Accurate quantification of proteins is one of the major tasks in current proteomics research. To address this issue, a wide range of stable isotope labeling techniques have been developed, allowing one to quantitatively study thousands of proteins by means of mass spectrometry. In this article, the FindPairs module of the PeakQuant software suite is detailed. It facilitates the automatic determination of protein abundance ratios based on the automated analysis of stable isotope-coded mass spectrometric data. Furthermore, it implements statistical methods to determine outliers due to biological as well as technical variance of proteome data obtained in replicate experiments. This provides an important means to evaluate the significance in obtained protein expression data. For demonstrating the high applicability of FindPairs, we focused on the quantitative analysis of proteome data acquired in 14N/15N labeling experiments. We further provide a comprehensive overview of the features of the FindPairs software, and compare these with existing quantification packages. The software presented here supports a wide range of proteomics applications, allowing one to quantitatively assess data derived from different stable isotope labeling approaches, such as 14N/15N labeling, SILAC, and iTRAQ. The software is publicly available at http://www.medizinisches-proteom-center.de/software and free for academic use.
AndreevV.P., LiL., RejtarT., LiQ., FerryJ.G., KargerB.L.2006. New algorithm for N-15/N-14 quantitation with LC-ESI-MS using an LTQ-FT mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res, 5:2039–2045.
3.
AudiG., WapstraA.H.1995. The 1995 update to the atomic mass evaluation. Nuclear Physics A, 595:409.
4.
BantscheffM., SchirleM., SweetmanG., RickJ., KusterB.2007. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Analy Bioanalyt Chem, 389:1017–1031.
5.
BeynonR.J., PrattJ.M.2005. Metabolic labeling of proteins for proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics, 4:857–872.
6.
BohlkeJ.K., De LaeterJ.R., De BievreP.et al.2005. Isotopic compositions of the elements, 2001. J Phys Chem Ref Data, 34:57–67.
BouyssieD., De PeredoA.G., MoutonE.et al.2007. Mascot file parsing and quantification (MFPaQ), a new software to parse, validate, and quantify proteomics data generated by ICAT and SILAC mass spectrometric analyses. Molec Cellular Proteomics, 6:1621–1637.
9.
CagneyG., EmiliA.2002. De novo peptide sequencing and quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures using mass-coded abundance tagging. Nat Biotechnol, 20:163–170.
10.
ChakrabortyA., RegnierF.E.2002. Global internal standard technology for comparative proteomics. J Chromatogr A, 949:173–184.
11.
ChebyshevP.L.1867. Des valeurs moyennes. Liouville's J Math Pures Appl, 12:177–184.
12.
CoplenT.B.2001. Atomic weights of the elements 1999. Pure Appl Chem, 73:667–683.
13.
CoxJ., MannM.2008. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nature Biotechnol, 26:1367–1372.
14.
DixonW.1953. Processing data for outliers. Biometrics, 9:74–89.
15.
EngJ.K., McCormackA.L.3rd. 1994. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 976–989.
16.
FennJ.B., MannM., MengC.K., WongS.F., WhitehouseC.M.1989. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science, 246:64–71.
17.
FosterL.J., De HoogC.L., MannM.2003. Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100:5813–5818.
18.
GoodlettD.R., KellerA., WattsJ.D.et al.2001. Differential stable isotope labeling of peptides for quantitation and de novo sequence derivation. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 15:1214–1221.
19.
GouwJ.W., TopsB.B., MortensenP., HeckA.J., KrijgsveldJ.2008. Optimizing identification and quantitation of 15N-labeled proteins in comparative proteomics. Anal Chem, 80:7796–7803.
20.
GygiS.P., RistB., GerberS.A., TurecekF., GelbM.H., AebersoldR.1999. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol, 17:994–999.
21.
HalliganB.D., SlyperR.Y., TwiggerS.N., HicksW., OlivierM., GreeneA.S.2005. ZoomQuant: an application for the quantitation of stable isotope labeled peptides. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 16:302–306.
22.
HanD.K., EngJ., ZhouH.L., AebersoldR.2001. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol, 19:946–951.
23.
HebelerR., OeljeklausS., ReidegeldK.E.et al.2008. Study of early leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana by quantitative proteomics using reciprocal N-14/N-15 labeling and difference gel electrophoresis. Molec Cellular Proteomics, 7:108–120.
IbarrolaN., KalumeD.E., GronborgM., IwahoriA., PandeyA.2003. A proteomic approach for quantitation of phosphorylation using stable isotope labeling in cell culture. Anal Chem, 75:6043–6049.
26.
KarasM., HillenkampF.1988. Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal Chem, 60:2299–2301.
27.
KessnerD., ChambersM., BurkeR., AgusD., MallickP.2008. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics, 24:2534–2536.
28.
KierszniowskaS., WaltherD., SchulzeW.X.2009. Ratio-dependent significance thresholds in reciprocal 15N-labeling experiments as a robust tool in detection of candidate proteins responding to biological treatment. Proteomics, 9:1916–1924.
