The increasing popularity of proteomics has created a need for quantitative analysis methods. As a result, many different techniques are now available for performing gel-based or gel-free quantitative proteomic analysis of biological samples. These techniques provide an insight into global protein expression from identification to quantification, taking into account the highly dynamic status of the proteome. With its relatively small and compact genome, yeast is widely used as a model organism for molecular genetics, cell biology, and proteomic studies. In this review, we will show how quantitative proteomics has been used to study the effect of different stresses on yeast.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AebersoldR., MannM.2003. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 422:198–207.
2.
AttfieldP.V.1997. Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat. Biotechnol., 15:1351–1357.
3.
BaeW., ChenX.2004. Proteomic study for the cellular responses to Cd2+ in Schizosaccharomyces pombe through amino acid-coded mass tagging and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 3:596–607.
4.
BandhakaviS., XieH., O'CallaghanB., SakuraiH., KimD.H., GriffinT.J.2008. Hsf1 activation inhibits rapamycin resistance and TOR signaling in yeast revealed by combined proteomic and genetic analysis. PLoS One, 3:e1598.
5.
BatailleN., ThoravalD., BoucherieH.1988. Two-dimensional gel analysis of yeast proteins: application to the study of changes in the levels of major polypeptides of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depending on the fermentable or nonfermentable nature of the carbon source. Electrophoresis, 9:774–780.
6.
BatailleN., RegnacqM., BoucherieH.1991. Induction of a heat-shock-type response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae following glucose limitation. Yeast, 7:367–378.
7.
BenderT., LeidholdC., RuppertT., FrankenS., VoosW.2010. The role of protein quality control in mitochondrial protein homeostasis under oxidative stress. Proteomics, 10:1426–1443
8.
BlombergA.1995. Global changes in protein-synthesis during adaptation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to 0.7 M Nacl. J. Bacteriol., 177:3563–3572.
9.
BoucherieH.1985. Protein synthesis during transition and stationary phases under glucose limitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol., 161:385–392.
10.
BraconiD., BernardiniG., PossentiS., LaschiM., ArenaS., ScaloniA.et al.2009. Proteomics and redox-proteomics of the effects of herbicides on a wild-type wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. J. Proteome Res., 8:256–267.
BreuerU., HarmsH.2006. Debaryomyces hansenii: an extremophilic yeast with biotechnological potential. Yeast, 23:415–437.
13.
BroC., RegenbergB., LagnielG., LabarreJ., Montero-LomeliM., NielsenJ.2003. Transcriptional, proteomic, and metabolic responses to lithium in galactose-grown yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem., 278:32141–32149.
14.
CaustonH.C., RenB., KohSS., HarbisonC.T., KaninE., JenningsE.G.et al.2001. Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell, 12:323–337.
15.
ChengJ.S., QiaoB., YuanY.J.2008. Comparative proteome analysis of robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae insights into industrial continuous and batch fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 81:327–338.
16.
ChoeL., D'AscenzoM., RelkinN.R., PappinD., RossP., WilliamsonB.et al.2007. 8-plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Proteomics, 7:3651–3660.
17.
ChongP.K., GanC.S., PhamT.K., WrightP.C.2006. Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reproducibility: implication of multiple injections. J. Proteome Res., 5:1232–1240.
18.
CourchesneW.E., TuncM., LiaoS.2009. Amiodarone induces stress responses and calcium flux mediated by the cell wall in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can. J. Microbiol., 55:288–303.
19.
de GrootM.J.L., Daran-LapujadeP., van BreukelenB., KnijnenburgT.A., de HulsterE.A.F., ReindersM.J.T.et al.2007. Quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics of anaerobic and aerobic yeast cultures reveals post-transcriptional regulation of key cellular processes. Microbiology, 153:3864–3878.
20.
de NobelH., LawrieL., BrulS., KlisF., DavisM., AlloushH.et al.2001. Parallel and comparative analysis of the proteome and transcriptome of sorbic acid-stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 18:1413–1428.
21.
DeRisiJ.L., IyerV.R., BrownP.O.1997. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science, 278:680–586.
22.
DowseyA.W., DunnM.J., YangG.Z.2003. The role of bioinformatics in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics, 3:1567–1596.
23.
ElliottM.H., SmithD.S., ParkerC.E., BorchersC.2009. Current trends in quantitative proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom., 44:1637–1660.
24.
