Systems biology proposes a multidisciplinary approach of biological systems, in order to obtain global and quantitative models of their functioning. This review presents an overview of 10 years of systemic analyses of the cellular responses to environmental stresses, using one of the favorite postgenomics models: the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These analyses include the global reconstruction and the dynamic modeling of the regulatory networks involved in the adaptation of the cells to environmental fluctuations and the extension of these approaches to other yeast species, to provide insights in the mechanisms that drive the evolution of the biological network properties.
AkacheB., MacPhersonS., SylvainM.A., TurcotteB.2004. Complex interplay among regulators of drug resistance genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem, 279:27855–27860.
5.
ArayaC.L., PayenC., DunhamM.J., FieldsS.2010. Whole-genome sequencing of a laboratory-evolved yeast strain. BMC Genomics, 11:88.
6.
BalkovaK., SarinovaM., HodurovaZ., GoffriniP., GbelskaY.2009. Functional analysis of the Kluyveromyces lactis PDR1 gene. FEMS Yeast Res, 9:321–327.
BanerjeeD., LelandaisG., ShuklaS., MukhopadhyayG., JacqC., DevauxF.et al.2008. Responses of pathogenic and non-pathogenic yeast species enlighten the functioning and evolution of multidrug resistance transcriptional networks. Eukaryot Cell, 7:68–77.
9.
BergmannS., IhmelsJ., BarkaiN.2004. Similarities and differences in genome-wide expression data of six organisms. PLoS Biol, 2:E9.
10.
BoorsmaA., FoatB.C., VisD., KlisF., BussemakerH.J.2005. T-profiler: scoring the activity of predefined groups of genes using gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res, 33:W592–W595.
11.
BoorsmaA., LuX.J., ZakrzewskaA., KlisF.M., BussemakerH.J.2008. Inferring condition-specific modulation of transcription factor activity in yeast through regulon-based analysis of genomewide expression. PLoS One, 3:e3112.
12.
BornemanA.R., GianoulisT.A., ZhangZ.D., YuH., RozowskyJ., SeringhausM.R.et al.2007. Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. Science, 317:815–819.
13.
BremR.B., YvertG., ClintonR., KruglyakL.2002. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science, 296:752–755.
14.
BullardJ.H., MostovoyY., DudoitS., BremR.B.2010. Polygenic and directional regulatory evolution across pathways in Saccharomyces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107:5058–5063.
15.
BussemakerH.J., FoatB.C., WardL.D.2007a. Predictive modeling of genome-wide mRNA expression: from modules to molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct., 36:329–347.
16.
BussemakerH.J., WardL.D., BoorsmaA.2007b. Dissecting complex transcriptional responses using pathway-level scores based on prior information. BMC Bioinformatics, 8,Suppl 6:S6.
17.
CharvinG., CrossF.R., SiggiaE.D.2008. A microfluidic device for temporally controlled gene expression and long-term fluorescent imaging in unperturbed dividing yeast cells. PLoS ONE, 3:e1468.
18.
ChenD., TooneW.M., MataJ., LyneR., BurnsG., KivinenK.et al.2003. Global transcriptional responses of fission yeast to environmental stress. Mol Biol Cell, 14:214–229.
19.
ClineM.S., SmootM., CeramiE., KuchinskyA., LandysN., WorkmanC.et al.2007. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc, 2:2366–2382.
20.
CollinsS.R., KemmerenP., ZhaoX.C., GreenblattJ.F., SpencerF., HolstegeF.C.et al.2007. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics, 6:439–450.
21.
CosteA.T., KarababaM., IscherF., BilleJ., SanglardD.2004. TAC1, transcriptional activator of CDR genes, is a new transcription factor involved in the regulation of Candida albicans ABC transporters CDR1 and CDR2. Eukaryot Cell, 3:1639–1652.
22.