29.
LinW.T., HungW.N., YianY.H.et al.2006. Multi-Q: A fully automated tool for multiplexed protein quantitation. J Proteome Res, 5:2328–2338.
30.
LipmanD.J., PearsonW.R.1985. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science, 227:1435–1441.
31.
LiX.J., ZhangH., RanishJ.A., AebersoldR.2003. Automated statistical analysis of protein abundance ratios from data generated by stable-isotope dilution and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem, 75:6648–6657.
32.
MaccossM.J., WuC.C., LiuH., SadygovR., YatesJ.R.3rd. 2003. A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. Anal Chem, 75:6912–6921.
33.
MartensL., ChambersM., SturmM.et al.2011. mzML—a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol Cell Proteomics, 10R110 000133.
34.
MatthiesenR., TrelleM.B., HojrupP., BunkenborgJ., JensenO.N.2005. VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins. J Proteome Res, 4:2338–2347.
35.
MundayD.C., HiscoxJ.A., BarrJ.N.2010. Quantitative proteomic analysis of A549 cells infected with human respiratory syncytial virus subgroup B using SILAC coupled to LC-MS/MS. Proteomics, 10:4320–4334.
36.
OdaY., HuangK., CrossF.R., CowburnD., ChaitB.T.1999. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96:6591–6596.
37.
OngS.E., BlagoevB., KratchmarovaI.et al.2002. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics, 1:376–386.
OngS.E., MittlerG., MannM.2004. Identifying and quantifying in vivo methylation sites by heavy methyl SILAC. Nat Methods, 1:119–126.
40.
PanC.L., KoraG., McDonaldW.H.et al.2006. ProRata: A quantitative proteomics program for accurate protein abundance ratio estimation with confidence interval evaluation. Anal Chem, 78:7121–7131.
41.
ParkS.K., VenableJ.D., XuT., YatesJ.R.2008. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods, 5:319–322.
42.
PerkinsD.N., PappinD.J., CreasyD.M., CottrellJ.S.1999. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20:3551–3567.
43.
PetersE.C., HornD.M., TullyD.C., BrockA.2001. A novel multifunctional labeling reagent for enhanced protein characterization with mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 15:2387–2392.
44.
QiuY., SousaE.A., HewickR.M., WangJ.H.2002. Acid-labile isotope-coded extractants: a class of reagents for quantitative mass spectrometric analysis of complex protein mixtures. Anal Chem, 74:4969–4979.
45.
Rodriguez-SuarezE., GubbE., AlzuetaI.F.et al.2010. Virtual expert mass spectrometrist: iTRAQ tool for database-dependent search, quantitation and result storage. Proteomics, 10:1545–1556.
46.
RosmanK.J.R., TaylorP.D.P.1997. Isotopic compositions of the elements 1997. Int Union Pure Appl Chem.
47.
RossP.L., HuangY.N., MarcheseJ.N.et al.2004. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics, 3:1154–1169.
48.
SachsL.2002. Angewandte Statistik, 10th. New York: Springer.
49.
SchmidtA., KellermannJ., LottspeichF.2005. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics, 5:4–15.
50.
SchnolzerM., JedrzejewskiP., LehmannW.D.1996. Protease-catalyzed incorporation of 18O into peptide fragments and its application for protein sequencing by electrospray and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis, 17:945–953.
51.
SchulzeW.X., MannM.2004. A novel proteomic screen for peptide-protein interactions. J Biol Chem, 279:10756–10764.
52.
ShadforthI.P., DunkleyT.P.J., LilleyK.S., BessantC.2005. i-Tracker: For quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ (TM)BMC Genomics, 6.
53.
SkiryczA., MemmiS., De BodtS.et al.2011. A reciprocal 15N-labeling proteomic analysis of expanding Arabidopsis leaves subjected to osmotic stress indicates importance of mitochondria in preserving plastid functions. J Proteome Res, 10:1018–1029.
54.
SoufiB., KumarC., GnadF., MannM., MijakovicI., MacekB.2010. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) applied to quantitative proteomics of Bacillus subtilis. J Proteome Res, 9:3638–3646.
55.
ThompsonA., SchaferJ., KuhnK.et al.2003. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem, 75:1895–1904.
56.
ThornA.M., OriansC.M.2011. Partial defoliation and hydraulic integration in Ocimum basilicum (Lamiaceae): Testing a model for sectored xylem flow using 15N labeling. Am J Bot, 98:1816–1824.
57.
UnluM., MorganM.E., MindenJ.S.1997. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis, 18:2071–2077.
58.
WieseS., ReidegeldK.A., MeyerH.E., WarscheidB.2007. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics, 7:340–350.
59.
YaoX., FreasA., RamirezJ., DemirevP.A., FenselauC.2001. Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal Chem, 73:2836–2842.
60.
YergeyJ.A.1983. A general approach to calculating isotopic distributions for mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrometry Ion Physics, 52:337–349.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
