Expansions of sequence databases driven by new sequencing technology continue apace. These result in a continuous supply of protein sequences and domains that cannot be straightforwardly annotated by simple homology methods. For these, structure-based function prediction may contribute to an improved annotation. Here, short Domains of Unknown Function (DUFs) are ab initio modeled with ROSETTA and screened for likely nucleic acid binding function. Thirty-two DUFs are thereby predicted to have a nucleic acid binding function. In most cases, additional evidence supporting that function could be obtained from structure comparison, domain architectures, distant evolutionary relationships, genome context or protein–protein interaction data. These predictions contribute to the function annotation of thousands of proteins.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndreevaA., HoworthD., ChandoniaJ.M., BrennerS.E., HubbardT.J., ChothiaC.et al.2008. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res, 36:D419–D425.
2.
AraminiJ.M., SharmaS., HuangY.J., SwapnaG.V., HoC.K., ShettyK.et al.2008. Solution NMR structure of the SOS response protein YnzC from Bacillus subtilis. Proteins, 72:526–530.
3.
BakerN.A., SeptD., JosephS., HolstM.J., McCammonJ.A.2001. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98:10037–10041.
4.
BatemanA., CoggillP., FinnR.D.2010. DUFs: families in search of function. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct BiolCryst Commun, F66:1–5.
5.
BermanH., HenrickK., NakamuraH., MarkleyJ.L.2007. The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res, 35:D301–D303.
6.
BonneauR., StraussC.E., RohlC.A., ChivianD., BradleyP., MalmstromL.et al.2002. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J Mol Biol, 322:65–78.
7.
BonneauR., BaligaN.S., DeutschE.W., ShannonP., HoodL.2004. Comprehensive de novo structure prediction in a systems-biology context for the archaea Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Genome Biol, 5:R52.
8.
BradleyP., MisuraK.M., BakerD.2005. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science, 309:1868–1871.
9.
ButlandG., Peregrin-AlvarezJ.M., LiJ., YangW., YangX., CanadienV.et al.2005. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature, 433:531–537.
10.
ChowE.D., LiuO.W., O'BrienS., MadhaniH.D.2007. Exploration of whole-genome responses of the human AIDS-associated yeast pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans var grubii: nitric oxide stress and body temperature. Curr Genet, 52:137–148.
11.
CollinsS.R., KemmerenP., ZhaoX.C., GreenblattJ.F., SpencerF., HolstegeF.C.et al.2007. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics, 6:439–450.
12.
DouillardF.P., RyanK.A., CalyD.L., HindsJ., WitneyA.A., HusainS.E.et al.2008. Posttranscriptional regulation of flagellin synthesis in Helicobacter pylori by the RpoN chaperone HP0958. J Bacteriol, 190:7975–7984.
13.
DunbrackR.L.Jr, CohenF.E.1997. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci, 6:1661–1681.
14.
EllrottK., JaroszewskiL., LiW., WooleyJ.C., GodzikA.2010. Expansion of the protein repertoire in newly explored environments: human gut microbiome specific protein families. PLoS Comput Biol, 6:e1000798.
15.
Ferrer-OrtaC., AriasA., Perez-LuqueR., EscarmisC., DomingoE., VerdaguerN.2004. Structure of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and its complex with a template-primer RNA. J Biol Chem, 279:47212–47221.
16.
FinnR.D., MistryJ., TateJ., CoggillP., HegerA., PollingtonJ.E.et al.2010. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res, 38:D211–D222.
17.
GaoM., SkolnickJ.2009. A threading-based method for the prediction of DNA-binding proteins with application to the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol, 5:e1000567.
18.
HautbergueG., GoguelV.2001. Activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase CTDK-I requires the heterodimerization of two unstable subunits. J Biol Chem, 276:8005–8013.
19.
HolmL., SanderC.1993. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol, 233:123–138.
20.
JaroszewskiL., LiZ., KrishnaS.S., BakolitsaC., WooleyJ., DeaconA.M.et al.2009. Exploration of uncharted regions of the protein universe. PLoS Biol, 7:e1000205.
21.
JensenL.J., KuhnM., StarkM., ChaffronS., CreeveyC., MullerJ.et al.2009. STRING 8—a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res, 37:D412–D416.
22.
KroganN.J., CagneyG., YuH., ZhongG., GuoX., IgnatchenkoA.et al.2006. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 440:637–643.
23.
LevittM.2009. Nature of the protein universe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106:11079–11084.
24.
LuoC., HuG.Q., ZhuH.2009. Genome reannotation of Escherichia coli CFT073 with new insights into virulence. BMC Genomics, 10:552.
25.
MalmstromL., RiffleM., StraussC.E., ChivianD., DavisT.N., BonneauR.et al.2007. Superfamily assignments for the yeast proteome through integration of structure prediction with the gene ontology. PLoS Biol, 5:e76.
26.
MardisE.R.2008. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 9:387–402.
27.
ParrishJ.R., YuJ., LiuG., HinesJ.A., ChanJ.E., MangiolaB.A.et al.2007. A proteome-wide protein interaction map for Campylobacter jejuni. Genome Biol, 8:R130.
28.
QianB., RamanS., DasR., BradleyP., McCoyA.J., ReadR.J.et al.2007. High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature, 450:259–264.
29.
RainJ.C., SeligL., De ReuseH., BattagliaV., ReverdyC., SimonS.et al.2001. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature, 409:211–215.
30.
ResslS., Terwisscha van ScheltingaA.C., VonrheinC., OttV., ZieglerC.2009. Molecular basis of transport and regulation in the Na(+)/betaine symporter BetP. Nature, 458:47–52.
31.
RigdenD.J.2009. From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics. Springer: Dordrecht.
32.
RigdenD.J.2006. Understanding the cell in terms of structure and function: insights from structural genomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 17:457–464.
33.
SaliA., BlundellT.L.1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol, 234:779–815.
34.
SammutS.J., FinnR.D., BatemanA.2008. Pfam 10 years on: 10,000 families and still growing. Brief Bioinform, 9:210–219.
35.
SchadeM., TurnerC.J., KuhneR., SchmiederP., LowenhauptK., HerbertA.et al.1999. The solution structure of the Zalpha domain of the human RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 reveals a prepositioned binding surface for Z-DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96:12465–12470.
36.
SimonsK.T., KooperbergC., HuangE., BakerD.1997. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol, 268:209–225.
37.
SimonsK.T., RuczinskiI., KooperbergC., FoxB.A., BystroffC., BakerD.1999. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins, 34:82–95.
38.
SodingJ.2005. Protein homology detection by HMM–HMM comparison. Bioinformatics, 21:951–960.
39.
SzilagyiA., SkolnickJ.2006. Efficient prediction of nucleic acid binding function from low-resolution protein structures. J Mol Biol, 358:922–933.
40.
TatusovR.L., FedorovaN.D., JacksonJ.D., JacobsA.R., KiryutinB., KooninE.V.et al.2003. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics, 4:41.
41.
YoosephS., SuttonG., RuschD.B., HalpernA.L., WilliamsonS.J., RemingtonK.et al.2007. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol, 5:e16.
42.
ZhulinI.B., TaylorB.L., DixonR.1997. PAS domain S-boxes in Archaea, Bacteria and sensors for oxygen and rsedox. Trends Biochem Sci, 22:331–333.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