DarzacqX., YaoJ., LarsonD.R., CausseS.Z., BosanacL., de TurrisV.et al.2009. Imaging transcription in living cells. Annu Rev Biophys, 38:173–196.
23.
DecourtyL., SaveanuC., ZemamK., HantrayeF., FrachonE., RousselleJ.C.et al.2008. Linking functionally related genes by sensitive and quantitative characterization of genetic interaction profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105:5821–5826.
24.
DekelE., AlonU.2005. Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature, 436:588–592.
25.
DevauxF., MarcP., BouchouxC., DelaveauT., HikkelI., PotierM.C.et al.2001. An artificial transcription activator mimics the genome-wide properties of the yeast Pdr1 transcription factor. EMBO Rep, 2:493–498.
26.
DevauxF., CarvajalE., Moye-RowleyS., JacqC.2002. Genome-wide studies on the nuclear PDR3-controlled response to mitochondrial dysfunction in yeast. FEBS Lett, 515:25–28.
27.
DietrichF.S., VoegeliS., BrachatS., LerchA., GatesK., SteinerS.et al.2004. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science, 304:304–307.
DunhamM.J., BadraneH., FereaT., AdamsJ., BrownP.O., RosenzweigF.et al.2002. Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:16144–16149.
32.
DunnB., LevineR.P., SherlockG.2005. Microarray karyotyping of commercial wine yeast strains reveals shared, as well as unique, genomic signatures. BMC Genomics, 6:53.
33.
ElowitzM.B., LevineA.J., SiggiaE.D., SwainP.S.2002. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science, 297:1183–1186.
34.
EnjalbertB., SmithD.A., CornellM.J., AlamI., NichollsS., BrownA.J.et al.2006. Role of the Hog1 stress-activated protein kinase in the global transcriptional response to stress in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell, 17:1018–1032.
FardeauV., LelandaisG., OldfieldA., SalinH., LemoineS., GarciaM.et al.2007. The central role of PDR1 in the foundation of yeast drug resistance. J Biol Chem, 282:5063–5074.
38.
FayJ.C., McCulloughH.L., SniegowskiP.D., EisenM.B.2004. Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol, 5:R26.
39.
FischerG., RochaE.P., BrunetF., VergassolaM., DujonB.2006. Highly variable rates of genome rearrangements between hemiascomycetous yeast lineages. PLoS Genet, 2:e32.
40.
FitzpatrickD.A., LogueM.E., StajichJ.E., ButlerG.2006. A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol, 6:99.
41.
FoatB.C., HoushmandiS.S., OlivasW.M., BussemakerH.J.2005. Profiling condition-specific, genome-wide regulation of mRNA stability in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102:17675–17680.
42.
FoatB.C., MorozovA.V., BussemakerH.J.2006. Statistical mechanical modeling of genome-wide transcription factor occupancy data by MatrixREDUCE. Bioinformatics, 22:e141–e149.
43.
FrancoisP., HakimV.2004. Design of genetic networks with specified functions by evolution in silico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101:580–585.
FriedmanN.2004. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science, 303:799–805.
46.
FriedmanN., VardiS., RonenM., AlonU., StavansJ.2005. Precise temporal modulation in the response of the SOS DNA repair network in individual bacteria. PLoS Biol, 3:e238.
GaschA.P.2007. Comparative genomics of the environmental stress response in ascomycete fungi. Yeast, 24:961–976.
49.
GaschA.P., SpellmanP.T., KaoC.M., Carmel-HarelO., EisenM.B., StorzG.et al.2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell, 11:4241–4257.
50.
GaschA.P., MosesA.M., ChiangD.Y., FraserH.B., BerardiniM., EisenM.B.2004. Conservation and evolution of cis-regulatory systems in ascomycete fungi. PLoS Biol, 2:e398.
51.
GavinA.C., BoscheM., KrauseR., GrandiP., MarziochM., BauerA.et al.2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415:141–147.
52.