FeldmanH.2010. Yeast: Molecular and Cell Biology. Wiley-VCH Verlag: Weinheim.
25.
GamberiT., CavalieriD., MagheriniF., MangoniM.L., De FilippoC., BorroM.et al.2007. An integrated analysis of the effects of Esculentin 1–21 on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BBA-Proteins Proteomics, 1774:688–700.
26.
Garcia-LeiroA., CerdanM.E., Gonzalez-SisoM.I.2010. Proteomic analysis of the oxidative stress response in Kluyveromyces lactis and effect of glutathione reductase depletion. J. Proteome Res., 7:2358–2376.
27.
GaschA.P., SpellmanP.T., KaoC.M., Camel-HarelO., EisenM.B., StorzG.et al.2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell., 11:4241–4257.
28.
GavinA.C., BoscheM., KrauseR., GrandiP., MarziochM., BauerA.et al.2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415:141–147.
29.
GavinA.C., AloyP., GrandiP., KrauseR., BoescheM., MarziochM.et al.2006. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature, 440:631–636.
30.
GerberS.A., RushJ., StemmanO., KirschnerP.M.W., GygiS.P.2003. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100:6940–6945.
31.
GodonC., LagnielG., LeeJ., BuhlerJ.M., KiefferS., PerrotR.et al.1998. The H2O2 stimulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 273:22480–22489.
32.
GoffeauA., BarrellB.G., BusseyH., DavisR.W., DujonB., FeldmannH.et al.1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science, 274:546.
33.
GorgA., WeissW., DunnM.J.2004. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics, 4:3665–3685.
34.
GoriK., HebraudM., ChambonC., MortensenH.D., ArneborgN., JespersenL.2007. Proteomic changes in Debaryomyces hansenii upon exposure to NaCl stress. Fems Yeast Res., 7:293–303.
35.
GygiS.P., RistB., GerberS.A., TurecekF., GelbM.H., AebersoldR.1999. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol., 17:994–999.
36.
HansenR., PearsonS.Y., BrosnanJ.W., MeadenP.G., JamiesonD.J.2006. Proteomic analysis of a distilling strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during industrial grain fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 72:116–125.
37.
HoY., GruhlerA., HeilbutA., BaderG.D., MooreL., AdamsS.L.et al.2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415:180–183.
38.
HohmannS.2002. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 66:300.
HuY., WangG., ChenG.Y.J., FuX., YaoS.Q.2003. Proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under metal stress by two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 24:1458–1470.
41.
IssaqH.J., VeenstraT.D.2008. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE): advances and perspectives. Biotechniques, 44:697–698.
42.
IvakhnoS., KornelyukA.2006. Quantitative proteomics and its applications for systems biology. Biochemistry, 71:1060–1072.
43.
JamiesonD.J., RiversS.L., StephenD.W.1994. Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins induced by peroxide and superoxide stress. Microbiology, 140:3277–3283.
44.
JosicD., KovacS.2008. Application of proteomics in biotechnology—microbial proteomics. Biotechnol. J., 3:496–509.
45.
KolkmanA., OlsthoornM.M.A., HeeremansC.E.M., HeckA.J.R., SlijperM.2005. Comparative proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in chemostat cultures limited for glucose or ethanol. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 4:1–11.
46.
KolkmanA., Daran-LapujadeP., FullaondoA., OlsthoornM.M.A., PronkJ.T., SlijperM.et al.2006. Proteome analysis of yeast response to various nutrient limitations. Mol. Syst. Biol., 22006.0026.
47.
KuschH., BiswasK., SchwanfelderS., EngelmannS., RogersP.D., HeckerM.et al.2004. A proteomic approach to understanding the development of multidrug-resistant Candida albicans strains. Mol. Genet. Genomics, 271:554–565.
48.
KuschH., EngelmannS., AlbrechtD., MorschhauserJ., HeckerM.2007. Proteomic analysis of the oxidative stress responses in Candida albicans. Proteomics, 7:686–697.
49.
KuschH., EngelmannS., BodeR., AlbrechtD., MorschhauserJ., HeckerM.2008. A proteomic view of Candida albicans yeast cell metabolism in exponential and stationary growth phases. Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 298:291–318.
50.
Le MoanN., ClementG., Le MaoutS., TacnetF., ToledanoM.B.2006. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome of oxidized protein thiols: contrasted functions for the thioredoxin and glutathione pathways. J. Biol. Chem., 281:10420–10430.
51.
