Cognitive impairment is a common complication following spinal cord injury (SCI) and imposes a significant negative impact on adjustment, functional independence, physical and mental health, and quality of life. It is unclear whether interventions for cognitive impairment following SCI are effective. A systematic review of controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effect of interventions on cognitive functions in adults with SCI using search engines: Embase, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to December 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, and study findings were synthesized and summarized. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Eight moderate-quality studies were found that investigated the effects of physical exercise/activity-based therapy plus cognitive training or intermittent hypoxia, diet modification and dietary supplements, tibial nerve or cortical stimulation, and drug therapy on cognitive function in SCI. Physical exercise/activity–based therapy plus cognitive training showed most promise for improving cognitive functions, while drug therapy, diet modification, and dietary supplements showed potential for improving cognitive function. However, about half of the participants experienced heightened instability in blood pressure following the administration of midodrine, and one participant reported gastrointestinal side effects after taking omega-3 fatty acids. There was no evidence of improvement in cognitive function for stimulation techniques. The current review highlights the scarcity of research investigating the effectiveness of interventions that target cognitive function after SCI. Further, the effects of these eight studies are uncertain due to concerns about the quality of designs and small sample sizes utilized in the trials, as well as the employment of insensitive neurocognitive tests when applied to adults with SCI. This review highlights a significant gap in knowledge related to SCI cognitive rehabilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GuestJ, DattaN, JimsheleishviliG, et al.Pathophysiology, classification and comorbidities after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Pers Med, 2022; 12(7):1126; doi: 10.3390/jpm12071126
2.
DingW, HuS, WangP, et al.Spinal cord injury: The global incidence, prevalence, and disability from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2022; 47(21):1532–1540; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004417
3.
MiddletonJW, DaytonA, WalshJ, et al.Life expectancy after spinal cord injury: A 50-year Study. Spinal Cord, 2012; 50(11):803–811; doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.55
4.
TasiemskiT, KujawaJ, TederkoP, et al.Relationship between secondary health conditions and life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury: Study across twenty-one countries. Qual Life Res, 2023; 32(7):2069–2077; doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03376-3
5.
CraigA, TranY, AroraM, et al.Investigating dynamics of the spinal cord injury adjustment model: Mediation model analysis. J Clin Med, 2022; 11(15):4557; doi: 10.3390/jcm11154557
6.
CraigA, GuestR, TranY, et al.Cognitive impairment and mood states after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2017; 34(6):1156–1163; doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4632
7.
ChiaravallotiND, WeberE, WylieG, et al.Patterns of cognitive deficits in persons with spinal cord injury as compared with both age-matched and older individuals without spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2020; 43(1):88–97; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1543103
8.
SandalicD, TranY, CraigA, et al.The need for a specialized neurocognitive screen and consistent cognitive impairment criteria in spinal cord injury: Analysis of the suitability of the neuropsychiatry unit cognitive assessment tool. J Clin Med, 2022; 11(12):3344; doi: 10.3390/jcm11123344
9.
MahmoudiE, LinP, PetersonMD, et al.Traumatic spinal cord injury and risk of early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia: Large Longitudinal Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2021; 102(6):1147–1154; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.019
10.
LiF, HuoS, SongW. Multidimensional review of cognitive impairment after spinal cord injury. Acta Neurol Belg, 2021; 121(1):37–46; doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01507-y
11.
SachdevPS, BlackerD, BlazerDG, et al.Classifying neurocognitive disorders: The DSM-5 approach. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014; 10(11):634–642; doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181
12.
SandalicD, CraigA, TranY, et al.Cognitive impairment in individuals with spinal cord injury: Findings of a systematic review with robust variance and network meta-analyses. Neurology, 2022; 99(16):e1779–e1790; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200957
13.
ChiaravallotiND, MooreNB, NikelshpurOM, et al.An RCT to treat learning impairment in multiple sclerosis: The MEMREHAB trial. Neurology, 2013; 81(24):2066–2072; doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000437295.97946.a8
14.
ChiaravallotiND, SandryJ, MooreNB, et al.An RCT to treat learning impairment in traumatic brain injury: The TBI-MEM trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2016; 30(6):539–550; doi: 10.1177/1545968315604395
AnjumA, YazidMD, FauziDM, et al.Spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology, multimolecular interactions, and underlying recovery mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci, 2020; 21(20):7533; doi: 10.3390/ijms21207533
17.