GerberA.P., HerschlagD., BrownP.O.2004. Extensive association of functionally and cytotopically related mRNAs with Puf family RNA-binding proteins in yeast. PLoS Biol, 2:E79.
GertzJ., SiggiaE.D., CohenB.A.2009. Analysis of combinatorial cis-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters. Nature, 457:215–218.
55.
Geva-ZatorskyN., DekelE., CohenA.A., DanonT., CohenL., AlonU.2010. Protein dynamics in drug combinations: a linear superposition of individual-drug responses. Cell, 140:643–651.
56.
GoffeauA.2000. Four years of post-genomic life with 6,000 yeast genes. FEBS Lett, 480:37–41.
57.
GreigD., LouisE.J., BortsR.H., TravisanoM.2002. Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science, 298:1773–1775.
58.
GreshamD., DesaiM.M., TuckerC.M., JenqH.T., PaiD.A., WardA.et al.2008. The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet, 4:e1000303.
59.
GuelzimN., BottaniS., BourgineP., KepesF.2002. Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network. Nat Genet, 31:60–63.
60.
HahnJ.S., NeefD.W., ThieleD.J.2006. A stress regulatory network for co-ordinated activation of proteasome expression mediated by yeast heat shock transcription factor. Mol Microbiol, 60:240–251.
61.
HallstromT.C., Moye-RowleyW.S.2000. Multiple signals from dysfunctional mitochondria activate the pleiotropic drug resistance pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem, 275:37347–37356.
62.
HannumG., SrivasR., GuenoleA., van AttikumH., KroganN.J., KarpR.M.et al.2009. Genome-wide association data reveal a global map of genetic interactions among protein complexes. PLoS Genet, 5:e1000782.
63.
HarbisonC.T., GordonD.B., LeeT.I., RinaldiN.J., MacisaacK.D., DanfordT.W.et al.2004. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature, 431:99–104.
64.
HaseltineE.L., ArnoldF.H.2007. Synthetic gene circuits: design with directed evolution. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 36:1–19.
65.
HaugenA.C., KelleyR., CollinsJ.B., TuckerC.J., DengC., AfshariC.A.et al.2004. Integrating phenotypic and expression profiles to map arsenic-response networks. Genome Biol, 5:R95.
66.
HauserN.C., FellenbergK., GilR., BastuckS., HoheiselJ.D., Perez-OrtinJ.E.2001. Whole genome analysis of a wine yeast strain. Comp Funct Genomics, 2:69–79.
67.
HellauerK., AkacheB., MacPhersonS., SirardE., TurcotteB.2002. Zinc cluster protein Rdr1p is a transcriptional repressor of the PDR5 gene encoding a multidrug transporter. J Biol Chem, 277:17671–17676.
68.
HersenP., McCleanM.N., MahadevanL., RamanathanS.2008. Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105:7165–7170.
69.
HikkelI., Lucau-DanilaA., DelaveauT., MarcP., DevauxF., JacqC.2003. A general strategy to uncover transcription factor properties identifies a new regulator of drug resistance in yeast. J Biol Chem, 278:11427–11432.
70.
HoganD.J., RiordanD.P., GerberA.P., HerschlagD., BrownP.O.2008. Diverse RNA-binding proteins interact with functionally related sets of RNAs, suggesting an extensive regulatory system. PLoS Biol, 6:e255.
71.
HomannO.R., DeaJ., NobleS.M., JohnsonA.D.2009. A phenotypic profile of the Candida albicans regulatory network. PLoS Genet, 5:e1000783.
72.
HuZ., KillionP.J., IyerV.R.2007. Genetic reconstruction of a functional transcriptional regulatory network. Nat Genet, 39:683–687.
73.
HughesT.R., MartonM.J., JonesA.R., RobertsC.J., StoughtonR., ArmourC.D.et al.2000. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell, 102:109–126.
74.
IdekerT., GalitskiT., HoodL.2001a. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 2:343–372.
75.