LiJ.X., SteenH., GygiS.P.2003. Protein profiling with cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag (cICAT) reagents—the yeast salinity stress response. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2:1198–1204.
52.
LinF.M., QiaoB., YuanY.J.2009a. Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75:3765–3776.
53.
LinF.M., TangY., YuanY.J.2009b. Temporal quantitative proteomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to a nonlethal concentration of furfural. Proteomics, 9:5471–5483.
54.
MagheriniF., TaniC., GamberiT., CaselliA., BianchiL., BiniL.et al.2007. Protein expression profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during apoptosis induced by H2O2. Proteomics, 7:1434–1445.
55.
MailletI., LagnielG., PerrotM., BoucherieH., LabarreJ.1996. Rapid identification of yeast proteins on two-dimensional gels. J. Biol. Chem., 271:10263–10270.
56.
MansourS., BaillyJ., DelettreJ., BonnarmeP.2009. A proteomic and transcriptomic view of amino acids catabolism in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Proteomics, 9:4714–4725.
57.
McDonaghB., OguetaS., LasarteG., PadillaC.A., BarcenaJ.A.2009. Shotgun redox proteomics identifies specifically modified cysteines in key metabolic enzymes under oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteomics, 72:677–689.
58.
MelamedD., PnueliL., AravaY.2008. Yeast translational response to high salinity: global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels. RNA, 14:1337–1351.
59.
MiyagiM., RaoK.2007. Proteolytic 18O-labeling strategies for quantitative proteomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26:121–136
60.
MurguiaJ.R., BellesJ.M., SerranoR.1995. A salt-sensitive 3′(2′),5′-bisphosphate nucleotidase involved in sulfate activation. Science, 267:232–234.
61.
MurguiaJ.R., BellesJ.M., SerranoR.1996. The yeast HAL2 nucleotidase is an in vivo target of salt toxicity. J. Biol. Chem., 271:29029–29033.
62.
NavarreC., DegandH., BennettK.L., CrawfordK.S., MortzE., BoutryM.2002. Subproteomics: identification of plasma membrane proteins from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics, 2:1706–1714.
63.
NorbeckJ., BlombergA.1996. Protein expression during exponential growth in 0.7 M NaCl medium of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fems Microbiol. Lett., 137:1–8.
64.
NorbeckJ., BlombergA.1998. Amino acid uptake is strongly affected during exponential growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 0.7 M NaCl medium. Fems Microbiol Lett., 158:121–126.
OngS.E., BlagoevB., KratchmarovaI., KristensenD.B., SteenH., PandeyA.et al.2002. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 1:376–386.
67.
PengJ.M., EliasJ.E., ThoreenC.C., LickliderL.J., GygiS.P.2003. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res., 2:43–50.
PhamT.K., WrightP.C.2008. The proteomic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in very high glucose conditions with amino acid supplementation. J. Proteome Res., 7:4766–4774.
70.
PhamT.K., ChongP.K., GanC.S., WrightP.C.2006. Proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high gravity fermentation conditions. J. Proteome Res., 5:3411–3419.
71.
QuerinL., SanvitoR., MagniF., BustiS., Van DorsselaerA., AlberghinaL.et al.2008. Proteomic analysis of a nutritional shift-up in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies Gvp36 as a BAR-containing protein involved in vesicular traffic and nutritional adaptation. J. Biol. Chem., 283:4730–4743.
72.
RogersP.D., VermitskyJ.P., EdlindT.D., HilliardG.M.2006. Proteomic analysis of experimentally induced azole resistance in Candida glabrata. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 58:434–438.
73.
RománE., AranaD.M., NombelaC., Alonso-MongeR., PlaJ.2007. MAP kinase pathways as regulators of fungal virulence. Trends Microbiol., 15:181–190.
74.
RossP.L., HuangY.L.N., MarcheseJ.N., WilliamsonB., ParkerK., HattanS.et al.2004. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 3:1154–1169.
75.
SantosP.M., SimoesT., Sa-CorreiaI.2009. Insights into yeast adaptive response to the agricultural fungicide mancozeb: a toxicoproteomics approach. Proteomics, 9:657–670.
76.
SchmidtP., WalkerJ., SelwayL., SteadD., YinZ., EnjalbertB.et al.2008. Proteomic analysis of the pH response in the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata. Proteomics, 8:534–544.
77.
SeoH.Y., ChangY.J., ChungY.J., KimK.S.2008. Proteomic analysis of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon iron deficiency induced via human H-ferritin production. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 18:1368–1376.