AlizadehA, DyckSM, Karimi-AbdolrezaeeS. Traumatic spinal cord injury: An overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front Neurol, 2019; 10:282; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00282
18.
OyinboCA. Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: A nugget of this multiply cascade. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars), 2011; 71(2):281–299; doi: 10.55782/ane-2011-1848
19.
WuJ, ZhaoZ, KumarA, et al.Endoplasmic reticulum stress and disrupted neurogenesis in the brain are associated with cognitive impairment and depressive-like behavior after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2016; 33(21):1919–1935; doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4348
20.
DuttaD, KhanN, WuJ, et al.Extracellular vesicles as an emerging frontier in spinal cord injury pathobiology and therapy. Trends Neurosci, 2021; 44(6):492–506; doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.01.003
21.
SachdevaR, GaoF, ChanC, et al.Cognitive function after spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Neurology, 2018; 91(13):611–621; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006244
22.
LiY, BressingtonD, ChienWT. Systematic review of psychosocial interventions for people with spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation: Implications for evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2017; 14(6):499–506; doi: 10.1111/wvn.12238
23.
MolinaB, SeguraA, SerranoJP, et al.Cognitive performance of people with traumatic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study comparing people with subacute and chronic injuries. Spinal Cord, 2018; 56(8):796–805; doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0076-0
24.
PachecoN, MollayevaS, JacobB, et al.Interventions and cognitive functioning in adults with traumatic spinal cord injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil, 2021; 43(7):903–919; doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1644380
25.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
26.
HigginsJP, GreenSE. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley; 2008.
27.
LiY, CosterS, NormanI, et al.Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for people with recent-onset psychosis: A systematic review. Early Interv Psychiatry, 2021; 15(1):3–15; doi: 10.1111/eip.12929
SterneJ, SavovicJ, PageMJ, et al.RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj, 2019; 366:l4898; doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
30.
SullivanGM, FeinnR. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ, 2012; 4(3):279–282; doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
31.
MuradMH, WangZ, ChuH, et al.When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: Guide for meta-analysis and interpretation. Bmj, 2019; 364:k4817; doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4817
32.
MaggioMG, BonannoM, ManuliA, et al.Do individuals with spinal cord injury benefit from semi-immersive virtual reality cognitive training? Preliminary results from an exploratory study on an underestimated problem. Brain Sci, 2023; 13(6):945; doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060945
33.
WechtJM, WeirJP, KatzelnickCG, et al.Double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial to determine the effects of midodrine on blood pressure during cognitive testing in persons with SCI. Spinal Cord, 2020; 58(9):959–969; doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0448-0
34.
AmatachayaS, SrisimK, ArrayawichanonP, et al.Dual-task obstacle crossing training could immediately improve ability to control a complex motor task and cognitive activity in chronic ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2019; 25(3):260–270; doi: 10.1310/sci18-00038
35.
NorouziJA, SabourH, LatifiS, et al.Does consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids influence on neurorehabilitation in traumatic spinal cord-injured individuals? A double-blinded clinical trial. Spinal Cord, 2014; 52(5):378–382; doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.30
36.
AllisonDJ, JosseAR, GabrielDA, et al.Targeting inflammation to influence cognitive function following spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. Spinal Cord, 2017; 55(1):26–32; doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.96
37.
StampasA, KorupoluR, ZhuL, et al.Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in acute spinal cord injury neurogenic bladder: A randomized control pilot trial. Neuromodulation, 2019; 22(6):716–722; doi: 10.1111/ner.12855
38.
Navarrete-OpazoA, AlcayagaJ, TestaD, et al.Intermittent hypoxia does not elicit memory impairment in spinal cord injury patients. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2016; 31(4):332–342; doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw012
39.
SelingardiP, de LimaRA, DaSV, et al.Long-term deep-TMS does not negatively affect cognitive functions in stroke and spinal cord injury patients with central neuropathic pain. BMC Neurol, 2019; 19(1):319; doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1531-z
40.
WoodsSP, DelisDC, ScottJC, et al.The california verbal learning test–second edition: Test-retest reliability, practice effects, and reliable change indices for the standard and alternate forms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2006; 21(5):413–420; doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.002
41.