IdekerT., ThorssonV., RanishJ.A., ChristmasR., BuhlerJ., EngJ.K.et al.2001b. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science, 292:929–934.
76.
IhmelsJ., FriedlanderG., BergmannS., SarigO., ZivY., BarkaiN.2002. Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network. Nat Genet, 31:370–377.
IhmelsJ., BergmannS., BermanJ., BarkaiN.2005a. Comparative gene expression analysis by differential clustering approach: application to the Candida albicans transcription program. PLoS Genet, 1:e39.
79.
IhmelsJ., BergmannS., Gerami-NejadM., YanaiI., McClellanM., BermanJ.et al.2005b. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science, 309:938–940.
80.
IhmelsJ., CollinsS.R., SchuldinerM., KroganN.J., WeissmanJ.S.2007. Backup without redundancy: genetic interactions reveal the cost of duplicate gene loss. Mol Syst Biol, 3:86.
81.
IngoliaN.T., MurrayA.W.2007. Positive-feedback loops as a flexible biological module. Curr Biol, 17:668–677.
82.
JonesT., FederspielN.A., ChibanaH., DunganJ., KalmanS., MageeB.B.et al.2004. The diploid genome sequence of Candida albicans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101:7329–7334.
83.
KellisM., PattersonN., EndrizziM., BirrenB., LanderE.S.2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature, 423:241–254.
84.
KellisM., BirrenB.W., LanderE.S.2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 428:617–624.
KlippE., NordlanderB., KrugerR., GennemarkP., HohmannS.2005. Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock. Nat Biotechnol, 23:975–982.
87.
KrantzM., AhmadpourD., OttossonL.G., WarringerJ., WaltermannC., NordlanderB.et al.2009. Robustness and fragility in the yeast high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) signal-transduction pathway. Mol Syst Biol, 5:281.
88.
KvitekD.J., WillJ.L., GaschA.P.2008. Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet, 4:e1000223.
89.
LandryC.R., OhJ., HartlD.L., CavalieriD.2006a. Genome-wide scan reveals that genetic variation for transcriptional plasticity in yeast is biased towards multi-copy and dispensable genes. Gene, 366:343–351.
90.
LandryC.R., TownsendJ.P., HartlD.L., CavalieriD.2006b. Ecological and evolutionary genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Ecol, 15:575–591.
91.
LarsonD.R., SingerR.H., ZenklusenD.2009. A single molecule view of gene expression. Trends Cell Biol, 19:630–637.
92.
Le CromS., DevauxF., MarcP., ZhangX., Moye-RowleyW.S., JacqC.2002. New insights into the pleiotropic drug resistance network from genome-wide characterization of the YRR1 transcription factor regulation system. Mol Cell Biol, 22:2642–2649.
93.
LèbreS., BecqJ., DevauxF., StumpfM., LelandaisG.(in revision)Statistical inference of the time-varying structure of gene-regulation networks.
LelandaisG., TantyV., GeneixC., EtchebestC., JacqC., DevauxF.2008. Genome adaptation to chemical stress: clues from comparative transcriptomics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata. Genome Biol, 9:R164.
LuY., RosenfeldR., Bar-JosephZ.2006. Identifying cycling genes by combining sequence homology and expression data. Bioinformatics, 22:e314–e322.
102.
Lucau-DanilaA., DelaveauT., LelandaisG., DevauxF., JacqC.2003. Competitive promoter occupancy by two yeast paralogous transcription factors controlling the multidrug resistance phenomenon. J Biol Chem, 278:52641–52650.
103.
Lucau-DanilaA., LelandaisG., KozovskaZ., TantyV., DelaveauT., DevauxF.et al.2005. Early expression of yeast genes affected by chemical stress. Mol Cell Biol, 25:1860–1868.
104.
MaheshriN., O'SheaE.K.2007. Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 36:413–434.
MazurieA., BottaniS., VergassolaM.2005. An evolutionary and functional assessment of regulatory network motifs. Genome Biol, 6:R35.
