, et al. (2010). Metabolomics in premature labor: A novel approach to identify patients at risk for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 23, 1344–1359.
45.
SartyGE, KendallEJ, AdamsGP, and PiersonRA. (2006). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of bovine ovarian follicular fluid at four selected times of the oestrous cycle. Reprod Fertil Dev, 18, 559–571.
46.
SeliE, BotrosL, SakkasD, and BurnsDH. (2008). Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using proton nuclear magnetic resonance correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 90, 2183–2189.
47.
SeliE, SakkasD, ScottR, KwokSC, RosendahlSM, and BurnsDH. (2007). Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 88, 1350–1357.
48.
SoedeNM, LangendijkP, and KempB. (2011). Reproductive cycles in pigs. Anim Reprod Sci, 124, 251–258.
49.
Sutton-McDowallML, GilchristRB, and ThompsonJG. (2010). The pivotal role of glucose metabolism in determining oocyte developmental competence. Reproduction, 139, 685–695.
50.
SuttonML, GilchristRB, and ThompsonJG. (2003). Effects of in-vivo and in-vitro environments on the metabolism of the cumulus-oocyte complex and its influence on oocyte developmental capacity. Hum Reprod Update, 9, 35–48.
51.
WallaceM, CottellE, GibneyMJ, et al. (2012). An investigation into the relationship between the metabolic profile of follicular fluid, oocyte developmental potential, and implantation outcome. Fertil Steril, 97, 1078–1084.
52.
WesterhuisJ, HoefslootH, SmitS, et al. (2008). Assessment of PLS-DA cross validation. Metabolomics, 4, 81–89.
53.
WishartDS, LewisMJ, MorrisseyJA, et al. (2008). The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome. J Chromatogr B, 871, 164–173.
54.
WishartDS, TzurD, KnoxC, et al. (2007). HMDB: The Human Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Res, 35:D521–526.
55.
YingS, WangZ, WangC, et al. (2011). Effect of different levels of short-term feed intake on folliculogenesis and follicular fluid and plasma concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase, glucose, and hormones in Hu sheep during the luteal phase. Reproduction, 142, 699–710.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