DonaghyS, WassPJ. Interrater reliability of the functional assessment measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998; 79(10):1231–1236; doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90267-2
42.
BlackstoneK, MooreDJ, FranklinDR, et al.Defining neurocognitive impairment in HIV: Deficit scores versus clinical ratings. Clin Neuropsychol, 2012; 26(6):894–908; doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.694479
43.
Vera-VillarroelP, SilvaJ, Celis-AtenasK, et al.Evaluación del cuestionario SF-12: Verificación de la utilidad de la escala salud mental [Evaluation of the SF-12: Usefulness of the mental health scale]. Rev Med Chil, 2014; 142(10):1275–1283; doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014001000007
44.
GrabinerMD, TroyKL. Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2005; 2:25; doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-2-25
45.
DelisDC, FreelandJ, KramerJH, et al.Integrating clinical assessment with cognitive neuroscience: Construct validation of the California Verbal Learning Test. J Consult Clin Psychol, 1988; 56(1):123–130; doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.56.1.123
46.
EricksonKI, HillmanC, StillmanCM, et al.Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: A review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2019; 51(6):1242–1251; doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936
47.
AnguloJ, ElAM, Alvarez-BustosA, et al.Physical activity and exercise: Strategies to manage frailty. Redox Biol, 2020; 35:101513; doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101513
48.
LiY, WongA, ChungWM, et al.Evaluation of a Physical-Psychological Integrative (PPI) intervention for community-dwelling spinal cord injury survivors: Study protocol of a preliminary randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 2023; 18(3):e282846; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282846
49.
KandolaA, HendrikseJ, LucassenPJ, et al.Aerobic exercise as a tool to improve hippocampal plasticity and function in humans: Practical implications for mental health treatment. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016; 10:373; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00373
50.
DeryN, PilgrimM, GibalaM, et al.Adult hippocampal neurogenesis reduces memory interference in humans: Opposing effects of aerobic exercise and depression. Front Neurosci, 2013; 7:66; doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00066
51.
SilsupadolP, Shumway-CookA, LugadeV, et al.Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009; 90(3):381–387; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.559
52.
De LucaR, MaggioMG, MarescaG, et al.Improving cognitive function after traumatic brain injury: A clinical trial on the potential use of the semi-immersive virtual reality. Behav Neurol, 2019; 2019:9268179; doi: 10.1155/2019/9268179
53.
MaggioMG, StagnittiMC, RizzoE, et al.Limb apraxia in individuals with multiple sclerosis: Is there a role of semi-immersive virtual reality in treating the Cinderella of neuropsychology? Mult Scler Relat Disord, 2023; 69:104405; doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104405
54.
ParkHY, JungWS, KimJ, et al.Changes in the paradigm of traditional exercise in obesity therapy and application of a new exercise modality: A narrative review article. Iran J Public Health, 2019; 48(8):1395–1404.
55.
HwangKY, OhYT, YoonH, et al.Baicalein suppresses hypoxia-induced HIF-1alpha protein accumulation and activation through inhibition of reactive oxygen species and PI 3-kinase/Akt pathway in BV2 murine microglial cells. Neurosci Lett, 2008; 444(3):264–269; doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.08.057
56.
ZhuXH, YanHC, ZhangJ, et al.Intermittent hypoxia promotes hippocampal neurogenesis and produces antidepressant-like effects in adult rats. J Neurosci, 2010; 30(38):12653–12663; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6414-09.2010
57.
LinY, YanJ, GuoX, et al.Effects of exercise training under hypoxia versus normoxia on cognitive function in clinical and non-clinical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2023; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.009
58.
van der PuttenJJ, HobartJC, FreemanJA, et al.Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1999; 66(4):480–484; doi: 10.1136/jnnp.66.4.480
59.
MoafmashhadiP, KoskiL. Limitations for interpreting failure on individual subtests of the montreal cognitive assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2013; 26(1):19–28; doi: 10.1177/0891988712473802
60.
WeatherlyH, DrummondM, ClaxtonK, et al.Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: Key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy, 2009; 93(2–3):85–92; doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.07.012
61.
LiY, ChienWT, BressingtonD. Effects of a coping-oriented supportive programme for people with spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation: A quasi-experimental study. Spinal Cord, 2020; 58(1):58–69; doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0320-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