107.
Meireles-FilhoA.C., StarkA.2009. Comparative genomics of gene regulation-conservation and divergence of cis-regulatory information. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 19:565–570.
108.
MurphyK.F., AdamsR.M., WangX., BalazsiG., CollinsJ.J.2010. Tuning and controlling gene expression noise in synthetic gene networks. Nucleic Acids Res, 38:2712–2726.
109.
NagalakshmiU., WangZ., WaernK., ShouC., RahaD., GersteinM.et al.2008. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science, 320:1344–1349.
110.
NeilH., MalabatC., d'Aubenton-CarafaY., XuZ., SteinmetzL.M., JacquierA.2009. Widespread bidirectional promoters are the major source of cryptic transcripts in yeast. Nature, 457:1038–1042.
111.
NevittT., Rodrigues-PousadaC.2006. The stress response in the budding yeast. Heat Shock Proteins in Biology and Medicine. RadonsJ., MulthoffG.Research Signpost, Kerala, India, 39–58.
112.
NichollsS., StraffonM., EnjalbertB., NantelA., MacaskillS., WhitewayM.et al.2004. Msn2- and Msn4-like transcription factors play no obvious roles in the stress responses of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell, 3:1111–1123.
113.
PayenC., FischerG., MarckC., ProuxC., ShermanD.J., CoppeeJ.Y.et al.2009. Unusual composition of a yeast chromosome arm is associated with its delayed replication. Genome Res, 19:1710–1721.
114.
Pena-CastilloL., HughesT.R.2007. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes?Genetics, 176:7–14.
115.
PerocchiF., JensenL.J., GagneurJ., AhtingU., von MeringC., BorkP.et al.2006. Assessing systems properties of yeast mitochondria through an interaction map of the organelle. PLoS Genet, 2:e170.
RonenM., RosenbergR., ShraimanB.I., AlonU.2002. Assigning numbers to the arrows: parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:10555–10560.
120.
RualJ.F., VenkatesanK., HaoT., Hirozane-KishikawaT., DricotA., LiN.et al.2005. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature, 437:1173–1178.
121.
RuderferD.M., RobertsD.C., SchreiberS.L., PerlsteinE.O., KruglyakL.2009. Using expression and genotype to predict drug response in yeast. PLoS One, 4:e6907.
122.
RusticiG., van BakelH., LacknerD.H., HolstegeF.C., WijmengaC., BahlerJ.et al.2007. Global transcriptional responses of fission and budding yeast to changes in copper and iron levels: a comparative study. Genome Biol, 8:R73.
123.
SalinH., FardeauV., PicciniE., LelandaisG., TantyV., LemoineS.et al.2008. Structure and properties of transcriptional networks driving selenite stress response in yeasts. BMC Genomics, 9:333.
124.
SchachererJ., ShapiroJ.A., RuderferD.M., KruglyakL.2009. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 458:342–345.
125.
SegalE., ShapiraM., RegevA., Pe'erD., BotsteinD., KollerD.et al.2003. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet, 34:166–176.
126.
ShannonP., MarkielA., OzierO., BaligaN.S., WangJ.T., RamageD.et al.2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res, 13:2498–2504.
127.
Shav-TalY., DarzacqX., ShenoyS.M., FuscoD., JanickiS.M., SpectorD.L.et al.2004. Dynamics of single mRNPs in nuclei of living cells. Science, 304:1797–1800.
SussmanM.R., HuttlinE.L., WohlbachD.J.2009. Democratization and integration of genomic profiling tools. Methods Mol Biol, 553:373–393.
133.
SwainP.S., ElowitzM.B., SiggiaE.D.2002. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:12795–12800.
134.
TanK., FeiziH., LuoC., FanS.H., RavasiT., IdekerT.G.2008. A systems approach to delineate functions of paralogous transcription factors: role of the Yap family in the DNA damage response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105:2934–2939.
135.