78.
ShevchenkoA., JensenO.N., PodtelejnikovA.V., SaglioccoF., WilmM., VormO.et al.1996. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. USA, 93:14440–14445.
SickmannA., ReindersJ., WagnerY., JoppichC., ZahediR., MeyerH.E.et al.2003. The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100:13207–13212.
81.
SoufiB., KelstrupC.D., StoehrG., FrohlichF., WaltherT.C., OlsenJ.V.2009. Global analysis of the yeast osmotic stress response by quantitative proteomics. Mol. Biosystems, 5:1337–1346.
82.
SunN.K., JangJ., LeeS., KimS., LeeS., HoeK.S.et al.2005. The first two-dimensional reference map of the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins. Proteomics, 5:1574–1579.
83.
TeixeiraM.C., SantosP.M., FernandesA.R., Sa-CorreiaI.2005. A proteome analysis of the yeast response to the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Proteomics, 5:1889–1901.
84.
ThorsenM., LagnielG., KristianssonE., JunotC., NermanO., LabarreJ.et al.2007. Quantitative transcriptome, proteome, and sulfur metabolite profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to arsenite. Physiol. Genomics, 30:35–43.
85.
TimmsJ.F., CramerR.2008. Difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics, 8:4886–4897.
86.
TrabalziniL., PaffettiA., ScaloniA., TalamoF., FerroE., CoratzaG.et al.2003. Proteomic response to physiological fermentation stresses in a wild-type wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. J., 370:35–46.
87.
UnluM., MorganM.E., MindenJ.S.1997. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis, 18:2071–2077.
88.
VaudelM., SickmannA., MartensL.2010. Peptide and protein quantification: a map of the minefield. Proteomics, 10:650–670.
89.
VidoK., SpectorD., LagnielG., LopezS., ToledanoM.B., LabarreJ.2001. A proteome analysis of the cadmium response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 276:8469–8474.
90.
WashburnM.P., WoltersD., YatesJ.R.2001. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol., 19:242–247.
91.
WashburnM.P., KollerA., OshiroG., UlaszekR.R., PlouffeD., DeciuC.et al.2003. Protein pathway and complex clustering of correlated mRNA and protein expression analyses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100:3107–3112.
92.
WeeksM.E., SinclairJ., JacobR.J., SaxtonM.J., KirbyS., JonesJ.et al.2005. Stress-induced changes in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteome using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry and a novel integrated robotics platform. Proteomics, 5:1669–1685.
93.
WeeksM.E., SinclairJ., ButtA., ChungY.L., WorthingtonJ.L., WilkinsonC.R.M.et al.2006. A parallel proteomic and metabolomic analysis of the hydrogen peroxide- and Sty1p-dependent stress response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proteomics, 6:2772–2796.
94.
WetmoreB.A., MerrickB.A.2004. Toxicoproteomics: proteomics applied to toxicology and pathology. Toxicol. Pathol., 32:619–642.
WilkinsM.R., SanchezJ.C., GooleyA.A., AppelR.D., HumpherySmithI., HochstrasserD.F.et al.1996. Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev., 13:19–50.
97.
WilmM.2009. Quantitative proteomics in biological research. Proteomics, 9:4590–4605.
98.
XuY., WangY., YanL., LiangR.M., DaiB.D., TangR.J.et al.2009. Proteomic analysis reveals a synergistic mechanism of fluconazole and berberine against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans: endogenous ROS augmentation. J. Proteome Res., 8:5296–5304.
99.
YinZ.K., SteadD., SelwayL., WalkerJ., Riba-GarciaI., McinerneyT.et al.2004. Proteomic response to amino acid starvation in Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics, 4:2425–2436.
100.
YinZ.K., SteadD., WalkerJ., SelwayL., SmithD.A., BrownJ.P.et al.2009. A proteomic analysis of the salt, cadmium and peroxide stress responses in Candida albicans and the role of the Hog1 stress-activated MAPK in regulating the stress-induced proteome. Proteomics, 9:4686–4703.
101.
YooY.S., RegnierF.E.2004. Proteomic analysis of carbonylated proteins in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using avidin-fluorescein affinity staining. Electrophoresis, 25:1334–1341.
102.
ZhouW.D., RyanJ.J., ZhouH.L.2004. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae—induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J. Biol. Chem., 279:32262–32268.