TeixeiraM.C., MonteiroP., JainP., TenreiroS., FernandesA.R., MiraN.P.et al.2006. The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res, 34:D446–D451.
136.
TeixeiraM.C., DiasP.J., SimoesT., Sa-CorreiaI.2008. Yeast adaptation to mancozeb involves the up-regulation of FLR1 under the coordinate control of Yap1, Rpn4, Pdr3, and Yrr1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 367:249–255.
137.
ThakurJ.K., ArthanariH., YangF., PanS.J., FanX., BregerJ.et al.2008. A nuclear receptor-like pathway regulating multidrug resistance in fungi. Nature, 452:604–609.
138.
ThiebautM., ColinJ., NeilH., JacquierA., SeraphinB., LacrouteF.et al.2008. Futile cycle of transcription initiation and termination modulates the response to nucleotide shortage in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell, 31:671–682.
TiroshI., WeinbergerA., BezalelD., KaganovichM., BarkaiN.2008. On the relation between promoter divergence and gene expression evolution. Mol Syst Biol, 4:159.
144.
TiroshI., ReikhavS., LevyA.A., BarkaiN.2009. A yeast hybrid provides insight into the evolution of gene expression regulation. Science, 324:659–662.
145.
TownsendJ.P., CavalieriD., HartlD.L.2003. Population genetic variation in genome-wide gene expression. Mol Biol Evol, 20:955–963.
146.
TsaiH.F., KrolA.A., SartiK.E., BennettJ.E.2006. Candida glabrata PDR1, a transcriptional regulator of a pleiotropic drug resistance network, mediates azole resistance in clinical isolates and petite mutants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 50:1384–1392.
147.
TsongA.E., TuchB.B., LiH., JohnsonA.D.2006. Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic. Nature, 443:415–420.
148.
TuB.P., KudlickiA., RowickaM., McKnightS.L.2005. Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes. Science, 310:1152–1158.
149.
TuchB.B., GalgoczyD.J., HerndayA.D., LiH., JohnsonA.D.2008a. The evolution of combinatorial gene regulation in fungi. PLoS Biol, 6:e38.
150.
TuchB.B., LiH., JohnsonA.D.2008b. Evolution of eukaryotic transcription circuits. Science, 319:1797–1799.
WangW., CherryJ.M., BotsteinD., LiH.2002. A systematic approach to reconstructing transcription networks in Saccharomycescerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:16893–16898.
153.
WapinskiI., PfefferA., FriedmanN., RegevA.2007. Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature, 449:54–61.
154.
WapinskiI., PfiffnerJ., FrenchC., SochaA., ThompsonD.A., RegevA.2010. Gene duplication and the evolution of ribosomal protein gene regulation in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.
155.
WohlbachD.J., ThompsonD.A., GaschA.P., RegevA.2009. From elements to modules: regulatory evolution in Ascomycota fungi. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 19:571–578.
156.
WolfeK.H., ShieldsD.C.1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature, 387:708–713.
157.
WorkmanC.T., MakH.C., McCuineS., TagneJ.B., AgarwalM., OzierO.et al.2006. A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways. Science, 312:1054–1059.
YuH., BraunP., YildirimM.A., LemmensI., VenkatesanK., SahalieJ.et al.2008. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science, 322:1904–110.
160.
YvertG., BremR.B., WhittleJ., AkeyJ.M., FossE., SmithE.N.et al.2003. Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet, 35:57–64.
161.
ZenklusenD., LarsonD.R., SingerR.H.2008. Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 15:1263–1271.
162.
ZhuJ., JambhekarA., SarverA., DeRisiJ.2006. A Bayesian network driven approach to model the transcriptional response to nitric oxide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One, 1:e94.
163.
ZhuJ., ZhangB., SmithE.N., DreesB., BremR.B., KruglyakL.et al.2008. Integrating large-scale functional genomic data to dissect the complexity of yeast regulatory networks. Nat Genet, 40:854–861.
